Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Your opinion about SOTM US
Alex Barth writes: What do you think are the big topics and challenges for OpenStreetMap as we're about to go into the second decade? What does this mean for State of the Map? For OSM in the US? Finding and fixing the badly-digitized TIGER data. I've got it mostly under control in NY, but I still find bits and pieces of it left. And when I go looking in neighboring states, I shudder. -- --my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [OSM-talk] Your opinion about SOTM US
Alex Barth writes: What do you think are the big topics and challenges for OpenStreetMap as we're about to go into the second decade? What does this mean for State of the Map? For OSM in the US? Finding and fixing the badly-digitized TIGER data. I've got it mostly under control in NY, but I still find bits and pieces of it left. And when I go looking in neighboring states, I shudder. -- --my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-cz] Licence (zase)
Myslim, ze neprehledl. Nicmene je to WordPress s pluginem viz: http://rosa-os.cz/wp-content/plugins/comprehensive-google-map-plugin Takze pokud se napise sem, tak (pokud je to mozne) nekde v nastavenich zkusi vypnout OSM. Mozna by bylo lepsi zkusit napsat autorovi pluginu, tim se to vyresi i zde ale i na jinych pouzitich. https://wordpress.org/plugins/comprehensive-google-map-plugin/ nicmene podle webu se to tvari ze uz to nikdo nevyviji. Bye Dne 10. března 2015 0:48 Petr Vejsada o...@propsychology.cz napsal(a): Ahoj, ač, jak víte, jsem ohledně licence docela v klidu, tak toto mě tedy vydráždilo: http://rosa-os.cz/nase-sluzby/azylovy-dum/ defaultně vrstva OSM, attribution Google-podmínky použití. Můžete to, prosím, zkontrolovat, zda jsem něco nepřehlédl? Zdvořilý mail už mám připravený, ale než ho odešlu, rád bych, aby se na to někdo podíval. Díky. -- Petr ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk] Quality of OSM Notes
Hi all. I think, we could ask people to provide us with some contact info after note being added. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Cat Forest
On 14/02/2015 21:30, SomeoneElse wrote: Hi folks, Every now and then, not far from null island, some features pop up in the middle of the Atlantic. One of them's called Cat Forest. You can see references to it here: The source of Cat Forest has been found: https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 Thanks to the new mapper who explained which guide they were going through at the time. Cheers, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-de] Ein Wunsch für openstreetmap.de
Am 6. März 2015 um 13:17 schrieb Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de: Was aber eine moderne Erfindung ist - so weit ich weiss wurde in zeitgenössischen Karten sowas im Allgemeinen nie verwendet In Karten vielleicht nicht aber Gebrochene Grotesk war zu dieser Zeit schon üblich. Der Bunker in Nürnberg unter dem Burgberg hat z.B. solche Beschriftungen. Ein guter Artikel ist der hier: http://gazette.de/Archiv/Gazette-Mai2001/Willberg.html Keine Ahnung ob es Tannenberg, National oder Gotenburg als freien Font gibt. je nach Kontext war der Nazi-faschismus wahlweise traditionell deutschtümelnd rückwärtsgewandt oder progressiv fortschrittssymbolisierend, teilweise sogar avantgardistisch, sieht man z.B. auch in der Architektur, wo die Industriearchitektur modern, rational und progressiv war, während die Siedlungspolitik romantisch verklärend dörfliche Strukturen simulierte (wohlgemerkt nach der Industriealisierung, und auch im Kontext von Großstädten wie Berlin, s. z.B. SS-Kameradschaftssiedlung Zehlendorf), und die Staatsarchitektur antikisierende, monumentale Repräsentationsbauten hinklotzte (dabei versucht, eine Kontinuitätslinie vom römischen Weltreich über das deutsche Kaiserreich des Mittelalters zum 3. Reich zu spannen), in deren Schatten der Einzelne sich wie ein kleiner unbedeutender Wurm fühlt, zumindest was das so intendiert ;-) Da scheint es nur logisch, dass auch Karten als technisches Medium ein eher modernes Antlitz hatten, und eben normalerweise keine Frakturschrift verwendeten. Ein bisschen was über den Einsatz von Frakturschrift findet man hier: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraktur_%28Schrift%29#Verwendung_der_Fraktur_in_der_Neuzeit Gruß, Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[OSM-ja] JOSMが動かない(api.openstreetmap.org/api/capabilitiesアクセス出来ず)
JOSMのバージョンが新しくなり、入れ替えてみました。 そのせいなのか確認出来てませんが、 JOSMは次のリソースにアクセスしようとしました。 ・ https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/capabilities しかし、次のネットワークエラーで失敗しました。 ・ java.netSocketTimeoutException: connect timed out プロキシ設定が行われていない可能性があります。 プロキシ設定を変更しますか? というエラーが出て、JOSMが動きません。 ;; ANSWER SECTION: api.openstreetmap.org. 600 IN A 193.63.75.99 api.openstreetmap.org. 600 IN A 193.63.75.100 api.openstreetmap.org. 600 IN A 193.63.75.103 なので、上記3つが接続先なのですが、全部pingは届きます。 バージョンアップで設定変更しなければならないことあるのでしょうか? ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping dangerous bicycle locations?
2015-03-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com: Subdivision of the hazard namespace To me it would come naturally to subdivide the namespace as follows for different users of the road: - hazard:general= - hazard:pedestrian= - hazard:motor_vehicle= - hazard:bicycle= - etc. +1, but I suggest to keep hazard for hazard:general Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-hr] HULK hackaton
http://www.linux.hr/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3169 Ekipa trazi ideje. Šta kažete da kreiramo hackaton gdje bi unosili podatke za jedan od naših vrtova? Recimo naselja u RH? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sBAMDmcLItgro3wQrIO-JN2LxuRRLyx8JL-a5yO2gUk/edit?pli=1#gid=0 Još ih je hrpu sa nedostajućim popisom stanovništva. ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
[Talk-de] Fahrt zu Fossgis über Dortmund
Hallo, fährt jemand (mit Auto) zur Fossgis und kommt an Dortmund vorbei? Dort liegt etwas und könnte mit zur Fossgis fahren. Mfg Marc ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-dk] Flytning af Marguritruten i forbindelse med vejændring
Hej Jesper Margueritruten ser fin ud, men jeg ville rydde lidt op i skoven af tags i cykeltunnellen og desuden bør en cykelsti i en tunnel ikke dele noder med de veje/jernbaner den går under. Richard Fairhurst der blandt andet står bag http://cycle.travel argumenterede på et tidspunkt i en blog http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Richard/diary/20333[1] for brugen af highway=cycleway fremfor highway=path for cykelstier og jeg har overgivet mig og følger nu hans anbefaling på det punkt. Mvh Michael/Hjart Tirsdag den 10. marts 2015 11:49:05 skrev Jesper Dige: Hej Dette er min første email på listen. Da jeg har ændret på Margueritruten, vil jeg gerne have nogle af jer mere erfarne, til at kontrollere jeg ikke har lavet noget bras. Min første rettelse med relationer. Jeg har ingen fejl i JOSM når jeg uploader. Det er i toppen i skørping, hvor Himmerlandsvej og Jyllandsgade er blevet adskildt i jernbane overskæringen, som er erstattet af en cykel og gang tunnel. Vej forbindelsen er flyttet til Under Broen. Her er nu rute ref 519 og Margueritruten. Changesettet er her http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29381216 Venlig Hilsen Jesper Dige [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Richard/diary/20333 ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
[Talk-it] OpenRouteService
Segnalo che ORS non è morto: http://giscienceblog.uni-hd.de/2015/02/26/ors-new-backend/ ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-dk] Flytning af Marguritruten i forbindelse med vejændring
Hej Dette er min første email på listen. Da jeg har ændret på Margueritruten, vil jeg gerne have nogle af jer mere erfarne, til at kontrollere jeg ikke har lavet noget bras. Min første rettelse med relationer. Jeg har ingen fejl i JOSM når jeg uploader. Det er i toppen i skørping, hvor Himmerlandsvej og Jyllandsgade er blevet adskildt i jernbane overskæringen, som er erstattet af en cykel og gang tunnel. Vej forbindelsen er flyttet til Under Broen. Her er nu rute ref 519 og Margueritruten. Changesettet er her http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29381216 Venlig Hilsen Jesper Dige ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Updated geocoding community guideline proposal
Am 10.03.2015 um 02:10 schrieb Alex Barth: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch mailto:si...@poole.ch wrote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Geocoding_-_Guideline#.22Collective_Database.22_alternative 1. Why is the input data part of the Derivative Database? There is an underlying assumption that the input data will match, in the best case exactly, an object in the OSM dataset, and that you are extracting further information about it (aka its geographic location) from the OSM data. Note that in this model we are treating the input data as a key in to the geocoded dataset. Treating the geocoded results plus input data as a derivative DB sidesteps various issues. They have their roots in, on the one hand, the most popular OSM based geocoder not just returning a pair of coordinates and, on the other hand, us having no control over how geocoding is technically implemented. It further makes clear if that you are using more attributes to improve the geocoding that they are subject to the same terms. Not sure I follow here. The geocoded results plus input data in and itself would be in the most common cases not Substantial even by OSM's very aggressive definition of what's Substantial ( 100 features OTOH). A non-Substantial extract would remain non-Substantial. The cases I thought we were discussing here, are the real world requirements of 100'000 if not millions of objects that have to be bulk geo-coded. If these use cases are of no concern or don't actually exist, then it is not quite clear to me why we are having the discussion in the first place, given that: - on the fly geocoding is unproblematic (no database created) - a small number of geocoded results is non-Substantial and doesn't create share alike obligations. So it depends on how you'd store the results returned by the geocoder and whether you'd store the input data with it. The logic is fairly clear. Assume you have a database of restaurant reviews, besides the review related data, every entry has restaurant name and street address. - I create a table with name and street address extracted from my database. - I geocode name and street address with OSM, adding the coordinates (or building polygons or whatever) to above table - I can now use this table (subject to the ODbL) and the original data together as a collective database to for example create a map with the restaurant locations or run a service that calculate routes to the restaurants on the fly. The important bit is not arguing about how the database is arranged and so on, but more that it gives us a model with which we can define precisely which data is subject to being available on ODbL terms. And yes in above example a user could ask you to give out the list of restaurant names, addresses and coordinates, which assuming that, for example, names could be missing in OSM, would actually be useful to the community. Which brings us to point 2: 2. This language is not explicit about Geocoding Results from other databases that are stored in the same database. Would they be part of the Derivative Database? I believe that is a not an issue as formulated. You would need a clear way of keeping the data separate. For lack of a better example: two tables: addresses geocoded with OSM, addresses geocoded with here, but IMHO labelling the geocoding source could be considered enough (given that you may want to provide dynamically displayed attribution you would likely want to do this in any case). Now this interpretation together with the linked data concept of the same Collective Database alternative (below) would mean that only data directly retrieved from OSM would ever be covered by the ODbL. The ODbL would not extend to any data added to the same database. Right? As written in my original mail, the main issue is not so much that you can use similar data from a different source together with your dataset, the question is how do you do so without using information from OSM? Aka the fall back question. Re-visiting the example above: assume that the 2nd point is modified to be: - I geocode name and street address with OSM, adding the coordinates (or building polygons or whatever) to above table, if I don't find a match or the match in OSM doesn't fit my quality requirements, I geocode the name and address with a commercial database and store the results in a separate table. Is the 2nd table free of OSM rights? Not an easy question to answer. Note: http://osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines/Horizontal_Map_Layers_-_Guideline currently, on a similar issue, takes the stance that this is not something that is supported. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list
[OSM-talk] Routing across parks
Hi With the addition of routing to the man page there's been a few cases of adding ways in order to get routing to work. This is not the fault of the people editing, but the routing software. For example let's use parks. Both of the foot routers won't cross the park unless there's a specific path way. However, as users can wander about anywhere they like there are no marked paths, not even worn ground. (I would post an example but OSM has just gone down) I thought the assumption was parks pedestrian areas etc were able to be crossed as long as there were ways joined to the perimeter to enter/exit. Why can't routing software process the perimeter checking each node to see if there's a joined way to exit? As parks have many entrances adding ways connecting up each of them would be over the top. Separate Q: On Richard F. cycle.travel routing. How do reset start again? Cheers Dave F. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-us] Mappy hour tomorrow!
