well, i won't resort to name calling, but maybe you should read everything that
i wrote down. the reason that i have a problem with nate isn't that he didn't
come back, its that he told dan jeremy and will that he was going to come back.
in fact, they waited around for months for him. that's why i have a problem with
him. nate left them hanging when they wanted to record right away, but they kept
waiting for him because he said he was going to do it. that's how he bailed on
the band. he told them he was going to do it, and when they finally gave him an
ultimatum he backed out and stayed in the foos. had he said all along that he
wasn't going to do it, i would have a lot more respect for him. that's it.
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > i personally don't want him back in the band. i like his work
> > that he contributed, but he bailed on the rest of the band.
>
> oh, he bailed on SDRE? i guess he wasnt involved in the foos at all, eh?
> sdre broke up. nate went on to make music in the foos. so sdre gets back
> together and nate is suppose to say to grohl "hey, it was fun, but that EMO
> band i was in is getting back together...you know the one where i had a huge
> problem with the lead singer's christianity...well anyway Dave, im getting
> back together with them."
> is that how he was to avoid "bailing" on sdre?
>
> and the reason you dont want nate back in the band is because he bailed on
> them? so, if he were in the band you would be fine with it? like him if he
> is in sdre, dont like him in he isnt in sdre. right?
>
> damn, thats dumb. is it jeremy, dan, or will that is sucking your cock so
> you say this dumb shit?
>
> jeff.
