[Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay, and the tricksters who do them

2011-10-10 Thread Peter Fraser
I changed the subject line since this is how the conversation is drifting.  And 
here's the full story.

There are lots of folks on eBay now who put random shipping prices into their 
listings because of the restrictions eBay automatically imposes. For example, I 
always put $1 in there and clearly state in the listing that I'll get the 
actual shipping cost once we know the winner's location, and bill that amount.  
That's the fair thing to do.

This guy said in his listing that he would ship it as cheaply as possible, 
but then also had $50 showing in the shipping slot.

So all I did was politely enquire as to whether he wanted to quote actual 
shipping now that he knew my location.  That could have worked in either 
direction, by the way.

In return I got a rant about how he doesn't know how to pack and how he has UPS 
pack for him, and that he actually wouldn't ship it as cheaply as possible as 
stated in the listing, but for $50.  I immediately went back to him agreeing to 
that (because it wasn't worth the quibble over a $10 overcharge), but asking 
him to please make sure the tip of the stylus was protected before handing it 
off to the random UPS folks.  We all know how easily Columbia floating 
reproducers can bang into mandrels, but others don't.

And I heard nothing back, even though I pinged him a couple more times.  So I 
looked him up and phoned him, politely seeking to complete our contract.  He 
cursed at me and hung up on me, but still got nothing via eBay from him.  I 
went thru eBay to try to get him to complete the deal, but no luck - but did 
succeed in getting him a black mark.  If I had paid, it would have been more 
severe and eBay would have paid me, then delisted him.  But when he didn't 
respond I knew it was fishy, so I held up on the money, thank goodness.  The 
transaction is STILL live now, btw...I could still send the money.

Yeah, I was surprised at his seemingly good feedback, too.  According to it, 
he's your standard A+ best ebayer ever! will do business again! which 
is so meaningful and special as we all know, right?

-- Peter
pjfra...@mac.com

On Oct 9, 2011, at 9:42 PM, The Farmers g...@usfamily.net wrote:

 Yes, that does look like an exceptionally nice machine - wish I had seen it 
 and bid on it!  And I could have just picked it up here in Minneapolis since 
 he offered free local pickup (ebay 370545662693).  Somehow, when someone 
 advertises right in the eBay ad what the shipping will cost,  most buyers 
 just figure that into their bid limit and so it makes no sense to question it 
 AFTER you bid. It really makes no difference to your pocketbook to pay little 
 for an item plus lots for shipping, or lots for the item and little for 
 shipping - that used to be a way sellers lowered eBay final value fees until 
 eBay started charging the fees on the shipping cost too.
 
 I just wonder about the problem since this seller had 2584 feedbacks with 
 100% good feedbacks over the past 12 months, until now.  Looks like a good 
 seller, except it certainly wasn't right for him to sell it elsewhere so 
 quickly.
 
 Sorry, I don't have the reproducer or the machine you are looking for.
 
 -- Greg Farmer
 
 
 
 - Original Message - From: Peter Fraser pjfra...@mac.com
 To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 10:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Columbia B Eagle and/or Columbia floating cylinder 
 reproducer wanted
 
 
 That's immaterial because you don't have the particulars, nor have you seen 
 the communication.
 
 Too bad it turned out like this, but they turn up, and I'll certainly find 
 one.  His business practices and attitude were quite poor despite the best 
 efforts of both me and eBay, so I thought I'd pass the warning along.  I 
 smelled a rat so held up payment, which was a real stroke of luck.
 
 -- Peter
 pjfra...@mac.com
 
 On Oct 9, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Vinyl Visions vinyl.visi...@live.com wrote:
 
 
 You won a nice original machine... original reproducer, original belt cover 
 (which is usually missing), original patent disc (which is often missing 
 and can cost $50 or more), original lid - overall nice machine - not bad 
 for $368 and $50 shipping - I wouldn't ship one for less than $50, because 
 of the inherent risk and required packing. I doubt that you will find one 
 in that condition for less...
 
 From: pjfra...@mac.com
 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:02:37 -0700
 To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Subject: [Phono-L] Columbia B Eagle and/or Columbia floating cylinder 
 reproducer wanted
 
 Hey gang -
 
 I'm looking for a Columbia model B Eagle graphophone, as well as a 
 Columbia reproducer that is correct for an early (plain-case) Columbia AT.
 
 Any leads or offers?  Thanks...
 
 I'm using the reproducer off my Q on the AT for now, but want it to have 
 its own.
 
