[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On 12 February 2013 12:45, Ian Delaney (idella4) wrote: > idella4 13/02/12 12:45:55 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > xen-tools-4.2.1-r2.ebuild masked due to need for further refinement, adding > to virtualizarion overlay > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.14465 profiles/package.mask > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.14465&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.14465&content-type=text/plain > diff : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.14464&r2=1.14465 > > Index: package.mask > === > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > retrieving revision 1.14464 > retrieving revision 1.14465 > diff -u -r1.14464 -r1.14465 > --- package.mask12 Feb 2013 07:19:29 - 1.14464 > +++ package.mask12 Feb 2013 12:45:54 - 1.14465 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.14464 > 2013/02/12 07:19:29 graaff Exp $ > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.14465 > 2013/02/12 12:45:54 idella4 Exp $ > # > # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, and > # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely > @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ > > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- > > +# Ian Delaney (12 Feb 2013) > +# This is a work in progress targeting an old bug > +# but followed by very keen users. It will be either > +# abandonned or implemented down the track pending further support > +=app-emulation/xen-tools-4.2.1-r2 > + > # Samuli Suominen (11 Feb 2013) > # The 3 files from this package are part of the linux-firmware > # package now. Removal in 30 days. > > > > Please also write an entry in the ChangeLog file as well. -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 fixed. On 05/22/2012 10:48 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > Missing ChangeLog entry; echangelog works in profiles/ > > On 05/22/2012 11:16 AM, Michael Weber (xmw) wrote: >> xmw 12/05/22 08:16:33 >> >> Modified: package.mask Log: mask x11-wm/parti >> >> Revision ChangesPath 1.13781 >> profiles/package.mask >> >> file : >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.13781&view=markup >> >> >> plain: >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.13781&content-type=text/plain >> >> >> diff : >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.13780&r2=1.13781 >> >> >> >> Index: package.mask >> === >> >> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v >> retrieving revision 1.13780 retrieving revision 1.13781 diff -u >> -r1.13780 -r1.13781 --- package.mask22 May 2012 05:09:29 >> -1.13780 +++ package.mask22 May 2012 08:16:32 - >> 1.13781 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >> >> >> - -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.13780 >> 2012/05/22 05:09:29 dirtyepic Exp $ +# $Header: >> /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.13781 >> 2012/05/22 08:16:32 xmw Exp $ # # When you add an entry to the >> top of this file, add your name, the date, and # an explanation >> of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely @@ -31,6 >> +31,11 @@ >> >> #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- >> >> +# Michael Weber (22 May 2012) +# Masked for >> removal in 30 days. +# Replaced by x11-wm/xpra. +x11-wm/parti + # >> Samuli Suominen (20 May 2012) # Still >> using vulnerable net-libs/xulrunner wrt bug 412341 # Build >> problems wrt bug 390325 >> >> >> >> > - -- - -- Gentoo Dev http://xmw.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+7VXcACgkQknrdDGLu8JAl3gD+LVcdhSBAw3t55C+3RXySdH38 bTqP30X+ffJgWXCxhDMA/3fwxRaqCXI/hzsrK6r80p1lJRsHIe9AVzdhl4gbNrcQ =0YuH -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
Missing ChangeLog entry; echangelog works in profiles/ On 05/22/2012 11:16 AM, Michael Weber (xmw) wrote: xmw 12/05/22 08:16:33 Modified: package.mask Log: mask x11-wm/parti Revision ChangesPath 1.13781 profiles/package.mask file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.13781&view=markup plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.13781&content-type=text/plain diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.13780&r2=1.13781 Index: package.mask === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v retrieving revision 1.13780 retrieving revision 1.13781 diff -u -r1.13780 -r1.13781 --- package.mask22 May 2012 05:09:29 - 1.13780 +++ package.mask22 May 2012 08:16:32 - 1.13781 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.13780 2012/05/22 05:09:29 dirtyepic Exp $ +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.13781 2012/05/22 08:16:32 xmw Exp $ # # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, and # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- +# Michael Weber (22 May 2012) +# Masked for removal in 30 days. +# Replaced by x11-wm/xpra. +x11-wm/parti + # Samuli Suominen (20 May 2012) # Still using vulnerable net-libs/xulrunner wrt bug 412341 # Build problems wrt bug 390325
