Bug#844035: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

2016-11-15 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Gianfranco, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote on 2016-11-14 22:20: > otherwise in 15 hours it will reach unstable. Thank you very much for your patience. So I hope the package will go into unstable. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) pgpqoU9ucEiLf.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von

Bug#844035: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

2016-11-13 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Chris, Chris Lamb wrote on 2016-11-12 23:00: > Huh, odd.. Not sure what's going on there, sorry. It seems the address of the ftp-master changed in the last time. I read mails of 'debian-announce' about that: ssh.upload.debian.org ftp.upload.debian.org Please can you check this? ---

Bug#844035: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

2016-11-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Chris, Chris Lamb wrote on 2016-11-12 09:48: > Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to ftp.upload.debian.org): > Uploading hylafax_6.0.6-7.dsc: done. > Uploading hylafax_6.0.6.orig.tar.gz: done. > Uploading hylafax_6.0.6-7.debian.tar.xz: done. > Uploading hylafax-client-dbg_6.0.6-7_amd6

Bug#844035: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

2016-11-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
emory corruption when using libtiff v4.0 or newer. * Add some more patches: - 826: Do not send pnmtops dpi value as float value. Closes: #727608 - 827: Make Debian build reproducible. Closes: #790355 * Remove obsolete debian/NEWS file. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn pgpdsFVy8ADT

Re: xfe is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-12-18 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello release team, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote on 2015-12-18 04:39: > > xfe 1.41-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-12-28 > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > 806579: xfe: FTBFS: configure:14251: error: "ftheader.h not found" since xfe version 1.41-1 the FTBFS bug #80

Re: Can not register at mentors website

2015-10-05 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Cornelius Kölbel wrote on 2015-10-05 09:51: > But my name is assigned to an email address to which I do not have > access anymore. You should be able to login with your (old) email address! and your password. Then you have access to your user account data and should be able to change your email

Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2

2015-09-15 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Vincent, > In 1.31.1-1, the NEWS.Debian file wasn’t copied by dh_installchangelogs > to /usr/share/doc/chrony because it seems that tool can’t cope with that > filename. So I renamed it to NEWS, and also removed an unnecessary call to > dh_installchangelogs in d/rules. Consequently, apt-list

Bug#793876: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-1

2015-08-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Vincent, Vincent Blut wrote on 2015-08-20 18:12: > I don’t known why tests have originally been disabled, but I guess > it’s because > they depend on the clknetsim tool which is not packaged in Debian. > Also, if that > tool isn’t installed on the system, the "test.common" script will try

Bug#793876: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-1

2015-08-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Vincent, Vincent Blut wrote on 2015-08-20 18:36: > features. By the way, if I want to close these outdated bug reports, > what’s > the canonical way to do it? I guess I can’t do that from d/changelog? do it in the changelog: e.g. "LP: #1313200" --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany)

Bug#793876: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-1

2015-08-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Vincent, Vincent Blut wrote on 2015-08-20 18:12: > > I assume that the change of maintainership has the consent of Joachim? > > Yes, we’ve discussed about this privately some times ago. Still ok > Joachim? Yes, that is fully ok. You make a very good job with maintaining chrony! Thank you

Re: wmii-doc

2015-04-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello João, João Vanzuita wrote on 2015-04-11 12:52: > I want to help maintain a package and started reading about it. This is a good idea. > Found wmii-doc marked as orphaned and it looks ok to start, but, wmii is > not active since 2012, what do you guys think about it ? I think you should

Bug#782173: RFS: chrony/1.30-2 [RC] -- Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

2015-04-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
slots for authenticated commands. * debian/control: - Update e-mail address of myself. - Add Vincent Blut as co-maintainer. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#781066: RFS: chrony/1.31-1 - Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

2015-03-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
tc/adjtime instead of /etc/default/rcS. Closes: #778710 * Remove all patches. * Patch: do not install COPYING file (same file is on system). Regards, Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Trouble with git import-orig --pristine-tar

2015-03-02 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Andreas, Andreas Tille wrote on 2015-03-02 19:57: >git import-orig --pristine-tar ../fastaq_3.2.0.orig.tar.gz I know that you need the upstream version: git-import-orig --upstream-version=1.0 ../-1.0.tar.gz or: git-import-orig --upstream-version=1.0 --filter="debian/*" ../-1.

Re: Recreating a package

2014-10-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Leopold, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote on 2014-10-09 12:21: > with debuild, it makes a debian clean and after another clean. I don't have > any log at the end of the process. Just with fakeroot debian/rules binary, > that lets this files on the disk. I haven't checked your debian/rules

Re: Recreating a package

2014-10-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote on 2014-10-09 10:45: > The question is that I don't want to recompile the sources, I just would like > to recreate the debs. Here [1] mention a method to do that, but it doesn't > work in my case: While compiling with debuild it creates files like this on

Re: Problem Occurred while creating deb package of libreoffice

2014-09-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Ritu, Ritu Panwar wrote on 2014-09-29 11:49: > Hi, I am novice in the process of creating deb package .I tried to create > deb package for libreoffice for ubuntu 12.04. what i did i got the source Why do you don't use the "ready for use" packages of libreoffice for Debian (and also Ubuntu)