Thanks Paul. I'll let you know. And thank you Richard, I agree, they are fun! On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:29 AM Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: I'm pretty adept at using Google+; if need be I can create the events in the future, I just need to know when. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 3/8/15 11:49 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: Sorry you can't make it Jack. The direct hangout link is here - I think: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/cpiqg6sldpjconoipvhmd3skhcc Sorry, Google+ makes it really hard to just share a link to an event. I still don't quite understand how it works. that link is telling me i need an invitation; i have requested one and am waiting for it. i agree, the G+ interface for hangouts is remarkably confusing. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks
Ah, thanks. With the X I assumed that was closing the side panel, not just clearing the data. On 10/03/2015 12:57, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Dave F. wrote: On Richard F. cycle.travel routing. How do reset start again? There's a Close route button at the top of the turn-by-turn directions - click that and it'll clear the route. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Routing-across-parks-tp5836533p5836536.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Over 9000 :-)
Congratulations, there are now more than two million registered OpenStreetMap editing api accounts. Let's all survey pur neighbourhoods today and see how much we can improve. Happy mapping. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-es] Academias de idiomas
Hola: iba yo tan tranquilo a incluir una academia de idiomas en la que ha empezado a trabajar una conocida y me encuentro con que no hay ninguna etiqueta que cubra estos establecimientos. Se me ha ocurrido usar amenity=school y school=language, pero solo hay 9 usos de esta última. ¿Alguna sugerencia? ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
Re: [Talk-it] no track !
Alessandro Barbieri wrote Il 09/03/2015 17:03, girarsi_liste ha scritto: Se non sei sicuro usa highway=road, vale a dire non classificabile. road è temporaneo e vuol dire non so classificarlo ma va classificato. This is intended as a temporary tag to mark a road until it has been properly surveyed. Once it has been surveyed, the classification should be updated to the appropriate value. +1 IMHO va benissimo /track/, oppure /service/, se sai a cosa serve quella specifica strada. /surface=*/ serve per definire che tipo di terreno troverai percorrendola (asfalto, ghiaia, sterrato, ecc., con il tag jolly /unpaved/ ad indicare -se ho ben capito anch'io- una strada genericamente non-rivestita da uno strato di materiale duro, da specificarsi meglio in seguito) /path/ si riferisce ad un generico percorso non utilizzabile da mezzi a motore (ok piedi, bici, slitta e dorso di mulo, secondo il Wiki). Potrebbe forse andar bene anche nel caso in discussione, ma bisognerebbe accertarsi che ci siano dei cartelli specifici (oppure, previo survey, vrificare che i mezzi a motore non possano effettivamente transitarvi (ad es. per via del terreno impervio). Ciao, MAx -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/no-track-tp5836343p5836532.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-ja] JOSMが動かない(api.openstreetmap.org/api/capabilitiesアクセス出来ず)
いいだです。 先ほどから、データアップロードのAPIの調子が悪いようです。 僕もタイムアウトします。 昨日も、OWGメンバーがデータセンター入りしていたようですし、 しばらく待ったほうがよいかもしれません。 なお、緊急メンテ等の情報は以下のTwitterアカウントで流されることが多いです。 https://twitter.com/OSM_Tech 2015年3月10日 21:08 ribbon o...@ns.ribbon.or.jp: JOSMのバージョンが新しくなり、入れ替えてみました。 そのせいなのか確認出来てませんが、 JOSMは次のリソースにアクセスしようとしました。 ・ https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/capabilities しかし、次のネットワークエラーで失敗しました。 ・ java.netSocketTimeoutException: connect timed out プロキシ設定が行われていない可能性があります。 プロキシ設定を変更しますか? というエラーが出て、JOSMが動きません。 ;; ANSWER SECTION: api.openstreetmap.org. 600 IN A 193.63.75.99 api.openstreetmap.org. 600 IN A 193.63.75.100 api.openstreetmap.org. 600 IN A 193.63.75.103 なので、上記3つが接続先なのですが、全部pingは届きます。 バージョンアップで設定変更しなければならないことあるのでしょうか? ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
Re: [OSM-talk] Quality of OSM Notes
Bryce - that is a good point. When a note gets resolved, we have the ideal opportunity to engage the casual contributor who is kind enough to leave a note that is good enough for someone to act on. Unfortunately we cannot (easily?) do that the way notes are set up right now. At Telenav we go around that problem by adding a service layer between the notes and the user. When someone submits feedback with Scout, it goes to that service layer, which then determines if it's 'good enough' and posts it to OSM as a note. It keeps track of the OSM status of the note, and gets back to the Scout user when it gets resolved in OSM. (I wrote about this in my diary, http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/28208). This system is tailored to our specific use case but it would not be too hard (famous last words) to add this to 'native' OSM by asking folks to (optionally) leave their email address so we can keep them apprised of its status. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote: Less notes should not be an objective, smarter ways to look at them and process them should. I agree, simplicity rules. Some ideas to manage the overkill. While we can build better tools to process large numbers of notes, the one thing we can't do under the current system is ask the person who wrote the note for more information. There's (usually) just one chance to collect that information. And when the map is updated, is an excellent time to draw people back to OSM for a second look (so they can take pride in having contributed). For both reasons I think that getting more contact information outweighs simplicity. -- Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-us] Mappy hour tomorrow!
On Mar 8, 2015 10:43 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hey all, It's time for Mappy Hour tomorrow! I changed the time slot to 11am Pacific / 2pm Eastern, Thanks for organizing these, Martijn. They're fun. :-) ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks
Dave F. wrote: On Richard F. cycle.travel routing. How do reset start again? There's a Close route button at the top of the turn-by-turn directions - click that and it'll clear the route. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Routing-across-parks-tp5836533p5836536.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-ca] Manitoba Snowmobile trails
Hi everyone We have a user (IndyGord) who imported and has been updating the official organized snowmobile routes, which is great. Unfortunately he doesn't do a very good job. The trails ignore existing infrastructure and intersect highways without an intersecting node, which leads to things like this ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.44774/-96.25508 the snowmobile trails are tagged as paths, everything else is a track) and has caused problems with bike and foot routing throughout the province. I attempted to fix this by converting the trails into a relation and changing those routes accessible by other means of transportation into tracks. Paths that could not be used by anything except snowmobiles (i.e. they cross open water) were tagged foot=no and bicycle=no. I initially did trail 29 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4651257) but decided to look for feedback before proceeding. I sent a message to IndyGord on the 6th, but I haven't got a response. So I am looking for feedback on my conversion of trail 29 and any suggestions for how to do the rest of the province. Additionally, thoughts on how to reach out to IndyGord would be appreciated. Sam ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
[Talk-ca] Ottawa March Meetup
Hi folks, Join us Friday March 26th at 7pm for our monthly meetup. Denis will be giving a quick talk and demo on setting up a local Nominatim service for geocoding. Everyone is welcome, so drop by:) Details here: http://meetu.ps/2GSFby Cheers, Richard ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-it] Ausili per mappare route in Josm
Per la continuità ho notato che Josm dà una indicazione già nella finestra di modifica della relazione, quindi questo è già a posto. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ausili-per-mappare-route-in-Josm-tp5836565p5836567.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks
Subject: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks For example let's use parks. Both of the foot routers won't cross the park unless there's a specific path way. However, as users can wander about anywhere they like there are no marked paths, not even worn ground. (I would post an example but OSM has just gone down) If I understand correctly that you want routing to cross a park as long as the way in and the way out are connected to the perimeter of the park. This is only correct in parks where you are free to walk anywhere. Most parks in continental Europe do not work this way. Typically, but not always, you have to stay on the paths. To solve this, one needs possibly a new (?) tag for parks like stay_on_path=yes|no ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] Ausili per mappare route in Josm
Per verificare la continuità puoi utilizzare http://ra.osmsurround.org/ 2015-03-10 17:43 GMT+01:00 mircozorzo mircozo...@inwind.it: Ciao, vorrei mappare/controllare un itinerario, vorrei aprire la relazione e poterne scorrere i membri controllando in questo modo che ci sia continuità. E' un buon metodo? C'è un metodo migliore più veloce/automatico? Se è il migliore vorrei sapere se si può fare in modo che scorrendo i membri josm lo selezioni automaticamente e la finestra della mappa si sposti seguendo/zoomando sul membro selezionato di volta in volta. In altre parole vorrei poter scorrere con i tasti della tastiera i membri velocemente fintanto che la finestra tiene il focus sul membro di volta in volta evidenziato. Grazie. Ciao, Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ausili-per-mappare-route-in-Josm-tp5836565.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks
On 3/10/2015 12:56 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: If I understand correctly that you want routing to cross a park as long as the way in and the way out are connected to the perimeter of the park. This is only correct in parks where you are free to walk anywhere. Most parks in continental Europe do not work this way. Typically, but not always, you have to stay on the paths. To solve this, one needs possibly a new (?) tag for parks like stay_on_path=yes|no I agree - there needs to be areas of general walk permission established before a router can include that area. FYI - OpenTripPlanner includes some form of routing for highway=pedstrian areas. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] High load on the rendering servers?
