Re: [PHP-DEV] Scope and namespace

2003-03-13 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Not really, we can't.  You can have functions inside a namespace, that 
> don't have a class entry attached to them.
> I guess we could create some hybrid of the namespace and ce, but it would 
> end up being ugly, with many more extra checks.

Suppose we left only one field, scope. For those functions not attached
to a class, we'd have scope->type = ZEND_NAMESPACE, and for methods we'd
have scope->type = ZEND_USER_CLASS or something. Unless, you mean that
you want to keep track of both theh namespace and the class for methods.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Everything should be made as simple
as possible, but not simpler."
  -- Albert Einstein

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP-DEV] Scope and namespace

2003-03-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Seeing as how we now have only one-level deep namespaces and classes
(which is another topic), does it make sense to have both 'scope' and
'ns' fields in zend_op_array structure? I would think they can be merged
into one.

I still want to hear from Zeev about lack of nested classes/namespaces..
maybe in Montreal. :)

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] Moderate PHP-DEV

2003-03-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tom Sommer wrote:
> I agree, I think changing the name is the way to go, and to remove it from 
> the public mailing lists (or put it under another category)
> 
> Don't forget that mailing lists is not the whole problem, many also use 
> news groups :)
> 
> php.internal
> php.coredev
> 
> or something like that
> 
> Personally I just lurk here :)

Ugh. Let's just change the name to php-george-w-bush-lovers. Hardly
anyone will subscribe voluntarily. Problem solved.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* The best source is the source code. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /tests/classes interface_class.phpt interface_doubled.phpt interface_implemented.phpt interface_instantiate.phpt interface_member.phpt interface_method.phpt interface_method_final.phpt interface_method_private.phpt interface_must_be_implemented.phpt

2003-03-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
> >interface JAZ {}
> >interface FOO {}
> >interface BAR extends FOO {}
> >class foo implements FOO {}
> 
> This works even though i do not like  extends FOO.

Why? Both C# and Java (AFAIR) allow interfaces to extend other
interfaces.

> This doesn't - i hope - trying -
> 
>  interface a {}
> interface b {}
> class c implements (a,b) {}
> /usr/src/php4-HEAD/-(4) : Parse error - parse error, unexpected '(', 
> expecting T_STRING or T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM or T_NAMESPACE_NAME
> 
> You have to do
> 
> class foobar extends foo implements BAR,JAZ {}

I think we should disallow classes extending interfaces. Only
'implements' should be supported.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

We all have photographic memories, it's just
that some of us don't have any film.

--
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] Moderate PHP-DEV

2003-03-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> It doesn't.  They are free to send the mail to whomever they like, even
> put up a website with their ideas.  They are not censured, they are
> restricted.  In what country can you walk onto the floor of the congress
> (parliament) without sponsorship?  Entirely open infrastructures are
> great when the community is small/growing, but when the community is
> this size, we need to be pragmatic and not lose the forest for the
> trees.

Amen. +1.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"I still find each day too short for all the thoughts I want to think, 
all the walks I want to take, all the books I want to read, and all the
friends I want to see." 
  -John Burroughs

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /tests/classes interface_class.phpt interface_doubled.phpt interface_implemented.phpt interface_instantiate.phpt interface_member.phpt interface_method.phpt interface_method_final.phpt interface_method_private.phpt interface_must_be_implemented.phpt

2003-03-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>   I have seen extended interfaces quite often in the Java world.
> 
>   IIRC, the following code currently runs without problems and it should
>   stay that way, if it does not harm us in any way:
> 
>  interface Foo {}
> interface Bar extends Foo {}
> class FooBar implements Bar {}
> ?>

I wasn't talking about interfaces extending interfaces - that is
perfectly fine. I was saying that "class blah extends " and
"class blah implements " is confusing.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

When we eliminate the impossible, whatever remains,
however improbable, must be true. -- Sherlock Holmes

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /tests/classes interface_class.phpt interface_doubled.phpt interface_implemented.phpt interface_instantiate.phpt interface_member.phpt interface_method.phpt interface_method_final.phpt interface_method_private.phpt interface_must_be_implemented.phpt

2003-03-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
> a class can only extend ONE class/interface but it can implement multiple
> interfaces. If you ask me i would not allow extending interfaces at all.

That's what I was thinking too.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

For every complex problem, there is a solution
that is simple, neat, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken

--
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /tests/classes interface_class.phpt interface_doubled.phpt interface_implemented.phpt interface_instantiate.phpt interface_member.phpt interface_method.phpt interface_method_final.phpt interface_method_private.phpt interface_must_be_implemented.phpt

2003-03-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> helly Tue Mar 11 19:10:00 2003 EDT
> 
>   Added files: 
> /php4/tests/classes   interface_class.phpt interface_doubled.phpt 
>   interface_implemented.phpt 
>   interface_instantiate.phpt 
>   interface_member.phpt interface_method.phpt 
>   interface_method_final.phpt 
>   interface_method_private.phpt 
>   interface_must_be_implemented.phpt 
>   Log:
>   Added some interface tests

I have 2 questions:

1. Do the interface functions have to be explicitly specified as
abstract?

   interface Foo {
function bar();
   }

Because this runs fine for me with no errors.

1. What is the difference between the following:

   interface Foo {
   }
 
   class Boo extends Foo {
   }

and

   class Zoo implements Foo {
   }

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"In this age, which believes that there is a short cut to everything,
 the greatest lesson to be learned is that the most difficult way is, in
 the long run, the easiest."
-Henry Miller, The Books in My Life

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP-DEV] Segfault

2003-03-11 Thread Andrei Zmievski
With the latest ZE2:



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck, 
is probably the day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners."
- Ernst Jan Plugge

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard var.c

2003-03-10 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>   Can I have my get_object_handle() function, too, pretty please? ;-)
> 
>   Besides, IIRC, Andi said "back then" that the object handle is not
>   unique.

But it's still useful.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong."
   -- Wolfgang Pauli

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] iterating objects with interfaces

2003-03-10 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Very cool. :)

On Sun, 09 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  i've just done the first step for a new extension which shall make use
> of interfaces newly implemented in ZE2.
> 
> currently the extension implements the namespace "spl" and the
> interfaces "spl_foreach", "spl_forward" and "spl_key". A class that
> implements these can be used in a foreach() call. This work without
> even modifying the engine, i simply hook on the necessary calls.
> 
> References:
> 
> The documentation of the interfaces and their usage:
> http://marcus-boerger.de/php/ext/spl/spl.phps
> 
> The extension code:
> http://marcus-boerger.de/php/ext/spl/spl-20030309.tar.bz2
> 
> And a testfile to demonstrate it works (beside shutdown):
> http://marcus-boerger.de/php/ext/spl/tests/foreach.phpt
> 
> Of corse i am curious about other meanings :-)
> Otherwise i wouldn`t have posted here, would i?
> 
> regards
> marcus
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Marcus Börger - Looking for all sorts of freelance work - just ask...
> 
> Did i help you? Consider a gift:
> http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/wishlist/ho722v0rg1u0
> --
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List 
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* I don't mind going nowhere as long as it's an interesting path. *

--
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: New CLI switches (was [PHP-DEV] Using CLI as a shell)

2003-02-04 Thread Andrei Zmievski
> > I don't like this. IMO all those switches make it messy... and I really
> > don't see the advantage of this over -r. PHP isn't supposed to be used
> > like this. If it things get too complicated for -r, write a separate
> > script instead of hacking up the command line. 
> > -1 on this.
> 
> Yeah, I still dont see the real advantages here.

Same here.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Don't sweat it -- it's not real life.  It's only ones and zeroes."
   -- Gene Spafford

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: zend_API.c

2003-02-03 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003, Harald Radi wrote:
> if $obj is an overloaded object $obj->method() would directly call the native
> implementation of method(), if it is a pear object, $obj->method() will result
> in a userspace method invokation that actually calls the native implementation
> adding a further level of indirection for each method call. for something like
> while($mysqli->fetch_row()) {} this could be an issue (though i don't know how
> much of an issue).

It's a difference between doing a call_user_function_ex() and invoking
the handler directly.

> you're missing the point. if i invoke a method i don't expect it to print a
> warning, i expect it to throw an exception (most likely) and imho this is the
> prevailing opinion in oo.

No, I'm not missing the point. How is this going to be achieved with
your approach? You have the same function handling both function and OO
API? Is it going to throw exception based on how it's called?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

The 3 great virtues of a programmer:
Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris. 
--Larry Wall

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: zend_API.c

2003-02-03 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003, Harald Radi wrote:
> because then we have userland -> ze2 oo -> userland -> php function instead of
> userland -> php function. maybe that's negligable, i didn't benchmark it.

Hmm, care to explain this? It should just be object call -> PHP function
call.
 
> exception vs. warning.

The underlying function can still print warning. No exceptions needed.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Music expresses that which can not be said
 and on which it is impossible to be silent."
 -Victor Hugo

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: zend_API.c

2003-02-03 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003, Harald Radi wrote:
> that would be a big step back again for several reasons:
> 
> -) if done in c code you have one function serving as function and method,
> thus you have the same order/amount of arguments for the function _and_ the
> method.

I don't see this as an issue - the OO API in PEAR would be a simple
wrapper for the function.

> -) if something changes in the code, it automatically changes for the function
> and the method, if we had a pear class someone would have to maintain that.

See above.

> -) we finally brought down the cost of handling object beeing virtually the
> same as for handling resources, so why should we try that hard to make the
> damn thing slow again ?

