On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:48 +0100, Paweł Tomulik wrote: […] > I have a project where I just set construction variables CC=clang and > CXX=clang++ and it works well (I check existence of these compilers with > SConf, so I don't need the Tool machinery to search for the compiler > executables). > > Some time ago I also wrote these two tools: > > https://github.com/ptomulik/scons-tool-clang > https://github.com/ptomulik/scons-tool-clangpp > > but for some (forgotten) reason I don't use them :)
This may work fine, but if SCons does not have tools called clang, clang ++, clanglink *AND* detection of clang for the cc, c++ and link tools, then SCons has no credible support for Clang. My real question is whether SCons should prefer clang over gcc for Linux. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
