Re: Implementing highly efficient binary protocol clients ands server using Google Protocol Buffers and Netty
Netty 3.1.0.ALPHA3 has been released today - you don't need to build from the source anymore. Please visit the documentation page below and click the 'LocalTime' example: * http://www.jboss.org/auth/netty/documentation.html Thanks, Trustin On Jan 7, 9:34 pm, Trustin Lee trus...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, As I posted a topic here before, I have done some integration for protobuf and Netty to enable the rapid implementation of highly efficient binary protocol clients and servers. With both technologies combined, you can build a socket client / server with protobuf very quickly. I'd like to hear some feed back from protobuf users, so I'm posting a link to the detailed information on this: *http://n2.nabble.com/Google-Protocol-Buffers-integration-is-ready.-td... Please feel free to reply to this message, to send me an e-mail directly, or to reply to the original post at your option. Thanks for the great work on protobuf, your previous feed back, and your upcoming feed back in advance! :) Trustin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Implementing highly efficient binary protocol clients ands server using Google Protocol Buffers and Netty
Hi folks, As I posted a topic here before, I have done some integration for protobuf and Netty to enable the rapid implementation of highly efficient binary protocol clients and servers. With both technologies combined, you can build a socket client / server with protobuf very quickly. I'd like to hear some feed back from protobuf users, so I'm posting a link to the detailed information on this: * http://n2.nabble.com/Google-Protocol-Buffers-integration-is-ready.-td2122078.html Please feel free to reply to this message, to send me an e-mail directly, or to reply to the original post at your option. Thanks for the great work on protobuf, your previous feed back, and your upcoming feed back in advance! :) Trustin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Looking for an idea to implement a network application with protobuf
Hi, I'm currently trying to write a prototype client / server application that exchanges a message which is encoded with protobuf format. From my understanding, it seems like a user usually defines a top level message type that can be a container of other messages. This approach is called 'extension', and is described here in detail: * Official documentation - http://tinyurl.com/56cerv * Forum discussion - http://tinyurl.com/5zabns The question is, is this the most common and efficient way to exchange various types of messages with protobuf? What did you do to build a network application with many complex message types? Is there any alternative approach that might be used in a certain case? I'd like to hear your experience. Thanks, Trustin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---