You are proving my point - the cost of handling objects is minimal, so
why not do it in userland?

> -) the errorhandling issue is not (easily) coverable if we simple wrap the
> funcitons as pear classes.

What errorhandling issue?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: zend_API.c

2003-02-03 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003, Harald Radi wrote:
> because people prefer either the one or the other way to manipulate things.
> people not familiar with oo will most likely not not stick with the oo api nor
> will they be happy if they're forced to use it. on the other hand people
> writing their scripts entirely oo will propably hate it to mix function calls
> with method invokations all the time.
> furthermore functions are supposed to issue warnings and methods are supposed
> to throw exceptions, two entirely different concepts of error handling where
> neitherone is preferable.
> 
> so the question is to give rope or not.

Ugh, so following your line of reasoning we should rewrite all
extensions to provide both function and OO apis? A better approach would
be to have extensions provide only function API and then write a PEAR
class to expose them as objects.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* My wishlist: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/wishlist/2Q2DIPY7BZLSH/ *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: zend_API.c

2003-02-03 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003, Harald Radi wrote:
> it is not yet used anywhere, so we can still change it however we want. if you
> think it doesn't belong there we can even remove it, but i already needed that
> functionality in 3+ extensions and i guess you even will like it for your gtk
> stuff. i even have to review the thing as i don't think it that it works as
> expected right now, but i was in a hurry yesterday and made a skeleton for
> georgs mysqli extension which needed that functions.

Continuing from IRC discussion: why do we need extensions that provide
both function and object APIs for the same functionality? Are we trying
to emulate Perl or something? To me, that is introducing more confusion
for the sake of flexibility. I am strongly of the opinion that we should
stick to having it one way or the other.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Music expresses that which can not be said
 and on which it is impossible to be silent."
 -Victor Hugo

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: zend_API.c

2003-02-03 Thread Andrei Zmievski
> 2003-02-02  Harald Radi  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> * zend_API.c
>   zend_API.h:
>   extend the parameter parsing API by two functions
>   for parsing method parameters with automatic
>   detection if the function was called as such or as
>   a class method (with a valid this ptr).
>   if called as a function the first parameter has to be
>   the object it is operating on, if called as a method
>   this is used.

Would have been nice of you to talk with me about this first, since I
maintain that code.
 
-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Use the source, Luke. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] (fwd) Re: realpath(), stat() and dcache on FreeBSD

2003-01-26 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Rasmus,

I've asked one of our FreeBSD gurus to shed some light on the issue you
brought with the slow performance of realpath() and stat() calls on that
OS. Hope this makes sense. ;)

-Andrei

-- 
Andrei Zmievski Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Front End Software Engineer Web:http://www.fastsearch.com/
Fast Search & Transfer Inc  Phone:  781-304-2493
93 Worcester Street Fax:781-304-2410
Wellesley MA 02481-9181, USAMain:   781-304-2400

--- Begin Message ---
> Hi Tor,
> 
> I have been told that you are the FreeBSD guru at FAST, so I wanted to
> check on something with you. A thread came up recently on php-dev
> mailing list which discussed performance issues with using include()
> and require() calls in PHP on FreeBSD systems. It seems that FreeBSD
> does not implement a dcache like Linux does, so doing realpath() and
> stat() calls is very expensive. Obviously, we use PHP on FreeBSD to run
> AlltheWeb.com and it affects us as well.

FreeBSD has a namei cache, the implementation for 4.7-RELEASE is in
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c.

namei() calls lookup() which calls VOP_LOOKUP().  For ufs vnodes, that
means that vfs_cache_lookup is called.  vfs_cache_lookup calls
VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP() on cache misses.  For ufs vnodes, that means that
ufs_lookup() is called.

>From the namei comment in /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:

 * Overall outline of namei:
 *
 *  copy in name
 *  get starting directory
 *  while (!done && !error) {
 *  call lookup to search path.
 *  if symbolic link, massage name in buffer and continue
 *  }


>From the lookup() comment in /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:

 * Overall outline of lookup:
 *
 * dirloop:
 *  identify next component of name at ndp->ni_ptr
 *  handle degenerate case where name is null string
 *  if .. and crossing mount points and on mounted filesys, find parent
 *  call VOP_LOOKUP routine for next component name
 *  directory vnode returned in ni_dvp, unlocked unless LOCKPARENT set
 *  component vnode returned in ni_vp (if it exists), locked.
 *  if result vnode is mounted on and crossing mount points,
 *  find mounted on vnode
 *  if more components of name, do next level at dirloop
 *  return the answer in ni_vp, locked if LOCKLEAF set
 *  if LOCKPARENT set, return locked parent in ni_dvp
 *  if WANTPARENT set, return unlocked parent in ni_dvp

>From the vfs_cache_lookup() comment in /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cache.c:

 * Perform canonical checks and cache lookup and pass on to filesystem
 * through the vop_cachedlookup only if needed.


>From the ufs_lookup() comment in /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_lookup.c:

 * This routine is actually used as VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP method, and the
 * filesystem employs the generic vfs_cache_lookup() as VOP_LOOKUP
 * method.
 *
 * vfs_cache_lookup() performs the following for us:
 *  check that it is a directory
 *  check accessibility of directory
 *  check for modification attempts on read-only mounts
 *  if name found in cache
 *  if at end of path and deleting or creating
 *  drop it
 *   else
 *  return name.
 *  return VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP()
 *
 * Overall outline of ufs_lookup:
 *
 *  search for name in directory, to found or notfound
 * notfound:
 *  if creating, return locked directory, leaving info on available slots
 *  else return error
 * found:
 *  if at end of path and deleting, return information to allow delete
 *  if at end of path and rewriting (RENAME and LOCKPARENT), lock target
 *inode and return info to allow rewrite
 *  if not at end, add name to cache; if at end and neither creating
 *nor deleting, add name to cache


The command
sysctl vfs.cache
outputs some statistics about the namei cache and can be used to measure
cache hit ratio.

The command
  systat -vmstat
provides some semi-real-time statistics.

- Tor Egge



--- End Message ---
-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard filters.c

2003-01-07 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> moriyoshi Mon Jan  6 19:03:26 2003 EDT
> 
>   Modified files:  
> /php4/ext/standardfilters.c 
>   Log:
>   Implemented string.base64 stream filter
>   @- Implemented string.base64 stream filter. (Moriyoshi)

Couldn't you have used parts of ext/standard/base64.c here instead of
duplicating code?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

The church is near but the road is icy;
the bar is far away but I will walk carefully. -- Russian proverb

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/iconv iconv.c

2003-01-03 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> moriyoshi Fri Jan  3 00:14:34 2003 EDT
> 
>   Modified files:  
> /php4/ext/iconv   iconv.c 
>   Log:
>   MFB: fixed shift-out sequence unawareness issue

Please, fix stuff in HEAD and *then* merge into the branch.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

Linux is like living in a teepee.
No Windows, no Gates, Apache in house.
- Usenet signature

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4(PHP_4_3) / acinclude.m4 configure.in /main streams.c

2003-01-02 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 01 Jan 2003, Wez Furlong wrote:
> wez   Wed Jan  1 04:55:38 2003 EDT
> 
>   Modified files:  (Branch: PHP_4_3)
> /php4 acinclude.m4 configure.in 
> /php4/mainstreams.c 
>   Log:
>   Workaround a bug in glibc 2.2.9x and later that causes it not to seek to EOF
>   for stdio streams opened with a mode of "a+".

Wez,

How about implementing those persistent STDIO streams for 4.3.1?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Think digital, act analog. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2003-01-02 Thread Andrei Zmievski
I'll check on this.

On Wed, 01 Jan 2003, Wez Furlong wrote:
> Is there some magic that needs to be done to rotate the ChangeLog?
> By this I mean:
> 
> gzip ChangeLog
> mv ChangeLog.gz ChangeLog2002.gz
> touch ChangeLog
> cvs add -kb ChangeLog2002.gz
> cvs ci -m "rotate changelog" ChangeLog ChangeLog2002.gz
> 
> It seems the most recent entry in the log is from the 29th December, and
> I wonder if some script needs to be kicked to update the log.
> 
> --Wez.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List 
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

What's hard, in hacking as in fiction,
is not the writing, it's deciding what to write.
-- Neal Stephenson

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Happy New Year!

2002-12-31 Thread Andrei Zmievski
This has been a great year for our community. We have attracted
wonderful new developers, such as Edin, Ilia, Wez, and others,
significantly improved our little language, and knocked back a few beers
at various conferences. In this coming year, I wish us all to realize
some of our dreams, make new friends, learn and share our knowledge,
seize the day, and have much fun altogether.

Have a Happy New Year! I'm heading out tonight to celebrate. Until 2003!

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

What's hard, in hacking as in fiction,
is not the writing, it's deciding what to write.
-- Neal Stephenson

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] Merging into PHP_4_3

2002-12-30 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> It would be nice that bug fixes that are being merged into PHP_4_3 branch
> are documented in its NEWS file. In that way we can realease a new version
> rather quickly.

I concur. Please remember to update NEWS on the branch.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Perl - the only language that looks the same
before and after RSA encryption." -Keith Bostic 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] option to start in PHP mode

2002-12-30 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Why don't we have the ?> problem? You can also use ?> in eval()'s. Anyway, 
> Rasmus mentioned that a switch already exists although I don't think it's 
> such a great idea due to the previously mentioned reasons. I think all PHP 
> code should be consistent.

