[RFC] Astro related modules

I've now re-organized the astronomical calculation portions of the chinese calendar modules into the following. This should be nicer to the namespace. Please let me know if they look ok: http://www.wafu.ne.jp/~daisuke/DateTime-Util-Calc-0.01.tar.gz http://www.wafu.ne.jp/~daisuke/DateTime-Uti

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

Also, regarding DTF::HTTP suitability, it has a requirement of HTTP::Date which is part of LWP. This probably counts against it for bundling (though most people using bundles probably have LWP already). cheers, -- Iain. pgp000

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [23 Oct 2003 08:01]: [...] > That sounds like a good idea, however I'm not sure about > including DT::F::Mail and DT::F::HTTP. They seem to be > fairly specific- task oriented modules. > > I admit that they're probably common tasks, but if I > wanted a quick

Re: RFC: DateTime::TemporalValue

Dan Kubb wrote: > I recently worked on a project where I had to keep track of data > that changed over time. I needed to keep a history of the > changes, as well as allow values to be specified for future > time periods. > For example, a value could be set, and it would go into > effect starting

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

> Dave Rolsky schreef: > > DateTime, it will tell you that you need these prereqs anyway. Eugene van der Pijll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The first few versions of Bundle::DateTime left out those prereqs. > As a result, the bundle was difficult to install for the first time: A

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

Dave Rolsky schreef: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Eugene van der Pijll wrote: > > > DT prereq's: > > Class::Factory::Util 1.3 - prereq's of DateTime > > Params::Validate 0.52 > > Test::More 0 > > Time::Local 1.04 > > Class::Singleton 1.03 - prereq of DT::TimeZone > > DateTime::Lo

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Eugene van der Pijll wrote: > DT prereq's: > Class::Factory::Util 1.3 - prereq's of DateTime > Params::Validate 0.52 > Test::More 0 > Time::Local 1.04 > Class::Singleton 1.03 - prereq of DT::TimeZone > DateTime::Locale 0.03 - needed by DateTime > Da

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

Rick Measham schreef: > I just installed Bundle::DateTime on my Darwin machine ... I hadn't > looked through the docs beforehand :) > > Can I suggest two other bundles that I'm willing to maintain (they > shouldn't need much alteration anyway. Not like the full bundle!) > > Bundle::DateTime::Mi

Re: RFC: DateTime::TemporalValue

Dan Kubb wrote: > > I recently worked on a project where I had to keep track of data > that changed over time. I needed to keep a history of the > changes, as well as allow values to be specified for future > time periods. DateTime::TemporalValue 082: #Class::Multimethods could really clean th