On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:30:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The changelog entry for 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 is closed, though there isn't a
> tag for this version. What is the update waiting for now?
It was waiting for some more testing, but I finished that
yesterday. DSA should be going out today.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:23:52PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 10:36 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:30:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > The changelog entry for 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 is closed, though there isn't a
> >
Source: linux
Version: 4.9.2-2
Hi! Please enable CONFIG_KEXEC on arm64. The userspace side landed in
unstable yesterday, and I verified that it works (at least in QEMU) w/
a Debian kernel rebuilt w/ CONFIG_KEXEC=y.
-dann
hey Marcelo,
I've backported the fix for CVE-2005-2709 to 2.4 for Debian's 2.4
sarge kernel. Below is a patch against 2.4.32, in case one hasn't been
submitted to you yet. Please apply.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urNp linux-2.4.32.orig/in
el: [ cut here ]
> Nov 18 17:32:16 localhost kernel: kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:683!
hey roumano,
Can you check and see if this issue still exists for you in the 2.6.14
packages in sid?
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Version: 2.6.14-3
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 17:30 +0100, Roumano wrote:
> Yes, problem is solve.
Thanks, marking accordingly.
In the future, please leave the bug number in the CC field when
replying.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
reassign 338185 elilo
stop
This is actually a bug in elilo, see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ia64&m=113315906701976&w=2
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey Vagrant,
I just root caused an issue w/ the same symptom on ia64. Turns out
the bootloader was passing a bloated initrd_size option to the kernel.
Since initramfs is known to work on x86 w/ other bootloaders, I'm
thinking qemu maybe doing the same thing.
Can you try a test for me?
1) Rebui
hey Paul,
Would it be possible for you to include your full bootlog?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: important
The mptspi module is required for at least some machines that use the mptscsih
driver for the root device.
Please bzr merge http://dannf.org/bzr/initramfs-tools
(I'm new to bzr - is this the appropriate way to send you a patch?)
-- System Information
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 04:12 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > BTW, also, about ia64 situation, is it possible to use yaird in
> > initrd case still ? I know Eric was disabling this for 0.12, but we
> > are still using 0.11 ?
>
> Yaird 0.0.11 is newest release - so it _will_ be removed but _was_
lem, where binutils_2.16.1-3
did not.
This patch appears to fix the problem:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9c184a073bfd650cc791956d6ca79725bb682716;hp=444d1d9bb5b724f03344c9317bc01d54a9b39073
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UN
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 17:33 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:13:16AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 04:12 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > BTW, also, about ia64 situation, is it possible to use yaird in
> > > > in
er.debian.org/~joey/security/kernel/patches/
http://squishy.cc/woody/
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
roposed-security-updates main
>
>
> If you know of new security bugs, and they aren't in
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/patch-tracking/?rev=0&sc=0
> then send a note here, to the testing-security team, or
> open a bug in the BTS.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 08:10 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > Yes. I really said woody.
> >
> > I've imported the woody 2.4 kernel trees into an svn repository:
> > svn.debian.org/var/lib/gforge/chroot/home/users/dannf/woody
> >
&
If someone has something they need to get into this release, let me know
& I'll halt. Otherwise, I'll proceed & upload once I've built/tested
this.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 19:14 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:01:27PM +0000, Dann Frazier wrote:
> > Author: dannf
> > Date: Thu Dec 8 17:01:26 2005
> > New Revision: 4992
> >
> > Added:
> >
> > dists/sid/linux-2.
-s390 kernel-image-2.6-s390 kernel-image-2.6-686
Architecture: source ia64 all
Version: 2.6.14-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Changed-By: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
kernel-image-2.6-itanium - Linux kernel 2.6 image on Itanium ma
You may now return to your regularly scheduled dist-upgrades.
elilo (3.4pre5.2-2) fixes the issues with initramfs
linux-2.6 (2.6.14-5) fixes the boot hang bug
klibc is buggy on ia64, so avoid initramfs-tools for now. Use yaird
instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 20:20 +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> ok, so the initramfs-tools bug seems to be run-init of klibc:
> a bit hard to debug if it's not possible to get into the bb shell.
> will think about it and reping.
Do you think a sysrq+t would be useful?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 16:41 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 04 December 2005 11:18, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > So, my question is: Is there some way to tell "everytime a new kernels
> > appears at $location, please apply all patches in $directory, and
> > compile it with this and that config for
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 23:12 -0800, Amu wrote:
> Hi all,
> I got the error while running make command
> in on binutils.
This is list is for Debian kernel development discussions. You might
have better luck contacting a LFS or binutils mailing list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 10:41 -0500, Rich Johnson wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:13 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > You are trying to build 2.6.8 with gcc 4. 2.6.8 isn't in sid and
> > gcc 4
> > isn't in sarge. Closing.
