I am also in favor of incorporating a newer version of Qt into SCons. It would be good to be backwards compatible with previous versions, if possible. Or at the very least allow for multiple versions like: Qt5, Qt4, Qt3, etc
Brady On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm in favor of standardizing (i.e. importing into SCons) a more recent Qt > tool. Qt3 is pretty ancient now. > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Currently the qt tool is Qt3 and worse than useless because it doesn't >> say qt3 it says qt. Thanks to Dirk and co we have a qt4 tool that works, >> but it is not standard even though the Qt3 only qt tool is. What about >> Qt5? >> >> I am prompted to ask now as someone was asking me about SCons at ACCU >> 2013 and the issue of Qt support arose. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> Russel. >> >> ============================================================================= >> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >> sip:[email protected] >> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] >> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > > -- > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