On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 15:45:29 +0100, colliar wrote: Sounds like work for the editor software if the api is not capable to prevent moving a node hundreds of kilometres. Even if the API rejects very long ways the editor needs a little work to output a useful error message like precondition failed (just love that one) to the user. Thomas ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-fr] Erreurs Osmose Fantoir place=
Bonjour, je n'arrive pas à corriger les erreurs d'Osmose *Objet de type FANTOIR non concordant avec un objet OSM* FANTOIR B to W type is for locality, hamlet or isolated_dwelling Ce sont des noms donnés à des petits quartiers d'une petite ville. Au début javais mis place=suburg on m'a suggéré place=neighbourhood qui serait plus adapté dans ce cas. J'ai bien peur que l'erreur pourrait venir d'Osmose qui pour les Fantoirs de B à W n'accepte que locality, hamlet or isolated_dwelling. Pensez vous qu'Osmose soit trop restrictif dans ces choix, ou en effet le tag place=neighbourhood n'est toujours pas adapté. Que faudrait il mettre alors. Pour voir de quoi il s’agit, les erreurs sont ici http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/?username=Cavokld# Merci de votre aide ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk] Cat Forest
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:02 AM, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote: The source of Cat Forest has been found: https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 Thanks to the new mapper who explained which guide they were going through at the time. Excellent detective work and followup! ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-it] Ausili per mappare route in Josm
Ciao, vorrei mappare/controllare un itinerario, vorrei aprire la relazione e poterne scorrere i membri controllando in questo modo che ci sia continuità. E' un buon metodo? C'è un metodo migliore più veloce/automatico? Se è il migliore vorrei sapere se si può fare in modo che scorrendo i membri josm lo selezioni automaticamente e la finestra della mappa si sposti seguendo/zoomando sul membro selezionato di volta in volta. In altre parole vorrei poter scorrere con i tasti della tastiera i membri velocemente fintanto che la finestra tiene il focus sul membro di volta in volta evidenziato. Grazie. Ciao, Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ausili-per-mappare-route-in-Josm-tp5836565.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-cz] Licence (zase)
On 03/10/2015 06:10 PM, Petr Vejsada wrote: Ahoj, google API to umí, viz http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Maps_Example No technicky to umí, což o to (zobrazí libovolnou mapovou vrstvu, když ji dostane ve správným formátu). Jenom zrovna tenhle příklad je pro změnu v rozporu s googlí licencí - ta vyžaduje neschovaný googlí logo a Podmínky užití bez ohledu na to, co za dlaždice zobrazuje, prostě tím, že je to Google Maps API. takže problém bude s tím pluginem a v tom případě je pro provozovatele nejjednodušší způsob, jak problém vyřešit, vypnout OSM Teoreticky by se to dalo řešit _přidáním_ (c) OSM Contributors navíc k tomu googlímu, ale...je to takovej licenční kočkopes a čert ví, jestli vůbec nějaký legální řešení existuje. Takže jo, mapy od Googlu a OSM není úplně vhodný kombinovat, opruzený z toho budou všechny strany. Honza Piškvor Martinec ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSRM-talk] arrive to destination on the adequate side in two-way streets
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:54:06PM -0300, Fernando Pacheco wrote: Hi all. We are developing an application for routing solid waste collection trucks. We use OSRM to calculate distances between collecting points (intermediate points). Some customers are located in two-way streets (simple, no separators) ... How can I say to OSRM that must arrive to the collecting points at the adequate side of the street? That is, on the side where the client is, without crossing the opposite direction of the street to access the load. Is it possible?. Thanks in advance. Fernando. I had the immediate idea of taking the dataset and duplicated all non-oneway streets (only the way) and making it 2 oneways. I am unshure now how to tell osrm you want to end up on a specific way (not location) which is geometrically identical to the other. Another idea - create small fake ways via postgis etc from the nearest road to your collection point near the street and add a fake turn restriction from the road ( only_right_turn ). Flo -- Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de We need to self-defense - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today! signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Your opinion about SOTM US
Russ Nelson writes: For OSM in the US? Finding and fixing the badly-digitized TIGER data. I agree. Interstates are largely there, state highways are getting there, rail is underway now, and a lot of lesser streets and highways are cleaned up. But there remain substantial TIGER deserts, and much TIGER data are pretty darn noisy: downright inaccurate (but we do seem to agree, better than nothing). Who remembers Operation Cowboy?! We are now kind of doing something like that with rail (in a very loose way with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_States_railways), but TIGER data in general just need serious and sustained attention until consensus emerges that they don't. That seems a long way off so let's do our best to roll up our sleeves and identify how and where this might happen. SteveA California ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-es] Academias de idiomas
Hola, a mí me parece más elegante quizá la opción del tag amenity=training y training=* (en este caso, language). Lo que intentaría buscar es alguna etiqueta que permita definir los idiomas que se imparten en la academia, pero ahí ya no sé si sería mejor usar la fórmular de indicarlo con separadores con :, para permitir que una academia tenga varios idiomas, o cuál sería la mejor forma... algo así como language:es=yes,language:en=yes, etc. Un saludo, Jonás. 2015-03-10 15:31 GMT+01:00 Miguel Sevilla-Callejo miguel.sevi...@uam.es: Hola, Hace mucho tiempo me encontré con este problema y tras mucho darle vueltas por la wiki llegué a otra solución: amenity=training training=languaje No me pregunteis cómo llegué a esa conclusión pero me pareció la más correcta a pesar de no encontrar muchos usos. Y es que en el fondo una academia de idiomas (esto no es exactamente eso pero me valía) no es muy diferente de una autoescuela, en la que se usa amenity=training y pensé (o vi, ya no me acuerdo) que esa combinación podía ser interesante. aquí el nodo en cuestión: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2430285941 No tiene renderizado por cierto... Ya diréis qué solución os parece más adecuada. ... encontré mi referencia: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training M *[image: Geo]**Miguel Sevilla Callejo* *Doctor en Geografía | Doctor in Geography* *Consultor freelance e investigador | Freelance Consultant Researcher* Colaborador del Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, CSIC, Zaragoza | Fellow at the Pyrenean Institute of Ecology - Spanish National Research Council Colegiado nº698, Colegio Oficial de Geógrafos | Member #698, Spanish Professional Association of Geographers Web: http://bit.ly/sevillacallejo http://bit.ly/sevillacallejo http://bit.ly/sevillacallejo 2015-03-10 14:22 GMT+01:00 Ander Pijoan ander.pij...@deusto.es: Pensaba que existía language_school. Pero mirando taginfo parece que no: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=language_school#values Y shcool=language está en las mismas: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/school=language No lo tengo nada claro pero creo que igual sería mejor amenity=language_school ya que poniendo amenity=school + school=language igual la gente busca amenity=school y se creen que es una escuela? No lo sé, a ver si alguien más opina algo. El 10 de marzo de 2015, 14:13, Paúl Sanz paulsanzca...@gmail.com escribió: Hola: iba yo tan tranquilo a incluir una academia de idiomas en la que ha empezado a trabajar una conocida y me encuentro con que no hay ninguna etiqueta que cubra estos establecimientos. Se me ha ocurrido usar amenity=school y school=language, pero solo hay 9 usos de esta última. ¿Alguna sugerencia? ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es -- Ander Pijoan Lamas Research Assistant, Deustotech Computer Science Engineer University of Deusto E-mail: ander.pij...@deusto.es Phone: +34 664471228 in: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=162888312 ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es -- Jonás Andradas GPG Fingerprint: 678F 7BD0 83C3 28CE 9E8F 3F7F 4D87 9996 E0C6 9372 Keyservers: pgp.mit.edu | pgp.rediris.es ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
Re: [Talk-cz] Licence (zase)
Ahoj, google API to umí, viz http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Maps_Example nebo z nedávné doby z praxe http://www.vyletsepsem.cz/pridat-vylet takže problém bude s tím pluginem a v tom případě je pro provozovatele nejjednodušší způsob, jak problém vyřešit, vypnout OSM Dne Út 10. března 2015 10:04:11, Marián Kyral napsal(a): turistika.cz - stejný problém: http://www.turistika.cz/mapy/ceska-republika#center=49.82,15.475zoom=7; layerControl=vylety,mista,trasylayerFilterItem=mapType=OSM Chtělo by to prozkoumat to API. Problém je buď v API - že neumožňuje přidat podmínky vrstvy nebo nebo to neumí ty pluginy. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Licence (zase)
Ahoj, ten kluk, co dělá vyletsepsem.cz tam má všechno - když je zobrazená OSM vrstva, má tam googlí logo, (C) OSM i googlí podmínky použití, což je IMO správně. I nad OSM vrstvou si návštěvník pustit streetview, tedy podmínky užití Googlu jsou na místě. -- Petr Dne Út 10. března 2015 18:21:30, Jan Martinec napsal(a): Teoreticky by se to dalo řešit _přidáním_ (c) OSM Contributors navíc k tomu googlímu, ale...je to takovej licenční kočkopes a čert ví, jestli vůbec nějaký legální řešení existuje. Takže jo, mapy od Googlu a OSM není úplně vhodný kombinovat, opruzený z toho budou všechny strany. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk] Quality of OSM Notes
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: While we can build better tools to process large numbers of notes, the one thing we can't do under the current system is ask the person who wrote the note for more information. There's (usually) just one chance to collect that information. And when the map is updated, is an excellent time to draw people back to OSM for a second look (so they can take pride in having contributed). So require an OSM account for posting notes? -- Alex Barth Vice President OpenStreetMap United States Inc. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Your opinion about SOTM US
Alex, Our friends on the other side of the pond like to point out that we have many poorly and unmapped areas. I'm sure we all agree that their assessment is correct. Solving this problem should be one of our highest priorities. Two solutions come to mind, increase the number of imports and growing the community of mappers. While I feel that imports have their place, i.e. addresses and building outlines, my preferred solution is to increase the number of mappers. It would be great to see a session to brainstorm how to set target growth rates and then how to achieve them. My sense is that having the US Chapter Board involved is needed to help overcome some obstacles, ie. funding, software tools, communications, etc. I'd be happy to create a proposal for such a session, but it would need a facilitator to help us work with a large group of interested parties. (I haven't facilitated a large group in many years.) My other obstacle is I'm currently visiting Costa Rica and I'm often in places with limited internet access which makes it hard to communicate. I'd like to get some feedback what others think. Do we have a problem of being under and poorly mapped lands? Is it worthwhile to hold a session to build a roadmap to fix it? If so how would you do it? Clifford On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote: Casting the net a little wider: What do you think are the big topics and challenges for OpenStreetMap as we're about to go into the second decade? What does this mean for State of the Map? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hey all, I put together a 3 minute survey about the upcoming State of the Map US conference. The main thing I would like to know more about is the types of talks you would be interested in, or even specifically which people or organizations you would want to see a talk from. You can find the survey here: http://goo.gl/forms/YZpm2aPk2O If you don't want to fill out the survey, you can also send your opinion my way in an email. In any case, thanks in advance for taking the time. Remember, the Call for Papers will be open for another 3 weeks: http://stateofthemap.us/talk/ Thanks again, -- Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ Talk-us mailing list talk...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping dangerous bicycle locations?
