I'd say on linux default to gcc. If we add clang tools the user can always override them if they wish to.
-Bill On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:58 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > Im not sure what percentage of linux devs use clang vs gcc, but my > personal experience is gcc is more widely used. > > Yet another gcc user, > William > On Jan 5, 2015 6:51 PM, "Russel Winder" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:48 +0100, Paweł Tomulik wrote: >> […] >> > I have a project where I just set construction variables CC=clang and >> > CXX=clang++ and it works well (I check existence of these compilers with >> > SConf, so I don't need the Tool machinery to search for the compiler >> > executables). >> > >> > Some time ago I also wrote these two tools: >> > >> > https://github.com/ptomulik/scons-tool-clang >> > https://github.com/ptomulik/scons-tool-clangpp >> > >> > but for some (forgotten) reason I don't use them :) >> >> This may work fine, but if SCons does not have tools called clang, clang >> ++, clanglink *AND* detection of clang for the cc, c++ and link tools, >> then SCons has no credible support for Clang. >> >> My real question is whether SCons should prefer clang over gcc for >> Linux. >> >> -- >> Russel. >> >> ============================================================================= >> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >> sip:[email protected] >> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] >> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
