Hello!,
I'm packaging gigalomania and want to convert copyright to machine-readable
format but I'm having lintian warnings I don't know how to fix.
The original copyright is here:
http://gigalomania.sourceforge.net/#licences
There are a lot of images with different authors embedded into single f
David Rabel writes:
> On 09.02.2018 00:44, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Is the compiled binary file generated entirely from sources that are
> > all in the upstream source distribution?
>
> Yes, it's genereated from the sources. Allthough I cannot technically
> verify that.
That will be a necessary par
On 09.02.2018 00:44, Ben Finney wrote:
> David Rabel writes:
>
>> I am maintaining jugglinglab. The upstream source package contains a
>> compiled binary file. What is the cleanest solution to get rid of it?
>
> Is the compiled binary file generated entirely from sources that are all
> in the up
Your message dated Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:20:11 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ddupdate/0.5.3-1 [ITP] #886546
has caused the Debian Bug report #887126,
regarding RFS: ddupdate/0.5.3-1 [ITP] #886546
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inotify-tools"
* Package name : inotify-tools
Version : 3.14-4
Upstream Author : Radu Voicilas
* Url : https://github.com/rvoicilas/inotify-tools/wiki/
* Lic
Miroslav Kravec writes:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
>
> And, is there any official recommendation to get software (development
> tools) rather packaged, and used as build dependency, than being
> copied?
I'm not sure I unders
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> I got interested in this, as I want to use a tool, which isn't
>> packaged in debian. And upstream considers it to be a good idea to
>> include tool's sources into project, where it's used. I like more
>> clean solution - get the tool packaged in
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Miroslav Kravec wrote:
> Could you please provide the name of the policy? I've just read it,
> and I haven't found one.
Debian Free Software Guidelines item 2:
https://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines
2. Source Code
The program must include source code,
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:14 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> A source package that contains a file that requires source not in Debian
> is one of the reasons given by FTP masters for rejecting a source
> package https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html>, as a
> “serious violation” of Debian policy.
C
9 matches
Mail list logo