mpts. I feel like I'm not seeing the forest for the
trees...
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.o
The text isn't a graphic.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Crest Christopher <
crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What do you mean by "live text" ?
>
> Christopher
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> color: $lightblue
>>
>
--
Tom Livi
Sorry. A little sass is still in there.
On Tuesday, September 2, 2014, Philip Taylor wrote:
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> background-color: $yellow;
>> color: $lightblue;
>>
>
> What do the dollar signs contribute ?
> Philip Taylor
>
Text!
>
> Best,
> Karl
>
>
>
> Karl DeSaulniers
> Design Drumm
> http://designdrumm.com
>
>
>
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Tom Livingston > wrote:
>
> > The text isn't a graphic.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Cre
I'll play with that, thanks Georg
On Tuesday, September 2, 2014, Georg wrote:
> Den 02.09.2014 22:20, skrev Tom Livingston:
>
>> http://www.tomliv.com/img/button.png
>>
>
> If that's a typical "button", I would think the addition of
> 'back
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> Le 3 sept. 2014 à 07:05, Georg a écrit :
>
> > Den 02.09.2014 22:20, skrev Tom Livingston:
> >> http://www.tomliv.com/img/button.png
> >
> > If that's a typical "button", I woul
ure I'm currently using is just this:
Learn More
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-dis
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
>> If you look carefully at the image I linked to, the text and arrow image
>> aren't well centered vertically. It look better in Safari. I know vertical
>> centering is a bit annoying but is there
e is an image of two
different colored arrows that move up and down on hover via
background-position.
.button{
background-position: 100% 0;
}
.button:hover{
background-position: 100% -43px;
}
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlin
g the coffee
cup layout on that page is how do you provide a fallback for that?
Anyone?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Good morning fellow listers,
>
> CSS Shapes.
>
> No doubt this will be something I'm asked to do in a page layout soon. I
> was just watching this demo of a new Chrome extension:
>
> http://razvancaliman.com/wri
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> Le 4 sept. 2014 à 21:32, Tom Livingston a écrit :
>
> > No doubt this will be something I'm asked to do in a page layout soon. I
> > was just watching this demo of a new Chrome extension:
> >
>
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> Le 4 sept. 2014 à 00:31, Tom Livingston a écrit :
>
> > If you look carefully at the image I linked to, the text and arrow image
> > aren't well centered vertically. It look better in Safari. I know
>
>
>> One possibility: set the line-height to '1' on the element. Might help a
>> little by making the line box the same size as the font-size.
>>
>> Le 4 sept. 2014 à 00:50, Tom Livingston a écrit :
>>
>> > Also, I can't use background-p
--------
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org ]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FA
my rules?
>
> John
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org ]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:32 PM, John wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> The is a stylable element independent of the img.
>
>
> OK..then would that mean that an empty a tag would have an underline?
>
>
>
> ^^ this would
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:32 PM, John wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> The is a stylable element independent of the img.
>>
>>
>> OK..
I guess you would if the images wasn't found. Alt text would get decorated?
Can't check right now.
On Thursday, September 11, 2014, Philippe Wittenbergh
wrote:
>
> Le 11 sept. 2014 à 18:56, MiB >
> a écrit :
>
> > sep 11 2014 05:19 Tom Livingston >:
> >
-- Forwarded message --
From: *MiB*
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2014
sep 11 2014 13:33 Tom Livingston >:
I guess you would if the images wasn't found. Alt text would get decorated?
Can't check right now.
That is what is happening and is on spec as far as I k
...and it's wrapped in an .