 And I won an Eagle on eBay last week, but the fraudster seller sold it out 
 from under me when I tried to give him some safe shipping tips and 
 

Re: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay, and the tricksters who do them

2011-10-10 Thread The Farmers
Yes, it sure doesn't sound like the seller is trying to keep his customers 
satisfied.  Too bad you missed out on a great looking phonograph. Actual 
shipping should be around $20-25 for a light-weight phonograph like that, 
and would probably be that much only because of the size of the box needed 
to protect that horn.  In my opinion, getting it packed at UPS is for the 
seller's convenience and it always rubs me the wrong way to have to pay 
extra for that when I buy something.


I would like to mention though that I've found eBay's shipping calculator to 
work quite well.  When selling, I find an appropriate box and weigh it plus 
the item plus packing material, and enter that, along with measurements, 
into the listing, along with several options for shipping (parcel post, 
priority, etc). After it sells, eBay's invoice automatically will include 
the shipping costs for each shipping method to the buyers actual zip or 
country, and it seems to always be accurate. This makes sending out the 
invoice with correct shipping cost MUCH easier and quicker than manually 
figuring it out after the sale.  Most buyers must be happy with this since 
my eBay feedback rating for shipping  handling charges is now averaging 
4.96 stars out of 5 possible. I think there's always that odd buyer who 
won't give sellers 5 stars because he thinks the post office is charging too 
much, even though that is out of our hands.


-- Greg



- Original Message - 
From: Peter Fraser pjfra...@mac.com

To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 1:00 AM
Subject: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay,and the tricksters who do 
them



I changed the subject line since this is how the conversation is drifting. 
And here's the full story.


There are lots of folks on eBay now who put random shipping prices into 
their listings because of the restrictions eBay automatically imposes. For 
example, I always put $1 in there and clearly state in the listing that 
I'll get the actual shipping cost once we know the winner's location, and 
bill that amount.  That's the fair thing to do.


This guy said in his listing that he would ship it as cheaply as 
possible, but then also had $50 showing in the shipping slot.


So all I did was politely enquire as to whether he wanted to quote actual 
shipping now that he knew my location.  That could have worked in either 
direction, by the way.


In return I got a rant about how he doesn't know how to pack and how he 
has UPS pack for him, and that he actually wouldn't ship it as cheaply as 
possible as stated in the listing, but for $50.  I immediately went back 
to him agreeing to that (because it wasn't worth the quibble over a $10 
overcharge), but asking him to please make sure the tip of the stylus was 
protected before handing it off to the random UPS folks.  We all know how 
easily Columbia floating reproducers can bang into mandrels, but others 
don't.


And I heard nothing back, even though I pinged him a couple more times. 
So I looked him up and phoned him, politely seeking to complete our 
contract.  He cursed at me and hung up on me, but still got nothing via 
eBay from him.  I went thru eBay to try to get him to complete the deal, 
but no luck - but did succeed in getting him a black mark.  If I had paid, 
it would have been more severe and eBay would have paid me, then delisted 
him.  But when he didn't respond I knew it was fishy, so I held up on the 
money, thank goodness.  The transaction is STILL live now, btw...I could 
still send the money.


Yeah, I was surprised at his seemingly good feedback, too.  According to 
it, he's your standard A+ best ebayer ever! will do business 
again! which is so meaningful and special as we all know, right?


-- Peter
pjfra...@mac.com

On Oct 9, 2011, at 9:42 PM, The Farmers g...@usfamily.net wrote:

Yes, that does look like an exceptionally nice machine - wish I had seen 
it and bid on it!  And I could have just picked it up here in Minneapolis 
since he offered free local pickup (ebay 370545662693).  Somehow, when 
someone advertises right in the eBay ad what the shipping will cost, 
most buyers just figure that into their bid limit and so it makes no 
sense to question it AFTER you bid. It really makes no difference to your 
pocketbook to pay little for an item plus lots for shipping, or lots for 
the item and little for shipping - that used to be a way sellers lowered 
eBay final value fees until eBay started charging the fees on the 
shipping cost too.


I just wonder about the problem since this seller had 2584 feedbacks with 
100% good feedbacks over the past 12 months, until now.  Looks like a 
good seller, except it certainly wasn't right for him to sell it 
elsewhere so quickly.


Sorry, I don't have the reproducer or the machine you are looking for.

