hi Sebastian,
On Mon Aug 19, 2024 at 6:37 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
[..]
> Note the occurences of gcc-14-base: two times without archi qualifieres
> (incorrect), once with :amd64 and :i386 (correct).
thanks for reopening and for the provided details.
I've uploaded a
Control: tags -1 + confirmed pending
On Fri Aug 2, 2024 at 12:12 AM CEST, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> I can't reproduce the issue locally, so I'd appreciate if you'd modify either
> version to print how long is the string that is passed to debconf.
whiptail fails with a 12
Control: tags -1 - help
Control: found -1 0.16
awesome, thanks guys!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi guys, thanks for your continued help with this.
I was able to reproduce the issue and have uploaded what I believe to be a fix,
as 0.16.12 in experimental. please verify.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 help
On Tue Aug 13, 2024 at 4:48 PM CEST, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:16:58 +0300, Antti Kultanen wrote:
>
> > > I've now been able to reproduce the entire issue and uploaded 0.16.11 to
> > > experimental. I'll wait on your feedback before uploading also to
>
thank you Gregor and Antti for the helpful follow ups.
I've now been able to reproduce the entire issue and uploaded 0.16.11 to
experimental. I'll wait on your feedback before uploading also to unstable.
thanks again,
Serafeim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi Holger,
On Mon Aug 12, 2024 at 1:44 PM CEST, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 11:41:54PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > apologies for this. adequate 0.16 onwards is a complete rewrite,
>
> I think it would have been adequate to upload that rewrite to experi
hi folks,
> > affects 1076788 + apt
> Bug #1076788 [adequate] adequate: Messes up the console apt was running from
apologies for this. adequate 0.16 onwards is a complete rewrite, and while I've
received a few bug reports since then, this is the first I hear of this issue,
so thanks for the repor
On Fri Aug 2, 2024 at 10:23 AM CEST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 22:49 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> >* Add version constraint to Build-Depends: golang-go, for relatively new
> > stdlib packages (cmp and slices). Closes: #1077724.
>
Control: tags -1 pending
oh dear! thanks to both of you for the report
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: found -1 0.15.9~deb12u1
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: found -1 0.1.1
hi Paul, thanks for the bug reports (this and the other ones).
On Thu Aug 1, 2024 at 4:17 AM CEST, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: adequate
> Version: 0.16.4
> Severity: important
>
> When debconf mode is enabled and there is a large amount of adequate
> output, debconf fails
John Paul, thanks for the report!
On Thu Aug 1, 2024 at 9:27 AM CEST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Source: adequate
> Version: 0.16.5
> Severity: normal
[..]
> src/salsa.debian.org/debian/adequate/binfmt.go:7:2: cannot find package "cmp"
> in any of:
> /home/glaubitz/adequate/adequa
On Wed Jul 31, 2024 at 5:33 AM CEST, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 04:41:10PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > looking at #944620, can somebody please share specifics of where/how the
> > build
> > log scanner is deployed/scheduled, and whether its l
Control: tags -1 pending
thanks for the suggestions!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi Paul,
On Sat Sep 22, 2018 at 3:46 AM CEST, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: adequate
> Version: 0.15.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I discovered some broken alternatives and reported them in #909340,
> it would be nice if adequate could also report when the alternatives
> registry items[1] contain filen
Control: reassign -1 wmaker
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Tue Jul 23, 2024 at 2:23 AM CEST, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
[..]
> Doug, would be okay with moving /usr/bin/wmaker from wmaker-common to wmaker?
> that'd also allow you to drop the no-manual-page lintian override in
>
hi Bernhard, qa folks,
looking at #944620, can somebody please share specifics of where/how the build
log scanner is deployed/scheduled, and whether its logs are available for
investigation?
https://qa.debian.org/bls links to package build logs, whereas I'm after the
logs that are generated while
thanks Sebastian for the report.
that'd be because your have installed all of:
libavcodec61, libavcodec61:i386, libavcodec61:amd64
it sounds like adequate should drop foo in the presence of any foo:arch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi Paul,
On Tue Jan 27, 2015 at 1:43 AM CET, Paul Wise wrote:
> I have a machine pinned to experimental with lots of different desktops
> and other packages installed and regularly upgrade it to find
> obsolete-conffile reports. Currently I have to wade through lots of
> complaints from adequate a
hi Andreas,
On Thu Jul 23, 2015 at 8:34 PM CEST, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[..]