Well, -r switch requires the PHP code as an argument. It doesn't read a
file. 

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"The human brain is a wonderful thing. It starts working the moment you
are born, and never stops until you stand up to speak in public. "
 -- Sir George Jessel

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] option to start in PHP mode

2002-12-27 Thread Andrei Zmievski
We've talked about this in the past, but let's bring it up again. It is
a bit awkward to use CLI when it requires those  tags. We
should probably have a command-line option that tells the parser to
start in PHP mode instead of HTML/text. Any thoughts on this?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* What were the first 15 billion years of the universe like for you? *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.3.0 released

2002-12-27 Thread Andrei Zmievski
The PHP developers are pleased to announce the immediate availability of
PHP 4.3.0, the latest and greatest version of this extremely popular and
widely used scripting language.

This release contains a multitude of changes, bug fixes and improvements
over the previous one, PHP 4.2.3. It further elevates PHP's standing as
a serious contender in the general purpose scripting language arena. The
highlights of this release are listed below:

 Command line interface

 This version finalizes the separate command line interface (CLI) that
 can be used for developing shell and desktop applications (with
 PHP-GTK). The CLI is always built, but installed automatically only if
 CGI version is disabled via --disable-cgi switch during configuration.
 Alternatively, one can use make install-cli target. On Windows CLI can
 be found in cli folder.

 CLI has a number of differences compared to other server APIs. More
 information can be found here:

 * PHP Manual: Using PHP from the command line
   http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.commandline.php


 Streams

 A very important "under the hood" feature is the streams API. It
 introduces a unified approach to the handling of files, pipes, sockets,
 and other I/O resources in the PHP core and extensions.

 What this means for users is that any I/O function that works with
 streams (and that is almost all of them) can access built-in protocols,
 such as HTTP/HTTPS and FTP/FTPS, as well as custom protocols registered
 from PHP scripts. For more information please see:

 * List of Supported Protocols/Wrappers
   http://www.php.net/manual/en/wrappers.php

 * Streams API
   http://www.php.net/manual/en/streams.php


 New build system

 This iteration of the build system, among other things, replaces the
 slow recursive make with one global Makefile and eases the integration
 of proper dependencies. Automake is only needed for its aclocal tool.
 The build process is now more portable and less resource-consuming.


 PHP 4.3.0 has many improvements and enhancements:

 * GD library is now bundled with the distribution and it is
   recommended to always use the bundled version
 * vpopmail and cybermut extensions are moved to PECL
 * several deprecated extensions (aspell, ccvs, cybercash, icap) and
   SAPIs (fastcgi, fhttpd) are removed
 * speed improvements in a variety of string functions
 * Apache2  filter is improved, but is still considered experimental
   (use with PHP in prefork and not worker (thread) model since many
   extensions based on external libraries are not thread safe)
 * various security fixes (imap, mysql, mcrypt, file upload, gd, etc)
 * new SAPI for embedding PHP in other applications (experimental)
 * much better test suite
 * significant improvements in dba, gd, pcntl, sybase, and xslt
   extensions
 * debug_backtrace() should help with debugging
 * error messages now contain URLs linking to pages describing the
   error or function in question
 * Zend Engine has some fixes and minor performance enhancements
 * and TONS of other fixes, updates, new functions, etc

For the full list of changes in PHP 4.3.0, see the NEWS file
(http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-4.php).

Thank you to all who coded, tested, and documented this release!

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"It's an emergent property of connected human minds that
they create things for one another's pleasure and to conquer
their uneasy sense of being too alone." -- Eben Moglen


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: php4.3.rc4 - things that wont compile under IRIX

2002-12-26 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Joerg Behrens wrote:
> We have some buggy Code left in the current rc.
> 
> 1. We have some bogus warnings at the end of the configure
> /config.status[2063]: 6: bad file unit number
> ./config.status[2064]: 6: bad file unit number

Not sure about this one.

> 2.Ext/exif
> cc-1133 cc: ERROR File = /usr2/MIPS/php-4.3.0RC4/ext/exif/exif.c, Line =
> 1623
>   Expression must be a modifiable lvalue.
> Sascha have already fix this... but looks like it is not merged to the rc4

It was merged after RC4.

> 2 Ext/mime_magic
> cc-1133 cc: ERROR File =
> /usr2/MIPS/php-4.3.0RC4/ext/mime_magic/mime_magic.c, Line = 361
>   Expression must be a modifiable lvalue.
> Stefan Esser lay hand on this but Andy didnt accepted his fix

It's merged in already.

> 3. Ext/mysql
> cc-1133 cc: ERROR File =
> /usr2/MIPS/php-4.3.0RC4/ext/mysql/libmysql/my_tempnam.c, Line = 99
>   Expression must be a modifiable lvalue.
>   ((char **)environ)=(char**)temp_env;  /* May give warning
> */
>   ^
> cc-1133 cc: ERROR File =
> /usr2/MIPS/php-4.3.0RC4/ext/mysql/libmysql/my_tempnam.c, Line = 105
>   Expression must be a modifiable lvalue.

I'm not touching libmysql..

> 4. Ext/standard
> cc-1020 cc: ERROR File =
> /usr2/MIPS/php-4.3.0RC4/ext/standard/flock_compat.c, Line = 59 and 61,63,70
> Look like there is a header file missing. Derick fixed that in cvs Head but
> forget to merge ?

I merged in the fix.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

The main reason Santa is so jolly is because he knows where
all the bad girls live.  -- George Carlin

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Preparing 4.3.0

2002-12-26 Thread Andrei Zmievski
I plan to update the version in appropriate files and the date in NEWS
and tag the tree tonight. After that, Edin and Phil should make their
Windows magic work and create the Win32 .zip and installer files.  I
will set the release date for Dec 28.

Please do not commit anything to the tree after it's been tagged!

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4(PHP_4_3) /ext/standard array.c

2002-12-26 Thread Andrei Zmievski
That's fine.

On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> > > Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Was this fix entirely necessary? It didn't seems like a showstopper bug.
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > First, I apologize I didn't ask you for permission before committing my 
> > > patch.
> > > Actually it might not be a showstopper, but I believe this should be 
> > > fixed before the release,
> > > because it's a bug that causes segfault in usual usage.
> > 
> > I thought segfault happened only on HEAD, not on the branch?
> 
> Sorry, it was just my mistake of fact. So is the fix really desirable?
> 
> Moriyoshi
> 
> > -Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
> > * Power corrupts. Atomic power corrupts atomically. *
> > 
> > -- 
> > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Freedom comes when you learn to let go.
 Creation comes when you learn to say no."
  -madonna 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4(PHP_4_3) /ext/standard array.c

2002-12-26 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> 
> >Was this fix entirely necessary? It didn't seems like a showstopper bug.
> > 
> >
> First, I apologize I didn't ask you for permission before committing my 
> patch.
> Actually it might not be a showstopper, but I believe this should be 
> fixed before the release,
> because it's a bug that causes segfault in usual usage.

I thought segfault happened only on HEAD, not on the branch?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Power corrupts. Atomic power corrupts atomically. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4(PHP_4_3) /ext/standard array.c

2002-12-26 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Was this fix entirely necessary? It didn't seems like a showstopper bug.

On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> moriyoshi Wed Dec 25 15:00:14 2002 EDT
> 
>   Modified files:  (Branch: PHP_4_3)
> /php4/ext/standardarray.c 
>   Log:
>   Fixed bug #21182
>   
>   
> Index: php4/ext/standard/array.c
> diff -u php4/ext/standard/array.c:1.199.2.9 php4/ext/standard/array.c:1.199.2.10
> --- php4/ext/standard/array.c:1.199.2.9   Fri Dec  6 12:36:25 2002
> +++ php4/ext/standard/array.c Wed Dec 25 15:00:12 2002
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> +--+
>  */
>  
> -/* $Id: array.c,v 1.199.2.9 2002/12/06 17:36:25 iliaa Exp $ */
> +/* $Id: array.c,v 1.199.2.10 2002/12/25 20:00:12 moriyoshi Exp $ */
>  
>  #include "php.h"
>  #include "php_ini.h"
> @@ -1429,18 +1429,17 @@
>   array_init(return_value);
>  
>   if (Z_TYPE_PP(zlow)==IS_STRING && Z_TYPE_PP(zhigh)==IS_STRING) {
> - char *low, *high;
> - convert_to_string_ex(zlow);
> - convert_to_string_ex(zhigh);
> - low = Z_STRVAL_PP(zlow);
> - high = Z_STRVAL_PP(zhigh);
> - if (*low>*high) {
> - for (; *low >= *high; (*low)--) {
> - add_next_index_stringl(return_value, low, 1, 1);
> + unsigned char low, high;
> + low = *((unsigned char *)Z_STRVAL_PP(zlow));
> + high = *((unsigned char *)Z_STRVAL_PP(zhigh));
> + 
> + if (low>high) {
> + for (; low >= high; (low)--) {
> + add_next_index_stringl(return_value, (char *)&low, 1, 
>1);
>   }   
>   } else {
> - for (; *low <= *high; (*low)++) {
> - add_next_index_stringl(return_value, low, 1, 1);
> + for (; low <= high; (low)++) {
> + add_next_index_stringl(return_value, (char *)&low, 1, 
>1);
>   }   
>   }
>   } else {
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"C combines all the power of assembly language with
 all the ease of use of assembly language" -- trad

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] CLI and CGI defaults

2002-12-24 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the current behavior of cli/cgi defaults, is not really intuitive, allthough 
>correctly mentioned in the NEWS entry.
> 
> Attached is a very simple patch, that will resolve that issue.
> 
> Specifically:
> if you specify --enable-cli and don't specify --enable-cgi, then CLI will be 
>installed and built. The current behavior, is that CGI will be installed and built, 
>which will (and already has) lead to confusion.