-- Greg Farmer



- Original Message - From: Peter Fraser pjfra...@mac.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: 

Re: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay, and the tricksters who do them

2011-10-10 Thread john robles
I must say that I can't agree with the opinion on the ebay shipping calculator 
- I find the shipping calculator to be quite faulty. I lost some money on a 
couple of shipments by trusting it. Ever since then I use my postal scale and 
USPS online, and the result is that the Priority Mail cost to ship is always 
quite different than the ebay calculator says!




From: The Farmers g...@usfamily.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Sunday, October 9, 2011 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay, and the tricksters who do 
them

Yes, it sure doesn't sound like the seller is trying to keep his customers 
satisfied.  Too bad you missed out on a great looking phonograph. Actual 
shipping should be around $20-25 for a light-weight phonograph like that, and 
would probably be that much only because of the size of the box needed to 
protect that horn.  In my opinion, getting it packed at UPS is for the seller's 
convenience and it always rubs me the wrong way to have to pay extra for that 
when I buy something.

I would like to mention though that I've found eBay's shipping calculator to 
work quite well.  When selling, I find an appropriate box and weigh it plus the 
item plus packing material, and enter that, along with measurements, into the 
listing, along with several options for shipping (parcel post, priority, etc). 
After it sells, eBay's invoice automatically will include the shipping costs 
for each shipping method to the buyers actual zip or country, and it seems to 
always be accurate. This makes sending out the invoice with correct shipping 
cost MUCH easier and quicker than manually figuring it out after the sale.  
Most buyers must be happy with this since my eBay feedback rating for shipping 
 handling charges is now averaging 4.96 stars out of 5 possible. I think 
there's always that odd buyer who won't give sellers 5 stars because he thinks 
the post office is charging too much, even though that is out of our hands.

-- Greg



- Original Message - From: Peter Fraser pjfra...@mac.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 1:00 AM
Subject: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay,and the tricksters who do them


 I changed the subject line since this is how the conversation is drifting. 
 And here's the full story.
 
 There are lots of folks on eBay now who put random shipping prices into their 
 listings because of the restrictions eBay automatically imposes. For example, 
 I always put $1 in there and clearly state in the listing that I'll get the 
 actual shipping cost once we know the winner's location, and bill that 
 amount.  That's the fair thing to do.
 
 This guy said in his listing that he would ship it as cheaply as possible, 
 but then also had $50 showing in the shipping slot.
 
 So all I did was politely enquire as to whether he wanted to quote actual 
 shipping now that he knew my location.  That could have worked in either 
 direction, by the way.
 
 In return I got a rant about how he doesn't know how to pack and how he has 
 UPS pack for him, and that he actually wouldn't ship it as cheaply as 
 possible as stated in the listing, but for $50.  I immediately went back to 
 him agreeing to that (because it wasn't worth the quibble over a $10 
 overcharge), but asking him to please make sure the tip of the stylus was 
 protected before handing it off to the random UPS folks.  We all know how 
 easily Columbia floating reproducers can bang into mandrels, but others don't.
 
 And I heard nothing back, even though I pinged him a couple more times. So I 
 looked him up and phoned him, politely seeking to complete our contract.  He 
 cursed at me and hung up on me, but still got nothing via eBay from him.  I 
 went thru eBay to try to get him to complete the deal, but no luck - but did 
 succeed in getting him a black mark.  If I had paid, it would have been more 
 severe and eBay would have paid me, then delisted him.  But when he didn't 
 respond I knew it was fishy, so I held up on the money, thank goodness.  The 
 transaction is STILL live now, btw...I could still send the money.
 
 Yeah, I was surprised at his seemingly good feedback, too.  According to it, 
 he's your standard A+ best ebayer ever! will do business again! 
 which is so meaningful and special as we all know, right?
 
 -- Peter
 pjfra...@mac.com
 
 On Oct 9, 2011, at 9:42 PM, The Farmers g...@usfamily.net wrote:
 
 Yes, that does look like an exceptionally nice machine - wish I had seen it 
 and bid on it!  And I could have just picked it up here in Minneapolis since 
 he offered free local pickup (ebay 370545662693).  Somehow, when someone 
 advertises right in the eBay ad what the shipping will cost, most buyers 
 just figure that into their bid limit and so it makes no sense to question 
 it AFTER you bid. It really makes no difference to your pocketbook to pay 
 little for an item plus 

Re: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay, and the tricksters who do them

2011-10-10 Thread The Farmers
Hmmm. I've had no problems. I just sold something tonight - weighs 8 pounds 
and goes in a 15 x 15 x 15 inch box. USPS site says Priority Mail from my 
zip to this zip would be $42.75 or $39.10 if paid online. eBay calculator 
said it would be $39.10 and put that in the invoice.  Right on.
Also just packed a 35 pound item going to Taiwan and now I just checked and 
see that the USPS site gives exactly the same cost that the eBay calculator 
put into that invoice.


