Are you using active resource in your version? Do you have any comments on how their API is structured? From my perspective, I think it needs a good amount a refactoring...
Here's the google code page I have setup for now: http://code.google.com/p/powncer/ Alex On Dec 29, 11:23 am, "Nick Zadrozny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007 10:36 PM, eggie5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was thinking that this (the bindings) would be a good candidate for > > my first gem! The Pounce gem... This would also boost our working with > > rails authority. > > I think that's a great idea. I've got a similar idea for a new gem as well. > > > Oh and is this a good project to go into the new sd ruby google code > > svn? > > Totally. We have a new Rubyforge account as well, which would probably be > more useful for publishing gems. Patrick has the details on that. > > -- > Nick Zadrozny * beyondthepath.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