On Thursday, September 11, 2014, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: *MiB* >
> Date: Thursday, September 11, 2014
>
>
>
>
> sep 11 2014 13:33 Tom Livingston :
>
> I guess you woul
incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
_
st wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | m
___
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org ]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org --
ation: landscape){.call {display:run-in; }}
>> and
>> /* Phone Portrait (320px) */
>> @media only screen and (max-width: 320px) {.call {display:run-in; }}
>>
>> Site can be viewed temporarily at:
>> http://www.sportsmanfishing.com/webdev/index.html
>>
>>
On Saturday, September 13, 2014, Paul wrote:
> I remember reading that somewhere also so I will give a try on my next go.
> Should I be using em instead of px?
>
>
>
> Brad Frost explains:
http://bradfrostweb.com/blog/post/7-habits-of-highly-effective-media-queries/#r
css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Devel
and
> occasionally come across cases where "decent" IE8 support is required.
>
> Tim
>
>
Just add a fallback, if this is the issue:
font-size: 16px;
font-size: 1rem;
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 |
___
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.o
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:16 PM, John wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> IMHO It's well worth adding the px fallback instead
>
>
>
> the px fallback being to add
>
> font-size: 16px;
> font-size: 1rem;
>
> to my css u
Correct.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:25 PM, John wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> the px fallback being to add
>
> font-size: 16px;
> font-size: 1rem;
>
> to my css up at the top, right? Does this also set 1rem equal to 16px?
>
>
>
650px, a side bar of 250 and a gutter of 60. Using percentages, that
would be 67%, 26% and 6% with 1% wiggle room (I don't recommend making
everything add up to exactly 100% because of differences in browser
renderings).
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer
t;
> Regards,
>
> Tim Dawson
>
> --
> Tim Dawson
> Maolbhuidhe
> Fionnphort
> Isle of Mull PA66 6BP
>
> 01681 700718
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discus
recommended due to the fact that child elements
will inherit the raw number value, rather than the computed value. With
this, child elements can compute their line heights based on their computed
font size, rather than inheriting an arbitrary value from a parent that is
more likely to need overri
org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer |
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://
;width="XXX" height="YYY" />
>>
>>
>>
>> h1 span {
>> display:none;
>> }
>> /* h1 text inside the span tag does not visually display,
>>
It's not the span tag that's good, it's the text it wrap
lp_support_evolt/
>
> __________
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-disc
em, except for the lack of the compounding issue associated
with em. And that's a really good thing.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-
an ? You would be adding the image after the element, but
it would be inside the . A quick test with adding some text after
an element worked for me in latest Mac FF/Chrome.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Develop
>> convoluted solution.
>>
>> Dave Solko
>> Pixel Alchemy
>> d...@pixelalchemy.com
>> 513.300.2165
>>
>>
>>
Can you add the image as base64 in the content: "": rule?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 5
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Chris Rockwell
> wrote:
>> I assume you're adding this as a background-image, is that correct?
>> Something like:
>> div:after {
>> content: " ";
>>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> Le 18 sept. 2014 à 22:28, Tom Livingston a écrit :
>
>> Can you add the image as base64 in the content: "": rule?
>
> How would that help in making the image a link?
>
>
I guess I was adding th
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:53 AM, John wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2014, at 5:47 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> I haven't heard any arguments about not using rem for anything but
>> font-size until this thread. I've only heard that it's no different
>>
iscuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [c
sizes in the layout and therefore things over
flow their containers or get cropped. That's poor planning. This is
failure on the designers/devs part. Not CSS's. Is CSS responsible for
the containers not flexing? Technically, yes. Did it get into the site
by itself and mess thing
>> Philippe
>> --
>> Philippe Wittenbergh
>> http://l-c-n.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ______
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/l
orks (a lot of classes I don't need, extra css, etc...). I have
crazy tight deadlines, so I need to go with what works for me, with
what I know, and what I can get done in time.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | m
> design to dev.
>> I want to know how do you translate a grid PSD to html?
>> What is the formula for adapting to these gutters? Ensuring the correct
>> layout using Bootstrap or the like for example?