Isn't the current behavior to always build CLI unless --disable-cli is
specified but not install it unless install-cli target is used?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Programming is an art form that fights back. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] RC4: ground rules

2002-12-21 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> 
> Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Moriyoshi,
> > 
> > I appreciate your effort here, but it seems that while this approach is
> > more flexible, it is also bound to have more complicated. I have decided
  ^^
Sorry about this grammar infelicity - it's a result of rewriting the
message.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

The church is near but the road is icy;
the bar is far away but I will walk carefully. -- Russian proverb

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] RC4: ground rules

2002-12-21 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Andrei I think that we should include this small change in 4.3.0. It cannot
> possibly affect anything in the negative way and I will make sure that the
> files are correctly placed in the distribution.

Ok, go ahead with this.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Who is Ray and why would we want to selectively trace him? *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] RC4: ground rules

2002-12-21 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Moriyoshi,

I appreciate your effort here, but it seems that while this approach is
more flexible, it is also bound to have more complicated. I have decided
to apply Philip's patch for 4.3.0.

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Ohh, it seems we have been working on the same patch simultaneously :)
> 
> Attached is my version of fix for bug #20441, which adopts a new ini entry 
> "php_auth_exposure" so that administrators can selectively expose auth 
> information to the clients regardless of safe_mode settings.
> 
> Possible values are:
> 
> - php_auth_exposure=user
>   Only PHP_AUTH_USER is exposed.
> 
> - php_auth_exposure=pw
>   Only PHP_AUTH_PW is exposed
> 
> - php_auth_exposure=user,pw
>   Both PHP_AUTH_USER and PHP_AUTH_PW are exposeed
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Moriyoshi
> 
> Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Attatched is a patch that essentially goes back
> > to 4.2.3 behavior except the external auth will not
> > be available with PHP in safe mode.  REMOTE_USER
> > exists regardless.  
> > 
> > It seems some people also wanted an ini option, I don't 
> > know how to do that! :)
> > 
> > References for this patch:
> >  http://bugs.php.net/20441
> >  http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php4/sapi/apache/mod_php4.c?r1=1.132&r2=1.133
> > 
> > On a related note, I'm curious why PHP_AUTH_TYPE does
> > not exist, only the variable AUTH_TYPE does (for me).  
> > PHP_AUTH_TYPE has been documented forever, not sure if
> > it used to exist but various parts of PHP4 source make
> > it seem like it should.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Philip Olson
> > 
> > p.s. Thanks to Wez and Steph for teaching me not to fear 
> > the source.
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> > 
> > > Everyone,
> > > 
> > > I have just released 4.3.0RC4. Despite the quote in my signature, I am
> > > determined to keep this one the very last final RC of the interminable
> > > 4.3.0 development cycle. Towards that end, I will closely monitor the
> > > CVS commits and revert any that do not satisfactorily explain what
> > > critical or showstopper bug they are fixing. I am aware that
> > > PHP_AUTH_USER issue raises certain concerns, but no one apparently could
> > > make a patch. If, however, one appears very soon, I may consider it a
> > > special one and apply it for 4.3.0.
> > > 
> > > -Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
> > > 
> > > "The time from now until the completion
> > >  of the project tends to become constant." -- Douglas Hartree
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> > > 
> > 
> > 

> Index: main/main.c
> ===
> RCS file: /repository/php4/main/main.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.520
> diff -u -r1.520 main.c
> --- main/main.c   16 Dec 2002 15:43:52 -  1.520
> +++ main/main.c   21 Dec 2002 06:17:30 -
> @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@
>  
>  static void php_build_argv(char *s, zval *track_vars_array TSRMLS_DC);
>  
> +static PHP_INI_MH(OnUpdate_php_auth_exposure);
> +#define PHP_EXPOSE_AUTH_USER 0x0001
> +#define PHP_EXPOSE_AUTH_PW   0x0002 
>  
>  static char *short_track_vars_names[] = {
>   "_POST",
> @@ -275,6 +278,7 @@
>   STD_PHP_INI_ENTRY("output_handler", NULL,   
>PHP_INI_PERDIR|PHP_INI_SYSTEM,  OnUpdateString, output_handler, 
>php_core_globals,   core_globals)
>   STD_PHP_INI_BOOLEAN("register_argc_argv",   "1",
>PHP_INI_PERDIR|PHP_INI_SYSTEM,  OnUpdateBool,   register_argc_argv, 
>php_core_globals,   core_globals)
>   STD_PHP_INI_BOOLEAN("register_globals", "0",
>PHP_INI_PERDIR|PHP_INI_SYSTEM,  OnUpdateBool,   register_globals,   
>php_core_globals,   core_globals)
> + STD_PHP_INI_ENTRY("php_auth_exposure",  "none", 
>PHP_INI_SYSTEM, OnUpdate_php_auth_exposure, php_auth_exposure,  
>php_core_globals,   core_globals)
>  #if PHP_SAFE_MODE
>   STD_PHP_INI_BOOLEAN("safe_mode","1",
>PHP_INI_SYSTEM, OnUpdateBool,   safe_mode,
>  php_core_globals,   core

Re: [PHP-DEV] RC4: ground rules

2002-12-21 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Frank Kromann wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
> 
> Should I commit a small fix to the Windows projects to avoid having the
> CGI and CLI produce php.exe to the same directory ?

What will the fix do exactly?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"What's a polar bear?"
"A rectangular bear after a coordinate transform."
-- Bill White ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] RC4: ground rules

2002-12-20 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Everyone,

I have just released 4.3.0RC4. Despite the quote in my signature, I am
determined to keep this one the very last final RC of the interminable
4.3.0 development cycle. Towards that end, I will closely monitor the
CVS commits and revert any that do not satisfactorily explain what
critical or showstopper bug they are fixing. I am aware that
PHP_AUTH_USER issue raises certain concerns, but no one apparently could
make a patch. If, however, one appears very soon, I may consider it a
special one and apply it for 4.3.0.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"The time from now until the completion
 of the project tends to become constant." -- Douglas Hartree

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Changelog broken?

2002-12-20 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Ilia has rewritten the old php-rcs2log script in PHP itself and it's
working wonderfully. The Changelog generation is back online.

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Steve Alberty wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the Changelog file in the php4 cvs tree is unchanged since 7 days.
> > Is the script (cvs2cl ?) broken?
> 
> It's actually rcs2log script with some modifications. And yes, I think
> the number of CVS accounts has finally broken this poor script's back.
> awk dies with the message "argument list too long".
> 
> -Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
> * "I do not envy the guy at [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- me *
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Think digital, act analog. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: #21060 [Opn->Bgs]: range() gives warning and returns false when low == high

2002-12-20 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Let's postpone this until 4.3.1. It is not critical.

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >  ID:   21060
> >  Updated by:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  Reported By:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -Status:   Open
> > +Status:   Bogus
> >  Bug Type: Arrays related
> >  Operating System: Linux 2.4.18
> >  PHP Version:  4CVS-2002-12-16 (dev)
> >  New Comment:
> > 
> > Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
> > a bug. Please double-check the documentation available at
> > http://www.php.net/manual/ and the instructions on how to report
> > a bug at http://bugs.php.net/how-to-report.php
> > 
> > Nothing wrong with this behaviour, the low & high point are the same,
> > hence the false output indicating failure.
> 
> Actually, I think this is a bug, and I see the usefulnes in having the 
> floor and bottom having the same value. I can write up a patch if 
> needed.
> 
> Derick
> 
> -- 
> 
> -
>  Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ 
>  JDI Media Solutions http://www.jdimedia.nl/
>  PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals   http://php-mag.net/
> -
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List 
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Black holes are where God divided by zero. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI (compromise proposal)

2002-12-20 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> What about uniqid(): http://www.zend.com/zend/week/week116.php#Heading5
> 
> I would go for disabling when not available and sending an error
> when calling from cygwin without more entropy parameter set to
> true. The rest can be fixed for 4.3.1 as it seems to late for a fix
> in 4.3.0.

Fine with me.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck, 
is probably the day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners."
- Ernst Jan Plugge

--
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI (compromise proposal)

2002-12-19 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> 
> Here is the patch against PHP_4_3 that implements the Unix side of 
> changes.

Go ahead and apply it. We obviously need RC4 now so commit your critical
fixes to other areas ASAP, because I want to release the RC tonight or
tomorrow.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Unix is user friendly, it is just chooses its users selectively. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI (compromise proposal)

2002-12-19 Thread Andrei Zmievski
This gets my complete support. Let's go ahead with the changes.

