Oh, I think I misunderstood you when you said this: "I think that's a great idea. I've got a similar idea for a new gem as well."
I thought you were saying you were working on a pounce api wrapper also... You mean or another API (slimtimer) correct? On Dec 29, 3:01 pm, "Nick Zadrozny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I'm not using ActiveResource because the authentication for the app I'm > using (SlimTimer) is token based and ActiveResource only really does HTTP > Basic. I'd love to see some kind of token-based support (or, heck, OAuth > while I'm dreaming) in ActiveResource. > > On Dec 29, 2007 11:39 AM, eggie5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Are you using active resource in your version? Do you have any > > comments on how their API is structured? From my perspective, I think > > it needs a good amount a refactoring... > > > Here's the google code page I have setup for now: > > >http://code.google.com/p/powncer/ > > > Alex > > > On Dec 29, 11:23 am, "Nick Zadrozny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 28, 2007 10:36 PM, eggie5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I was thinking that this (the bindings) would be a good candidate for > > > > my first gem! The Pounce gem... This would also boost our working with > > > > rails authority. > > > > I think that's a great idea. I've got a similar idea for a new gem as > > well. > > > > > Oh and is this a good project to go into the new sd ruby google code > > > > svn? > > > > Totally. We have a new Rubyforge account as well, which would probably > > be > > > more useful for publishing gems. Patrick has the details on that. > > > > -- > > > Nick Zadrozny * beyondthepath.com > > -- > Nick Zadrozny * beyondthepath.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