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:26:38 +0100, Stefan Keller wrote: What about crowdsourcing dangerous bicycle locations using key/tag hazard? See http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:hazard And see also https://twitter.com/sfkeller/status/574213951644368896 tl;dr: As a lot of others already said: a quite subjective thing to map. In Germany a lot of more experienced bicyclists regard all separate cycleways or even footways with bicycle=yes as hazard – with good reason. Every year a signifikant number of bicyclists get right-hooked by cars turning right and their drivers not paying enough attention. Every year, a signifikant number of those right-hooked bicyclists die. Never mind the cars parking on the cycleways, crossing service streets, the pedestrians, dogs etc which would make the experienced bicyclist cringe from awe while the less experienced are happy to cruise along with walking speed even on sidewalks where they are not allowed except being ten or younger. Ridiculous is the mentioning of snow or shattered glass. During winter and below 0°C common sense should tell a bicyclist that surfaces might be covered with snow or ice and thus slippery. Some tags regarding winter servicing do exist although the proposal wasn't guided to a voting process. For glass and other stuff on highways: everybody should expect that on the surface of the road stuff may lay which can harm the vehicle – from glass of bottles thrown away by stupid people to shattered windows of a car after an accident to nails and screws falling off carpenter's car to vehicle parts lost while driving (exhaust, bump guard, suspension parts, oil etc). Bicyclists may take into consideration that on a road frequently traveled by cars the smaller stuff like glass gets cleared away by the crumbling effect of the car's tires so that cleaning is in opposition to a cycleway needed less often. (Of course the bicyclist shouldn't ride to the utmost right of a highway were no cars go and all the rubble collects) Thomas ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-be] Call for Venues Open: State of the Map 2016
Dear all, I have proposed and obtained that RMLL be organised in Brussels in July 2013. I would like to propose that State of the map be organised at ULB in Brussels in 2016. Who would help in structuring the dossier and later help with the local organization ? Much thanks, Nicolas PS I think that organizing such an event can help to structure our community and strengthen the use of OSM in Belgium -- Message transféré -- From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com Date: Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:16 PM Subject: Call for Venues Open: State of the Map 2016 The Call for Venues for State of the Map 2016 is now open. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Call_for_venues Build a team for your city and bid to host the OpenStreetMap conference. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk] Quality of OSM Notes
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Alex Barth a...@openstreetmap.us wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: While we can build better tools to process large numbers of notes, the one thing we can't do under the current system is ask the person who wrote the note for more information. There's (usually) just one chance to collect that information. And when the map is updated, is an excellent time to draw people back to OSM for a second look (so they can take pride in having contributed). So require an OSM account for posting notes? No, don't require an OSM account. Not at all. But a craigslist-like anonymous email would work fine. The user enters a real email address, and osm.org promises to forward only map update notices to it (or some version of that). Have a look at the model articulated by Nir Eyal to try and describe why sites like Pinterest and Instagram took off. The model posits that successful properties entice people to take an action (post a note), get a reward (a return email saying the note was useful), they feel a sense of investment and are triggered to make another action (say, another note, or a map edit): http://www.nirandfar.com/2012/03/how-to-manufacture-desire.html The model is not a perfect fit, but it's close. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] New taginfo feature and a challenge...
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote: Hi! Taginfo just got a new feature, it can now find keys similar to other keys. This is useful to find related keys, but also to find misspelled keys. I hope the community uses this feature to clean up those wayward keys... More at http://blog.jochentopf.com/2015-03-05-new-taginfo-features-and-a-challenge.html It's a great feature, thanks! ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: You've scheduled: Openstreetmap Local Meetup Leuven March 28
Dear Jo I have registered but will only be able to be with you at about 17. Have you got in touch with jounalists to invite them to attend and maybe report the event afterwards ? Regards NP ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Scholarships and talks deadlines - we'd like to hear from you!
Scholarships still open! -- Forwarded message -- From: Alex Barth a...@openstreetmap.us Date: Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:31 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] Scholarships and talks deadlines - we'd like to hear from you! To: Open Street Map Talk-US talk...@openstreetmap.org, OSM Talk t...@openstreetmap.org Hello everyone - Important deadlines are coming up for State of the Map US: - March 15: apply for a scholarship - March 22: submit a talk - March 31: last day to get an early bird ticket for $90 This is particularly a call to everyone subscribed to this list. So many of you do amazing work on the map or on OpenStreetMap software - we'd love to invite you to share experiences from your work or your ideas for the project. Submitting a talk is not the only way to participate: - You can schedule birds of a feather sessions (round tables) ad-hoc at the conference - There will be a hack day with plenty of space and opportunity for code sprints, documentation sprints, and workshops - The international Maptime community will hold their summit at the conference - The American Red Cross will be hosting a missing maps party - There will be an NYC foot survey Get in touch if you have ideas: bo...@opensteretmap.us or just post here on the list. This conference is organized by the OpenStreetMap US chapter and volunteers but this is really an open invitation to anyone in the world. Look at it like your neighbor is throwing a party and everyone's invited over. Looking forward to seeing you in New York - Alex PS: if you'd like to help spread the word: https://twitter.com/sotmus/status/575450081886781441 -- Alex Barth Vice President OpenStreetMap United States Inc. ___ talk mailing list t...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Your opinion about SOTM US
Alex, Our friends on the other side of the pond like to point out that we have many poorly and unmapped areas. I'm sure we all agree that their assessment is correct. Solving this problem should be one of our highest priorities. Two solutions come to mind, increase the number of imports and growing the community of mappers. While I feel that imports have their place, i.e. addresses and building outlines, my preferred solution is to increase the number of mappers. It would be great to see a session to brainstorm how to set target growth rates and then how to achieve them. My sense is that having the US Chapter Board involved is needed to help overcome some obstacles, ie. funding, software tools, communications, etc. I'd be happy to create a proposal for such a session, but it would need a facilitator to help us work with a large group of interested parties. (I haven't facilitated a large group in many years.) My other obstacle is I'm currently visiting Costa Rica and I'm often in places with limited internet access which makes it hard to communicate. I'd like to get some feedback what others think. Do we have a problem of being under and poorly mapped lands? Is it worthwhile to hold a session to build a roadmap to fix it? If so how would you do it? Clifford On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote: Casting the net a little wider: What do you think are the big topics and challenges for OpenStreetMap as we're about to go into the second decade? What does this mean for State of the Map? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hey all, I put together a 3 minute survey about the upcoming State of the Map US conference. The main thing I would like to know more about is the types of talks you would be interested in, or even specifically which people or organizations you would want to see a talk from. You can find the survey here: http://goo.gl/forms/YZpm2aPk2O If you don't want to fill out the survey, you can also send your opinion my way in an email. In any case, thanks in advance for taking the time. Remember, the Call for Papers will be open for another 3 weeks: http://stateofthemap.us/talk/ Thanks again, -- Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel ___ talk mailing list t...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-es] Academias de idiomas
Hola, Hace mucho tiempo me encontré con este problema y tras mucho darle vueltas por la wiki llegué a otra solución: amenity=training training=languaje No me pregunteis cómo llegué a esa conclusión pero me pareció la más correcta a pesar de no encontrar muchos usos. Y es que en el fondo una academia de idiomas (esto no es exactamente eso pero me valía) no es muy diferente de una autoescuela, en la que se usa amenity=training y pensé (o vi, ya no me acuerdo) que esa combinación podía ser interesante. aquí el nodo en cuestión: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2430285941 No tiene renderizado por cierto... Ya diréis qué solución os parece más adecuada. ... encontré mi referencia: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training M *[image: Geo]**Miguel Sevilla Callejo* *Doctor en Geografía | Doctor in Geography* *Consultor freelance e investigador | Freelance Consultant Researcher* Colaborador del Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, CSIC, Zaragoza | Fellow at the Pyrenean Institute of Ecology - Spanish National Research Council Colegiado nº698, Colegio Oficial de Geógrafos | Member #698, Spanish Professional Association of Geographers Web: http://bit.ly/sevillacallejo http://bit.ly/sevillacallejo http://bit.ly/sevillacallejo 2015-03-10 14:22 GMT+01:00 Ander Pijoan ander.pij...@deusto.es: Pensaba que existía language_school. Pero mirando taginfo parece que no: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=language_school#values Y shcool=language está en las mismas: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/school=language No lo tengo nada claro pero creo que igual sería mejor amenity=language_school ya que poniendo amenity=school + school=language igual la gente busca amenity=school y se creen que es una escuela? No lo sé, a ver si alguien más opina algo. El 10 de marzo de 2015, 14:13, Paúl Sanz paulsanzca...@gmail.com escribió: Hola: iba yo tan tranquilo a incluir una academia de idiomas en la que ha empezado a trabajar una conocida y me encuentro con que no hay ninguna etiqueta que cubra estos establecimientos. Se me ha ocurrido usar amenity=school y school=language, pero solo hay 9 usos de esta última. ¿Alguna sugerencia? ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es -- Ander Pijoan Lamas Research Assistant, Deustotech Computer Science Engineer University of Deusto E-mail: ander.pij...@deusto.es Phone: +34 664471228 in: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=162888312 ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
[OSRM-talk] osrm route directly from command line not via http possible?
