Re: LyX 2.4.0, Release Candidate 1
On 16/01/2024 9:40 am, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: The LyX team is happy (and relieved) to announce the publication of the first 'release candidate' for the long awaited 2.4.0. You can find tarballs and binaries for Windows and OSX here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Strictly speaking, we are releasing RC1 for testing purposes only. Please report any bugs you may find to the user list or the developer list, as you prefer. That said, many of us have been using the development branch for production work, and we believe it is pretty stable. Remember, however, that files saved with 2.4 cannot be opened in LyX 2.3.x unless you first export them to that format. Riki Installed rc1 without problems on windows 10. Documents seem to load and display correctly. Andrew -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: LyX 2.4.0, Release Candidate 1
On Jan 15, 2024, at 2:40 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > The LyX team is happy (and relieved) to announce the publication of the first > 'release candidate' for the long awaited 2.4.0. Just compiled it under Linux and was very happy to see that y’all fixed the chonky (specifically, overly wide) toolbars you’d get under beta5 when you affixed them to the left edge of the window! They're svelte now, just as they are under MacOS. -chris -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: LyX 1.0
On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 11:36 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Hi there, > > This LyX 1.0 file from Patrick is not readable with current versions. > Experiments show that lyx2lyx first complains about a malformed file > when converting to LyX 1.4. > > I do not know how to go further, though. > > Ideas? > > JMarc For some reason it seems that I left this unanswered. :-( The original files seems to be really truncated. If you look into a file from that time all of them end with... \the_end That is what the conversion step in 1.4 is complaining about. This files does not have that and so I assume that the problem comes from the time when the file was saved. I can recover what is there but that needs to be done by hand. PS: I noticed this thread when comparing the time spent by lyx2lyx based on the Python version used. In this case the result was converting the 2.3 User Guide to the 2.4 file format. Basically the last versions of python (3.11 and 3.12) run ~ 8 times faster than with python 2.7. -- José Abílio lyx2lyx_times.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
LyX 2.4.0, Release Candidate 1
The LyX team is happy (and relieved) to announce the publication of the first 'release candidate' for the long awaited 2.4.0. You can find tarballs and binaries for Windows and OSX here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Strictly speaking, we are releasing RC1 for testing purposes only. Please report any bugs you may find to the user list or the developer list, as you prefer. That said, many of us have been using the development branch for production work, and we believe it is pretty stable. Remember, however, that files saved with 2.4 cannot be opened in LyX 2.3.x unless you first export them to that format. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: ARM vs Universal Etf
Scott, you are welcome. Now that I have retired I can finally play in a non-production environment :-)-O... el On 2024-01-15 04:24 , Scott Kostyshak wrote: [...] > Thanks, this is helpful. Indeed exporting to 2.3.x it works fine > with 2.3.x and fails with current master. Because I'm on a newer > compiler, I can only compile back to master as of late 2020 and I > still see the bug there as well. So I can't bisect it. Hopefully > someone else can take a look. [...][ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