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> After having consulted with Andrei, Derick and others on irc here is
> a proposal for a compromise:
> 
> On Unix:
> 
> 1. Both cgi and cli are built as 'php' in their respective sapi
> directories (pretty much as it is today except that cgi gets renamed
> back from php-cgi to just php).
> 2. Make install will *not* install cli if cgi build was selected
> (only cgi gets installed).
> 3. A new install target 'install-cli' is introduced so that make
> install-cli will overwrite whatever is in $(PREFIX)/bin/php.
> 
> On Windows:
> 
> 1. php.exe in the root of distribution is php cgi sapi.
> 2. New cli directory is included with php.exe (cli) in it.
> 
> If this is an acceptable compromise I volunteer to do the changes
> required.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* The great thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] -+ [01]

2002-12-19 Thread Andrei Zmievski
+1 on this.. :)

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so 
> that it's clear that people's opinion does matter.  Something along the 
> lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position to decide about 
> PHP'.
> 
> Zeev
> 
> At 02:35 19/12/2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> >On 18 Dec 2002, Xavier Spriet wrote:
> >
> >> Well it's up to whoever has karma to make that decision.
> >> People can give their opinion obviously but shouldn't expect to actually
> >> make the decision.
> >
> >That's the problem with the current state of PHP development.
> >Too many people think that their opinion actually matters.
> >
> >- Sascha
> >
> >
> >--
> >PHP Development Mailing List 
> >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List 
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"What's a polar bear?"
"A rectangular bear after a coordinate transform."
-- Bill White ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP_AUTH_USER

2002-12-19 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Phil Driscoll wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 December 2002 11:46 pm, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> > I had discussed the issue with Rasmus and Jani some time ago and the
> > concensus reached was only to disable PHP_AUTH_USER when safe mode is
> > active. Nobody got around to do anything about it though. Is this still an
> > acceptable solution?
> That would satisfy my customer and anyone else in the same situation, but 
> would not satisfy the person who posted the bug in the first place, who I 
> suspect would like finer grained control than that, hence my suggestion of 
> yet another (sorry!) php.ini option.

I think Derick had the same suggestion as well. We should probably go
ahead and do it and then remove the .ini option in PHP 5.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

Computer, if you don't open that exit hatch this moment I shall zap straight
off to your major data banks and reprogram you with a very large axe.
-- Douglas Adams / The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI

2002-12-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Philip Olson wrote:
> 
> So every tutorial and documentation on this would have to
> say this right?
> 
>   "Ask your sysadmin what the CGI and CLI versions of your
>PHP are called, they could be anything as there is no
>standard.  For the purpose of this (tutorial|documentation), 
>we'll call CLI php-cli and CGI php-cgi."
> 
> Same goes for all cgi scripts, they'll work some places but
> not others...  And various RPM's would have different naming
> schemes depending on the maintainers preference.

The merging of CLI and CGI will still happen, but in 4.3.1.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Marriage is not a word. It's a sentence. Life-long sentence. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI

2002-12-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I doubt this will happen fast enough. We should just release the way we 
> released 4.2.x, which as far as I know was php for CGI and php-cli for CLI 
> or am I a bit behind things? :)

Derick and I hashed it out on IRC and we have a proposal:

We should keep 4.2.x behavior with some modifications. CLI and CGI
should always be built unless disabled, and the executables should go
into sapi/cli/php and sapi/cgi/php, respectively. In addition, 'install'
target should be modified to detect whether the user is trying to
install either one of these SAPIs, output a warning message regarding
the potential naming problem, and stop. Let the user install CLI and CGI
manually, basically.

I really hope we can come to an agreement on this.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI

2002-12-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> The next point release after 4.2.0 was 4.2.1.
> 
> There are too many major changes in 4.3 vs. 4.2 to call it a
> 'point release'.

Semantics.

> Especially, there are still significant
> backwards compatibility bugs, such as
> 
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=20441

Does everyone agree that it's a BC bug? If so, who is going to fix it?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI

2002-12-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Sebastian Nohn wrote:
> I think a lot more users will be pissed of when renaming php to php-cgi than
> regarding to the cli-version of php as php-cli or phpsh or anything else.
> The best solution would be indeed bundling both to one binary. If this
> delays a 4.3.0-release? I don't give a damn about it! The idea "release
> fast, release often" is completely ridiculous in my eyes.

Release early, release often?? Have you bothered to check when 4.2.0
came out? Let me refresh your memory: 22 Apr 2002. That's 8 months ago.
For a point release. That is what's ridiculous.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* On the keyboard of life, always keep one finger on the escape key. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI

2002-12-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Xavier Spriet wrote:
> Experimental or not, people use it and have developed a need for it.
> Many apps out there are based on experimental technology, that's not a
> reason to break them all...

So I strongly suggest that whoever has the necessary knowledge on how to
merge CGI and CLI back together come forward and do this. Let's get
4.3.0 out the door and move on to the new great things.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

The 3 great virtues of a programmer:
Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris. 
--Larry Wall

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] CGI and CLI

2002-12-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
What was the consensus on CGI vs. CLI naming or merging issue? Or was
there a consensus at all? I full plan to go ahead with 4.3.0 release
before the end of the year, so those interested in doing anything about
this issue better get their butts in gear.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong."
   -- Wolfgang Pauli

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Branch commits (important)

2002-12-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
All,

I've looked at the list of CVS commits over the last few days and saw
that people are committing apparently non-critical things to the branch.
Please do not do that! After the final RC only fixes for crash and
showstopper bugs should be merged in. Those of you doing it are only
slowing down the 4.3.0 release. Some of the commits I'm talking about:

http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.cvs&article=17258
Comment: Allow compilation of mssql extension on *nix

http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.cvs&article=17246
Comment: A better, strtok() free implementaion of php_disable_functions().

http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.cvs&article=17239
Comment: Add constant that shows whether or not exif uses mbstring.

I am sorry, but what the hell? At this point we might as well have RC4.
Do you really want that?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] php-cgi vs php-cli naming issue

2002-12-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
How about we simply add a configure option to control this?

--enable-simple-cli-name would build CGI as php-cgi and CLI as php

That way we preserve BC and let those who like CLI named 'php' have that
too.

-Andrei


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: cleaning/building just one extension

2002-12-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> We could add a target clean-ext-EXTNAME..
> 
> - Sascha

What about build-ext-EXTNAME? I ran into this yesterday when I checked
out a fresh copy of the tree and wanted to build only wddx module as a
shared library.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] cleaning/building just one extension

2002-12-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
With the new build system, is there a way to clean/build just one
extension, as opposed to having to do it to the whole tree? Something
like "make clean ext=wddx", perhaps?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

I must say I find television very educational. The minute
somebody turns it on, I go to the library and read a good book.
   - Groucho Marx

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.3.0RC3

2002-12-11 Thread Andrei Zmievski
PHP 4.3.0RC3 is out. Please download it from http://qa.php.net/ and
test. This is the last release candidate before 4.3.0 final is
unleashed.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* The future is not what it used to be. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] note about 4.3.0RC3

2002-12-11 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Tagging RC3 now.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

The Heineken Uncertainty Principle:
  You can never be sure how many beers you had last night.

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/bcmath bcmath.c php_bcmath.h

2002-12-10 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I think this is one of those exceptions where we should probably not go by 
> our standard and call the function bcpowmod(). It looks a bit funny that 
> all of the BC functions don't have underscores but only one does. It'll 
> probably confuse people more than it helps.
> What do you guys think?

I think it's fine to keep it as bcpowmod(), since we'll probably rename
functions in the future anyway.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* I don't have a solution but I admire the problem. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

2002-12-09 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 09 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> 
> Maybe phpsh would be a good idea for the name of the CLI? It wouldn't 
> confuse ppl as much as php-cli
> 
> 
> I'm really not that sure it makes sense to rename the CGI from php to 
> php-cgi after such a long time. It's not as if we're breaking BC for the 
> sake of adding very much needed functionality.
> 
> Anyway, I'm -0 for the change and +0 to find a more suitable name for the 
> CLI :)

I am actually in favor of CLI executable being 'php'. If it's a problem
on Windows, then we could possibly compromise and have the CGI version
being called php.exe, but I think that it's important we keep it 'php'
on UNIX.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Change is the only constant. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] RC3 plans

2002-12-09 Thread Andrei Zmievski
While there are some opinions that RC3 should be put out in a week or
so, I disagree. I'd like to release it on Wednesday at the latest,
and before then have everyone trying to either fix the critical bugs
that are in the system, or at least recategorize them if no one is going
to bother to fix them.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Then again, E=mc^2 may only be a local phenomenon."
  -- Einstein

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.3 when?

2002-12-09 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 09 Dec 2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
> I have a patch from Melvyn for streams under *BSD systems, and the
> critical bugs should also be fixed, particularly 20539, 19919 and 19292.
> 
> [15209] Under Apache, register_shutdown_function() broke between 4.0.x to 4.1.x
> [19292] random error: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in wrong directory
> [19919] segmentation violation in sapi_apache_header_handler, mod_php4.c  line 208
> [20109] iplanet 6 core dump w/NSAPI load
> [20190] Random mem corruption: zend_get_executed_filename() mismatch
> [20467] Buffer overflow returning binary (sybase)
> [20539] PHP CLI Segmentation Fault
> [20802] memory limit crash

Plus our QA team is not quite what it used to be and Derick is gone for
a couple of days. We were planning to roll RC3 with a short test cycle,
but it would be good to do that with the abovementioned bugs fixed. If
we don't fix them, then we need to bear responsibility for them showing
up in 4.3.0.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Later in this talk, I intend to define
 the universe and give three examples." -- Larry Wall

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.3.0RC2 released

2002-11-27 Thread Andrei Zmievski
The second release candidate of the inimitably fabulous PHP version 4.3.0 is
out. It can be downloaded from http://qa.php.net. Give it a good testing!

-Andrei


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

2002-11-26 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
> > I rather propose. And, it seems to interest many on the list.
> 
> Don't forget that there seem to be many who strongly opose your 
> suggestion.