The only problem I have is now having to pay eBay a percentage on the 
shipping cost - that just doesn't seem fair and it causes me to lose quite a 
bit on the heavier items.


The eBay calculator also shows me what the cost would be if I used any of 
the Regional Priority Mail cartons, whereas I don't see that on the USPS 
site. Sometimes using these cartons (have to order the cartons online from 
USPS) saves quite a bit and allows me to refund the buyer some postage. And, 
sometimes a buyer might pay for Parcel Post but if I see that a Regional 
Priority Mail carton is about the same price or even cheaper, I'll use that 
to provide faster delivery with free tracking.


-- Greg


- Original Message - 
From: john robles john9...@pacbell.net

To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay,and the tricksters who 
do them



I must say that I can't agree with the opinion on the ebay shipping 
calculator - I find the shipping calculator to be quite faulty. I lost some 
money on a couple of shipments by trusting it. Ever since then I use my 
postal scale and USPS online, and the result is that the Priority Mail cost 
to ship is always quite different than the ebay calculator says!





From: The Farmers g...@usfamily.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Sunday, October 9, 2011 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay, and the tricksters who 
do them


Yes, it sure doesn't sound like the seller is trying to keep his customers 
satisfied. Too bad you missed out on a great looking phonograph. Actual 
shipping should be around $20-25 for a light-weight phonograph like that, 
and would probably be that much only because of the size of the box needed 
to protect that horn. In my opinion, getting it packed at UPS is for the 
seller's convenience and it always rubs me the wrong way to have to pay 
extra for that when I buy something.


I would like to mention though that I've found eBay's shipping calculator to 
work quite well. When selling, I find an appropriate box and weigh it plus 
the item plus packing material, and enter that, along with measurements, 
into the listing, along with several options for shipping (parcel post, 
priority, etc). After it sells, eBay's invoice automatically will include 
the shipping costs for each shipping method to the buyers actual zip or 
country, and it seems to always be accurate. This makes sending out the 
invoice with correct shipping cost MUCH easier and quicker than manually 
figuring it out after the sale. Most buyers must be happy with this since my 
eBay feedback rating for shipping  handling charges is now averaging 4.96 
stars out of 5 possible. I think there's always that odd buyer who won't 
give sellers 5 stars because he thinks the post office is charging too much, 
even though that is out of our hands.


-- Greg



- Original Message - From: Peter Fraser pjfra...@mac.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 1:00 AM
Subject: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay,and the tricksters who do 
them



I changed the subject line since this is how the conversation is drifting. 
And here's the full story.


There are lots of folks on eBay now who put random shipping prices into 
their listings because of the restrictions eBay automatically imposes. For 
example, I always put $1 in there and clearly state in the listing that 
I'll get the actual shipping cost once we know the winner's location, and 
bill that amount. That's the fair thing to do.


This guy said in his listing that he would ship it as cheaply as 
possible, but then also had $50 showing in the shipping slot.


So all I did was politely enquire as to whether he wanted to quote actual 
shipping now that he knew my location. That could have worked in either 
direction, by the way.


In return I got a rant about how he doesn't know how to pack and how he 
has UPS pack for him, and that he actually wouldn't ship it as cheaply as 
possible as stated in the listing, but for $50. I immediately went back 
to him agreeing to that (because it wasn't worth the quibble over a $10 
overcharge), but asking him to please make sure the tip of the stylus was 
protected before handing it off to the random UPS folks. We all know how 
easily Columbia floating reproducers can bang into mandrels, but others 
don't.


And I heard nothing back, even 

Re: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay, and the tricksters who do them

2011-10-10 Thread Jan and Harold
I don't know how this works with the new Ebay scheme but, especially with 
larger items, we (and our friends) have asked the seller to take the item to 
the UPS or Fedex store and we deal with the store directly for packing and/or 
shipping costs. There have been no problems so far, although I have to admit, 
we and our friend have not bought anything phono related on Ebay for quite some 
time.
Jan




On 2011-10-10, at 12:23 AM, john robles wrote:

 I must say that I can't agree with the opinion on the ebay shipping 
 calculator - I find the shipping calculator to be quite faulty. I lost some 
 money on a couple of shipments by trusting it. Ever since then I use my 
 postal scale and USPS online, and the result is that the Priority Mail cost 
 to ship is always quite different than the ebay calculator says!
 