> >
> > If you want to build th
/svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/patch-tracking/CVE-2005-3527?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/patch-tracking/ia64-buggy-preempt?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 17:01 +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
> reopen 311357
> stop
>
> Followup-For: Bug #311357
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
>
> This bug is still not fixed! Why was it set to resolved???
Our mistake; though the fix is commented out (its non-securit
ow.
Can anyone help out with the mips build? I don't have a working mips
box.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 20:26 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 22 December 2005 18:39, dann frazier wrote:
> > Here's the current status of the woody builds:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelWoodyUpdateStatus
>
> I could install and boot
Since there has been no response from the maintainer for over a month,
I'm going to go ahead and close this one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:24 +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> reassign 344205 linux-source-2.6.15
> thanks
>
> Roland Mas, 2005-12-20 22:19:44 +0100 :
>
> > Trying to build my kernel from the linux-source-2.6.14 package (and no
> > external patches), I get an error in drivers/net/wireless/airo.c.
>
> S
tags 344205 + unreproducible
stop
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:24 +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> reassign 344205 linux-source-2.6.15
> thanks
>
> Roland Mas, 2005-12-20 22:19:44 +0100 :
>
> > Trying to build my kernel from the linux-source-2.6.14 package (and no
> > external patches), I get an error in
airo.c currently has MICSUPPORT enabled, which requires CONFIG_CRYPTO.
A user reported a build failure which is due to the lack of a Kconfig
dependency. See http://bugs.debian.org/344205.
This patch makes Kconfig enforce this dependency.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTEC
--- Begin Message ---
The patch titled
CONFIG_AIRO needs CONFIG_CRYPTO
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
config_airo-needs-config_crypto.patch
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
airo.c currently has MICSUPPORT enabled, which requires CONFIG_CRYPTO.
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 01:45 +, RParr wrote:
> If this is not the correct place to ask this question,
> please tell me where to go...
>
> I am trying to find out why the driver (arcmsr) for the
> Areca RAID controllers is not included in Debian kernel 2.6.15.
I don't see such a driver in upstr
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:24 -0300, dererk wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've a 2xPentium 166mhz cpu, and untill today I didn't realise to
> install a smp kernel to support it (it worked fine, but a bit slow),
> I've been running a 2.4.27-386 common one.
>
> But, when I tried to install the 2.4.27-2-686-
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 00:06 -0300, dererk wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:24 -0300, dererk wrote:
> >
> >
> >Unfortunately, you may have to. I don't think your cpus are supported
> >by a 686 optimized kernel, and there's
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 23:07 +, Stuart T. R. Rowan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 3c59x kernel module doesn't work with vlan (802.1q) tagged packets.
> Apparently the fix was committed somewhere around 2.6.10, anyway we've
> upgraded our stable box to vanilla kernel 2.6.15.1 to work around this
> issue -
Over the past few months, we've made quite a bit of progress collecting
and analyzing issues for the next sarge update. I think we're nearing a
good release point.
We currently have 8 pending issues for 2.6.8:
$ grep ^2.6.8-sarge-security * | grep -v -e N/A -e pending -e released \
-e ignored -
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
I'll file a bug for this & usertag it dkt-pending-sarge-update.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 16:23 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 23:07 +, Stuart
cial_op_exception;
pgm_check_table[0x14] = &do_pseudo_page_fault;
pgm_check_table[0x15] = &operand_exception;
-pgm_check_table[0x1C] = &privileged_op;
+pgm_check_table[0x1C] = &space_switch_exception;
#if defined (CONFIG_VIRT_TIMER) || defined (CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ)
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 23:18 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Even though 2.4 is moving very slowly nowadays (mostly security
> > > updates,
> > > very seldom new drivers are including), this is more work than
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:28 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 06:35:29PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:59:54PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > > I think I'll go ahead and put this into our tree & revert if it causes
> > >
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
> I have removed the original patch from sarge-security's 2.4.27-10sarge2
> as I believe that these patches are far to large for a security release.
> I don't believe they have been closely examined. And we don't even
> have a CVE for them. Should we
nel-kbuild-2.6-3: Debian kernel team
lm-sensors: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mindi-kernel: Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
systemimager: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hostap-modules-i386: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mol-modules-2.6.8: Jens Schmalzing &l
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.51
Severity: normal
I apt-get upgraded today & noticed the following error:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-mckinley (2.6.15-6) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitramfs to build the ramdisk.
Other valid candidates: mkinitramfs mkini
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 18:40 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> well the image above most likely wont boot,
> as you didn't post all the upgrade log, i assume that a bit later udev
> postinstall gets invoced and so the final image should still be fine.