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On 06/17/2011 04:10 PM, Stuart Longland (redhatter) wrote: > redhatter11/06/17 13:10:02 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > Masking of media-radio/svxlink-090426 and media-radio/gmfsk. The former > will > need a major overhaul, and I intend to replace the ebuild with a newer one. > > The latter, no point in keeping it around as media-radio/fldigi does the > same > and more. That, and gmfsk is no longer maintained... so out it goes. > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.12844 profiles/package.mask > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.12844&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.12844&content-type=text/plain > diff : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.12843&r2=1.12844 > > Index: package.mask > === > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > retrieving revision 1.12843 > retrieving revision 1.12844 > diff -u -r1.12843 -r1.12844 > --- package.mask 17 Jun 2011 09:55:07 - 1.12843 > +++ package.mask 17 Jun 2011 13:10:02 - 1.12844 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.12843 > 2011/06/17 09:55:07 olemarkus Exp $ > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.12844 > 2011/06/17 13:10:02 redhatter Exp $ > # > # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, and > # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely > @@ -31,6 +31,18 @@ > > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- > > +# Stuart Longland (17 Jun 2011) > +# Masked for removal within 30 days. Will be replacing it with updated > +# ebuilds to address numerous issues. See bugs #336993, #336199, #369881 > +# and #335307. > +=media-radio/svxlink-090426 > + > +# Stuart Longland (17 Jun 2011) > +# Masked for removal within 30 days. There is a newer version upstream but > it > +# doesn't compile for me, and upstream is now dead. As an alternative, have > a > +# look at media-radio/fldigi instead. (See bug #259451) > +media-radio/fldigi That doesn't make much sense... Mask fldigi and suggest it at the same time?
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
В Срд, 14/01/2009 в 20:24 -0800, Donnie Berkholz пишет: > On 11:05 Mon 12 Jan , AllenJB wrote: > > In my opinion the cvs commit log and the ChangeLog serve 2 different > > purposes. The cvs log is for developers while the ChangeLog is for > > users. While the cvs log will likely just want to explain what change > > was made, the ChangeLog should explain why it was made. > > So if you want to know both, you need to look in 2 places? That doesn't > seem very nice to me. We do not distribute portage tree trough cvs and rsync does not have ChangeLog's. But even with cvs, cvs log is very slow ... > Also in a distributed VCS, we'd want to generate > ChangeLogs from the commit logs True. But portage tree is still CVS and until this happened we need document all changes in ChangeLog's. -- Peter.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Thursday 15 of January 2009 05:24:41 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > So if you want to know both, you need to look in 2 places? That doesn't > seem very nice to me. Also in a distributed VCS, we'd want to generate > ChangeLogs from the commit logs to avoid all kinds of annoying conflict > resolution and remove redundant information. Hmm... or the other way around, so that, after making changes, echangelog would generate ChangeLog entry, then repoman manifest, and at the end repoman commit could just pick this entry and place as commit message. It would of course make sense when all commits were 'atomic' in some way - (one commit per package/directory - if there's no such policy already). -- regards MM signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On 11:05 Mon 12 Jan , AllenJB wrote: > In my opinion the cvs commit log and the ChangeLog serve 2 different > purposes. The cvs log is for developers while the ChangeLog is for > users. While the cvs log will likely just want to explain what change > was made, the ChangeLog should explain why it was made. So if you want to know both, you need to look in 2 places? That doesn't seem very nice to me. Also in a distributed VCS, we'd want to generate ChangeLogs from the commit logs to avoid all kinds of annoying conflict resolution and remove redundant information. > PS. I know about index2.xml - but that doesn't look like it's going to > be the main front page any time soon at the moment, which is a real > shame because it has some awesome changes. I need to write up an announcement for the changes, then Xavier will flip the switch. Think days not weeks. -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com pgpEDwTiHQbg4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:05 AM, AllenJB wrote: > Peter Volkov wrote: >> >> В Вск, 11/01/2009 в 10:31 +0100, Benedikt Böhm пишет: >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote: - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry >>> >>> `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see why i should add a changelog >>> entry. >> >> There is the same reason as for ChangeLogs for ebuilds. Users (I'm user >> too) don't have cvs log at hand at their systems but still consider that >> it's important to know about changes. >> >> Is it really hard to script `echangelog "msg" && cvs commit -m "msg"`? >> > In my opinion the cvs commit log and the ChangeLog serve 2 different > purposes. The cvs log is for developers while the ChangeLog is for users. > While the cvs log will likely just want to explain what change was made, the > ChangeLog should explain why it was made. > > Developers need to realise that users don't know everything about the > software they use and don't always pin down the reasons for unexpected > beviour. Users also don't always read the documentation given to them. > > This has been seen recently in the change of default behavior of the world > set in stable portage is a good example of this. Many users didn't even know > about the --update option and many don't read post-commit messages (I expect > because they don't realise the importance of those messages or how they can > change the ELOG options to make the messages easier to read, for example by > having them emailed to them). > > There are other examples of insufficient information being given to users > too - the dvdnav USE flag was masked recently, but neither the ChangeLog or > the cvs commit message give any indication as to why this occurred. > > In my opinion Gentoo developers need to do more to communicate with their > users. This could be as simple as prominently posting documentation on the > elog system and how to tailor it. Or it might involve posting more > announcements to the Gentoo website (which would double up and make the > project look more active than it currently does from its front page). It sounds like you just volunteered to write an article on elog for the GMN...am I reading your post correctly? :) > > AllenJB > > PS. I know about index2.xml - but that doesn't look like it's going to be > the main front page any time soon at the moment, which is a real shame > because it has some awesome changes. > >
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
Peter Volkov wrote: В Вск, 11/01/2009 в 10:31 +0100, Benedikt Böhm пишет: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote: - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see why i should add a changelog entry. There is the same reason as for ChangeLogs for ebuilds. Users (I'm user too) don't have cvs log at hand at their systems but still consider that it's important to know about changes. Is it really hard to script `echangelog "msg" && cvs commit -m "msg"`? In my opinion the cvs commit log and the ChangeLog serve 2 different purposes. The cvs log is for developers while the ChangeLog is for users. While the cvs log will likely just want to explain what change was made, the ChangeLog should explain why it was made. Developers need to realise that users don't know everything about the software they use and don't always pin down the reasons for unexpected beviour. Users also don't always read the documentation given to them. This has been seen recently in the change of default behavior of the world set in stable portage is a good example of this. Many users didn't even know about the --update option and many don't read post-commit messages (I expect because they don't realise the importance of those messages or how they can change the ELOG options to make the messages easier to read, for example by having them emailed to them). There are other examples of insufficient information being given to users too - the dvdnav USE flag was masked recently, but neither the ChangeLog or the cvs commit message give any indication as to why this occurred. In my opinion Gentoo developers need to do more to communicate with their users. This could be as simple as prominently posting documentation on the elog system and how to tailor it. Or it might involve posting more announcements to the Gentoo website (which would double up and make the project look more active than it currently does from its front page). AllenJB PS. I know about index2.xml - but that doesn't look like it's going to be the main front page any time soon at the moment, which is a real shame because it has some awesome changes.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
В Вск, 11/01/2009 в 10:31 +0100, Benedikt Böhm пишет: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote: > > - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry > > `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see why i should add a changelog entry. There is the same reason as for ChangeLogs for ebuilds. Users (I'm user too) don't have cvs log at hand at their systems but still consider that it's important to know about changes. Is it really hard to script `echangelog "msg" && cvs commit -m "msg"`? -- Peter.
