The only question is would this break the scons-local distributions? On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Bill Deegan" <[email protected]> > Sent: 12/26/2015 7:00 PM > To: "SCons developer list" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] That was easy… > > If we change to suggesting pip/easy_install to be the preferred method of > installing, then we can include any other packages we need and not have to > "Vendorize" them. > > > > On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 13:15 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > > > […] > > > > I should have said, I don't think we can make installing future a > > requirement for using scons. > > > > In my case, I was using lineprofiler. It does something strange > > with > > builtins, and the reason lineprofiler mysteriously stopped working > > after > > future was installed was hard to find. > > So the consequence of this is that we can only go to a level 1 futurize > and then the rest needs to be manually hacked so that there is no > future dependency? I suspect this means we will end up rewriting quite > a chunk of future, though not the bits needed for Python 2.6. > > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
