I think Anatoly's right -- at least we haven't required contributor assignments from anyone before.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:48 AM, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 06:05 -0500, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > In SCons' case the situation is easy, the assigned or > >> > shared copyright should rest with the SCons Foundation, and it should > be > >> > the foundation that is the published copyright owner. > >> > > >> > >> Yes, this is correct. > > > > Has everyone with contribution in the SCons codebase signed a copyright > > transfer, copyright share agreement, or a collaboration agreement > > covering these things? Who handles this on behalf of the SCons > > Foundation? > > > > I guess I need to sign one if I am about to send in a pull request. > > You don't need copyright assignment. It is only needed if SCons foundation > decides to change the license. So, if you ok with it being MIT licensed and > don't want to sue any of us, just submit your pull request. Otherwise, you > will need of course to sign an agreement. > -- > anatoly t. > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > -- Gary
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