 
 
 
 From: The Farmers g...@usfamily.net
 To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Sent: Sunday, October 9, 2011 11:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay, and the tricksters who 
 do them
 
 Yes, it sure doesn't sound like the seller is trying to keep his customers 
 satisfied.  Too bad you missed out on a great looking phonograph. Actual 
 shipping should be around $20-25 for a light-weight phonograph like that, and 
 would probably be that much only because of the size of the box needed to 
 protect that horn.  In my opinion, getting it packed at UPS is for the 
 seller's convenience and it always rubs me the wrong way to have to pay extra 
 for that when I buy something.
 
 I would like to mention though that I've found eBay's shipping calculator to 
 work quite well.  When selling, I find an appropriate box and weigh it plus 
 the item plus packing material, and enter that, along with measurements, into 
 the listing, along with several options for shipping (parcel post, priority, 
 etc). After it sells, eBay's invoice automatically will include the shipping 
 costs for each shipping method to the buyers actual zip or country, and it 
 seems to always be accurate. This makes sending out the invoice with correct 
 shipping cost MUCH easier and quicker than manually figuring it out after the 
 sale.  Most buyers must be happy with this since my eBay feedback rating for 
 shipping  handling charges is now averaging 4.96 stars out of 5 possible. I 
 think there's always that odd buyer who won't give sellers 5 stars because he 
 thinks the post office is charging too much, even though that is out of our 
 hands.
 
 -- Greg
 
 
 
 - Original Message - From: Peter Fraser pjfra...@mac.com
 To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 1:00 AM
 Subject: [Phono-L] shipping cost tricks on eBay,and the tricksters who do them
 
 
 I changed the subject line since this is how the conversation is drifting. 
 And here's the full story.
 
 There are lots of folks on eBay now who put random shipping prices into 
 their listings because of the restrictions eBay automatically imposes. For 
 example, I always put $1 in there and clearly state in the listing that I'll 
 get the actual shipping cost once we know the winner's location, and bill 
 that amount.  That's the fair thing to do.
 
 This guy said in his listing that he would ship it as cheaply as possible, 
 but then also had $50 showing in the shipping slot.
 
 So all I did was politely enquire as to whether he wanted to quote actual 
 shipping now that he knew my location.  That could have worked in either 
 direction, by the way.
 
 In return I got a rant about how he doesn't know how to pack and how he has 
 UPS pack for him, and that he actually wouldn't ship it as cheaply as 
 possible as stated in the listing, but for $50.  I immediately went back to 
 him agreeing to that (because it wasn't worth the quibble over a $10 
 overcharge), but asking him to please make sure the tip of the stylus was 
 protected before handing it off to the random UPS folks.  We all know how 
 easily Columbia floating reproducers can bang into mandrels, but others 
 don't.
 
 And I heard nothing back, even though I pinged him a couple more times. So I 
 looked him up and phoned him, politely seeking to complete our contract.  He 
 cursed at me and hung up on me, but still got nothing via eBay from him.  I 
 went thru eBay to try to get him to complete the deal, but no luck - but did 
 succeed in getting him a black mark.  If I had paid, it would have been more 
 severe and eBay would have paid me, then delisted him.  But when he didn't 
 respond I knew it was fishy, so I held up on the money, thank goodness.  The 
 transaction is STILL live now, btw...I could still send the money.
 
 Yeah, I was surprised at his seemingly good feedback, too.  According to it, 
 he's your standard A+ best ebayer ever! will do business again! 
 which is so meaningful and special as we all know, right?
 
 -- Peter
 pjfra...@mac.com
 
 On Oct 9, 2011, at 9:42 PM, The Farmers 

[Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50 mechanism

2011-10-10 Thread Bob Maffit
Phono Folks:

 

I have heard in the past that one can take an Edison Amberola 50 mechanism
and drop it in an Amberola 30 case with no problem, and have a machine (sort
of a hotrod which has the attributes' of the longer playing 50 in a smaller
case. Is this so?

 

What modifications if any, is needed to do this? Discussion regarding this
matter would be appreciated.

