Re: [Clamav-users] announce? was (v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1)

2005-07-25 Thread OpenMacNews
Yah, but every message gets an inane followup message just like this one and it goes on and on and on. Again for the greater audience: People - everything you need to know is provided for you each time you run fresh clam. Pay Attention! well, since *i* started this thread on a DIFFERENT TOPIC .

Re: [Clamav-users] announce? was (v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1)

2005-07-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
jef moskot said: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote: >> Christopher McCrory said: >> > What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the >> 'users' >> > list also? >> Monitor your logs - you don't need anyone's help to learn there's a new >> version. Just a cron entry that

Re: [Clamav-users] announce? was (v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1)

2005-07-25 Thread jef moskot
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Christopher McCrory said: > > What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the 'users' > > list also? > Monitor your logs - you don't need anyone's help to learn there's a new > version. Just a cron entry that grep's -i "warning" pipe ma

Re: [Clamav-users] announce? was (v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1)

2005-07-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
Christopher McCrory said: > On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 20:38 -0700, OpenMacNews wrote: >> hi luca, >> >> per your a0.86.2 announcement, i just ul'd & installed v0.86.2 on OSX >> 10.4.2; i >> had previously been running v0.86.1. >> > > > > What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the

Re: [Clamav-users] announce? was (v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1)

2005-07-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
Brian Morrison said: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:33:37 -0700 in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christopher McCrory > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the >> 'users' list also? It seems easy and would save a lot of people the >> trouble of subscribin

Re: [Clamav-users] announce? was (v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1)

2005-07-25 Thread Brian Morrison
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:33:37 -0700 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christopher McCrory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the > 'users' list also? It seems easy and would save a lot of people the > trouble of subscribing to "yet another list". But t

Re: [Clamav-users] announce? was (v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1)

2005-07-25 Thread Stephen Gran
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:33:37PM -0700, Christopher McCrory said: > On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 20:38 -0700, OpenMacNews wrote: > > hi luca, > > > > per your a0.86.2 announcement, i just ul'd & installed v0.86.2 on OSX > > 10.4.2; i > > had previously been running v0.86.1. > > > > > > What are t

Re: [Clamav-users] announce?

2005-07-25 Thread Jacek Politowski
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:33:37PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote: >What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the 'users' >list also? It seems easy and would save a lot of people the trouble of >subscribing to "yet another list". And what's the trouble with that? -- Jacek

[Clamav-users] announce? was (v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1)

2005-07-25 Thread Christopher McCrory
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 20:38 -0700, OpenMacNews wrote: > hi luca, > > per your a0.86.2 announcement, i just ul'd & installed v0.86.2 on OSX 10.4.2; > i > had previously been running v0.86.1. > What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the 'users' list also? It seems easy a

Re: [Clamav-users] v0.86.2 'OUTDATED' version check INCORRECT ... reports as OLDER than v0.86.1

2005-07-25 Thread Damian Menscher
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: nonethless, there seems like there *was* a check which reported a newer version as too old ... You may be interested to know how this works: The version check just compares to see if you're running a specific version. Previously it checked if you wer