If we change to suggesting pip/easy_install to be the preferred method of installing, then we can include any other packages we need and not have to "Vendorize" them.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:15 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > > > […] > > > > I should have said, I don't think we can make installing future a > > requirement for using scons. > > > > In my case, I was using lineprofiler. It does something strange > > with > > builtins, and the reason lineprofiler mysteriously stopped working > > after > > future was installed was hard to find. > > So the consequence of this is that we can only go to a level 1 futurize > and then the rest needs to be manually hacked so that there is no > future dependency? I suspect this means we will end up rewriting quite > a chunk of future, though not the bits needed for Python 2.6. > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
