That's a SCons fork. Not an HG branch (in case its a terminology problem). Make sure you are using the CrossLanguage bookmark.
V/R, William On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > branch *SCons_20150323 * > > I can will setup from scratch again and try again. > > Jason > > *From:* William Blevins <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:38 PM > *To:* SCons developer list <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support > > Jason, > > Are you sure you are using the correct commit revision? > > None of those tests are failing on my Linux distro, and I haven't modified > any of those tests either. Plus, tests that I am expecting to fail are > apparently passing. > > V/R, > William > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So a quick pass of the tests has these failures >> >> Failed the following 15 tests: >> test\Batch\action-changed.py >> test\MSVS\vs-9.0-exec.py >> test\Win32\mingw.py >> test\exitfns.py >> test\implicit\IMPLICIT_COMMAND_DEPENDENCIES.py >> test\import.py >> test\long-lines\signature.py >> test\option\debug-count.py >> test\option\debug-multiple.py >> test\option\debug-objects.py >> test\scons-time\run\config\python.py >> test\scons-time\run\option\python.py >> test\sconsign\script\SConsignFile.py >> test\sconsign\script\Signatures.py >> test\sconsign\script\no-SConsignFile.py >> >> *From:* Jason Kenny <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 2:32 PM >> *To:* SCons developer list <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support >> >> Ok let me update the branch and re-run everything. >> >> Jason >> >> *From:* William Blevins <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 10:30 AM >> *To:* SCons developer list <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support >> >> Jason, >> >> I'm not sure. I remember that you were helping me look into the >> recursive Install behavior. Plus, possible parts incompatibility? >> >> I haven't ran the tests on a windows box at all. I don't expect anything >> new, but it should be done before it ships :) >> >> V/R, >> William >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Which MS toolchain on windows do we need tested? I can do a test run >>> this afternoon. >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> *From:* William Blevins <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2015 1:11 AM >>> *To:* SCons developer list <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support >>> >>> Happy with it* >>> >>> Until the review is complete, and I can perhaps get a few more guinea >>> pigs to try it out, it's hard to make a concrete projection. I have 3 items >>> listed out that need to be given a thumbs up/down at a minimum: >>> >>> * Item #1 is still mostly outstanding. I'm not sure how to address, >>> please see the discussion Jason and I started a few weeks ago under the >>> pull request comments. >>> >>> * Item #2 requires no changes (to my knowledge), but someone with more >>> QT knowledge may say otherwise. >>> >>> * I may already have most of the patch for Item #3 (IE. no scanner for >>> key) based on today's feedback. >>> >>> I also still need to request test runs on Windows, and for toolchains >>> that I may not have installed or instructions to install them (EG. D). >>> >>> V/R, >>> William >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:58 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> As soon as we are happen with it :) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Bill Deegan < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> O.k. let me push 2.3.5 with the visual studio 2015 stuff. >>>>> Then we'll changed to 2.4 merge slots. stabilize. release. >>>>> Then this code? (2.5?) >>>>> >>>>> -Bill >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have been using the slots drop for a while with Parts. I think >>>>>> it is ready. It does have a notable improvement in speed and memory >>>>>> size. I >>>>>> would before getting this out as officially earlier than later. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* William Blevins <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:31 PM >>>>>> *To:* Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> ; SCons developer list >>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sorry for chiming in so late. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28.07.2015 23:44, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, that's how we've done it in the past. Sounds like doing it at >>>>>>>> the same time as slots would be perfect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Doing this in parallel with the "slots" change sounds good to me >>>>>>> too. +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not opposed to releasing in the same update as slots, but since >>>>>> the cross language code reviews haven't been finished, I don't want to >>>>>> delay slots since it is ready now. >>>>>> >>>>>> The pessimist in me as sees doing two major enhancements in the same >>>>>> release as higher risk; I don't foresee any issues, but its worth the >>>>>> thought if the release overhead isn't too bad. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Gary >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Bill Deegan < >>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gary, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For such a change we should bump the second digit? >>>>>>>> 2.4? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree we should not turn down a change because it will cause >>>>>>>> rebuilds where the past didn't as long as it is now more correct >>>>>>>> (which it should be with this change). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, "forward" is the way to go. ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also agree we should be verbose in our notification of the >>>>>>>> impacts of the new change to avoid (as much as we can) "surprises". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think (better: hope) we did a good enough job for the "slots" >>>>>>> stuff on this. For the scanner changes, I see them more like a fix...so >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> single announcement should be sufficient? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Finally, and just in case I haven't done so already, I'd like to >>>>>>> thank William for all the work he's done on this issue. I couldn't help >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> much as I would've liked, but with Gary's support you tackled this down >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> brought it to a good end. Kudos to you...bravo! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Truly appreciated. I have spent a lot of time on this issue despite >>>>>> what one might expect from the number of lines of code. >>>>>> >>>>>> It was honestly my first time working in a "real" python environment >>>>>> outside of scripting, and the SCons code base is rather complex. It >>>>>> instills me greater appreciation for the work that has already done. >>>>>> >>>>>> I also want to thank everyone here for their help past and future, >>>>>> but don't pat me on the back until its done. I might get lazy :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dirk >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> ------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > ------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
