Re: [SR-Users] Return codes within a route

[Jeff Bilyk]

Thanks Muhammad, appreciate that clarification.

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:10 PM, M S  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return
> value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always
> explicitly return 1 or exit.
>
> —
> Muhammad.
> On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify.
>> I have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf.
>> Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route.  In some
>> cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching
>> headers.
>>
>> Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#
>> return seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements,
>> the route should return 1.  However, this route appears to be returning
>> -1.
>>
>> My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value,
>> and there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return
>> -1 (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core
>> cookbook indicates?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Jeff
>> ___
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>


-- 
Jeff
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Return codes within a route

[M S]

Hi,

My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return
value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always
explicitly return 1 or exit.

—
Muhammad.
On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify.  I
> have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf.
> Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route.  In some
> cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching
> headers.
>
> Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#return
> seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, the route
> should return 1.  However, this route appears to be returning -1.
>
> My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, and
> there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return -1
> (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core
> cookbook indicates?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jeff
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] Return codes within a route

[Jeff Bilyk]

Hello,

Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify.  I
have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf.
Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route.  In some
cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching
headers.

Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#return
seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, the route
should return 1.  However, this route appears to be returning -1.

My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, and
there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return -1
(as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core
cookbook indicates?

Thanks in advance,

Jeff
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users