On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Tim Jenness <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Dec 10, 2015, at 09:59 , Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I don't see it that way. I see it as a proactive, positive step. >> > > +1 > >> Look, right now there's a lot of, well, not-so-nice people in the world. >> Many of them hang out online. This isn't PC, it's a fact of modern life. >> This isn't going to get better; I think it's getting worse if anything. >> Saying "hey, we're a friendly and welcoming community" isn't pandering, it's >> accepting that not everyone is nice, but saying we aim to be. > > The scons list has been fine in the 6 months I’ve been here. Funnily enough > it is only this recent code of conduct debate that has worried me with talk > of victims and SJW. > > I think a code of conduct would be great and I imagine it would have zero > effect on this community internally. The code of conduct is also an outwards > facing item, though, that indicates to people that scons is welcoming to new > people asking questions. Why would we object to that?
Achievements work better. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pychievements/ And in the end communities be dominated by friendly and welcoming online bots who will censor out everybody who is not agree with their happy and optimistic view of the world and try to rise issues. =) -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