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:31:03 +0100 Benedikt Böhm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Benedikt Boehm (hollow) schrieb: > > > hollow 09/01/10 21:41:41 > > > > > > Modified: package.mask > > > Log: > > > mask sys-apps/baselayout-vserver for removal > > > > > > Revision ChangesPath > > > 1.9378 profiles/package.mask > > > > > > file : > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&view=markup > > > plain: > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&content-type=text/plain > > > diff : > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.9377&r2=1.9378 > > > > > > Index: package.mask > > > === > > > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > > > retrieving revision 1.9377 > > > retrieving revision 1.9378 > > > diff -u -r1.9377 -r1.9378 > > > --- package.mask 10 Jan 2009 17:17:32 - 1.9377 > > > +++ package.mask 10 Jan 2009 21:41:41 - 1.9378 > > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > > > > > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > > > 1.9377 2009/01/10 17:17:32 ulm Exp $ +# > > > $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9378 > > > 2009/01/10 21:41:41 hollow Exp $ # # When you add an entry to the > > > top of this file, add your name, the date, and # an explanation > > > of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely @@ -31,6 > > > +31,11 @@ > > > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- > > > > > > +# Benedikt Böhm (10 Jan 2009) > > > +# baselayout-vserver is unmaintained and obsoleted by > > > +# baselayout-2/openrc. please upgrade. removal in 30 days. > > > +sys-apps/baselayout-vserver > > > + > > > # Rémi Cardona (09 Jan 2009) > > > # old virtual left from the transition from monolithic > > > # to modular X. Use x11-libs/libXft directly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is bad, because: > > > > - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry > > `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see why i should add a changelog > entry. for the same reason packages have ChangeLogs. cvs logs don't come with the tree. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/45198 -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Benedikt Boehm (hollow) schrieb: > > hollow 09/01/10 21:41:41 > > > > Modified: package.mask > > Log: > > mask sys-apps/baselayout-vserver for removal > > > > Revision ChangesPath > > 1.9378 profiles/package.mask > > > > file : > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&view=markup > > plain: > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&content-type=text/plain > > diff : > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.9377&r2=1.9378 > > > > Index: package.mask > > === > > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > > retrieving revision 1.9377 > > retrieving revision 1.9378 > > diff -u -r1.9377 -r1.9378 > > --- package.mask10 Jan 2009 17:17:32 - 1.9377 > > +++ package.mask10 Jan 2009 21:41:41 - 1.9378 > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > > > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9377 > > 2009/01/10 17:17:32 ulm Exp $ > > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9378 > > 2009/01/10 21:41:41 hollow Exp $ > > # > > # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, > > and > > # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely > > @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ > > > > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- > > > > +# Benedikt Böhm (10 Jan 2009) > > +# baselayout-vserver is unmaintained and obsoleted by > > +# baselayout-2/openrc. please upgrade. removal in 30 days. > > +sys-apps/baselayout-vserver > > + > > # Rémi Cardona (09 Jan 2009) > > # old virtual left from the transition from monolithic > > # to modular X. Use x11-libs/libXft directly > > > > > > > > > > This is bad, because: > > - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see why i should add a changelog entry. > - - you forgot the last rites mail indeed > - - baselayout-2/openrc isn't stable yet, in fact it's even masked in > profiles/targets/vserver/package.mask i don't care. baselayout-vserver is a hack, the vserver profiles are deprecated since ages (although i think the restructuring revived them), and the vserver team (that's only me currently) doesn't support anything else beside openrc. Greets, Bene pgpTyRoGxJdYC.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benedikt Boehm (hollow) schrieb: > hollow 09/01/10 21:41:41 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > mask sys-apps/baselayout-vserver for removal > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.9378 profiles/package.mask > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.9378&content-type=text/plain > diff : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.9377&r2=1.9378 > > Index: package.mask > === > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > retrieving revision 1.9377 > retrieving revision 1.9378 > diff -u -r1.9377 -r1.9378 > --- package.mask 10 Jan 2009 17:17:32 - 1.9377 > +++ package.mask 10 Jan 2009 21:41:41 - 1.9378 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9377 2009/01/10 > 17:17:32 ulm Exp $ > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.9378 2009/01/10 > 21:41:41 hollow Exp $ > # > # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, and > # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely > @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ > > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- > > +# Benedikt Böhm (10 Jan 2009) > +# baselayout-vserver is unmaintained and obsoleted by > +# baselayout-2/openrc. please upgrade. removal in 30 days. > +sys-apps/baselayout-vserver > + > # Rémi Cardona (09 Jan 2009) > # old virtual left from the transition from monolithic > # to modular X. Use x11-libs/libXft directly > > > > This is bad, because: - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry - - you forgot the last rites mail - - baselayout-2/openrc isn't stable yet, in fact it's even masked in profiles/targets/vserver/package.mask Regards, Friedrich -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklpQ9MACgkQknxn9PmJ76VnyQCdHNTqkJVvMiD3Pr1/j8Ri8R3F 0nAAn35fDhWFUatM7er/sX6aPvAS4OwP =vVPy -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:10:44 + "Daniel Gryniewicz (dang)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dang08/09/30 15:10:44 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > Remove poppler from mask; current evince works fine s/current/only/ I currently have pdftex,luatex & xpdf failing here. It would have been nice if maintainers had been contacted before pushing this to ~arch since it is a very well known api-breaking library. Not that they seem difficult to fix but I'm not really fond of the "let it break, wait for bug reports, fix later" way. Alexis. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