 

later

 

Bob

___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50 mechanism

2011-10-10 Thread William Taney
My understanding is you don't even need to swap mechanisms, you can install a 
second spring barrel in a model 30 and have the same result.
Bill

On Oct 10, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Bob Maffit wrote:

 Phono Folks:
 
 
 
 I have heard in the past that one can take an Edison Amberola 50 mechanism
 and drop it in an Amberola 30 case with no problem, and have a machine (sort
 of a hotrod which has the attributes' of the longer playing 50 in a smaller
 case. Is this so?
 
 
 
 What modifications if any, is needed to do this? Discussion regarding this
 matter would be appreciated.
 
 
 
 later
 
 
 
 Bob
 
 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.org

___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50 mechanism

2011-10-10 Thread Steven Medved

All you have to do is you have both mechanisms complete is the let the motor 
wind down and move the 50 spring barrels over to the 30 and the 30 to the 50.  
You will have to move the hook that holds the spring as the extra barrel is in 
the way, see below for more info. If you drop the complete 50 mechanism in a 30 
you will need to relocate the hook holding the spring that goes from the horn 
to the motorboard.  Most boards are drilled universal so you can do this with 
no problem and you can make a 30 a double spring motor if you put the springs 
barrels from a 50 on the 30 board. Make sure the rubber hose that covers the 
lug is there to insulate against motor noise.  I repaired a 30 with a broken 
motor board by placing a 50 mechanism in it, you will want to change the ID 
plate as well, I think I still have brass nails for the ID plate transfer. Steve
  From: maff...@bresnan.net
 To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:59:05 -0600
 Subject: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50 mechanism
 
 Phono Folks:
 
  
 
 I have heard in the past that one can take an Edison Amberola 50 mechanism
 and drop it in an Amberola 30 case with no problem, and have a machine (sort
 of a hotrod which has the attributes' of the longer playing 50 in a smaller
 case. Is this so?
 
  
 
 What modifications if any, is needed to do this? Discussion regarding this
 matter would be appreciated.
 
  
 
 later
 
  
 
 Bob
 
 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.org
  
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50 mechanism

2011-10-10 Thread Steven Medved

The spring barrels come as a set so you have to swap the barrel(s) and the 
winder.  The single spring winder has 4 screws the double has 2 screws and most 
boards are dilled universal.  You still have to swap the hook that holds the 
spring that goes from the horn to the motor board.   The DD motors are the same 
with the exception of the spring which the DD motor does not have so you can 
make a single spring motor a double, even some Edison machines are found with 
double springs when the came with singles. Steve
  From: b...@taney.com
 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:18:41 -0500
 To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50   
 mechanism
 
 My understanding is you don't even need to swap mechanisms, you can install a 
 second spring barrel in a model 30 and have the same result.
 Bill
 
 On Oct 10, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Bob Maffit wrote:
 
  Phono Folks:
  
  
  
  I have heard in the past that one can take an Edison Amberola 50 mechanism
  and drop it in an Amberola 30 case with no problem, and have a machine (sort
  of a hotrod which has the attributes' of the longer playing 50 in a smaller
  case. Is this so?
  
  
  
  What modifications if any, is needed to do this? Discussion regarding this
  matter would be appreciated.
  
  
  
  later
  
  
  
  Bob
  
  ___
  Phono-L mailing list
  http://phono-l.org
 
 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.org
  
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50 mechanism

2011-10-10 Thread Bob Maffit
Steve:

Thanks

Bob

-Original Message-
From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Medved
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 1:38 PM
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50
mechanism


You cannot use two 30 barrels as the 50 barrels come as an assembly and you
need the 50 winder.  The springs are the same, but the double spring 50 and
the double spring DD barrels come as one unit and that one 50 unit cannot be
made from two 30 barrels. Steve
  From: maff...@bresnan.net
 To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:36:33 -0600
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50
mechanism
 
 Steven:
 
 Would using 2 Amberola 30 Spring Barrels be the same as the 50 spring
 barrels?
 
 If not what would be the problem  what changes or modifications would be
 needed other than adding the 2 screw winder to accommodate the space
change
 from 1 to 2 barrels?
 