> I don't know if that would be a task for adequate, but we should have
> some automated check for perl (and python) modules to see whether their
I'd make the case that adequate is not the right place. first of all the
hi folks,
new adequate maintainer here. thanks for filing the bug and for looking into it.
I think that either case could be made as to whether this is a bug in adequate
or in wmaker (imho the Debian policy is open to interpretation in this regard).
arguably, adequate is being rather pedantic by
hi Laurent, thanks for the report.
On Thu Jul 11, 2024 at 7:14 PM CEST, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Package: adequate
> Version: 0.15.14
> Severity: important
yes, sorry, known issue - both the apt hook and debconf integration are
buggy/incomplete in experimental. I don't expect this to be fixed ver
thanks Guillem!
that all seems reasonable to me, and I think we can rely on Debian Policy 10.9:
Files should be owned by "root:root", and made writable only by the
owner and universally readable (and executable, if appropriate), that
is mode 644 or 755.
I'll make adequate
tags 805592 moreinfo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hola Guillem, bon dia ;)
do you think that this bug is still relevant, especially with most daemons now
being handled internally by systemd? if so, can you please point me to a
specific package with non-readable pid file(s)?
gràcies,
Serafeim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi,
https://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling suggests that that should be doable
using dpkg conffile checksums, e.g.
% dpkg-query -W -f='${Conffiles}' apt-cacher-ng
/etc/apt-cacher-ng/acng.conf 87897bc5b2bbb83614d1ef5e57b57abc
/etc/apt-cacher-ng/security.conf e6cc84b92032492d92d2f723a6a0a63
tags 731346 + wontfix
thanks
this concern becomes a non-issue with wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hello folks,
10y later, I'm inclined to close this bug.
adequate has autopkgtest tests, which run quite quickly with schroot (sudo
autopkgtest --ignore-restrictions=breaks-testbed,needs-root . -- schroot
) and https://ci.debian.net/packages/a/adequate/ works like a charm.
I intend to adopt adequate and rewrite it in go. I've reached out to
former contributors and current stakeholders on their opinion about
that, and have not received any nacks yet (although I've only received a
couple of responses).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
reassign 969981 ftp.debian.org
retitle 969981 RM: acpitail -- RoQA; orphaned, abandoned upstream
thanks
better alternatives: acpitool, acpi_listen (from the acpid package)
reassign 846308 ftp.debian.org
retitle 846308 RM: tpb -- RoQA; orphaned, abandoned upstream
thanks
tpb is orphaned, dead-upstream, has very few users, and its
functionality is largely covered by the acpid package (modulo OSD, which
major window managers do provide). the latest bug was filed 7y ago
reassign -1 src:snarf
retitle -1 snarf: proposed removal
usertags: proposed-removal
thanks
snarf has very few users, better alternatives exist, has not had a
maintainer in 10y, and no active upstream
I'd be happy to sponsor the uploads for this package (and its
dependencies that are not already in the archive).
tags 719792 wontfix
thanks
Sounds good to me.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the socnetv package.
The socnetv package has not been updated by its nominal maintainer in more
than three years, during which time there have been two NMUs (and I'm about to
make a third one).
The package description is:
SocNetV is a graphical
Hi Caitlin,
Thanks for your work, it looks great! However it seems to fail to install
when doc-base is already in place:
(Reading database ... 357341 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../socnetv_1.3+dfsg-1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking socnetv (1.3+dfsg-1) over (0.90-3.1)
Hi Caitlin,
Dimitris in CC (the upstream author) has just released version 1.3. Would
you mind updating the package for it?
Thanks
Serafeim
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the cflow package.
The package description is:
GNU cflow analyzes a collection of C source files and prints a graph, charting
control flow within the program.
.
GNU cflow is able to produce both direct and inverted flowgraphs for C
sour
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the bogofilter package.
The package description is:
This package implements a fast Bayesian spam filter along the lines suggested
by Paul Graham in his article "A Plan For Spam".