>> How do you adapt custom designs to this layout that may or may not
>
>
Agreed. Just do it. Try it. The framework creates the layout - two columns
etc - and you put your content in where it goes. At that point you may have
more specific issues that might be more easily helped with here on the list
like "how do I get this image to break out of its
possible. You don't need a grid frame work, obviously, although if
> you want to build a responsive site they say it will help with the
> development.
I only build responsively now and I don't use a framework.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Med
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-di
Just gonna throw this out here for FYI/Reference purposes, just in case:
http://sudheerdev.github.io/Foundation5CheatSheet/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-d
h: 600px; (or
whatever you need).
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-di
with and without this line.
Here's reference:
http://www.quirksmode.org/mobile/metaviewport/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
#663399
___
better here - provided flash card content
will work in a mobile portrait orientation. Scrolling card content
works on my iPhone but a scroll bar is not visible for me. This might
cause users to not know scrolling is possible.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic
es.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discus
ss-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
Sorry, that should read "If you don't know context you CAN'T use the
formula..."
Another victim of auto correct...
On Monday, October 20, 2014, Tom Livingston wrote:
> I have to agree with Philip here. If you don't know context you can use
> the formula you refe
ting pixel-expressed designs, but
> also when reading this list.
>
>
>
I'm sorry. I must have missed the context mentioned. I only saw references
to fixed width gutters. I'll re-read.
--
Tom Livingston |
On Monday, October 20, 2014, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, October 20, 2014, MiB > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> okt 20 2014 12:20 Philip Taylor :
>>
>> > On the contrary, I want to challenge your assertion that "you can
>> translate fro
On Monday, October 20, 2014, David Hucklesby wrote:
> On 10/20/14, 2:16 AM, MiB wrote:
>
>>
>> okt 20 2014 11:08 MiB :
>>
>> Grids are not hocus locus.
>>>
>>
>>
> I’m giving this response a "Like" :)
Magic plague ;-)
--
om/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
___
:
>
> On Oct 20, 2014, at 5:50 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> Actually, in Chrome dev tools, i see .sample-summary div wrapping only
> the two little paragraphs. And the wrapping the imgs is 100%
> width;
>
>
> Here is with that with a red line around it..
>
> the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:11 PM, John wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> .sample-summary is 100% width, and is holding the images down. In
>> Chrome dev tools, I was able to add a style to .sample-summary as so:
>>
>> width:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:22 PM, John wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
>
> That style says that the s INSIDE .sample-summary are 30% wide.
>
> and the markup I see in Chrome dev tools is:
>
>
>
>
>
> [img]
>
ss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Se
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:07 AM, David Laakso wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> Only thing that struck me was the menu background could be
>> a bit more opaque, especially when over busier page contents.
>>
>
iscuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
Hello list,
Shocking as this may seem, I'm having an issue with IE8.
When I first hit this page it seems to work fine. But after a refresh
or two, it goes blank and doesn't recover.
Can anyone see what I am not?
http://proof.mlinc.com/tl/ie8test/
Thanks in advance.
--
Tom
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Shocking as this may seem, I'm having an issue with IE8.
>
> When I first hit this page it seems to work fine. But after a refresh
> or two, it goes blank and doesn't recover.
>
> Can
I'm not able to look right now but based on Philippe's reply it sounds like you
had a ul inside an li. The li has :hover styles applied. Since the ul was not
visible but still present (because there is no such thing as display:hidden;)
the li was actually as tall as its content - which included
I've been using a polyfill called picturefill. It will serve the necessary
image based on media query. Very few people, if any, change browser viewport
sizes while browsing like devs do in testing. Only the appropriate image gets
served. No crazy amounts of server requests.
Sent from my iPhone
Swapping bg images is easy enough with media queries, however, many mobile
device browsers will download images within other mqs. There is an easy way to
stop this in most cases.
For example, my base mobile styles (because you build pages mobile-first,
right?) have a bg img. I'll use that img u
u don't need to (because the content works fine without an adjustment
at these breakpoints). Again, this assumes a mobile-first build (because
that's best).