Myself included.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* The best source is the source code. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] RC2

2002-11-21 Thread Andrei Zmievski
I think RC1 is going quite well (with the exception of bcmath issues, I
believe?), so I propose putting out RC2 next week. If that one does just
swimmingly, we should be ready for the release.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

For every complex problem, there is a solution
that is simple, neat, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: ZE2 and abstract

2002-11-20 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> Added final now: http://marcus-boerger.de/php/ext/ze2
> 
> So we have:
> abstract [static] function '(' parameters ')' ';'
> [ final ] [ static ] function '(' parameters ')' '{' code '}'
> 
> There is a check that you cannot overwrite a final function of cause
> and i also added a check that you cannot redeclare a function abstract.
> See test files on this.

Please, please, please, please... please! Use the word 'method', not
'function', when referring to class methods. It will help avoid further
confusion. Please.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented
six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton

--
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] is_callable & Bug 20216

2002-11-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Leon Atkinson wrote:
> Hmm...OK.  Yes, that does make is_callable return false.  Can you explain
> the logic behind this?  I tried lots of other values and got TRUE.  For
> example:
> 
> var_dump(is_callable(array('$$$','%^&'), true));
> var_dump(is_callable('%^&', true));
> 
> These aren't valid identifiers, but the function is (apparently) reporting
> that syntax is OK.

The syntax check is only intended to reject arrays that don't have a
valid structure to be used as callbacks. The valid ones are supposed to
have only 2 entries, the first of which is an object or a string, and
the second one is a string. The function doesn't do any checking of the
contents of the array.

> Ah, yeah, I guess there isn't a way to tell if a method is callable
> statically or not unless you check that it contains no references to
> instance properties.
> 
> So, would it be fair to say this function is intended for debugging the
> core?  And, if you have the time, could you describe the situation where
> this function is useful?

It is useful when you have a function that takes a callback as a
parameter and it needs to check whether that callback is, in fact,
callable.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* We are not a clone. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] is_callable & Bug 20216

2002-11-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Since I wrote the function, I can provide some insight.

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Leon Atkinson wrote:
> This function wraps zend_is_callable.  The first argument is the name
> of a function or method.  Class and object methods are specified by
> passing an array with two elements: class or object and method name.

Right.

> The second argument seems to be for checking syntax only, but I can't
> figure out how to make is_callable return FALSE when the second
> argument is TRUE.

Try this:

var_dump(is_callable(array(1,2), true));

> The third argument receives the "callable name".  In the example below
> it's "a::b".  Note, however, that despite the implication that a::b()
> is a callable static method, this is not the case.
> 
>class a
>   {
> var $c;
> 
> function b()
>{
>  return($this->c);
> }
>   }
> 
>   $d = new a;
> 
>   if(is_callable(array($d, 'b'), FALSE, $name))
>   {
> print($name);
>   }
> ?>

Well, $name is just supposed to indicate which class/method you were
checking. It doesn't tell you whether the method is static or not,
because in PHP 4 it doesn't make sense.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

Politics is for the moment, an equation is for eternity.
   
   -- Albert Einstein

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] XP?

2002-11-17 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Who says Xtreme Programming can't work over long distances.. :)

iliaa   Sat Nov 16 19:07:33 2002 EDT

  Modified files:  (Branch: PHP_4_3)
/php4/main  streams.c 
  Log: MFH

wez Sat Nov 16 19:08:42 2002 EDT

  Modified files:  (Branch: PHP_4_3)
/php4/main  streams.c 
  Log: Remove debugging printf

iliaa   Sat Nov 16 19:11:20 2002 EDT

  Modified files:  (Branch: PHP_4_3)
/php4/main  streams.c 
  Log: Fix compile warning.

wez Sat Nov 16 20:06:32 2002 EDT

  Modified files:  (Branch: PHP_4_3)
/php4/main  streams.c 
  Log: Avoid a potential double fclose().

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

Any sufficiently advanced bug is
indistinguishable from a feature.
-- Rich Kulawiec

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Re: Aggregation & ZE2 fix

2002-11-16 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> With the following patch aggregation works for me with ZE1 and ZE2,
> php 4.3.0 and php4.4-dev. If noone objects i will commit this.

Aggregation will be implemented at the engine level in ZE2. Don't commit
this patch.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

--
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] mbstring and 4.3.0

2002-11-15 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> It's not that I think enabling it is such a bad idea but as we're going for 
> PHP 5 right after PHP 4.3 anyway I don't think it's too bad to wait for 
> that. I'm sure lots of people will test PHP 5 RC's so there'll be lots of 
> testing (long sentence but I hope it can be understood :)

I think we will still have 4.4.0 before PHP 5. The timeframe between
4.3.0 and 5 is just too large not to have another release.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Everything should be made as simple
as possible, but not simpler."
  -- Albert Einstein

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/overload API

2002-11-14 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Timm Friebe wrote:
> Hello,
> Andrei, as I can see, you're the author of ext/overload. As suggested
> earlier, I've added a second parameter to sybase_fetch_object() which
> allows users to pass an object to be filled with the results from the
> fetched row (e.g. $article= sybase_fetch_object($q, new Article()); or
> $article= sybase_fetch_object($q, 'Article')).
> 
> Well, if "Article" is an overloaded class, they'd probably expect that
> their __set*-handlers are called when the object's properties are set.
> Of course, object_and_properties_init() does not do this. But indeed,
> it'd be quite nice if they would.
> 
> Thus, one would need the C functions call_get_handler and
> call_set_handler to be declared not static but PHPAPI (is this right?)
> and an additional method to test if a zend_class_entry is overloaded.
> 
> * http://sitten-polizei.de/php/overload.patch
>   would make it work. Maybe macros would be a better way?
> 
> * http://sitten-polizei.de/php/sybase_ct.patch
>   shows a sample usage (btw, is there any documentation on TSRM?)
>   maybe _set_object_prop should be moved to ext/overload as a 
>   utiltiy function?
> 
> I came up with this since I use sybase resultsets within SOAP, clearly
> needing to distinguish strings from datetime types, int, floats and so
> on. My first idea was to introduce a function
>   sybase_bind_datatype(SYBASE_DATETIME, 'Date')
> but why not make use of an already existing and powerful extension?

Because this extension is going away in ZE2?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* We reason deeply, when we forcibly feel. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3 mbstring patch?

2002-11-14 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, lowbwtom wrote:
> Will there be a patch to fix the mbstring bug in 4.2.3? Any idea when?
> (specifically to fix the missing 4 characters in array posts)
> 
> Some of us have been totally screwed by this bug - since our isp's have
> updated to 4.2.3 and left everyone's sites totally broken. They refuse to
> drop back to old version and are leaving everyone "up the creek" until php
> 4.3.0 is in final release or a 4.2.3 patch is released.
> 
> For the love of PHP, give me relief!

While it's not directly on topic of this post, this is *exactly* why
mbstring will not be enabled by default in 4.3.0.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] 4.3 Branched

2002-11-13 Thread Andrei Zmievski
I made a branch for 4.3 and tagged it PHP_4_3. Please remember to sync
your fixes into the branch, if they are important and relevant, of
course.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* It said 'Winmodem' on the box, but I still feel like I lost. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] mbstring and 4.3.0

2002-11-13 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> FWIW:
> * If this is ever going to make core as a part of PHP's i18n efforts, you
>   are going to have to deal with the 'unseen' at some point. You are not
>   going to identify them, by testing it within a select group. For this
>   reason, the userbase is always the guinnea-pig with every new feature
>   in a release.

Explain to me please why --enable-mbstring is not enough. The userbase
is not going to be a guinea-pig since only a subset of users will have a
need for mbsting and those that do can use the switch. Those that don't
will not even notice that it's not enabled.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

I must say I find television very educational. The minute
somebody turns it on, I go to the library and read a good book.
   - Groucho Marx

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] prototypes for getters and setters.

2002-11-13 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, John Coggeshall wrote:
> 
> I understand what your saying, however I guess I see the tradeoff of
> creating a new reserved word to a (IMHO of course) kinda messy new
> syntax a good one. 
> 
> Besides, having an absolute standard for get/set would be benefital to
> all developers.. Knowing that setting $foo is always setfoo() (or
> set_foo(), makes no difference) would be nice. 

We do have an absolute standard: __get() and __set().

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* I wish life had an UNDO function. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] mbstring and 4.3.0

2002-11-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Ilia A. wrote:
> mbstring has many dedicated developers whom are doing excellent maintaining 
> and upgrading this extension. Which at the moment makes mbstring very much a 
> work in progress, there is hardly a day without at least one or two CVS 
> commits to it. Since this is a work in progress, it is simply not safe to 
> enable it by default if we want to claim any sort of stability for 4.3.0 
> release. There is a chance it'll work out, but IMHO there is even a greater 
> chance it will cause problems like it did in 4.2.3 with mangling of POST 
> requests, 4.3.0 will have more then enough new stuff as is.
> Perhaps by the next major release, mbstring will be a lot more mature and 
> thoroughly tested in production enviroment. At that point we can discuss this 
> issue again and consider whether this extension has merit for most users and 
> based on that decide whether or not to enable it by default.