>
Yes, udev postinstall did get executed later
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:12 +0100, Yann Rouillard wrote:
> > I can't say I'm a fan of adding another flavour. How many people are
> > actually using >4GB of memory on x86? I suspect (or hope) that people
> > who are going to be doing those sorts of things will be using x86_64
> > and ia64 hardwar
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
In kernel.org 2.6.8, the block layer (drivers/block/ioctl.c) has:
case BLKFLSBUF:
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
if (disk->fops->ioctl) {
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.53
Severity: important
NET: Registered protocol family 1
NET: Registered protocol family 17
Freeing unused kernel memory: 336kB freed
Loading, please wait...
Begin: Loading essential driversSCSI subsystem initialized
... ...
tg3.c:v3.47 (Dec 28, 2005)
GSI 29 (le
In fact it would have saved me a whole lot of time this
> week.
>
> Let me know your thoughts on these patches and their suitability for
> inclusion in Debian kernels.
hey Ryan,
Your best bet is to continue to push for upstream acceptance:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPat
sorry; this is just another occurrence of #341181. I thought this had
been fixed for some reason[1]. I'll go ahead and close this one and
undo [1] for ia64.
[1] svn diff svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel -r5595:5597
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:19 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > sorry; this is just another occurrence of #341181. I thought this had
> > been fixed for some reason[1]. I'll go ahead and close this one and
> > undo [1] fo
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 13:56 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:38:58AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> > hey Ryan,
> > Your best bet is to continue to push for upstream acceptance:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGui
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:02 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > > can you please check which klibc is installed?
> >
> > 1.2.4-1
>
> ok thanks for feedback.
>
> > > and if the initramfs you were booting
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 21:46 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as we're now on track in getting sarge r2 out, I'm interessted when the
> next kernel update should happen - and of course if there is something
> important from your side. As far as I understood, that update will be an
> ABI-change
Daniel,
Please provide the output of:
lspci -v
lspci -n
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 16:53 +, Sudhakar Manukonda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using (Redhat 32bit ) and (Suse 64bit) machines .
>
>
> The g++ compiler version we use is "gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat
> Linux 7.2 2.96-124.7.2)"
>
> The gcc compiler for suse is "gcc version 3.3.3 (SUSE Li
Package: klibc-utils
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: important
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:07 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello dannf,
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:00:35PM +0000, Dann Frazier wrote:
> > Log:
> > * [ia64] use yaird on ia64 until #341181 is fixed
>
>
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:11 +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As of now, the following architectures still need updated configs:
>
> alpha
Configured fine for me, we'll see what the buildds do
> hppa (#356629)
Should be fixed in r6256
ia64 had problems, but it should be good as of r6255
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 02:36:05PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> should we upload 2.6.16-2 today, to get ia64 and hppa into the archive?
>
> Only m68k would be left then, and could be scheduled as 2.6.16-3 upload
> when it's done.
>
> Best regards
> Frederik Schueler
Didn't see
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:05:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
>
> Version: 2.6.8-16sarge2
>
>
>
> Segmentation fault message during boot. It apperas here
I don't see anything that points to a kernel problem. Can you try
regenerating your initrd and
time comes. Doing either of these now would also fix iptables
for you.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;ve
reduced it to wishlist in order for the merge to succeed.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rom the above
> thread does seem to fix.
This has gone upstream, changeset is here:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|src/|src/drivers|src/drivers/md|related/drivers/md/lvm-snap.c
This should go into a non-security sarge update, when (and if) that
happens. T
' to
/etc/modules:
echo mousedev >> /etc/modules
echo psmouse >> /etc/modules
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ur /etc/modules file as a workaround.
Since this appears to not be an issue with the kernel - rather, an
issue with getting the right modules loaded - I will close this
report. you might take a look at #255744 for what appears to be a
discussion on this topic.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCR
reflect this.
As I understand it, linux-headers-$version is the filed shared by all
of the linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all-$arch packages - so what
about linux-headers-$version-common, or linux-headers-$version-shared?
The word "support" doesn't make sense to me in this context.
forward 360232 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6307
tag 360232 + unreproducible
stop
This has already been submitted upstream, and is being discussed on
linux-ia64[1]. However, none of the developers have been able to
reproduce, likely because we don't have this hardware.
--
that looks like it could've caused this behavior:
http://changelog.debian.net/linux-2.6
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 241670 kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa
tag 241670 sarge
stop
linux-2.6 descriptions include the string "multi-processor", so this
only affects sarge. sarge/hppa was 2.6-only, so it only affects 2.6.8
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
nything. The only thing that I
> can think of is that the kernel is causing it.
hey Joe,
Can you try the 2.6.16 kernel in sid and see if this problem still exists?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; The same for pciehp and shpchp, by the way.
It appears that the kernel is responding appropriately to attempts to
load modules that *should* fail. Therefore, I'll reassign to
hotplug, since it appears that hotplug is the package trying to load
these modules.
--
dann frazier
--
To
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:39:49AM +0200, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm use debian from last 5 years, and I like to know if installing oracle
> is a security risk for my systems.