Hi I'm new to OSRM and the mailing list but have managed to get it all working well on a 64bit Ubuntu 14.04 server. I’m writing looking for help to get OSRM’s routing algorithm working directly from the command line rather than via http. More info OSRM is already extremely fast when called using curl http://localhost … - however I’m looking to include it an algorithm to generate millions of realistic driving routes, and am hoping that the underlying C++ routing function might be accessible from the command line directly in some way. With a command line function that wraps around OSRM’s routing algorithm, I could call this from within R where I’m writing the rest of my code. My C++ skills are unfortunately at the extreme beginner level, but I have found where I might start if I were much more advanced: either the file simpleclient.cpp in the OSRM github repo or the node_osrm.cpp file in the node-osrm repo which looks like it's similar to simpleclient.cpp. Hopefully someone has already crossed this bridge and could I'm hoping provide some kind of simple command-line wrapper function to these underlying c++ functions so that I can avoid the http approach which I'm guessing slows things down. Thanks in advance... Thanks so much in advance I really appreciate any help or tips to get this working Love osrm by the way Mike PS I posted this on stackoverflow but found this mailing list and thought I might have more luck using it. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28958577/open-source-routing-machine-via-the-commandl ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping dangerous bicycle locations?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: Sharp curves .. would they not be obvious from the map it self .. one node on the sharp corner compared to many for a 'smooth' corner.'Masked' corners where some object hides on coming traffic (e.g. building, vegetation) are also a hazard. These hazards exist for all kinds of traffic and not indicated on maps. The signs I have in mind were added after a long history of incidents at the given location. One such sign warns of a persistently wet surface in a given area. Enough cyclists spilled on that section that the sign was added. This is typical: traffic measures are added after a series of incidents among road users. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-hr] HULK hackaton
Hackatoni mogu biti: - za početnike - na primjer osnove pythona - napredni - na primjer izrada aplikacije Napredni dovršavaju kod, a početnici unose podatke :D On 03/10/2015 02:01 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote: Bilo bi dobro da se u hackatonu dovrši taj kod, jerbo je još uvijek malko u ranim fazama. Fali mu još da se prate promjene od zadnjeg osvježavanja, da se promjene pošalju na mail, i da se sa jednostavnim sučeljem napravi novi vrt u par klikova. E da, i automatsko osvježavanje. Kad se sve to napravi, može se objaviti kao addon za Google docs. Dana 10. ožujka 2015. u 13:21 hbogner hbog...@gmail.com je napisao/la: http://www.linux.hr/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3169 Ekipa trazi ideje. Šta kažete da kreiramo hackaton gdje bi unosili podatke za jedan od naših vrtova? Recimo naselja u RH? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sBAMDmcLItgro3wQrIO- JN2LxuRRLyx8JL-a5yO2gUk/edit?pli=1#gid=0 Još ih je hrpu sa nedostajućim popisom stanovništva. ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
[OSM-talk] Problem with usage of other values than yes for key building
Hi, I have a problem with the usage values other yes in key building. It seems to me that this any other usage of building=yes (for area type) is almost purely redundant. When looking at taginfo [1], building has following three top most key usages: yes 119260798 85% house 11592812 8% residential 3145218 2% ... So, other than yes has a frequency of 15% and less. Then, when looking at the wiki page [2] it mostly points to alternative tags, like * building=apartment = tourism=apartment * building=hotel = tourism=hotel * building=warehouse = shop=department_store (no indication to that in warehouse * building=church/cathedral = amenity=place_of_worship * building=school/hospital = amenity=school/hospital Sometimes when looking at wiki pages of building=* they even don't mention the preferred tagging, like building=apartment [3]. I tend to stipulate that any other value than yes for key building should be deprecated. Or am I missing something? Yours, S. [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building#values [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building [3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dapartments ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Call for Venues Open: State of the Map 2016
The Call for Venues for State of the Map 2016 is now open. This time we mean it! - State of the Map Working Group. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Call_for_venues ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping dangerous bicycle locations?
To me it's almost undisputed that traffic signs - including warning signs for cyclists - can be and are mapped. -S. 2015-03-10 21:33 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com: On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: Sharp curves .. would they not be obvious from the map it self .. one node on the sharp corner compared to many for a 'smooth' corner.'Masked' corners where some object hides on coming traffic (e.g. building, vegetation) are also a hazard. These hazards exist for all kinds of traffic and not indicated on maps. The signs I have in mind were added after a long history of incidents at the given location. One such sign warns of a persistently wet surface in a given area. Enough cyclists spilled on that section that the sign was added. This is typical: traffic measures are added after a series of incidents among road users. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-cz] Vykreslování turistických tras (Re: semestralni projekt - napady)
On Tue 2015-03-10 05:51:31, Marián Kyral wrote: -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Ladislav Laska la...@kam.mff.cuni.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 9. 3. 2015 15:08:37 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Vykreslování turistických tras (Re: semestralni projekt - napady) Inu, to vypadá podobně, jako předmět který u nás chvíli vedl Pasky na MFF : -). Myslím, že se nějaké vhodně obtížná práce najde třeba v mapovátku Merkaartor, které jsem nedávno adoptoval a snažím se ho trošku zvelebovat. Třeba do té doby doženu majitele serveru k oživení webu :-) Jaké jsou výhody Merkaartoru oproti JOSM (kromě toho, že je v C++)? JOSM je velmi low-level editor. Merkaator se snazi byt privetivejsi. (Potom taky JOSM vypada hrozne a je linej. Ale porad je nejlepsi co znam :-) ) Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-ca] Call for Venues Open: State of the Map 2016
The Call for Venues for State of the Map 2016 is now open. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Call_for_venues Build a team for your city and bid to host the OpenStreetMap conference. ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: You've scheduled: Openstreetmap Local Meetup Leuven March 28
I'm proposing a meetup in Leuven for the 28th of March 2015 Jo -- Forwarded message -- From: Meetup i...@meetup.com Date: 2015-03-10 19:19 GMT+01:00 Subject: You've scheduled: Openstreetmap Local Meetup Leuven March 28 To: winfi...@gmail.com [image: Meetup] http://www.meetup.com/t/co1.1_1/ You're confirmed! Openstreetmap Local Meetup Leuven March 28 http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/221059592/t/co1.1_grp/?rv=co1.1 Jo OpenStreetMap België/Belgique! Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 4:00 PM Wereldcafee COOP Leuven Joris Helleputteplein, Den Tempst 2, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Leuven Directions http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=50.878380,4.697600 Post Comment http://www.meetup.com/__ms35492902/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/221059592/t/co1.1_sp1/?new_comment=1_af_eid=221059592_af=eventexpires=1426184380339sig=3940866780a71b4d9696e5af1a823e2fdac86807 Never miss a last-minute change. Get the app. [image: iPhone App Store] http://www.meetup.com/r/email/iphone/0/co1.1_appstore/http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/meetup/id375990038 [image: Google Play] http://www.meetup.com/r/email/android/0/co1.1_appstore/http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.meetupreferrer=utm_source%3Demailfooter Unsubscribe http://www.meetup.com/__ms35492902/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/optout/?submit=trueeo=co1.1_ms_unsub=trueemail=rsvpConfexpires=1428603580340sig=0c1f7292a566440e9592ebd0514bea0a447e6dd3 from similar emails from this Meetup Group Add i...@meetup.com to your address book to receive all Meetup emails Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 #14c04e9ea4b2d4e0_ *Meetup HQ in NYC is hiring!* meetup.com/jobs http://www.meetup.com/jobs/ meetup.ics Description: application/ics ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Your opinion about SOTM US
I'm still kicking up chunks of stuff GNIS and TIGER pulled in that are woefully inaccurate. Just did some cursory Lincoln County, NV work after my father got lost out there while motorcycling with his wife (fortunately for him, he carries survival basics and knows how to survive in the Great Basin and how to recover when lost out there, so having bad information was just super annoying, not necessarily life-threatening in this case). Seems GNIS and/or TIGER pulled in some POIs for hamlets that either never existed in the first place, or were abandoned 50+ years ago and are long gone now. Whenever I'm out there or I have a reason to edit out there, I do try to make sure it's at least minimally connected and tagged more or less correctly (though the geometry might not be super-accurate since we're talking about having to fix dozens of miles at a time in open-nothing) so it can at least be used to route back to civilization. This is definitely a recurring problem for almost every map in the Mojave and Great Basin deserts and pretty much a matter of life and death for those visiting a pretty decent chunk of northern Arizona, New Mexico, parts of southern California, western Utah, southeastern Oregon and just Nevada in general. Given that the US Department of the Interior's been trying to get mapmakers to fix it since the USGS is horribly out of date in the region, we could probably garner a lot of goodwill by fixing the map so it doesn't kill people... On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: Alex Barth writes: What do you think are the big topics and challenges for OpenStreetMap as we're about to go into the second decade? What does this mean for State of the Map? For OSM in the US? Finding and fixing the badly-digitized TIGER data. I've got it mostly under control in NY, but I still find bits and pieces of it left. And when I go looking in neighboring states, I shudder. -- --my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog ___ Talk-us mailing list talk...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Your opinion about SOTM US
I'm still kicking up chunks of stuff GNIS and TIGER pulled in that are woefully inaccurate. Just did some cursory Lincoln County, NV work after my father got lost out there while motorcycling with his wife (fortunately for him, he carries survival basics and knows how to survive in the Great Basin and how to recover when lost out there, so having bad information was just super annoying, not necessarily life-threatening in this case). Seems GNIS and/or TIGER pulled in some POIs for hamlets that either never existed in the first place, or were abandoned 50+ years ago and are long gone now. Whenever I'm out there or I have a reason to edit out there, I do try to make sure it's at least minimally connected and tagged more or less correctly (though the geometry might not be super-accurate since we're talking about having to fix dozens of miles at a time in open-nothing) so it can at least be used to route back to civilization. This is definitely a recurring problem for almost every map in the Mojave and Great Basin deserts and pretty much a matter of life and death for those visiting a pretty decent chunk of northern Arizona, New Mexico, parts of southern California, western Utah, southeastern Oregon and just Nevada in general. Given that the US Department of the Interior's been trying to get mapmakers to fix it since the USGS is horribly out of date in the region, we could probably garner a lot of goodwill by fixing the map so it doesn't kill people... On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: Alex Barth writes: What do you think are the big topics and challenges for OpenStreetMap as we're about to go into the second decade? What does this mean for State of the Map? For OSM in the US? Finding and fixing the badly-digitized TIGER data. I've got it mostly under control in NY, but I still find bits and pieces of it left. And when I go looking in neighboring states, I shudder. -- --my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [OSM-talk] New taginfo feature and a challenge...
