I'm confused...What does pownce have to do with slimtimer?
On Dec 29, 3:01 pm, "Nick Zadrozny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I'm not using ActiveResource because the authentication for the app I'm
> using (SlimTimer) is token based and ActiveResource only really does HTTP
> Basic. I'd love to see some kind of token-based support (or, heck, OAuth
> while I'm dreaming) in ActiveResource.
>
> On Dec 29, 2007 11:39 AM, eggie5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Are you using active resource in your version? Do you have any
> > comments on how their API is structured? From my perspective, I think
> > it needs a good amount a refactoring...
>
> > Here's the google code page I have setup for now:
>
> >http://code.google.com/p/powncer/
>
> > Alex
>
> > On Dec 29, 11:23 am, "Nick Zadrozny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 28, 2007 10:36 PM, eggie5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I was thinking that this (the bindings) would be a good candidate for
> > > > my first gem! The Pounce gem... This would also boost our working with
> > > > rails authority.
>
> > > I think that's a great idea. I've got a similar idea for a new gem as
> > well.
>
> > > > Oh and is this a good project to go into the new sd ruby google code
> > > > svn?
>
> > > Totally. We have a new Rubyforge account as well, which would probably
> > be
> > > more useful for publishing gems. Patrick has the details on that.
>
> > > --
> > > Nick Zadrozny * beyondthepath.com
>
> --
> Nick Zadrozny * beyondthepath.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
