Phil Homewood wrote:
> Inconclusive. The email reported an 81.5% ratio where
> the printout claimed 81.7. Close, but no cigar... I
> think I'll wait and see what tonight's run does...
The compression ratio on my 2.4.4p2 box printed
correctly. I think this was purely coincidenta
Phil Homewood wrote:
> We'll see what happens in tonight's run with 2.4.4p3 :-)
Inconclusive. The email reported an 81.5% ratio where
the printout claimed 81.7. Close, but no cigar... I
think I'll wait and see what tonight's run does...
--
Phil Homewood, Systems Janitor,
Paul Bijnens wrote:
> >Upgraded one box to 2.4.4p3. amreport still shows the
> >bogus labels when run against a log generated under
> >2.4.4p2. Tonight I'll see what it does when it creates
> >the log itself. :-)
>
> Do you mean you upgraded a client? Just the amanda server is fine.
> The 2.4.4p3
3. amreport still shows the
bogus labels when run against a log generated under
2.4.4p2. Tonight I'll see what it does when it creates
the log itself. :-)
(Does amreport pull its stats from anywhere but the logfile?)
--
Phil Homewood, Systems Janitor, http://www.SnapGear.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sks ...)
This seems to have started occurring sometime since
2.4.4 (not sure now whether 2.4.4p1 behaved, but I
know 2.4.4 was good.) Anyone?
--
Phil Homewood, Systems Janitor, http://www.SnapGear.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +61 7 3435 2810 Fx: +61 7 3891 3630
SnapGear - A CyberGuard Company
ut on stdout -- it
emails it.
> BTW, email isn't configured on the host machine - perhaps it is telling
> me it is working, but I can't read what it says.
That could well be the case. :-) Though it should spend
a noticeable amount of time telling you nothing before
it emails yo
l 1 on that
weekly tape is relative to the level 0 on the daily
that came before it, for instance
I posted about #2 some months ago, and suggested that I might
come up with a fix for it. Unfortunately I never did; we ended
up rearranging things rather creatively to get around the
pr
Dave Ewart wrote:
> [...] kernel: st0: Error with sense data: Info fld=0x8000, Deferred st09:00: sns =
> f1 4
> [...] kernel: ASC=15 ASCQ= 1
> [...] kernel: st0: Error with sense data: Info fld=0x1, Current st09:00: sns = f0 3
> [...] kernel: ASC=15 ASCQ= 2
[repeated]
> What looks like the pro
isocial Misdirected Autoresponder Notification Dumping Archive.
I made the same mistake.
:-/
(Seriously, though: can we shoot the people who send this
virus responder junk here? Or at least reject their mail
at amanda.org before it gets to the lists? Please?)
--
Phil Homewood, Sy
Phil Homewood wrote:
> Now that you mention it, I have had this, a couple of times in the
> last week. Am still trying to debug it, but:
>
> ??error [/bin/tar got signal 13, compress got signal 11]? dumper: strange [missing
> size line from sendbackup]
Turns out this also ap
r Debian box with a very similar configuration working
fine.
--
Phil Homewood, Systems Janitor, http://www.SnapGear.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +61 7 3435 2810 Fx: +61 7 3891 3630
SnapGear - Custom Embedded Solutions and Security Appliances
ement this have half a chance of being
accepted into the amanda codebase?
--
Phil Homewood, Systems Janitor, http://www.SnapGear.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +61 7 3435 2810 Fx: +61 7 3891 3630
SnapGear - Custom Embedded Solutions and Security Appliances
Paul Bijnens wrote:
> This directive would be needed by a client, and currently a client
> does not need a configuration file.
Could it not be supplied from the server to the client, as I believe
the "exclude list" option is?
> The other reason is that no-one submitted a patch (for a seperate
> o
specify where this particular program puts its data. What's
worse -- crippling the functionality, or being inconsistent?)
Cheers...
--
Phil Homewood, Systems Janitor, http://www.SnapGear.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +61 7 3435 2810 Fx: +61 7 3891 3630
SnapGear - Custom Embedded Solutions and Security Appliances
on to achive our objective,
correct?
Has anyone attempted anything like this before? It doesn't seem
that unusual, does it?
Finally, is there any reason *why* GNUTAR_LISTED_INCREMENTAL_DIR
isn't configurable in amanda.conf?
Any suggestions/advice/heckling appreciated...
--
Phil Homewood, Sy
15 matches
Mail list logo