Dirk, Yes I agree. Low importance task.
-Bill On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03.03.2014 20:37, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> Anatoly, >> >> This is a bikeshed'ing type discussion. >> So we'll never agree on this. >> >> The project has long had the emacs/vim info in each source file, so >> there's no reason to change. >> That said, some automated checking in buildbot might not be a bad idea. >> >> Though I'd put money that SCons source code (haveing long preceded PEP8 >> rules) won't conform (at present) to PEP 8. >> >> It might be worthwhile to get there though as such automated checking >> would get easier. >> >> Other opinions on PEP-8 formatting compliance? >> > > I, personally, don't feel like I would write better code (or more code) > with it. And as a user I don't care how the SCons sources look, as long as > it's doing what I expect from it. > > Let's all together try to get Python3-compliant instead... ;) > > Regards, > > Dirk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