I very much agree and am extremly reluctant to have mbstring enabled by
default, even though it is a very promising extension.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"When I get a little money, I buy books;
 and if any is left I buy food and clothes." -- Erasmus

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] gd, imagefilter

2002-11-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> That's it :)
> 
> I did not find a sample privat function, now I do. For the ML archive,
> here is how to do it:
> 
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:48:08 +0100 (CET)
> Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > typedef image_filter  {
> > void (function*)(INTERNAL_FUNCTION_PARAMETERS);
> > } image_filter;
> 
> has to be:
> typedef void (*image_filter)(INTERNAL_FUNCTION_PARAMETERS);
> 
> We do not need a bidemensional array, except if we want to add the arg
> number to avoid a useless call.
> image_filter filters[] = {_php_image_filter_none,
>   _php_image_filter_negate,
>   _php_image_filter_blur
> };
> 
> the "_php_" prefix seems to be the std for privat function, confirmation
> ?

Use just "php_". "_php_" is deprecated.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Reality isn't all it's cracked up to be. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] RAW POST DATA

2002-11-12 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> the current problem with HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA is just that
> i never really figured out when it should be populated
> depending on HTTP method, Content type and
> always_populate_raw_post_data, this is going to be fixed
> today

Okay.

> besides the HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA issue what i did was
> a cleanup of the HTTP content handler code in SAPI.c
> that fixes problems with PHP not comsuming content
> data although at least the apache 1.x API relies on
> it (for keepalive connections)

That needs to be tested pretty well, I imagine?

> php://input works for the apache sapi, but not with CGI
> i had no time yet to realy dig into it but i'm pretty sure
> it is a problem within the CGI sapi code and not in the
> content handler ...
> 
> i definetly want this feature in 4.3 as with plain 4.2.x
> it is impossible to handle PUT and WebDAV requests and even
> with the allow_webdav_methods patch and HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA
> extended to PUT and WebDAV specific methods you get back
> the same memory consumption problems as with file uploads
> before 4.2.0

This php://input thing is what concerns me. How much time do you need to
finish and test it? We don't want to delay RC1 too much.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Someone clearly thinks that C is a garbage collected language"
 -- Morten Welinder

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Changelog broken?

2002-11-11 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Steve Alberty wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the Changelog file in the php4 cvs tree is unchanged since 7 days.
> Is the script (cvs2cl ?) broken?

It's actually rcs2log script with some modifications. And yes, I think
the number of CVS accounts has finally broken this poor script's back.
awk dies with the message "argument list too long".

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* "I do not envy the guy at [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- me *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] abstract functions

2002-11-09 Thread Andrei Zmievski
ZE1 way:

 class MyClass {
function MyClass()
{
 die('MyClass is an abstract class');
}
 }

ZE2 way:

 class AbstractClassException {
 }

 class MyClass {
function MyClass()
{
throw new AbstractClassException();
}
 }
 
On Sat, 09 Nov 2002, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> does PHP4 with the ZE2 supports abstract function like Delphi or C++? 
> That would be very useful for class development, cause we can avoid 
> testing if a class is abstract if an abstract class couldn't be 
> instantiated?
> 
> Syntax could be like in C++
> class X
> {
>   X(){}
>   int y() = 0;
> }
> 
> or little bit more like pascal
> 
> class X
> {
>   X(){} // PHP
>   function x(); abstract;
> }
> 
> or
> 
> class X
> {
>   X(){} // PHP
>   abstract function x();
> }
> 
> Greetings,
> Jens
> -- 
> L i  W W W  i Jens Rehsack
> LW W W
> L i   W   W W   W   i  nnnLiWing IT-Services
> L iW W   W Wi  n  n  g   g
>   i W W i  n  n  g   gFriesenstraße 2
>   06112 Halle
>  g
>  g   g
> Tel.:  +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 91ggg e-Mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fax:   +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 92http://www.liwing.de/
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List 
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* A feature is a bug with seniority. *

--
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.3.0

2002-11-08 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Sat, 09 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> What's the schedule for 4.3? It seems to be lingering. That said I'd like 
> to resolve the bison issue before we release it (i.e. make sure that ZE1 
> isn't bitten by versions > 1.28).

It's not lingering. We just have to be more careful since it's such a
large release. I will make RC1 this weekend.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"It's an emergent property of connected human minds that
they create things for one another's pleasure and to conquer
their uneasy sense of being too alone." -- Eben Moglen

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] turning strlen() into an opcode

2002-11-08 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Sat, 09 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I am very much against anything like this.
> Improving strlen()'s performance only will have a negligible performance 
> impact on a real world script.
> With the same kind of argument you could probably find 10-20 functions 
> which would be faster if you'd make opcodes for them. That's not really 
> what you'd want to do.
> Also, the patch isn't quite the same functionality wise because strlen in 
> your patch is a reserved word. This isn't my main problem though as it 
> could be solved.

Just out of curiousity, what are the problems with making it a reserved
word and how could it be solved?

> If you want to really help improve performance of real-world scripts then 
> try and find a way to improve performance of *all* function calls, i.e., of 
> the extension API; and not by moving functions from the extension API into 
> the core.

No big deal. This just came up at the PHP conference in Germany during a
chat with George and Thies.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed.. Oh, wait.. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] turning strlen() into an opcode

2002-11-08 Thread Andrei Zmievski
I've made a small patch that turns strlen() into a statement executed by
the engine instead of a function. The reasoning is that something that
integral should probably be in the engine. I haven't done hard
benchmarking but it seems to improve performance of that particular
piece of code by about 25%. Feedback is welcome.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* "UNIX, isn't that some archaic form of DOS?" - our job applicant *

Index: zend_builtin_functions.c
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_builtin_functions.c,v
retrieving revision 1.124
diff -u -2 -b -w -B -r1.124 zend_builtin_functions.c
--- zend_builtin_functions.c21 Oct 2002 08:42:32 -  1.124
+++ zend_builtin_functions.c8 Nov 2002 21:15:20 -
@@ -30,5 +30,4 @@
 static ZEND_FUNCTION(func_get_arg);
 static ZEND_FUNCTION(func_get_args);
-static ZEND_NAMED_FUNCTION(zend_if_strlen);
 static ZEND_FUNCTION(strcmp);
 static ZEND_FUNCTION(strncmp);
@@ -80,5 +79,4 @@
ZEND_FE(func_get_arg,   NULL)
ZEND_FE(func_get_args,  NULL)
-   { "strlen", zend_if_strlen, NULL },
ZEND_FE(strcmp, NULL)
ZEND_FE(strncmp,NULL)
@@ -244,19 +242,4 @@
zend_hash_next_index_insert(return_value->value.ht, &element, 
sizeof(zval *), NULL);
}
-}
-/* }}} */
-
-
-/* {{{ proto int strlen(string str)
-   Get string length */
-ZEND_NAMED_FUNCTION(zend_if_strlen)
-{
-   zval **str;
-   
-   if (ZEND_NUM_ARGS() != 1 || zend_get_parameters_ex(1, &str) == FAILURE) {
-   ZEND_WRONG_PARAM_COUNT();
-   }
-   convert_to_string_ex(str);
-   RETVAL_LONG((*str)->value.str.len);
 }
 /* }}} */
Index: zend_compile.c
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_compile.c,v
retrieving revision 1.239
diff -u -2 -b -w -B -r1.239 zend_compile.c
--- zend_compile.c  3 Nov 2002 15:16:44 -   1.239
+++ zend_compile.c  8 Nov 2002 21:15:21 -
@@ -2101,4 +2101,15 @@
 }
 
+void zend_do_strlen(znode *result, znode *expr TSRMLS_DC)
+{
+   zend_op *opline = get_next_op(CG(active_op_array) TSRMLS_CC);
+
+   opline->opcode = ZEND_STRLEN;
+   opline->result.op_type = IS_TMP_VAR;
+   opline->result.u.var = get_temporary_variable(CG(active_op_array));
+   opline->op1 = *expr;
+   SET_UNUSED(opline->op2);
+   *result = opline->result;
+}
 
 void zend_do_foreach_begin(znode *foreach_token, znode *array, znode 
*open_brackets_token, znode *as_token, int variable TSRMLS_DC)
Index: zend_compile.h
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_compile.h,v
retrieving revision 1.144
diff -u -2 -b -w -B -r1.144 zend_compile.h
--- zend_compile.h  4 Aug 2002 06:39:44 -   1.144
+++ zend_compile.h  8 Nov 2002 21:15:21 -
@@ -326,4 +326,6 @@
 void zend_do_isset_or_isempty(int type, znode *result, znode *variable TSRMLS_DC);
 
+void zend_do_strlen(znode *result, znode *expr TSRMLS_DC);
+
 void zend_do_foreach_begin(znode *foreach_token, znode *array, znode 
*open_brackets_token, znode *as_token, int variable TSRMLS_DC);
 void zend_do_foreach_cont(znode *value, znode *key, znode *as_token TSRMLS_DC);
@@ -522,4 +524,6 @@
 
 #define ZEND_SEND_VAR_NO_REF   106
+
+#define ZEND_STRLEN 107
 
 /* end of block */
Index: zend_execute.c
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_execute.c,v
retrieving revision 1.315
diff -u -2 -b -w -B -r1.315 zend_execute.c
--- zend_execute.c  3 Nov 2002 15:16:45 -   1.315
+++ zend_execute.c  8 Nov 2002 21:15:21 -
@@ -2360,4 +2360,20 @@
}
NEXT_OPCODE();
+   case ZEND_STRLEN: {
+   zval tmp_val, *val = 
+get_zval_ptr(&EX(opline)->op1, EX(Ts), &EG(free_op1), BP_VAR_R);
+   if (val->type != IS_STRING) {
+   tmp_val = *val;
+   zval_copy_ctor(&tmp_val);
+   convert_to_string(&tmp_val);
+   val = &tmp_val;
+   }
+   
+EX(Ts)[EX(opline)->result.u.var].tmp_var.value.lval = val->value.str.len;
+   EX(Ts)[EX(opline)->result.u.var].tmp_var.type 
+= IS_LONG;
+   if (val == &tmp_val) {
+   zval_dtor(&tmp_val);
+   }
+   FREE_OP(EX(Ts), &EX(opline)->op1, 
+EG(free_op1));
+   }
+

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/sybase_ct commit?

