> Am 07.04.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Maarten Brock: > >> I see in the stm8-large regression that you fixed it by loading the >> least >> significant word into x and the most significant byte into a and write >> those to the function pointer location as you need them. Is this an OK >> solution or would you still prefer the most significant word in x and >> the least significant byte in a? >> > > The current solution is a bit of an ugly hack, but will certainly be > good enough for nearly all users. From this side the issue isn't a big > deal any more. > > However, the >> 8 bug on the assembler / linker side still seems > dangerous to me, in case someone tries to use >> 8 in asm code. After > all it not just loads wrong data, but also silently overwrites the > following instruction. > > Philipp
Can you check if my commit of today fixes this? Maarten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
