On my side I could say that so far none of the guys I asked to test the branch (3 developers) came back with problems after the small patch on the interactive mode . On the other side we are running a slightly modified version of scons so some of the changes we have done may have masked the problems found by Gary.
Bye Roberto > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:scons-dev- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dirk Bächle > Sent: venerdì 10 gennaio 2014 09:10 > To: SCons developer list > Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] please try latest default branch > > On 10.01.2014 01:06, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [...] > >> I'd say that it is a best engineering practice to cover legacy code > >> with tests, especially for optimizations. Is there a problem with > >> testing this case? -- anatoly t. > > Hi Anatoly, > > we're currently trying to find out what exactly is going wrong. If it turns > out > that my changes introduced an error that could've been detected by a > proper testcase, we should definitely add one (or more). > > And if we don't find the cause of the spurious re-builds, we have another > problem. This would mean we're working with a framework that even the > experts don't understand anymore. ;) > > Best regards, > > Dirk > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