2002-11-07 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002, Timm Friebe wrote:
> Sorry, I committed it before you wrote your e-mail. I don't quite
> understand why this should be shorter, though. This sort of was a
> mega-patch... or is it generally better so write stuff like 
> 
>   Added new functions: sybase_unbuffered_query(), sybase_fetch_assoc(),
>   sybase_set_message_handler(), see docs (Timm)
> 
> I personally think I'd rather like to see a somewhat verbose Changelog.
> If this isn't what is wanted, I'll try and keep it shorter for future
> commits.

Yes, I think it's better to compress it as in your example.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

As I was going up the stair, I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today. I wish, I wish he'd stay away.
-Hughes Mearns


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] mbstring and 4.3.0

2002-11-07 Thread Andrei Zmievski
At the PHP Conference in Germany several of us have discussed the
current state of mbstring and there was a proposal to not have it
enabled by default for 4.3.0 release. It seems that the extension
attempts to do "magic" stuff by overloading functions in the executor
globals and, as Thies said, that could be dangerous. Also, doesn't it
affect run-tests.php script currently?

Comments are welcome.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* We are not a clone. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/sybase_ct commit?

2002-11-07 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Sat, 02 Nov 2002, Timm Friebe wrote:
> Round 2 - fight:-)
> 
> OK, I guess now I'm ready for committing my changes. I got PHP compiled
> and tested out the new functionality of my ext/sybase_ct changes against
> CVS from today.
> 
> Just to make sure I'm getting it all right: This is what I'd put in the
> commit message
> 
> @- Implemented features/changes requested in Bug #16960 (Timm):
> @  . Added a new function sybase_unbuffered_query()
> @  . Added a new function sybase_fetch_assoc()
> @  . Added sybase_set_message_handler() which enables users to handle
> @server messages in a callback function
> @  . Added an ini entry for deadlock retries - retrying deadlocks 
> @can cause transaction state to break (sybct.deadlock_retry_count,
> @defaults to -1 "forever").
> @  . Fixed sybase_fetch_object() not to return object with numeric
> @members
> @  . Fixed issues with identical fieldnames
> @  . Made sybase_fetch_*() functions return correct datatypes
> @  . Made phpinfo() section more verbose
> @  . Made sybase_query() error messages more verbose

Can you compress this down to a couple of entries?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Ethernet n.: something used to catch the etherbunny. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/calendar calendar.c jewish.c sdncal.h

2002-10-31 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
> A crap, yes... fixing README.CVS-RULES right away.

Umm... @ should stay there. Just don't use it until 4.3.0 is out.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Claiming Java is easier than C++ is like
 saying that K2 is shorter than Everest." 
 -- Larry O'Brien (editor, Software Development)

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /main streams.c

2002-10-28 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > Hey Ilia,
> > 
> > Does this prevent opening of things like block and character special files?
> > If yes, then let's change it to explicitly check for directories instead,
> > as there are bound to be people out there that want to open things like
> > /dev/hda1 (for example).
> 
> You want to open that for writing? :)

That's what Real Programmers [TM] do.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed.. Oh, wait.. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.3.0pre2

2002-10-27 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Hello,

PHP 4.3.0pre2 is available for download from http://qa.php.net. This
second pre-release incorporates a large number of bug fixes since the
first one. Still, to help us catch as many bugs as possible, please
download it and start testing.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* Gun manufacturers don't make bad products, bad parents do. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] from one hash to another, in an extension

2002-10-23 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Tim Daly, Jr. wrote:
> > You don't need to SEPARATE_ZVAL() in this case.
> 
> I don't need to, or I need not to?

Don't use SEPARATE_ZVAL() when copying zval from one hash to another.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

We all have photographic memories, it's just
that some of us don't have any film.

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] from one hash to another, in an extension

2002-10-23 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Tim Daly, Jr. wrote:
> 
> I'm trying to figure out the right way to take an entry from one hash
> table, and put it in another, in C.  This is what I first tried:
> 
> // naive attempt at
> // $hash2["key"] = $hash1["key"];
> 
> zval **val;
> 
> zend_hash_find(hash1, "key", strlen("key")+1, (void **)&val);
> SEPARATE_ZVAL(val);
> zval_add_ref(val);
> zend_hash_update(hash2, "key", strlen("key")+1, (void *)val, NULL);
> 
> 
> That seemed to work.  But I started having strange problems in my PHP
> code, like I would assign the property of an object, and later the
> same property would be magically null again.  This problem goes away
> when I remove the SEPARATE_ZVAL above.
> 
> So, I though maybe one of you kind folks might shed some light on this
> for me.

You don't need to SEPARATE_ZVAL() in this case.

-- 
Andrei Zmievski Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Front End Software Engineer Web:http://www.fast.no/
Fast Search & Transfer Inc  Phone:  781-304-2493
93 Worcester Street Fax:781-304-2410
Wellesley MA 02481-9181, USAMain:   781-304-2400

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] Forked ext/gd by default

2002-10-21 Thread Andrei Zmievski
I think we should use forked version of gd library by default for 4.3.0.
>From what I hear it is already the best version of any of them out there
and if it saves us any more grief, all the better. Objections?

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"You choose to do the bad things in your life;
 the good ones come and drag you along with them."
- Michael Marshall Smith

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

2002-10-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> 
> > I. Am. So. Tired. Of. Seeing. This. Come. Up. Over. And. Over. Again.
> > 
> > The next time someone mentions this on the list, I'm grabbing a LART[1] and
> > heading over to their house.
> 
> So we're not going to turn it off by default? 

Come here, dear, I've got a present for you.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Don't sweat it -- it's not real life.  It's only ones and zeroes."
   -- Gene Spafford

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




[PHP-DEV] removing apidoc.txt

2002-10-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
I propose we remove apidoc.txt from the tree. It is prety outdated and
only promotes confusion. We have a module for API documentation and it
is available online as well.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
   --Pablo Picasso

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

2002-10-18 Thread Andrei Zmievski
They are _not_ the same person!

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Well, I differ with you on that.  I don't think there's anything in the 
> same class as  
> Zeev
> 
> At 18:08 17/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> >I don't think we should add special hacks to the scanner. Soon we're going 
> >to have a zillion hacks for other XML/SGML/foobar documents.
> >
> >Andi
> >
> >At 12:17 PM 10/16/2002 -0400, Ilia A. wrote:
> >>Since the general consensus by the developers is not to remove the 
> >>short_tags
> >>or even disable them. Perhaps we should consider alternate solutions to 
> >>this
> >>problem. Given the buzzword popularity of XML and its slowly growing
> >>popularity among website designers (XHTML) this issue is likely to come 
> >>up in
> >>the future yet again.
> >>The solution I would like to offer, is a patch that adds special handling 
> >>for
> >> >>inside  >>
> >>Ilia
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List 
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

"Claiming Java is easier than C++ is like
 saying that K2 is shorter than Everest." 
 -- Larry O'Brien (editor, Software Development)

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

2002-10-17 Thread Andrei Zmievski

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> This is one of the reason why I think we should try to change
> short_open_tag default. " Instruction). There may be many (and/or custom) PI tags and it
> may become more serious problem in the future.
> 
> We may even have XML processor that processes PHP code in XML
> documents in the future. i.e. PHP interpreter is invoked from
> XML processor.
> 
> Fortunately, we don't have much problem now.
> I think we are better to start discourage use of short tag
> more loudly instead of work around one by one.

> [about 40,000 other messages on this topic snipped]

I. Am. So. Tired. Of. Seeing. This. Come. Up. Over. And. Over. Again.

The next time someone mentions this on the list, I'm grabbing a LART[1] and
heading over to their house.

[1] Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/LART.html

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/
* We are not a clone. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] nl2br is broken in PHP4.3.0pre1

2002-10-16 Thread Andrei Zmievski

On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
> That's all up to Andrei, but I would favor for a pre2 during the next 
> week for further testing, but it looks good so far.

Yes, we'll make another 'pre' release early next week. Lots of good bugs
have been fixed since pre1.

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

Magic 8-ball is much more powerful than we thought. I mean, back in the 70's
it was predicting the nature of software in the 90's -- "Outlook not so good".

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [4.3] Current critical bugs

2002-10-15 Thread Andrei Zmievski

Why don't you close it? :)

On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> It has been fixed for a while.
> 
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Peter Neuman wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > "Andrei Zmievski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Summary: random error: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in
> > > wrong directory
> > > URL: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=19292
> >
> > Please Fix this, this is a very big Bug..
> >
> > Thanks
> > Peter Neuman
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




Re: [PHP-DEV] [4.3] Current critical bugs

2002-10-15 Thread Andrei Zmievski

On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >Summary: Copy of array is affected by reference
> >URL: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=15025
> 
> If you keep that one on the critical list, then 4.3.0 will remain a 
> philosophical concept :)

You said you'd think about fixing it and I've never heard back from you.
:)

-Andrei   http://www.gravitonic.com/

As I was going up the stair, I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today. I wish, I wish he'd stay away.
-Hughes Mearns


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




  1   2   3   4   5   6   >