On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 05:14:55PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > See my other remark about the removal of the command line option.
>
> It is not removed. You can any option specify either by command line, or
> by GENCONTROL_OPTS.
Fine.
> > So my last concern (which I also expressed in my answ
Andreas Tille writes:
>> Note that in the moment, the GENCONTROL_OPTS need to be defined *after*
>> the blends-dev/Makefile inclusion, since the latter set it to be empty
>> (I'll change that in a moment, however).
>
> Noted from changelog...
>
> See my other remark about the removal of the comman
Hi Ole,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:51:39PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >
> > I've read this - but how did you actually *used* this setting.
> > What are you doing on your side to trigger the UDD option?
>
> I just added it to my Makefile and it works. Complete astro/Makefile:
>
> ```
> #!/usr/
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Andreas Tille writes:
>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> > H,
>> > but no --udd option for the /usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control
>> > call. How are
Hi Ole,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > H,
> > but no --udd option for the /usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control
> > call. How are you triggering the UDD option at
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> H,
> but no --udd option for the /usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control
> call. How are you triggering the UDD option at your side?
Inside of blend-gen-control, see
https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> If there are no other urgent things, I would like to upload the new
> version (to experimental? or directly to unstable?). Remember, it will
> go through NEW (new binary python3-blends) and so take some time.
H,
diff --git a/
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 04:56:25PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> I extended the queries to allow multiple (and even versionized) provides.
>
> Cool.
If there are no other urgent things, I would like to upload the new
version (to experimental? or directly to unstable?). Re
Hi Ole,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 04:56:25PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I extended the queries to allow multiple (and even versionized) provides.
Cool.
> Andreas Tille writes:
> >
> > Yes. The package filo is missing and bedtools provides it. That's a
> > hint to fix the tasks file to not m
Hi Andreas,
I extended the queries to allow multiple (and even versionized) provides.
Andreas Tille writes:
>> > It has another really great feature. It has the following warning
>> > output:
>> >
>> > WARNING:__main__:"filo" has been replaced with "bedtools"
>>
>> Where does it get this from?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:02:38PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> > It has another really great feature. It has the following warning
> > output:
> >
> > WARNING:__main__:"filo" has been replaced with "bedtools"
>
> Where does it get this from? Is this issued when "filo" is a "Provides"?
See
Hi Ole,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:02:38PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
> > I mean we need different metapackages for say amd64, arm64, i386, etc.
> > I agree that this is no solution for MultiArch but from my point of
> > view that's rather a corner case. However, our met
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:02:39PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> We had a short discussion in
>>
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2018/03/msg00059.html
>>
>> and your answer. Do you mean something more?
>
> I mean we need different metapackages for
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:02:39PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> From your experience: do you think there are chances to get an
> additional table with normalized dependencies?
Just ask for commit permissions. I have created several tables and
wrote the according importer. As long as you do n
Andreas Tille writes:
>> Huh! That is ugly! Who made this???
>
> Probably the person who had the intention to add control file
> information verbosely to a database table. I had discussed things like
> this years ago (debian...@lists.debian.org with [UDD] in subject is the
> right place to discus
15 matches
Mail list logo