You might be better served by contacting the debian-user list.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSU
ned indefinitely
to continue a major + major-1 support model.
I of course agree with you that there's no reason to preclude
user-built kernels; and we certainly need to maintain the upgrade path.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
5.7-1 does not install that file on my system.
'dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/block/hal-unmount.dev' will show you what package
claims this file, if any.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/3
> Enable-
> Capabilities: [d0] #10 [0001]
>
>
> Please ask for whatever information you could need. I can also test things if
> you don't have hardware available for testing and you need it.
hey Miriam,
Can you provide the exa
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 04:49 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Note that one side-effect of dropping the minor number in the source
> > package name is that we won't be able to have one kernel in sid and one
> > in test
ier for
kernel-patch/kernel-modules package to track kernel-source uploads came
up.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 10:07 -0400, Brett Smith wrote:
> If that's the case, I'd be happy to talk to upstream myself about it.
> Talking to the SATA maintainers would probably be my best bet; if you could
> suggest the best way to reach them, I'd appreciate it.
fyi, see the MAINTAINERS file in the
hey,
Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what is in the works[2] for a security
update.
All the patches referenced in -16 are already in svn for 2.6.8-15sarge1,
so looks li
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 19:26 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> hey,
> Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
> 2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
> 2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what is in the works[2] for a security
> update.
fyi
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:32 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:26:26PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey,
> > Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
> > 2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
> > 2
Horms said he had merged in up to 2.6.12.2, so I went through the
2.6.12.3 changes. Here's my notes - I've committed the three I marked
applicable.
[PATCH] If ACPI doesn't find an irq listed, don't accept 0 as a valid PCI irq.
- Fixes a bug introduced between 2.6.8 & 2.6.12
[PATCH] revert nf_res
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:49 +0900, Horms wrote:
> New batch, got to run to a meeting, will finish off later.
>
> --
> Horms
>
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/stable-queue.git;a=tree;h=931f32e10913cbb20170dd90623aacb2139a8129;hb=1f61f31059270a271c6fcb7c3c5782dda85238eb;f=qu
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:34 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
> >
> > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
> > unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:11 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Why not use linux-image-foo instead of kernel-image-foo, w/ an
> > > appropriate
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:43 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
> volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12
> backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that;
> however, if people wa
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:04 +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Referring to
> http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html
> (thanks dannf) I notice that the following kernel-tree versions
> are in use in Sarge:
>
> 2.4.27-10: alpha, i386, ia64, powerpc (latest)
> 2.4.27-9: powerp
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 21:04 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:11:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > This is not an appropriate upgrade path as this headers don't ask apt to
> > > install the new package.
> > Even
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:29 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello
>
> The problems is not Dell PowerEdge specific. My TYAN Tiger-i7320-S5350
> (standard dual xeon server from www.ipc2u.com) also reports only 3.5GB
> after booting the Sarge 2.6 kernel :-( The BIOS reports full 4GB.
> So if it do
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 07:50 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:21:37PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 21:04 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:11:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 200
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 08:44 -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> Based on some answers you have given to me, it appears that I need
> to come up with a udeb package for the three module files (.ko) files
> that I need to load (or perhaps three separate udeb packages). I also
> need to come up with a reg
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 20:22 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I just upgraded the kernel on the machine in question to the kernel
> found at
> ftp://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb>,
> and the airo driver worked there too. :)
>
> Please c
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 15:06 -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> There is a sk98lin driver available from syskonnect.com that is
> offered with a GPL license. I have verified that this driver
> does work for the Intel 88e8050 Chip.
Can you try the linux-image-2.6.12-1- from unstable to see if it
works f
tags 322935 + patch
thanks
I'm not sure if we want to do this or not, but here's a patch that
should do it.
Index: control.tree.in
===
--- control.tree.in (revision 3898)
+++ control.tree.in (working copy)
@@ -23,3 +23,13 @@
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 16:34 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Horms schrieb:
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > >>Broken
> > > Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
> >
> > -4 is already
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
> I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN,
> and its probably a good time to think about some releases -
> security bugs keep coming in all the time, bu
forwarded 323289 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3869
tags 323289 + upstream
thanks
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 07:53 -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> Dann Frazier suggested to me to try the 2.6.12 kernel image in
> unstable (linux-image-2.6.12-2) on the system with the
> Intel 88e
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 14:22 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It won't actually break d-i when installing etch, because the dependency of
> kernel-latest on these kernels will prevent the removal of the necessary
> binary packages from testing.
>
> It will break d-i installs of sid, until the point t
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 16:12 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> linux-2.6 deprecates kernel-latest, afaict. It provides the same binary
> packages as transition packages that depend on the s/kernel/linux/
> equivalents.
>
> The remaining problem is that the version string used b
1 - 100 of 1291 matches
Mail list logo