 Later
 
 Bob
 -Original Message-
 From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org]
On
 Behalf Of Steven Medved
 Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 11:48 AM
 To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50
 mechanism
 
 
 The spring barrels come as a set so you have to swap the barrel(s) and the
 winder.  The single spring winder has 4 screws the double has 2 screws and
 most boards are dilled universal.  You still have to swap the hook that
 holds the spring that goes from the horn to the motor board.   The DD
motors
 are the same with the exception of the spring which the DD motor does not
 have so you can make a single spring motor a double, even some Edison
 machines are found with double springs when the came with singles. Steve
   From: b...@taney.com
  Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:18:41 -0500
  To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
  Subject: Re: [Phono-L] converting an Amberola 30 to using a Amberola 50
 mechanism
  
  My understanding is you don't even need to swap mechanisms, you can
 install a second spring barrel in a model 30 and have the same result.
  Bill
  
  On Oct 10, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Bob Maffit wrote:
  
   Phono Folks:
   
   
   
   I have heard in the past that one can take an Edison Amberola 50
 mechanism
   and drop it in an Amberola 30 case with no problem, and have a machine
 (sort
   of a hotrod which has the attributes' of the longer playing 50 in a
 smaller
   case. Is this so?
   
   
   
   What modifications if any, is needed to do this? Discussion regarding
 this
   matter would be appreciated.
   
   
   
   later
   
   
   
   Bob
   
   ___
   Phono-L mailing list
   http://phono-l.org
  
  ___
  Phono-L mailing list
  http://phono-l.org
 
 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.org
 
 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.org
  
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org

___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


[Phono-L] Grille for Edison A-250

2011-10-10 Thread bruce78rpm
Does anyone have the link for the supplier who makes and sell good quality 
reproduction grilles for an Edison A-250 Disc Phonograph ? I can't seem to 
locate it 
on line. Thanks in advance for any help that is forthcoming. 

Bruce 
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


Re: [Phono-L] Grille for Edison A-250

2011-10-10 Thread John Maeder
It's Brian Krapes. 
http://www.z50partsandphonographspecialty.com/Order_Forms.html

 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:03:24 +
 From: bruce78...@comcast.net
 To: Phono-L@oldcrank.org
 Subject: [Phono-L] Grille for Edison A-250
 
 Does anyone have the link for the supplier who makes and sell good quality 
 reproduction grilles for an Edison A-250 Disc Phonograph ? I can't seem to 
 locate it 
 on line. Thanks in advance for any help that is forthcoming. 
 
 Bruce 
 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.org
  
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


Re: [Phono-L] Grille for Edison A-250

2011-10-10 Thread brice paris
Bruce   Try Tom Rutkowski at gril...@gmail.com  he also has a webb site at 
www.grampstreasures.com.  He has made me several grills including , 1A/DD250 in 
quartered oak and a puritian curved both way quatered oak.  They are perfect 
and you can not tell from original whne refinished.   I highly recommend him.   
brice
 
From: bruce78...@comcast.net bruce78...@comcast.net
To: Phono-L Phono-L@oldcrank.org
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 5:03 PM
Subject: [Phono-L] Grille for Edison A-250

Does anyone have the link for the supplier who makes and sell good quality 
reproduction grilles for an Edison A-250 Disc Phonograph ? I can't seem to 
locate it 
on line. Thanks in advance for any help that is forthcoming. 

Bruce 
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


Re: [Phono-L] Grille for Edison A-250

2011-10-10 Thread bruce78rpm
That's the fellow. That website has been discontinued, but I sent him an email 
inquiry and hopefully he is still in business. 

Bruce 

- Original Message -
From: brice paris antqf...@yahoo.com 
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org 
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:15:23 PM 
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Grille for Edison A-250 

Bruce Try Tom Rutkowski at gril...@gmail.com he also has a webb site at 
www.grampstreasures.com. He has made me several grills including , 1A/DD250 in 
quartered oak and a puritian curved both way quatered oak. They are perfect and 
you can not tell from original whne refinished. I highly recommend him. brice 

From: bruce78...@comcast.net bruce78...@comcast.net 
To: Phono-L Phono-L@oldcrank.org 
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 5:03 PM 
Subject: [Phono-L] Grille for Edison A-250 

Does anyone have the link for the supplier who makes and sell good quality 
reproduction grilles for an Edison A-250 Disc Phonograph ? I can't seem to 
locate it 
on line. Thanks in advance for any help that is forthcoming. 

Bruce 
___ 
Phono-L mailing list 
http://phono-l.org 
___ 
Phono-L mailing list 
http://phono-l.org 
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org


Re: [Phono-L] Victor III is Working! Thank you!

