Speaking of "pseudonymity"...
At 12:53 PM -0400 9/27/05, Somebody wrote:
>
>Argh! Not this again!
Yes, again, and I'll keep repeating it until you get it. :-).
>No, "anonymity" is "don't know who sent it".
For some definitions of "who". To paraphrase a famous sink-washing
president, it depends
Chinese Web Controls and Tor ... a subject I happen to have close personal
experience with. Just took a three week vacation to Dali, China and after
hitting the Great Firewall of China (tm), hopped over to the eff site,
downloaded tor and privoxy, and 10 minutes later was up and running bypassing
Quoting "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 8:43 AM -0700 9/27/05, James A. Donald wrote:
> >In the long run, reliable pseudonymity will prove more
> >valuable than reliable anonymity.
>
> Amen. And, at the extreme end of the curve, perfect psedudonymity *is*
> perfect anonymity.
>
> "Charac
At 8:37 PM -0400 9/27/05, lists wrote:
> Building a TOR nymspace would be much more
>interesting and distributed.
Since the first time I met Dingledine, he was talking pseudonymity,
bigtime. I was curious when he went to play with onion routers, but maybe
I'm not so surprised anymore...
Cheers,
R
Dont' agree here...
From: Steve Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Hello directly from Jimbo at
Wikipedia]
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:41:34 -0400
On 9/28/05, Roy M. Silvernail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A Wikiwhiner wrote
> > I have valid
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/27/1235203
Posted by: CmdrTaco, on 2005-09-27 13:37:00
[1]Carl Bialik from the WSJ writes "China is moving to 'centralize all
China-based Web news and opinion under a state regulator,' the Wall
Street Journal reports, but determined citizens
Tyler Durden wrote:
Sorry...I don't understand...why would psuedonymity services be provided
within Tor?
I find the concept of having both pseudonymous and anonymous traffic
through TOR quite interesting. In some cases, you really do wish to just
separate yourself from your meatspace identity
- Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:54:38 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wikipedia & Tor
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:18:31AM -0400,
[yes, I know I'm preaching to the choir]
> - Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > A potential for cooperation is the proposal below for authenticated
> > access to Wikipedia through Tor. I will not speak to any particular
> > design here, but if Wikipedia has
On 9/28/05, Roy M. Silvernail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A Wikiwhiner wrote
> > I have valid although perhaps unpopular
> > contributions to make, and not only is my freedom to express myself
> > limited, the quality of the material on Wikipedia suffers due to the
> > absence of my perspective.
> - Forwarded message from cypherpunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: cypherpunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Hello directly from Jimbo at Wikipedia
> As an occasional Tor and Wikipedia user, let me add a couple of points.
>
> First, in case it is not obvious, the problem with the p
Quoting Alan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > We are not looking for a perfect solution. Yes, Wikis will be
> > vandalized. We're prepared to deal with that, we do deal with that.
> > But what I am seeking is some efforts to
Sorry...I don't understand...why would psuedonymity services be provided
within Tor?
An external reputation/psuedonymity server would of course "reduce" a Tor
users' anonymity to mere psuedonymity, but I don't see how it would do
anything more, and who cares? If Wikipedia (or anyone) doesn't w
--
From: "Tyler Durden"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A very subtle attack, perhaps? If I were so-and-so, I
> consider it a real coup to stop the kinds of
> legitimate Wikipedia entries that might be made from
> Tor users. And if this is the case, you can bet that
> there are other "o
What the heck are you doing there for three weeks? Buying some golden
triangle goods?
I hear it's beautiful, however, but it's not like you took a direct
international flight there...
-TD
From: Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
> - Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> We are not looking for a perfect solution. Yes, Wikis will be
> vandalized. We're prepared to deal with that, we do deal with that.
> But what I am seeking is some efforts to think usefully about how to
> helpfully reconcile o
16 matches
Mail list logo