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:45:24AM +0100, colliar wrote: Not sure if it is connected but I have problems with the taginfo website. If I want to have a closer look at a tag (key=value) like highway=cycleway [1], I only get one page with the former tabs as links but clicking on them does not change anything except the URL [2]. The page stays the same. Was a bug. Only happened when using https. Fixed now. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-173-7019282 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-hr] Fw: Partial Website + API outage
Evo i jedne dobre vijesti, ali valjda ste to u medjuvremenu i sami ustanovili. :D On 9 Mar 2015 17:38, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: Hi All, OpenStreetMap is currently offline due to a network problem at the data centre which hosts us. Status updates here: https://twitter.com/OSM_Tech/ Alternative: #osm-dev on http://irc.openstreetmap.org/ We are trying to get everything back up ASAP, but currently do not yet have an ETA. All servers are now back to normal. Kind regards, Grant Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone -Original Message- From: Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:26:23 To: OSM Dev Listd...@openstreetmap.org; Talk Openstreetmapt...@openstreetmap.org; annou...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Announce] Partial Website + API outage ___ Announce mailing list annou...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/announce ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
[OSM-talk] Call for Venues for State of the Map 2016 - now open!
Hi all, It's emails like this that I really enjoy writing but Richard's beat me too it :-(. Ah well I had it written anyway so might as well hit send :-) --- The state of the map working group are delighted to announce that the call for venues for 2016 is now open! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Call_for_venues This is much earlier than in previous years which means that you are free to propose any dates within 2016. If there is an exciting event going on in your city that OpenStreetMappers may be interested in, then why not align the conference to this. The State of the Map working group is here to help you. We're an expanded team compared to the last few years and are looking forward to receiving your bids. In 2014 we were south of the equator in Buenos Aires, in 2016 we could be in your home country! So lets celebrate hitting 2 million registered users*, share experiences and ideas, and plan for the next 10 years of OSM. See you in 2016... -- State of the Map, working group * don't worry - you won't have 2 million people turning up on your doorstep looking for somewhere to stay! ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-us] Call for Venues Open; State of the Map 2016
The Call for Venues for State of the Map 2016 is now open. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Call_for_venues Build a team for your city and bid to host the OpenStreetMap conference. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-de] Formal proposal: mechanically reverting fixme=set␣better␣denotation / denotation=cluster
I'm writing with a proposed extension to this mechanical edit: adjusting the type and wood tags to current conventions. It's easy to do and saves future changeset churn. I'm also adding denoation=historic on certain trees, and removing denotation=cluster from things like water towers. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[talk-au] Call for Venues Open: State of the Map 2016
The Call for Venues for State of the Map 2016 is now open. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Call_for_venues Build a team for your city and bid to host the OpenStreetMap conference. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [OSM-talk] Problem with usage of other values than yes for key building
Well I for one see hardly any usage of building=yes in my town Kópavogur, in fact it has a usage of only 7,25% ! No imports were made so that could explain the low value of building=yes apartments458 commercial85 construction2 garage771 garages168 house1025 industrial61 no17 office3 residential3457 roof6 school5 shed7 stable53 yes478 Þann 10.3.2015 20:48, skrifaði Simon Poole: Am 10.03.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Stefan Keller: Hi, I have a problem with the usage values other yes in key building. It seems to me that this any other usage of building=yes (for area type) is almost purely redundant. When looking at taginfo [1], building has following three top most key usages: yes 119260798 85% house 11592812 8% residential 3145218 2% ... I suspect the numbers are strongly biased due to building outline imports. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: [talk-au] Call for Venues Open: State of the Map 2016
Pour ceux que ca interesse. -- Forwarded message -- From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com Date: Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:16 PM Subject: Call for Venues Open: State of the Map 2016 The Call for Venues for State of the Map 2016 is now open. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2016/Call_for_venues Build a team for your city and bid to host the OpenStreetMap conference. ___ Talk-au mailing list talk...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-fr] Maj des batiments issus du cadastre
Bonjour Pour mon premier message à cette liste de distribution je vais me présenter rapidement. Je vis à Toulouse et je participe à OpenstreetMap depuis un peu plus d'un an (je sais plus trop). Bref. Au début c'était juste pour corriger une évolution et je trouve que c'est de plus en plus prenant et je me trouve maintenant à faire des modifs beaucoup plus lourdes. :-) J'ai toujours trouvé que la mise à jour des bâtiments était pénible à faire. Parce qu'il faut comparer ce qui existe avec ce qui est fourni par le cadastre. On peut superposer les deux avec josm. C'est très facile quand il y a 100 pâtés de maison mais c'est un cauchemard quand il y en a plus de 1000. Du coup j'ai fait un petit script python (joint à ce message) qui fait la comparaison entre ce qui existe et ce qui fourni par le cadastre. Il détermine quels sont les bâtiments supprimés, les bâtiments nouveaux, et les bâtiments modifiés. Il y a toujours un travail à faire à partir des résultats obtenus parce que ce n'est pas possible d'éviter des faux positifs mais ça évite de faire une comparaison maison par maison. Bien sûr, il vaut mieux que la commune sur laquelle il est appliqué soit déjà issue des données du cadastre. Une commune ou le bâti est tracé à partir de Bing donnera des résultats plus mitigés. Je ne vais pas détailler ici le fonctionnement de mon script. C'est déjà fait dans cette fil que j'ai ouvert sur le forum osm-fr : http://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewtopic.php?f=5t=1762 Je peux vous fournir un fichier exemple d'utilisation. Il s'agit du bâti de la commune de Seilh (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/158877) au nord de Toulouse : http://sendbox.fr/pro/5r3o7uspdsb0/Seilh.zip.html Ce zip contient 2 fichiers : Seilh_as_is.osm : les batiments tels qu'ils sont dans OSM actuellement Seilh_to_be.osm : les bâtiments tels que le cadastre le donne actuellement. Pour l'utilisation la commande est simple : python BatiOSm.py Seilh_as_is.osm Seilh_to_be.osm prefixe préfixe sera utilisé pour nommer les fichiers résultats. Merci pour votre aide et pour votre retour si vous avez des suggestions d'améliorations ou si vous avez des comportements bizarres ! Sébastien # -*- coding:Utf-8 -*- #!/usr/bin/env python import sys import os from math import sqrt import time from operator import attrgetter BORNE_INF_MODIF = 1.e-5 BORNE_SUP_MODIF = 1.e-4 class Point: Définition d'un point. Attributs : - identifiant (chaine de caractère) - latitude et longitude (flottant) def __init__(self, node_id, node_lat, node_lon): self.node_id = node_id self.node_lat = float(node_lat) self.node_lon = float(node_lon) def affiche(self): print self.node_id, self.node_lat, self.node_lon def distance(self, other): Calcul de la distance entre deux points d_lat = self.node_lat - other.node_lat d_lon = self.node_lon - other.node_lon return sqrt(d_lat**2 + d_lon**2) def export_node(self): Création du code xml équivalent au point self.print_node = node id=' + self.node_id + \ ' action='modify' visible='true' lat=' + \ str(self.node_lat) + ' lon=' + str(self.node_lon) + ' / class Batiment: L'entité Batiment rassemble plusieurs données : - bat_id : un identifiant (chaine de caractère) - nbre_node : le nombre de points du batiment (nombre entier) - node_id : le tableau des Points du batiments - pt_moy : le point de référence du batiments (centre de gravité) - dist_mini : une valeurs de distance pour détecter la modification du batiment - largeur : la largeur du batiment - status : le status du batiment (nouveau, identique, modifié, supprimé) - nombre_tag : le nombre de tag défini dans le fichier - tableau_tag_key : le tableau d'identifiants des tags - tableau_tag_value : le tableau des valeurs des tags - pbAire : l'information si le batiment a une aire nulle - multipolygone : yes si le batiment en est un, no sinon - role : le role si le batiment appartient à une relation - ind_relation : l'indice de la relation auquel il appartient def __init__(self, bat_id, nbre_node, node_id, numTag, tableauTagKey, tableauTagValue, distance=1000, largeur = 0., status = UNKNOWN, pbAire = NO, multipolygone = no, role = outer, ind_relation = 0): self.bat_id = bat_id self.nbre_node = nbre_node self.node_id = node_id self.dist_mini = float(distance) self.largeur = largeur self.status = status self.nombre_tag = numTag self.tableau_tag_key = tableauTagKey self.tableau_tag_value = tableauTagValue self.pbAire = NO self.multipolygone = no self.role = outer self.ind_relation = 0 def
[OSM-talk] Second decade visions