2011-10-10 Thread Vinyl Visions

The machine is great... but the music leaves a little to be desired. Try some 
20's Jazz or Blues. Coon Sanders or Irving Aaronson and his Commanders would be 
great or even some Helen Kane (Betty Boop) to liven things up. Check out 
RedHotJazz.com for some ideas... Just a suggestion - everyone has different 
tastes.

 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:06:37 -0700
 From: riccib...@yahoo.com
 To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Victor III is Working! Thank you!
 
 Hello Everyone,
 Thank you again for helping us to solve our motor issue and for all the 
 comments about whether or not to restore our Victor II. It looks like we will 
 take our time searching for parts and restore the II. We will let you all 
 know how it comes out.  The Victor III was our first outside horn Victor 
 machine so we are so happy to have it working. There is an old repair to the 
 spear tip oak horn that we will need to deal with and we would like to have 
 the tone arm re-plated but for now we are just happy to hear it play! :)
 Below are links to a video of our now working Victor III and our Home Model D 
 with wood grained metal cygnet playing our first ever royal purple cylinder. 
 Thank you again for all of your help! 
 Melissa
 Victor III
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHjh_Xfw1n0 
 Home Model D
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lADxtbyrJY 
  
 
 --- On Sun, 10/9/11, Vinyl Visions vinyl.visi...@live.com wrote:
 
 From: Vinyl Visions vinyl.visi...@live.com
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Victor III is Working! Thank you!
 To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Date: Sunday, October 9, 2011, 9:49 PM
 
 
 You should be able to find the parts to complete it for several hundred 
 dollars. Since you only have $75 in it... I would restore it - it's 
 definitely worth more than the parts should cost and a Vic II is a great 
 machine.
 
  Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:37:47 -0700
  From: riccib...@yahoo.com
  To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
  Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Victor III is Working! Thank you!
  
  Hello Everyone,
  Thank you so much for the outpouring of support last weekend when our new 
  Victor III motor was giving us so much trouble! 
  We went to an antiques auction last Monday and won a very poor Victor II 
  for only $75.00. We replaced our Victor III drive gear with the one on the 
  Victor II and presto! 
  It turns out we have a bad drive gear on the Victor III!!  It now works 
  like a charm! Many people guessed that the gear was maybe an older 
  replacement part or poor reproduction and it turns out that is most likely 
  the case!
  The wooden horn sounds fantastic and it is so loud! I am going to post a 
  video of it playing tomorrow. 
  The Victor II needs a new tone arm, back bracket, crank, connector for the 
  horn and now a new drive gear in order to be restored. The case is okay and 
  since we only paid $75.00 for it, we are tempted to put the work and parts 
  into it to get it running again. Do you think it is worth fixing up or are 
  the parts going to cost more than it is worth eventually? Your opinions are 
  greatly appreciated.
  Thank you again for all the help and advice!
  Melissa
  --- On Mon, 10/3/11, Melissa Ricci riccib...@yahoo.com wrote:
  
  From: Melissa Ricci riccib...@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Clarification of Victor III Motor Question
  To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
  Date: Monday, October 3, 2011, 12:00 PM
  
  Hello Everyone,
   
  First let me say that I truly appreciate all the great suggestions and help 
  offered for our problem. I am writing this to everyone because I have 
  received these same suggestions from many, many people. So I would like to 
  clarify what we have already tried.
   
  We have already:
   
  1. Adjusted the drive gear up and down (above, below and on the center of 
  the worm gear) to try to get it to mesh with the governor worm gear better.
  2. Made sure that no set screws or parts of the governor are hitting 
  anything when in operation.
  3. Made sure the ball bearing is present in it's spot.
  4. Turned the drive gear upside down.
  5. All part are clean, lubricated and move freely with no friction until 
  the drive gear is mated with the governor worm gear. 
   
  I hope this helps. Thank you again for all the suggestions. Please keep 
  them coming! If you have an idea, we would love to hear it. We are going to 
  look at it more when we get home from work this evening.
   
  Thank you,
  Melissa
  
  --- On Mon, 10/3/11, tuban...@aol.com tuban...@aol.com wrote:
  
  
  From: tuban...@aol.com tuban...@aol.com
  Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Victor III Motor Question
  To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
  Date: Monday, October 3, 2011, 11:02 AM
  
  
  Get or borrow an adjustable strobe light to visually freeze the parts at  
  the time of the click.  I have solved a few hard ones like this with a  
  strobe.
  
  Don
  
  
  In a message dated 10/3/2011 8:48:07 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
  lhera...@bu.edu writes:
  
  And/or  does the bull gear and spring