Am 07.04.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Maarten Brock: >> Am 07.04.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Maarten Brock: >> >>> I see in the stm8-large regression that you fixed it by loading the >>> least >>> significant word into x and the most significant byte into a and write >>> those to the function pointer location as you need them. Is this an OK >>> solution or would you still prefer the most significant word in x and >>> the least significant byte in a? >>> >> >> The current solution is a bit of an ugly hack, but will certainly be >> good enough for nearly all users. From this side the issue isn't a big >> deal any more. >> >> However, the >> 8 bug on the assembler / linker side still seems >> dangerous to me, in case someone tries to use >> 8 in asm code. After >> all it not just loads wrong data, but also silently overwrites the >> following instruction. >> >> Philipp > > Can you check if my commit of today fixes this? > > Maarten
Thanks. I'll check later this week. I'm currently travelling, the airport WiFi here is a bit slow and doesn't seem to allow svn. Philipp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
