I'm in favor of standardizing (i.e. importing into SCons) a more recent Qt tool. Qt3 is pretty ancient now.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]>wrote: > Currently the qt tool is Qt3 and worse than useless because it doesn't > say qt3 it says qt. Thanks to Dirk and co we have a qt4 tool that works, > but it is not standard even though the Qt3 only qt tool is. What about > Qt5? > > I am prompted to ask now as someone was asking me about SCons at ACCU > 2013 and the issue of Qt support arose. > > Thanks. > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > -- Gary
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
