On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:26:56AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > What I ran into with 5.0 was that there was a define that you set to
> > enable compiling with gcc 3.x, and there were some #ifdef's to make it
> > work. However
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What I ran into with 5.0 was that there was a define that you set to
> enable compiling with gcc 3.x, and there were some #ifdef's to make it
> work. However, that define also enabled building gcc 3.x from the
> FreeBSD source
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:15:46PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> >1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean?
>
> How clean do you mean? The standard compiler in -CURRENT is a gcc 3.1
> snapshot.
Oh, that's probably clean enough to start working with. It definitely says
to
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:37:41PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:54:29PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > Two main things:
> > >
> > > 1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean?
>1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean?
How clean do you mean? The standard compiler in -CURRENT is a gcc 3.1
snapshot.
>2) pmake (aka /usr/src/usr.bin/make) - the source tree for this on the
>various BSD flavors differ significantly, but all appear to share some
>b
* Joel Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020409 03:11]:
> 2) pmake (aka /usr/src/usr.bin/make) - the source tree for this on the
> various BSD flavors differ significantly, but all appear to share some
> basic level of functionality. How similar are they? I'm looking at taking
> over the pmake package, an
>http://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/bmake.html
>
> for details. it's going to have more-netbsd changes than freebsd
> or openbsd but i know simon has also worked at getting them as close
> as possible (there are some inconsistency extensions, :U and :L
> mean different things a
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 12:36:14PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
>
>1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If
>so, I might futz with trying to do up a chroot based on that, at some point
>here... unless someone else desperately wants to do it or somethin
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:54:29PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > Two main things:
> >
> > 1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If
> > so, I might futz with trying to do up a chroot based on that, a
1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If
so, I might futz with trying to do up a chroot based on that, at some point
here... unless someone else desperately wants to do it or something.
2) pmake (aka /usr/src/usr.bin/make) - the source tree for th
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:54:29PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> Two main things:
>
> 1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If
> so, I might futz with trying to do up a chroot based on that, at some point
> here... unless someone else desperately wants to do it or some
11 matches
Mail list logo