.
This version substantially improves on Paul's proposal b
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the beanstalkd package.
The package description is:
Beanstalkd is a simple, fast, workqueue service (a specific case of message
queueing), in which messages are organised in "tubes". Beanstalk clients can
insert and consume messages into
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the socnetv package.
The package description is:
SocNetV is a graphical application designed to be an easy tool for Social
Networks Analysis and Visualisation (not to be confused with social
networking, as in online communities). With it,
Hi Jonathan,
> What are my options apart from manually removing reconf-inet's entries
> from /etc/inetd.conf and restart inetd using invoke-rc.d?
>
It's unfortunate that the same link is used for both reconf-inetd and
systemd. Can't you ship a new systemd service file that refers to another
(ne
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
>From my RFA, #749340, two weeks ago:
I request an adopter for the nodebox-web package.
I packaged it several years ago because it was needed for another package, one
that is not in the Debian archive anymore. nodebox-web has low popcon and no
rdepends, s
Hi Jon,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 07:54:11PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I've recently revisited this issue. I've discovered two things: firstly, there
> are two distinct class heirarchies/families within the 'mailbox' library: the
[..]
Thanks for your interest in archivemail.
In case you've
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the nodebox-web package.
I packaged it several years ago because it was needed for another package, one
that is not in the Debian archive anymore. nodebox-web has low popcon and no
rdepends, so adopt it only if you (plan to) use it yourself.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the cflow package; I don't have the time for it.
The package description is:
GNU cflow analyzes a collection of C source files and prints a graph, charting
control flow within the program.
.
GNU cflow is able to produce both direct and inverte
Bonjour Didier!
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:35:59PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> I've noticed that bogofilter embeds a copy of libtrio's source files; the
> build system
> should ensure that libtrio-dev's header files are used and that bogofilter is
> linked
> against the system version of libtr
Hi Jon,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> Given that you have already orphaned both reconf-inetd and update-inetd,
> and nobody else has come forward, I think it would be best for nyancat
> not to depend on either of them.
I've RFA'd them; I'm still the maintain
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:51:09PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> Hi Serafeim,
>
> On 02/01/14 23:13, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > Here's a list of instructions instead:
> >
> > - don't ship anything under /usr/share/reconf-inetd/
> > - rep
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:33:22AM +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> Can you please supply a patch for this. DEP9 provides no guidance on how
> correctly to migrate users away from reconf-inetd in the postinst.
Here's a list of instructions instead:
- don't ship anything under /usr/share
Package: nyancat-server
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I plan to remove reconf-inetd from the Debian archive, since jessie will most
likely be released with a modern init system which makes inetd even more
irrelevant (and thus reconf-inetd not a worthwhile project).
Please drop nyncat-ser
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I have orphaned the pdfshuffler package due to no interest in it.
The package description is:
PDF-Shuffler is a small application which allows one to merge or split pdf
documents and rotate, crop and rearrange their pages using an interactive
and intuitive graphi
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the update-inetd package.
The package description is:
This package provides a program used by other packages to
automatically update /etc/inetd.conf, the configuration file shared
by all implementations of the Internet super-server.
.
N
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the reconf-inetd package.
The package description is:
reconf-inetd is a dpkg-trigger script that updates the configuration of the
internet superserver. It is a replacement for update-inetd, as per DEP9.
.
If the above does not mean anyth
Attached the patch that was submitted six(!) years ago, refreshed for current
apt-listbugs. I've modified it to change -F to a boolean switch, rather than
one that requires an argument (as per msg #30 in this bug report).
As discussed off-line, it'd be great if force-pin would default to true in
c
Francesco,
As discussed off-line, here's a script to somewhat emulate apt's behaviour
according to the patch in this bug report, for the sake of testing.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
apt-hook-fd-fixture.rb
Description: application/ruby
Daniel, David,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:52:49PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:15:32PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> > On 17 March 2013 19:56, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:14:50PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
>
Package: reconf-inetd
Version: 1.120603
Severity: normal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: reconf-inetd
Version: 1.120603
Severity: normal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Francesco,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:22:27PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote [edited]:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:09:43 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> The current apt-listbugs text user interface displays the bugs that
> affect the installation/upgrade and then offers the user the
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
> Package: beanstalkd
> Version: 1.7-1
>
> Beanstalkd is quite often going berserk and using 10% CPU on my machine.