2008/6/22 Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 15:49 +0200, Alin Nstac wrote: >> Peter Volkov wrote: >> > В Сбт, 21/06/2008 в 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer пишет: >> > >> >> Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when >> >> some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to >> >> the ChangeLog? >> >> >> > >> > Some days ago Diego (flameeyes) suggested to write script which will >> > abort commit in case ChangeLog is not filled. Taking into account a >> > number (about 1 commit per day(!)) of developers who forgive to use >> > echangelog I think this is the only way to go if we want that >> > ChangeLog's to be useful... >> > >> > >> How about fixing the right problem instead forcing devs to complete yet >> another step? >> The right way of fixing that is by creating changelogs automatically, >> based on cvs commit comments. >> > Possibly by making it a part of the whole repoman commit process? I'm > pretty sure I've mentioned this in a council meeting: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20080508-summary.txt > (Check the 'New Topics' -> 'When are ChangeLog entries required?' > summary) The portage team is always open for repoman improvements ;) > > -- > gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > >
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 15:49 +0200, Alin Nstac wrote: > Peter Volkov wrote: > > В Сбт, 21/06/2008 в 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer пишет: > > > >> Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when > >> some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to > >> the ChangeLog? > >> > > > > Some days ago Diego (flameeyes) suggested to write script which will > > abort commit in case ChangeLog is not filled. Taking into account a > > number (about 1 commit per day(!)) of developers who forgive to use > > echangelog I think this is the only way to go if we want that > > ChangeLog's to be useful... > > > > > How about fixing the right problem instead forcing devs to complete yet > another step? > The right way of fixing that is by creating changelogs automatically, > based on cvs commit comments. > Possibly by making it a part of the whole repoman commit process? I'm pretty sure I've mentioned this in a council meeting: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20080508-summary.txt (Check the 'New Topics' -> 'When are ChangeLog entries required?' summary) -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
Peter Volkov wrote: В Сбт, 21/06/2008 в 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer пишет: Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to the ChangeLog? Some days ago Diego (flameeyes) suggested to write script which will abort commit in case ChangeLog is not filled. Taking into account a number (about 1 commit per day(!)) of developers who forgive to use echangelog I think this is the only way to go if we want that ChangeLog's to be useful... How about fixing the right problem instead forcing devs to complete yet another step? The right way of fixing that is by creating changelogs automatically, based on cvs commit comments. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
В Сбт, 21/06/2008 в 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer пишет: > Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when > some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to > the ChangeLog? Some days ago Diego (flameeyes) suggested to write script which will abort commit in case ChangeLog is not filled. Taking into account a number (about 1 commit per day(!)) of developers who forgive to use echangelog I think this is the only way to go if we want that ChangeLog's to be useful... -- Peter. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:38 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Albert Zeyer wrote: > > > Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or > > > features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like > > > local USE flags documentation, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not > > > comments :)) use /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog. > > Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when > > some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to > > the ChangeLog? > echangelog works perfectly AFAIK. > I think he meant something which would add an entry to the ChangeLog during the commit stage without extra intevention. Having said that, many developers have some form of commit script which contains things like manifest, changelog and commit commands. welp -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Albert Zeyer wrote: > > Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or > > features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like > > local USE flags documentation, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not > > comments :)) use /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog. > Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when > some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to > the ChangeLog? echangelog works perfectly AFAIK. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 pgp2Jp7D1L2Va.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 10:43 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Чтв, 19/06/2008 в 21:03 +, Michael Sterrett (mr_bones_) пишет: > > mr_bones_08/06/19 21:03:29 > > > > Modified: package.mask > > Log: > > mask =games-kids/gcompris-8.4.5 until > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225883 is fixed up. > > > > Revision ChangesPath > > 1.8740 profiles/package.mask > > Whenever you modify anything in profiles directory, please, fill in > ChangeLog. ChangeLogs became useless if only part of developers fill > them. > > Just to remind. There are per-arch ChangeLog, base profile ChangeLog, > features ChangeLog and for other stuff ChangeLog: > > /usr/portage/profiles/base/ChangeLog > /usr/portage/profiles/arch/sh/ChangeLog > [snip other archs ChangeLog] > /usr/portage/profiles/default-bsd/ChangeLog > /usr/portage/profiles/embedded/ChangeLog > /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/arm/ChangeLog > [snip other archs ChangeLog] > /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/x86/ChangeLog > /usr/portage/profiles/features/ChangeLog > /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog > > Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or > features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like > local USE flags documentation, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not > comments :)) use /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog. Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to the ChangeLog? -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
В Чтв, 19/06/2008 в 21:03 +, Michael Sterrett (mr_bones_) пишет: > mr_bones_08/06/19 21:03:29 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > mask =games-kids/gcompris-8.4.5 until > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225883 is fixed up. > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.8740 profiles/package.mask Whenever you modify anything in profiles directory, please, fill in ChangeLog. ChangeLogs became useless if only part of developers fill them. Just to remind. There are per-arch ChangeLog, base profile ChangeLog, features ChangeLog and for other stuff ChangeLog: /usr/portage/profiles/base/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/arch/sh/ChangeLog [snip other archs ChangeLog] /usr/portage/profiles/default-bsd/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/embedded/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/arm/ChangeLog [snip other archs ChangeLog] /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/x86/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/features/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like local USE flags documentation, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not comments :)) use /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog. Thank you, -- Peter. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
Hello Luis. В Пнд, 09/06/2008 в 18:12 +, Luis F. Araujo (araujo) пишет: > araujo 08/06/09 18:12:09 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > Saving Squeak. Solving bugs #163724 , #196984 > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.8705 profiles/package.mask Whenever you modify anything in profiles directory, please, fill in ChangeLog. ChangeLogs became useless if only part of developers fill them. Just to remind. There are per-arch ChangeLog, base profile ChangeLog, features ChangeLog and for other stuff ChangeLog: /usr/portage/profiles/base/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/arch/sh/ChangeLog [snip other archs ChangeLog] /usr/portage/profiles/default-bsd/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/embedded/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/arm/ChangeLog [snip other archs ChangeLog] /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/x86/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/features/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like local USE flags, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not comments :)) use /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog. Thank you, -- Peter. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
В Чтв, 29/05/2008 в 15:42 +, Raul Porcel (armin76) пишет: > armin76 08/05/29 15:42:29 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > P.mask net-dns/resolvconfig-gentoo as per bug #219270 > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.8663 profiles/package.mask Whenever you modify anything in profiles directory, please, fill in ChangeLog. ChangeLogs became useless if only part of developers fill them. Just to remind. There are per-arch ChangeLog, base profile ChangeLog, features ChangeLog and for other stuff ChangeLog: /usr/portage/profiles/base/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/arch/sh/ChangeLog [snip other archs ChangeLog] /usr/portage/profiles/default-bsd/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/embedded/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/arm/ChangeLog [snip other archs ChangeLog] /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/x86/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/features/ChangeLog /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like local USE flags documentation, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not comments :)) use /usr/portage/profiles/ChangeLog. Thank you. -- Peter. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
В Вск, 18/05/2008 в 15:14 +, Samuli Suominen (drac) пишет: > drac08/05/18 15:14:30 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > dxr3player removed > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.8634 profiles/package.mask Could you add ChangeLog entries for thing like this, please? If only part of developers will update ChangeLogs they became useless... -- Peter. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
