> Am 07.04.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Maarten Brock:
>>> Am 07.04.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Maarten Brock:
>>>> I see in the stm8-large regression that you fixed it by loading the
>>>> least
>>>> significant word into x and the most significant byte into a and write
>>>> those to the function pointer location as you need them. Is this an OK
>>>> solution or would you still prefer the most significant word in x and
>>>> the least significant byte in a?
>>> The current solution is a bit of an ugly hack, but will certainly be
>>> good enough for nearly all users. From this side the issue isn't a big
>>> deal any more.
>>> However, the >> 8 bug on the assembler / linker side still seems
>>> dangerous to me, in case someone tries to use >> 8 in asm code. After
>>> all it not just loads wrong data, but also silently overwrites the
>>> following instruction.
>>> Philipp
>> Can you check if my commit of today fixes this?
>> Maarten
> Thanks. I'll check later this week. I'm currently travelling, the
> airport WiFi here is a bit slow and doesn't seem to allow svn.
> Philipp

Well SF is in a bad shape as well today. Lots of timeouts.


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Sdcc-user mailing list

Reply via email to