also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.17.1748 +0100]:
> Since logcheck ships lots and lots of files, it may be best for lpr to
> either rename the file to something like, like lpr.package, or just drop
> the file altogether. I'll take a look at the rules today and get this done..
The
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Does this mean the bug should be reassigned to logcheck-database?
The appropriate action, IMO, would be to Replace: logcheck-database; we
can then remove that file at our leisure. (I for one am using l-d from
backports.org on my server
martin f krafft wrote:
> logcheck-database exists as a bag for rules that are not in the
> packages. If a package provides its own rule files, the
> logcheck-database must not.
Yes, that makes very good sense. I've just added the missing rule from
1.2.63 logcheck-database to lpr package.
Does thi
Frédéric Brière wrote:
> severity 418393 serious
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:49:01PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>> Yes, definitely. The fix is just to remove the conffile from lpr. No
>
> Seems to me like these two files should at least be merged, as they have
> different rules.
Since
severity 418393 serious
thanks
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:49:01PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Yes, definitely. The fix is just to remove the conffile from lpr. No
Seems to me like these two files should at least be merged, as they have
different rules.
As for which package should inherit from the
Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> On 2007-04-09 Adam Majer wrote:
>> Christian Hammers wrote:
>>> While upgrading from sarge to etch:
>>>
>>> dpkg: error
>>> processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lpr_1%3a2006.11.04_i386.deb
>>> (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/lpr',
>>> which
On 2007-04-09 Adam Majer wrote:
> Christian Hammers wrote:
> >
> > While upgrading from sarge to etch:
> >
> > dpkg: error
> > processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lpr_1%3a2006.11.04_i386.deb
> > (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/lpr',
> > which is also in package log
Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> While upgrading from sarge to etch:
>
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lpr_1%3a2006.11.04_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/lpr', which is also in
> package logcheck-database
>
> Maybe lpr should have a "Re
Package: lpr
Version: 2006.11.04-1
Severity: normal
While upgrading from sarge to etch:
Unpacking replacement logcheck-database ...
Preparing to replace lpr 1:2003.09.23-7 (using
.../lpr_1%3a2006.11.04_i386.deb) ...
Stopping printer spooler: lpd .
Unpacking replacement lpr ...
dpkg: error process
9 matches
Mail list logo