Thanks Kartik On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Kartik Thakore <thakore.kar...@gmail.com>wrote:
> To work with perl, I suggest you learn CPAN. It is how all this will > be installed for you. > > cpan SDL > > Should work. If you have trouble just bug us at sdl-devel@perl.org . > Also when replying to these threads CC sdl-devel@perl.org > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Anjali Menon <anjalimeno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > At differing times yes but with an overlap. That was what most others > could > > not do. There is nothing in the docs for SDL::Mixer that say that it > cannot > > be done so I guess I'll just have to try it. Also, is there any way of > > installing this without getting git. Even if there is an older version > I'm > > ok with it if you could point me to it. I'm sorry for so many questions. > > I've never worked with perl before and there is something I need to get > done > > really fast thus the hurry. Thank you, > > > > Anjali > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:16 AM, My <thakore.kar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> This should be possible. Just to be clear you want to play different > wavs > >> on different channels at differing times. Right? Have you read the > >> SDL::Mixer::* docs? Is anything unclear? > >> > >> Kartik Thakore > >> > >> On 2011-07-20, at 3:45 AM, Anjali Menon <anjalimeno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Kartik, > >> > > >> > I have been going through the SDL::Mixer installation files and I had > >> > several questions about that. I am trying to write a program that will > play > >> > a certain wav file in one channel and somewhere in the middle of that > file > >> > it'll start playing another wav file in the other channel. Firstly, is > is > >> > possible with the SDL::Mixer::Channels extension to run two instances > of a > >> > player independent of eachother. I tried Win32::MediaPlayer and > Win32::Sound > >> > and both of them will stop a file that is currently playing if they > are > >> > given another play command. Can you tell me if SDL_Mixer can do this? > Thanks > >> > a lot for your help, > >> > > >> > Anjali > > > > >