I like Bill's approach, 2 thumbs up from me :) Brady
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > > On 15.04.2013 04:11, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> >> Greetings, >> >> SCons has always been (as much as possible) a batteries include tool. >> For me personally, and also from many questions on the mailing list and >> IRC, having mainstream tools not in the core confuses users. I consider QT >> to be a mainstream tool.. >> >> I'd suggest the following: >> 1) deprecate qt, rename it qt3 >> 2) integrate qt4 and qt5 into the core. >> >> Thoughts? I know I'm disagreeing with others, hopefully this isn't just >> bike sheding (Please call me on it if it is). >> >> > everything you say above makes sense to me. I don't need the Qt tools in > the core, but I don't need them external either. All I'd like to see is a > clear direction in which we are going, and you're offering one. > I'm a 100% for doing it like this, if no objections from other people show > up. > > > That said, I think it would be a great idea to add non-mainstream tools >> as python packages distributed via pypi which would install into the core >> or in such a way that the core would find them. >> >> > I agree. > > Regards, > > > Dirk > > ______________________________**_________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://two.pairlist.net/**mailman/listinfo/scons-dev<http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev> >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