W dniu 10.03.2015 3:52, Alex Barth napisał(a): Casting the net a little wider: What do you think are the big topics and challenges for OpenStreetMap as we're about to go into the second decade? What does this mean for State of the Map? I'm not sure what does this mean for SotM (?), but here are my thoughts on strategic topics as I see them being the active OSM community member from Poland. They are not very outstanding and visionary probably, but IMHO they are important and it can easily take few years - up to decade - to achieve these goals nevertheless... =} TL;DR summary: 1. More synergy between (sub)projets 2. Managing data overload 2a. Semi-automated tasks execution 2b. Continuous sanity check tools 2c. Big data analysis 3. Tools for personalizing OSM data presentation 4. Redesigning some key tagging schemes 5. Cooperation with external projects (especially open, like Wikidata) *** And now that TL part alone: 1. More synergy between (sub)projets OSM is acting in a highly decentralized way. I think this is healthy in general, but because the project is now on the road to be The Map (much like the Wikipedia is The Encyclopedia now), this results in growing inefficiency and inertia. Of course we can't avoid having some departments, just because the OSM is getting bigger and people tend to focus on their favorite activity, but nobody seems to care about the OSM output as a whole. For example you can talk to death every detail of tagging some esoteric features while completely ignoring how will it affect the rendering, routing or usability for mappers (for example how to tell the difference between tags A and B). While it's a general issue and can't be resolved once and for all, I think connecting more dots inside the project is very important factor of reaching The Map level. 2. Managing data overload We have so many data these days! It's a blessing and a curse. There are still many remote places where nothing is mapped - sure! But now we know how to do it, we have the tools to do it and we can help local volunteers to start (one of our most active member is helping to develop mapping in Nepal, another one is fond of Kyrgyzstan mountains). But what to do with big, dense cities, where we have the landuses, the buildings, the streets and all the other micromappping things - plus the 3D layers, indoor mapping, underground facilities, etc. squeezed together? It will be increasingly hard to work with them - and new users will be those who will suffer the most, because it's easier to damage something while trying to add nice shiny object than to really extend the map. Maybe we should split the data into sets or just make the iD and JOSM more layer/theme-centric tools - I don't know yet, but the problem is here to stay. 2a. Semi-automated tasks execution One of the things we should really start to practice is to rely more on the automation. Let me quote: Try not to let humans do what machines could do instead. As a rule of thumb, automating a common task is worth at least ten times the effort a developer would spend doing that task manually one time. For very frequent or very complex tasks, that ratio could easily go up to twenty or even higher. [ http://www.producingoss.com/en/managing-volunteers.html#automation ] As an example - we are just starting to use semi-automated script for updating public transport routes in Warsaw. There are over 300 lines here, many hundreds of bus/tram stops - and they are constantly changing, of course. one by one. When I got interested in it, we had a dedicated Wikiproject, but it was on hiatus by then and I quickly gave up too, because tracking so many objects in Wiki was a tedious and not very useful task. Once we learned that local public transport operator (called ZTM) has started giving away their precious raw data with coordinates (!), me and few other mappers started to add all the stops focusing on stop_position tagging. Now, after almost a year of work, we have all of them and the C++ script which creates updated routes network in about 15 minutes. Two important things happened lately regarding transport system in my hometown - one of the bridges was destroyed by fire and a new subway line was opened. If we did everything by hand, we would be dead now, because too many things would change too fast - but the script, even as rough as it is now, has no problem even if all the lines will change at once. We have only to feed it with new stops (when they are created) and we're done! However - beware of botocracy! If there's only one person able to use the tool, it's not sustainable model. It's important that the script only gives the .osm file on the output and we can easily handle injecting it into the database once a day - or at any other time rate. We have a chance to make manual fixes here and there if needed. Too much automation is not the answer - just let us get rid of boring
[Talk-it] overpass api population
Ciao a tutti, qualcuno sa come esportare con overpass turbo le città utilizzando il parametro population come limite? Vorrei esportare per esempio le città con più di un milione di abitanti... penso si debba usare una regex ma non ne ho trovato una che funzioni. Grazie -- ciao Luca http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ www.lucadelu.org ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-GB] Proposed import of approximately 6 bicycle repair tool stands in the UK
This import is now complete. For the UK the nodes were omitted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/329258 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-co] ACTUALIZACIÓN BALANCE POR SISMO EN EL TERRITORIO NACIONAL. COMUNICADO DE PRENSA 036
*Comunicado de prensa 036* *Bogotá 10 de marzo de 2015* *ACTUALIZACIÓN BALANCE POR SISMO EN EL TERRITORIO NACIONAL* *Bogotá, 10 marzo de 2015.* Hora y media después del sismo de 6.6 de magnitud con epicentro en el municipio La Mesa de Los Santos (Santander) a una profundidad de 161 kilómetros, y tras el monitoreo nacional con los Consejos Departamentales de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres se tiene el siguiente consolidado oficial: *Departamento de Santander* Afectación en seis municipios con un total de 23 viviendas averiadas, dos iglesias un centro comercial, cuatro hospitales y el aeropuerto de Bucaramanga. Así mismo se presentó un evento conexo en la refinería de Ecopetrol. Un incendio menor que se controló adecuadamente. *Departamento de Norte de Santander* La vía que comunica Cúcuta con Pamplona se encuentra cerrada a la altura del kilómetro 21 por un deslizamiento de tierra sobre la vía. *Valle del Cauca* El aeropuerto Ernesto Bonilla Aragón se encuentra cerrado preventivamente para realizar la verificación de afectación en la pista. *Casanare* Afectación en mampostería y fachada del edificio de la Gobernación *Bogotá* Afectación de estructuras en tres edificios ubicados en la calle 166 con carrera 60, una edificación en Engativa y la Torre Colpatria. Así mismo se realizar verificación por parte del IDIGER en la localidad de Suba. El Presidente de la República, Juan Manuel Santos Calderón, coordina acciones con la Sala de Crisis Nacional, con el fin de tener disponibilidad para la atención a posibles emergencias derivadas del sismo en el País. El Director de la Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres, Carlos Iván Márquez Pérez, destacó de manera positiva los ejercicios de evacuación en diferentes edificaciones y la conciencia ante riesgo sismo. Se recomienda a la comunidad mantener la calma y atender a la información oficial evitando desinformación que pueda generar pánico. Así mismo se recuerda realizar el retorno a la normalidad de forma tranquila y de acuerdo con las indicaciones de las autoridades competentes. *Redactó: Carolina Giraldo G. – Subdirección para el Manejo de Desastres* *3103073866 3103073866 - 3202407201 3202407201. carolina.gira...@gestiondelriesgo.gov.co carolina.gira...@gestiondelriesgo.gov.co* *Diana Londoño* – Jefe Oficina Asesora de Comunicaciones *3124483908 3124483908* *diana.lond...@gestiondelriesgo.gov.co diana.lond...@gestiondelriesgo.gov.co* *Oficina Asesora de Comunicaciones* Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres *Teléfono:* 5529696 Ext.500 Para anular la suscripción a este grupo y dejar de recibir sus mensajes, envía un correo electrónico a prensa+unsubscr...@dgr.gov.co. ___ Talk-co mailing list Talk-co@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co
Re: [Talk-se] Trafikverket öppnar upp NVDB!
On 2015-02-26 14:18, Andreas Vilén wrote: Så bra. Kanske borde ligga på dem ang. licens bara så det inte blir en som är inkompatibel med OSM? Det är ju rätt hårda krav för att få läggas in på OSM numera. Som jag fattat det duger inte cc-licenser utöver cc-0 längre. Kul att höra att NVDB ska öppnas upp! Den innehåller högkvalitativ vägdata för Sverige, så det vore helt klart önskvärt att den öppna licensen blir kompatibel med OSM. Jag håller med om att man behöver framföra detta behov till NVDB. Det finns många fall av goda intentioner med öppna data där man till sist inte riktigt förstått relevansen av en lämplig licens. Är det någon härifrån som varit i kontakt med NVDB-gruppen angående detta? Eller någon som har personliga kontakter med lämpliga personer inom Trafikverket eller Lantmäteriet? /Magnus /Andreas 2015-02-26 14:14 GMT+01:00 Tomas Wennström tomas.wennst...@gmail.com: I går var jag på SamGis skåne och pratade lite om öppen data. Och då fick jag av Trafikverket veta att de planerar att släppa Nationella vägdatabasen fri till 1 januari 2016! Vet inte om det är känt sen tidigare, men det var nytt för mig. Och om de inte krånglar till det med licensen så är ju detta jättebra för OSM, särskilt vad gäller det enskilda vägnätet. Hittade följande i NVDB-rådets senaste minnesanteckningar: "Öppna data Beslut taget på Trafikverket att nyttja Vinnovas definitioner av Öppna data och att jobba mot att NVDB-data öppnas upp från och med 1 januari 2016. Två projekt kommer att genomföras under vintern 2015 för att säkerställa detta, ett projekt internt på Trafikverket som ska se till att det fungerar internt Trafikverket och ett projekt tillsammans med Lantmäteriet för att lösa frågor kring öppna geodata för alla och produktion kring enskilda vägar. Senast 1/5 2015 skall Trafikverket och Lantmäteriet vara överens om ersättning för produktion av det enskilda vägnätet. Projektledare från Trafikverket är Patrik Jansson Det är viktigt att Trafikverket vid öppnandet visar på att NVDB tas fram i samverkan med kommunerna, Lantmäteriet och skogsnäringen. Beslut 3:3 Projekt startas upp för att NVDB blir öppna data den 1/1 2016. Senast 1/5 2015 skall Trafikverket och Lantmäteriet vara överens om ersättning för produktion av det enskilda vägnätet." http://www.nvdb.se/PageFiles/61/Minnesanteckningar%202014-12-12.pdf I dokumentet "Inriktning för utveckling av och samverkan kring NVDB 2014-2016 hittar jag följande: "Kraven på att vägdata i NVDB ska vara lätt tillgängliga och avgiftsfria ökar hela tiden. Vissa större dataanvandare och framförallt kommersiella aktörer är villiga att betala för grunddata för att få ställa krav på specialuttag av data. Detta öppnar för möjligt att ta betalt om kunden ställer krav på vidarebearbetning. NVDB:s inriktning är att erbjuda grundläggande vägdata avgiftsfritt (avgift = 0 kr). I detta bör ingå automatiserade datauttag och grundläggande användarstöd." http://nvdb.se/PageFiles/61/Inriktning%20f%C3%B6r%20utveckling%20av%20och%20samverkan%20kring%20NVDB%202014-2016.pdf Väl karterat, Tomas -- -- Tomas Wennström 0739-464202 tomas.wennst...@gmail.com ___ Talk-se mailing list Talk-se@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Carte des données indoor : OpenLevelUp!
