On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:15 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > […] > > I should have said, I don't think we can make installing future a > requirement for using scons. > > In my case, I was using lineprofiler. It does something strange > with > builtins, and the reason lineprofiler mysteriously stopped working > after > future was installed was hard to find.
So the consequence of this is that we can only go to a level 1 futurize and then the rest needs to be manually hacked so that there is no future dependency? I suspect this means we will end up rewriting quite a chunk of future, though not the bits needed for Python 2.6. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
