Im not sure what percentage of linux devs use clang vs gcc, but my personal experience is gcc is more widely used.
Yet another gcc user, William On Jan 5, 2015 6:51 PM, "Russel Winder" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:48 +0100, Paweł Tomulik wrote: > […] > > I have a project where I just set construction variables CC=clang and > > CXX=clang++ and it works well (I check existence of these compilers with > > SConf, so I don't need the Tool machinery to search for the compiler > > executables). > > > > Some time ago I also wrote these two tools: > > > > https://github.com/ptomulik/scons-tool-clang > > https://github.com/ptomulik/scons-tool-clangpp > > > > but for some (forgotten) reason I don't use them :) > > This may work fine, but if SCons does not have tools called clang, clang > ++, clanglink *AND* detection of clang for the cc, c++ and link tools, > then SCons has no credible support for Clang. > > My real question is whether SCons should prefer clang over gcc for > Linux. > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