Bonjour à tous, Encore du nouveau sur OpenLevelUp, et cette fois-ci pas mal de choses. En résumé : amélioration de l'affichage des objets et pop-ups, des liens rapides vers OSM, le cadastre en arrière-plan et la possibilité d'exporter un niveau en GeoJSON. C'est toujours ici : http://github.pavie.info/openlevelup/ Pour la version détaillée : * Meilleure gestion des buildingpart=verticalpassage [1] * Affichage des images (tag image=*) dans les pop-ups [2] * Les liens hypertextes sont cliquables (tags image, website, contact:website, url, wikimedia_commons) * L'icône correspondant au type d'objet s'affiche dans le titre * Le cadastre est disponible dans les couches * Lien vers OSM.org dans les pop-ups et en bas de page * Les objets building et buildingpart/indoor sont forcément mis en arrière-plan (certains objets étaient précédemment cachés) * De nombreuses icônes ajoutées (tags shop, amenity, tourism, ...) [3] * Le nom (tag name) de l'objet est affiché en titre de pop-up s'il est renseigné * Lien pour l'export en GeoJSON du niveau actuellement affiché. Vos retours d'expérience sont la bienvenue :) Cordialement, PanierAvide. [1] Escaliers : http://github.pavie.info/openlevelup/?lat=47.32473955069693lon=1.070371400097zoom=20level=0transcend=1legacy=1 [2] Sur l'entrée ouest : http://github.pavie.info/openlevelup/?lat=48.12148643666441lon=-1.7112547159194946zoom=20level=0transcend=1legacy=1 [3] Exemple au CNIT : http://github.pavie.info/openlevelup/?lat=48.892781245969005lon=2.2382980585098267zoom=18level=0transcend=1legacy=1 ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-it] Ausili per mappare route in Josm
Ciao, ottimo strumento fa il caso mio. Grazie! Ciao, Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Ausili-per-mappare-route-in-Josm-tp5836565p5836617.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-us] Best practices for outdoor mapping party
Two notes: Mapillary is great, but upload (from phone or from computer) can be very slow. I have not yet been able to establish what conditions the upload speed. My experience is that it is much faster in the (European) morning than in the (European) afternoon/evening. So allow plenty of time (several hours) between taking Mapillary photos and the successive data entry session When entering data in OSM make sure that you are not editing with different teams on the same area. This may produce data conflicts. Happy mapping Volker Padova, Italy ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-cz] Licence (zase)
čest práci, tak jsem se podíval do zdrojáků a zjistil, že nemá význam psát ani na Rosa[*] ani autorovi pluginu[**], protože ten jen volá nějaké Googlí API s tím, že mu předhodí odkaz na dlaždice OSM, takže ty Podmínky použití si tam dává Google sám (rychlý test: grep -i terms comprehensive-google-map-plugin.pot) don't be evil :-) [***] K. [*] když už, tak spíše jejich webmasterovi, zda nechce zvážit použití jiného pluginu - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wordpress#Using_a_plugin [**] jak bylo naznačeno, to by nemělo smysl tak jako tak: https://wordpress.org/support/topic/notice-about-plugin-discontinuation-future-recommendations [***] pardon za nekonstruktivní rýpnutí, ale toto jsem si prostě nemohl odpustit ... neskonalá naivita příznivců Google mě stále ještě dostává http://qz.com/284548/what-google-really-means-by-dont-be-evil/ ... But it also means that Google has effectively redefined what “evil” means. It is whatever Google thinks it means. Don’t take my word for it. As Eric Schmidt told Wired way back in 2003, “Evil is what Sergey [Brin] says is evil.” Dne Út 10. března 2015 07:12:09, TK napsal(a): Myslim, ze neprehledl. Nicmene je to WordPress s pluginem viz: http://rosa-os.cz/wp-content/plugins/comprehensive-google-map-plugin Takze pokud se napise sem, tak (pokud je to mozne) nekde v nastavenich zkusi vypnout OSM. Mozna by bylo lepsi zkusit napsat autorovi pluginu, tim se to vyresi i zde ale i na jinych pouzitich. https://wordpress.org/plugins/comprehensive-google-map-plugin/ nicmene podle webu se to tvari ze uz to nikdo nevyviji. Bye Dne 10. března 2015 0:48 Petr Vejsada o...@propsychology.cz napsal(a): Ahoj, ač, jak víte, jsem ohledně licence docela v klidu, tak toto mě tedy vydráždilo: http://rosa-os.cz/nase-sluzby/azylovy-dum/ defaultně vrstva OSM, attribution Google-podmínky použití. Můžete to, prosím, zkontrolovat, zda jsem něco nepřehlédl? Zdvořilý mail už mám připravený, ale než ho odešlu, rád bych, aby se na to někdo podíval. Díky. -- Petr ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-us] Best practices for outdoor mapping party
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote: When entering data in OSM make sure that you are not editing with different teams on the same area. This may produce data conflicts. This plugin can be useful to help coordinate while editing: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/GeoChat ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Mappy hour tomorrow!
I'm pretty adept at using Google+; if need be I can create the events in the future, I just need to know when. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 3/8/15 11:49 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: Sorry you can't make it Jack. The direct hangout link is here - I think: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/cpiqg6sldpjconoipvhmd3skhcc Sorry, Google+ makes it really hard to just share a link to an event. I still don't quite understand how it works. that link is telling me i need an invitation; i have requested one and am waiting for it. i agree, the G+ interface for hangouts is remarkably confusing. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-es] Fwd: Mapping Party en Poio.
¿Alguien se puede hacer cargo de esto? -- Mensaje reenviado -- Asunto: Mapping Party en Poio. Fecha: Martes 10. marzo 2015, 09.22.32 De: Xose Rial xoserialpe...@gmail.com Para: ivansanc...@escomposlinux.org Buenos días, Soy miembro de la Asociación Xeopesca http://xeopesca.com/ y estamos organizando una Mapping Party en Poio (Galicia) para el 11 de abril. He visto que eres administrador do grupo de correo-e de OpenStreetMap.es y quería simplemente preguntarte si sería posible la promoción de nuestro evento en vuestra página web. Un saludo -- *Xosé Rial* --- -- Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es i...@geonerd.org i...@mazemap.no ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
Re: [Talk-cz] Merkaartor vs JOSM
-- Původní zpráva -- Od: Karel Volný ka...@seznam.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 10. 3. 2015 10:03:28 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Merkaartor vs JOSM Dne Út 10. března 2015 05:51:31, Marián Kyral napsal(a): Od: Ladislav Laska la...@kam.mff.cuni.cz Myslím, že se nějaké vhodně obtížná práce najde třeba v mapovátku Merkaartor, které jsem nedávno adoptoval a snažím se ho trošku zvelebovat. ó budiž pochválen velkou chválou dobrodinec náš :-) Jaké jsou výhody Merkaartoru oproti JOSM (kromě toho, že je v C++)? za sebe můžu říct, že především mentalita to není jen C++, ale i Qt ... motá se kolem toho jiná sorta vývojářů než třeba kolem GTK+ (ok, to je špatný příklad, to je zprzněné C) nebo například FLTK prostě se mi s ním pracuje dobře (až na nějaké mušky samozřejmě), zatímco JOSM nebo teď ta nová webová blbost u mě neustále vyvolává pocity jako WTF, co tím chtěl básník říci, jak mám kua udělat to co chci?!? Ráno ve vlaku jsem si Merkaartor zkompiloval a po spuštění se dostavil stejný WTF pocit ;-) Ke čtení návodu jsem se zatím nedostal. Javu taky moc nemusím, do KDE by mi Qt aplikace lépe zapadla, ale možnosti JOSM, množství pluginů a jiných zdrojů JOSM nevýhody javy převáží. Marián ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-it] Tracce linea autobus Atac Roma
Ciao, avrei bisogno di capire se è possibile scaricare i dati delle tracce dei percorsi degli autobus della capitale. A dire il vero il meglio sarebbero i dati fresche aggiornati con le modifiche dell'ultima ora ma non so se chiedo troppo. Io ho visto che questi sono i siti che riportano le mappe ma non mi sembra si possano scaricare i dati. http://viaggiacon.atac.roma.it/?service=trovalinealinea=40percorso=40A http://www.esri.com/ Che voi sappiate, c'è la possibilità di avere questi dati, sono già disponibili? Grazie a tutti. Ciao, Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Tracce-linea-autobus-Atac-Roma-tp5836618.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-us] Scholarships and talks deadlines - we'd like to hear from you!
Hello everyone - Important deadlines are coming up for State of the Map US: - March 15: apply for a scholarship - March 22: submit a talk - March 31: last day to get an early bird ticket for $90 This is particularly a call to everyone subscribed to this list. So many of you do amazing work on the map or on OpenStreetMap software - we'd love to invite you to share experiences from your work or your ideas for the project. Submitting a talk is not the only way to participate: - You can schedule birds of a feather sessions (round tables) ad-hoc at the conference - There will be a hack day with plenty of space and opportunity for code sprints, documentation sprints, and workshops - The international Maptime community will hold their summit at the conference - The American Red Cross will be hosting a missing maps party - There will be an NYC foot survey Get in touch if you have ideas: bo...@opensteretmap.us or just post here on the list. This conference is organized by the OpenStreetMap US chapter and volunteers but this is really an open invitation to anyone in the world. Look at it like your neighbor is throwing a party and everyone's invited over. Looking forward to seeing you in New York - Alex PS: if you'd like to help spread the word: https://twitter.com/sotmus/status/575450081886781441 -- Alex Barth Vice President OpenStreetMap United States Inc. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[OSM-talk] Scholarships and talks deadlines - we'd like to hear from you!
Hello everyone - Important deadlines are coming up for State of the Map US: - March 15: apply for a scholarship - March 22: submit a talk - March 31: last day to get an early bird ticket for $90 This is particularly a call to everyone subscribed to this list. So many of you do amazing work on the map or on OpenStreetMap software - we'd love to invite you to share experiences from your work or your ideas for the project. Submitting a talk is not the only way to participate: - You can schedule birds of a feather sessions (round tables) ad-hoc at the conference - There will be a hack day with plenty of space and opportunity for code sprints, documentation sprints, and workshops - The international Maptime community will hold their summit at the conference - The American Red Cross will be hosting a missing maps party - There will be an NYC foot survey Get in touch if you have ideas: bo...@opensteretmap.us or just post here on the list. This conference is organized by the OpenStreetMap US chapter and volunteers but this is really an open invitation to anyone in the world. Look at it like your neighbor is throwing a party and everyone's invited over. Looking forward to seeing you in New York - Alex PS: if you'd like to help spread the word: https://twitter.com/sotmus/status/575450081886781441 -- Alex Barth Vice President OpenStreetMap United States Inc. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk