> Am 07.04.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Maarten Brock: >>> Am 07.04.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Maarten Brock: >>> >>>> I see in the stm8-large regression that you fixed it by loading the >>>> least >>>> significant word into x and the most significant byte into a and write >>>> those to the function pointer location as you need them. Is this an OK >>>> solution or would you still prefer the most significant word in x and >>>> the least significant byte in a? >>>> >>> >>> The current solution is a bit of an ugly hack, but will certainly be >>> good enough for nearly all users. From this side the issue isn't a big >>> deal any more. >>> >>> However, the >> 8 bug on the assembler / linker side still seems >>> dangerous to me, in case someone tries to use >> 8 in asm code. After >>> all it not just loads wrong data, but also silently overwrites the >>> following instruction. >>> >>> Philipp >> >> Can you check if my commit of today fixes this? >> >> Maarten > > Thanks. I'll check later this week. I'm currently travelling, the > airport WiFi here is a bit slow and doesn't seem to allow svn. > > Philipp
Well SF is in a bad shape as well today. Lots of timeouts. Maarten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