> Looking at the beanstalkd bugtracker, this should be fixed in 1.8, which
> was released a few months ago.
Thank
Package: reconf-inetd
Version: 1.120603
Severity: wishlist
reconf-inetd currenly only supports services that are associated with a
well-known port (by being listed in /etc/services).
unlisted services, such as approx, cannot be migrated to reconf-inetd until
this bug is fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
- Forwarded message -
From: Serafeim Zanikolas
To: debian-v...@lists.debian.org
Subject: [OT] flag RC-buggy packages to users of testing
[M-F-T set to 628...@bugs.debian.org, as I believe this is becoming OT]
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:17:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
[..]
> On Tue,
z
[0] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep9/#index5h1
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
commit 8b9b33eb0218b54858f574bde051182fdfe712af
Author: Serafeim Zanikolas
Date: Sun Mar 24 20:23:40 2013 +0100
inetd.conf entry: migrate away from inetd-co
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tag -1 +patch
Hi,
Please find attached a patch for migrating your package to reconf-inetd, as
per dep9 [0], in order to eliminate cross-package issues such as #168847.
I'll be happy to answer any questions.
cheers,
sez
[0] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep9/#i
Hi guys,
Attached a proof-of-concept for the advanced use case (in which the user
actually wants to review which buggy packages to pin or upgrade). Consider
this as a basis for further discussion, rather than something anywhere near a
working patch.
To give it a try, save the attached files in th
Hi Uli,
Any progress on the upload that you were preparing for this past week?
cheers,
sez
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Control: tag -1 -pending
Removing months-old pending tag.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ate debian/watch for version mangling.
+ * Setting high urgency due to RC bug.
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:04:39 +0100
+
keepassx (0.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix FTBFS with gcc 4.7. (Closes: #667224)
diff -Nurp keepassx-0.4.3/debian/copyright
felix/keepassx-0.4.3+d
.
+ * Add postrm/preinst scripts for removing/disabling/enabling the apt hook
+file, and change the latter to test the existence of post_invoke.py before
+invoking it (Closes: #703207, 700821).
+ * Setting high urgency due to RC bugs
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:45:
Control: tag -1 +pending
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU to delayed/5, using a repackaged source based on Prach
Pongpanich's patch. Please feel free to override it.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-
Control: notfound -1 0.4.3+dfsg-0.1
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Felix Geyer wrote:
> The upload looks good except that it doesn't close this bug ("close"
> vs. "closes" in the changelog).
Oops, that's right. Thanks for the review.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone t
that use common functions.sh
+ * In migrateDocSymlink(), remove multi-arch string from pkg name, if any
+ * All the above close #692948 (high urgency due to RC severity)
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:32:04 +0100
+
firebird2.5 (2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-2) unstable; urgency=high
* H
Control: tag -1 -pending
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
of go-*.png and help_about.png icons (project Oxygen, and license CC-BY-SA
+3.0 or LGPL respectively).
+ * The above three items close #698832
+ * Update debian/watch for version mangling.
+ * Setting high urgency due to RC bug.
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:04:39 +0100
+
to test the existence of post_invoke.py before
+invoking it (Closes: #703207, 700821).
+ * Setting high urgency due to RC bugs
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:45:30 +0100
+
apt-spacewalk (1.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
* [22c43b83] Rename binary package to apt-transport-spac
tag 700821 -pending
tag 703207 -pending
tag 700821 -patch
tag 703207 -patch
thanks
$ sudo dpkg -i apt-transport-spacewalk_1.0.6-2.1_all.deb
Selecting previously unselected package apt-transport-spacewalk.
(Reading database ... 369115 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking apt-transp
Felix,
Of course, you should disregard my comments about NMU in the changelog -- I've
only now noticed that you're in the uploaders list.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi guys,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:07:20AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:34:03 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
[..]
>· -n, --force-no Assumes that you select no for all questions.
>This option is assume
Control: tag -1 -pending
Untagging as it's been pending for over a week.
