Maybe it runs better on Linux than on the environment you tried it on.

Hopefully, because I had FF3.0b2 and NetBeans open and my MacBook wasn't
happy at all.

IDEs have their place for some people (though not for everyone).

I totally agree with you.

-Matt


On 2/15/08, Bill Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Maybe a CPU hog in some sense.  But, who cares.  Computing power is
> cheap nowadays.  I have a 3 year old P4 with a couple of gigs of RAM and
> it really doesn't break a sweat.  I have been running the Ruby release
> of Netbeans, VMware for testing IE, Aqua Data Studio, Firefox and
> Thunderbird simultaneously (among other apps) all morning and never
> noticed a slow down.  Maybe it runs better on Linux than on the
> environment you tried it on.
>
> IDEs have their place for some people (though not for everyone).  I used
> to be a console only developer.  But, I have grown to appreciate having
> everything in one place (especially since I am not a full time Ruby
> developer).  For example, being able to do things like single step
> through running Rails code and edit it in place with an editor I am used
> to has a certain appeal.
>
>
> --
> Bill Young
> Director of Computing Support
> Department of Computer Science and Engineering
> University of California, San Diego
> Office: EBU3B 1212
> Phone:  (858) 822-3286
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Matt Aimonetti wrote on 02/15/08 12:41:
>
> > NetBeans 6 is a CPU hog even with a decent computer, I personally stay
> > away from it. (and honestly, I don't need an IDE)
> >
> > I totally agree with Kevin, if you deploy on windows use windows (but
> > you might want to consider looking for a job somewhere else), otherwise
> > stick to Linux/Mac.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
>
> > On 2/15/08, *Bill Young* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >     I am a long term vi/vim user as well.  However, Netbeans 6 with the
> jvi
> >     plugin sure is nice.
> >
> >     For the original poster, one of my staff was developing on Windows
> and
> >     ended up switching to Linux.  The reason for that may have been
> along
> >     the lines of what Kevin said about developing on the same platform
> as we
> >     deploy on (we deploy on Linux).  It is just easier to shuffle the
> files
> >     around that way and any problems you run into may be more similar
> >     between your production and development environments.  In any case,
> I
> >     have been Linux from the start and am a happy camper.
> >
> >     --
> >     Bill Young
> >     Director of Computing Support
> >     Department of Computer Science and Engineering
> >     University of California, San Diego
> >     Office: EBU3B 1212
> >     Phone:  (858) 822-3286
>
> >     E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >
> >     Kenneth Lee wrote on 02/15/08 11:12:
> >
> >      > VIM is all I need.  Call me old school, but I don't even use a
> >     windowing
> >      > system.  I connect via the console and use screen + VIM.
> >      >
> >      > On 2/15/08, *Randy Walker* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> >      > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
> wrote:
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     I've tried on both and prefer mac.
> >      >
> >      >     The closest thing to TextMate I could find for pc was
> >     Jedit.  It has the
> >      >     ability to create snippet-like macros, but the code coloring
> >     feature
> >      >     isn't
> >      >     near as in encompassing as TMs.
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     -=R
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     On 2/15/08 10:21 AM, "liquid_rails"
> >     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >      >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      >      >
> >      >      > Any thoughts on this?
> >      >      > >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     >
> >
> >
> >     >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to