If one were inclined to host a cypherpunks list node, where would one
obtain the necessary information?
-MW-
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Anonymous wrote:
> >Some librarians are probably now thinking they have a patriotic duty to
> >see what people are reading and to report any "suspicious" behavior.
> >Part of the intent of the Patriot Act and the Library Awareness Program
> >was to bamboozle the nation's libra
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> I'm told by an organizer that
> Bruce Schneier will be speaking at toorcon in San Diego this year.
> See www.toorcon.org for info.
This is of interest why?
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> Yet more info. Let's not overreact before we get complete dataset.
It is worth noting that the notice mentioned below was placed on the JAP
website only after the news of the back channel was made public on Usenet
and the various security mailing list
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Lucky Green wrote:
> > The question is - do I have to code this or has someone
> > already done it ?
>
> http://www.lokmail.com/
It is inadvisable that anyone use Lokmail. The implications of a
"trust-us" encrypted mail service are obvious, and the people behind
Lokmail are o
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> > ...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
> > some component which made them slightly ill.
>
> Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them pretty
> sick...
Gee golly! I'm so glad that CNN told me that the
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Eric Cordian wrote:
> The look on your fellow astronauts'
> faces right before the grenade you are
> holding explodes --PRICELESS
Please. If we're going to toss around conspiracy theories, let's make sure
they are sane. I am having a hard time imagining
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Eric Cordian wrote:
> Nonetheless, it's an interesting story.
>
> I should note that the high security building I live regards master keying
> doors as a bad thing to do, and they have a key board and a signout
> sheet in the main office.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/23/
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> Ah, now I see. Before, I was thinking that he was talking about the passage
> where Onan pulls out and spills his seed on the ground, which, somehow, became a
> prescription against masturbation, although reading it, especially in context,
> is clearly
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Steve Mynott wrote:
> > ... and they lie about it being 3G (which doesn't exist yet.)
>
> It's a CDMA2000 phone which is 3G.
>
> 3G networks exist in many parts of the world, although behind schedule
> in other parts.
Hmm. I actually can't find any specs on that phone's max s
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:
> > Samsung unveil new 3G camcorder phone
> > http://www.3gnewsroom.com/3g_news/jan_03/news_2906.shtml
>
> Hardly Brinworld. And T-Mobile has had it for awhile.
>
> Why is warmed-over technology news given headlines?
... and they lie about it being 3G (which do
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
> Any time you post to a list of a bunch of people you don't know,
> you might be posting to a list of a bunch of people you don't like.
> Reading the archives sometimes helps.
A (hopefully) helpful hint for the newcomers to this list: Bill is usually
the
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
> "Soma"? Despite the fact that I've read large chunks of the Rig Vedas, I
> don't remember anything called "Soma" (unless this is a Brave New World
> Reference). Of course, the Bhagavad Gita is a subsection of the
> Mahabaratabut I don't imagine this is
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Anonymous wrote:
> (unrelated, I noticed that there is no un-crippled free version of PGP
> for windows XP any more - 8.0 beta expired)
What about PGP 8.0 Freeware? That isn't "crippled". (It doesn't include
automatic email plugins, which many think are a bad idea anyway, and
On 15 Dec 2002, David Wagner wrote:
> Declan McCullagh wrote:
> >Also epic.org (not a cypherpunk-friendly organization,
> >but it does try to limit law enforcement surveillance) [...]
>
> Is the cypherpunks movement truly so radicalized that it is
> not willing to count even EPIC among its friend
On 13 Dec 2002, Sleeping Vayu wrote:
> Uh...I'd point out that this is no coincidence. The Conpiracy Theorist
> would say that the War on Drugs was precisely the CIA's way to keep
> its own drug prices high and continue funding their own little
> activites.
Plausible.
> Oh, and aside from the fa
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Keith Ray wrote:
> It's been a number of years since Jim Bell wrote his infamous
> "Assassination Politics" essay. If someone were to try to implement
> the system today and not share Jim Bell's fate, they would need
> absolute anonymity and security. The technical requireme
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Morlock Elloi wrote:
> > It seems to be strange that he wrote at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > an address which is also given on his web page, but
> > ping pipeline.com doesn't work.
>
> Sorry to resort to ad hominem, but you're a technological imbecile.
>
> There is this magic thi
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> At 11:08 AM 9/21/02 -0400, Greg Vassie wrote:
> >> says Dr Ann Coavoukian, the commissioner of information and privacy
> in
> >> Ontario, U.S.A. "People are lying and vendors don't know what is
> false [or
> >
> >As a resident of Ontario, Canada,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> In some parts of rural america, folks signal the presence of cops by
> flashing their headlights
> when driving.
>
> Occurs to me that would be a cool function for SDR: press code for or
> say "cop". For N seconds,
> phone periodically sends "cop
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Lisa wrote:
> http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/hac/
>
> http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/02/09/11/1616231.shtml?tid=93
>
> Handbook of Applied Cryptography
> Posted by michael on Wednesday September 11, @12:24PM
> from the complete-from-adelman-to-zimmerman dept.
>
... just making certain Lucky has seen this gem.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mike Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Outlook S/MIME Vulnerability
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Adam Shostack wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that while this may be fun, usability and getting
> millions of users to see that remailers are useful to them is a more
> useful goal.
I agree, although I fail to see how working on this would interfere with
that goal in any way.
Operating an anonymity service or providing privacy enhancing
technologies to the public poses potential risks to the provider if
sufficiently motivated entities wish to prevent the availability of such
technology.
In particular danger are individuals whose meatspace identity and nyms are
not pub
After attempting to kill PGP, NAI is now working on "big brother in a
box".
From: http://news.com.com/2100-1001-955392.html?tag=fd_top
Security company Network Associates said Monday that it had purchased a
small start-up whose software lets corporations and others "wiretap" their
computer netw
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Anonymous wrote:
> Clearly we need a new approach. Here is a suggestion for a simple
> solution which will give everyone an important secret that they will
> avoid sharing.
>
> At birth each person will be issued a secret key. This will be called
> his Mojo.
[snip]
> Now
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Anonymous User wrote:
> This program can be used by anonymous contributors to release partial
> information about their identity - they can show that they are someone
> from a list of PGP key holders, without revealing which member of the
> list they are. Maybe it can help in
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Adam Back wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:05:49PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
> > So what if we create the Cypherpunks Root CA, which (either) signs
> > what you submit to it via a web page, or publish the secret key?
>
> This won't achieve the desired effect because it w
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Curt Smith wrote:
> This is a fairly accurate description of the situation, but
> neglects to emphasize that the reason [1-cypherpunk] bothers
> convincing [2-coerced associate] to use encrypted e-mail is
> because [1] understands its importance and is attempting to
> share/s
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Lucky Green wrote:
> Adam wrote:
> > Which is too bad. If NAI-PGP went away completely, then
> > compatability problems would be reduced. I also expect that
> > the German goverment group currently funding GPG would be
> > more willing to fund UI work for windows.
>
> Tell
NAI is now taking steps to remove the remaining copies of PGP from the
Internet, not long after announcing that the company will not release its
fully completed Mac OS X and Windows XP versions, and will no longer sell
any copies of its PGP software.
Do we still believe this was a pure cost-cutti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
The lne list trims away some of the headers, so tracing this forgery back
to the source authoritatively is difficult, but one immediately thinks of
Deep Cover Agent mattd when reading this, as he seems incapable of using
the space bar in a consistent fashion.
A
32 matches
Mail list logo