FWIW I've reproduced the issue in a reasonably modern laptop (lenovo x201):
Ran 2173 tests in 600.905s
FAILED (skips=21, failures=1, errors=2, successes=2149)
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do
Control: tag -1 +patch
Works for me.
commit 2674f3279495191233db770302d7e71d8647ce41
Author: Serafeim Zanikolas
Date: Mon Mar 18 23:09:23 2013 +0100
add postrm/preinst scripts to handle apt hook file
fixes #703207
diff --git a/debian/apt-transport-spacewalk.postrm
b/debian/apt
Control: tag -1 +patch
Hi Felix,
Thanks for preparing the patch. Some minor points:
- the release version should be 0.4.3+dfsg-0.1 (as per
http://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload)
- the changelog entry should start with:
* Non-maintainer upload.
- the urgency should be bumped to mediu
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 08:00:51PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 18 March 2013 18:56, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
[..]
> > If I understand correctly, debconf can only be used with predefined
> > templates,
> > thus predefined generic policy questions (as opposed to quest
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 05:34:03PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> Control: reopen 628996
> Control: retitle 628996 apt-listbugs: please use debconf
> #Control: tags 628996 - moreinfo
>
> On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:41:52 +0800 Daniel Hartwi
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:15:32PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 17 March 2013 19:56, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:14:50PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> >> The data can be passed through an open fd, similar to dpkg --status-fd
> >> a
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 02:14:50PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 17 March 2013 06:56, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > Hi Francesco,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:25:36PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote [edited]:
> >> On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:05:09
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36:22AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:07:21 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > Do you agree then that adding the fifo feature to apt and adapting
> > apt-listbugs accordingly is not needed nor does it suffice for fixing
> >
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:04:38 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I'm not sure any more that using a fifo instead of stdin is
> > needed for a "programmatic" frontend. After all, the tr
Hi Francesco,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:25:36PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote [edited]:
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:05:09 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote:
[..]
> > Using a hook-defined fifoname rather than a random fifoname should be
> > okay as the later isn't more secure than the former (if an attack
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:32:40PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> Right. Apt-listbugs is effectively called in the same context as
> maintainer scripts, and those are not guaranteed to have an
> interactive shell. The program must be smart enough to detect this
> and do the right thing (I'm not s
Hi David & Francesco,
Thanks for the quick feedback.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:05:09PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote [edited]:
> Using a hook-defined fifoname rather than a random fifoname should be
> okay as the later isn't more secure than the former (if an attacker has
> root rights to writ
tag 671726 +patch
thanks
Hi,
The attached patch enables apt to pass Pre-Install-Pkgs hook data via a fifo,
instead of via stdin (which remains the default, of course).
Unlike the proposal in the initial bug report, the fifo filename is not
randomised, but instead declared via the following confi
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 03:41:40AM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote [edited]:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:08:29PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > Some debian.net services would serve their purpose better if they were
> > integrated into the www.d.o namespace, but t
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Some debian.net services would serve their purpose better if they were
integrated into the www.d.o namespace, but the criteria for deciding which
services would qualify is not documented.
Here's some suggestions that could be a useful start:
- there
Package: maint-guide
Version: 1.2.31
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Please apply the attached patch to update the URL for the wnpp-by-tags
service.
Thanks,
sez
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimenta
diff (from upstream commit 70b63d5) to fix
+OUT_OF_MEMORY error after crash (Closes: #698140, aka upstream issue 44)
+
+ -- Serafeim Zanikolas Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:17:27 +0100
+
beanstalkd (1.4.6-4) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Add fiu-fix.diff (upstream commit 3176e28) to fix
Hi again,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:24:45PM +0200, Potamianos Gregory wrote:
[..]
> If the server crashes with an empty binlog, on the next startup it
> answers every submitted job with "out of memory" error and discards
> it. So the service is rendered useless and requires manual
> intervention.
Hi Gregory,
Thanks for the bug report.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Gregory Potamianos wrote:
[..]
> Beanstalkd reports OUT_OF_MEMORY error after unclean termination (crash) [1]
> Fix [2] seems to apply cleanly in 1.4.6-4
Unfortunately, it'll have to wait for an update after wheezy'
1 - 100 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