Here's the article. Test five is what I am referring to.
http://timkadlec.com/2012/04/media-query-asset-downloading-results/
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Crest Christopher
wrote:
Why do you recommend building mobile first ?
Aside from being best practice, it is much harder and requires more code to
achieve a mobile layout from a desktop first build because it requires you
to "undo" a great deal of
cuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End De
in a web page compared to a psd.
>
> I don't understand ?
>
"want to export my image assets perfectly, focus more on markup and
styles"... What is pixel-perfect in an image editor will not be in
code/browser.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer |
e 2x / 3x for Retina displays ?
>
I have used images for 2x displays. I dont worry about it for photographs.
Logos mostly.
see picturefill.js
http://scottjehl.github.io/picturefill/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:42 PM, David Laakso wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Crest Christopher
>> wrote:
>>
>> Why do you recommend building mobile first ?
>>
>> need a 5K image, from there I scale it down, or up because I'll be designing
>> for mobile first, then I adjust the page and graphics accordingly for
>> desktop.
>>
>> Christopher
>>
>> Tom Livingston Thursday, November 06, 2014
>>
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Crest Christopher <
crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks !
> The polyfill for pictures is nice, as you mentioned lousy support !
>
> Christopher
>
Native support for is spotty. The polyfill works.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-
Not working in ios8.1 safari either. Just sits at the bottom of the content.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 7:59 PM, Debbie Campbell wrote:
>
> Having a problem with IE here...
>
> http://www.boissonconsulting.com/resources/
>
> I'm using this sticky footer method (after trying seve
re you working on this? I am not seeing a sticky footer in any browser.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@li
It may just be early here but if the content is deeper than the current
viewport, this will cause problems. Also I don't see how this is "sticky".
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 9, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
> wrote:
>
> Am I right? I'm asking, not proclaiming.
>
> Code l
default or scaled up? That's the only thing I can see
that might be different. Since nothing seems to be telling the input
to be 100% wide, or float right, etc. of the aside, it seems to be
doing what I would expect - and that would be to NOT line up with the
right edge of the 'in' i
sktop…
>
> hope this helps someone..
>
> John
Well, unless you override #s in your desktop MQ, you would see a
change on desktop if you changed tablet MQ... provided you're building
mobile-first...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:11 PM, John wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 1:07 PM, John wrote:
>>
>> I am fairly sure I tried this before, but width 100% float right works now,
>> correctly, in all 4 bro
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:00 PM, John wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> Well, unless you override #s in your desktop MQ, you would see a
> change on desktop if you changed tablet MQ... provided you're building
> mobile-first...
>
>
&g
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:04 PM, John wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> Well, I guess that's not always true, depending on your MQs, huh?!
>
> I tend to use only min-width MQs for the most part.
>
>
> Yeah, most true and these vari
in advance.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/
Thanks guys. I seem to always forget CSS tables... I'll give it a
shot. I got some complicated transform hover effects that I need to
play nice...
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
ss-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | S
_
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt
.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-disc
e if you designed in such a
> way that your code will render appropriately at /any/
> resolution/screen-size/W-H-Y rather than coding for a discrete set of sizes
> today and having to do a complete re-write tomorrow ?
>
As previously mentioned.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End D
each one will not be possible.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-di
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:50 AM, MiB wrote:
>
>
> nov 13 2014 16:39 Tom Livingston :
>
>> A sheet/styles for base styles. No MQ.
>>
>> A sheet/styles that kicks in with an MQ of min-width: 30em to make any
>> necessary tweaks to the content.
>>
>>
the parent of my header
will mess up the fixed positioning. My question is how do I "turn
off/negate/undo" the transition at wider widths so my fixed header
will work?
Sorry, can't post code right now.
Thanks in advance.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | M
701 - 800 of 1178 matches
Mail list logo