Bug#757414: RFS: chrony/1.30-1 - Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

2014-08-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Eriberto, thank you for your reply and your hints. Now I have updated all items as you have written. And finally I have forwarded some patches to upstream and have added a notice into the patch files. The updated package is already on mentors.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/chro

Bug#757414: RFS: chrony/1.30-1 - Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

2014-08-07 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
script to recognize UTC hardware clock. Closes: #680498 * Use logrotate instead of cron script. Closes: #323966 * debian/rules: disable test simulation. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Replace DM email address and move to secure gnupg key

2014-07-22 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, I want to replace my DM email address. For my new email address I already have created a new secure gnupg key and this new key is already signed by one DD. But now what are the next steps? Must I add another DD sign in the same way as DD - or is one DD sign enough as DM ? And then? I hav

Bug#737907: RFS: chrony/1.29.1-1 -- Set the computer clock from time servers

2014-02-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Paul, at first thank you very much for uploading! Paul Gevers wrote on 2014-02-08 18:08: > - Upstream FAQ removed two questions and part of the answer to one > question is now part of the answer to another question. I am unsure if > this is intended. I haven't checked this point. I will do

Bug#737907: RFS: chrony/1.29.1-1 -- Set the computer clock from time servers

2014-02-06 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Regards, Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#732758: RFS: chrony/1.29-1 [ITA, RC] -- Set the computer clock from time servers

2013-12-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
re for ucf in postinst script. * Add status action in init script (debian/init). Closes: #652207 * Add debian/install file for installing example of chrony.conf. * Reduce debian/dirs file for use with debhelper 9. -- Joachim Wiedorn Fri, 20 Dec 2013 23:35:25 +0100 Regards, Jo

Bug#728376: RFS: fox1.6 / 1.6.49-1 (2. try)

2013-11-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
9. - Add fields to enable Multi-Arch only for runtime package. - Support transition to libtiff5. * Update library paths in install files and rules file. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe&

Bug#728376: RFS: fox1.6 / 1.6.49-1

2013-10-31 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
- Move to debhelper >= 9 and compat level 9. - Add fields to enable Multi-Arch only for runtime package. - Support transition to libtiff5. * Update library paths in install files and rules file. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debi

Re: build own web-gui

2013-10-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Pol Hallen wrote on 2013-10-20 21:01: > I'm apology if this isn't correct list but I didn't found any way... Right, it is not the right list! > I need build my own webgui to run bash scripts on my server: All what you need ist webmin. It is not inside debian! Look here: http://www.webmin.com/do

Re: build own web-gui

2013-10-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Pol Hallen, I have found another tool especially for administration of postfix: http://www.linux-magazin.de/Ausgaben/2011/03/Mailserver-Admin/%28offset%29/2 This tool postfixadmin can be installed via Debian: apt-get -u install postfixadmin Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UN

Re: Git usage: rebase master on custom tag from upstream branch

2013-10-01 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Anton Balashov wrote on 2013-10-01 12:49: > How to switch my master on custom tag from upstream branch? I want to > start work under a new (or custom) version. How to sync master > workspace with commit from upstream? And left the debian dir. > Of-course, I can backup debian dir and make a hard r

Bug in lilo: ftbfs with GCC-4.8 (#701315)

2013-05-04 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! ( based on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701315 ) I have searched the reason for problems with gcc 4.8. I have found that the new gcc generates other header in some lilo files (first.s and common.s). If I take back the changes because of gcc 4.8 in the two (generated) fi

Bug#694140: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.1+deb7u1 [RC] for Wheezy

2012-11-24 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
3.0 and higher (sys_linux.c) and ignore nonexistent patch level of kernel version (which come with some kernel versions). Backport of upstream patch for version 1.26. Solves: #628919 for version 1.24. Closes: #689012 -- Joachim Wiedorn Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:01:01 +0100 Rega

Closing a bug report twice (different versions) ?

2012-11-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! What is the right way, if a bugreport were closed with the newest sid version because this bug were fixed in this sid version, but the same bug is not fixed in freezed testing/wheezy version? Example: Found in version Fixed in version Done: ... Can this bug report be closed

Bug#692923: Bug#689012: Status of chrony

2012-11-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Enrico, Enrico Zini wrote on 2012-11-23 22:23: > So please do not consider the ball to be in the release team's court: > for this to be fixed, the relevant changes need to be backported to > 1.24. I am on the way to upload a new chrony version 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as David Prévot wrote on 2012-

Bug#692923: Bug #692923 / #689012: Status of chrony

2012-11-16 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Ana, Ana Guerrero wrote on 2012-11-16 14:09: > I mailed the current maintainer of chrony back when I did the NMU asking > him about the status of the package. I sugested him orphaning the package > or filing a RFA bug, but all he said is he would look at the package soon. > When he did it w

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-15 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Eugene, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote on 2012-11-14 19:08: > Just like Timo said, this patch doesn't fix this (RC) problem. Fix would > be: either apply the same idea (#if 0) to sys_linux.c or backport the > upstream patch [1]. I have thought the problem in sys_linux.c were already solved. I w

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello David, David Prévot wrote on 2012-11-10 17:40: > Please use 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as a version number (and eventually directly > “wheezy” instead of “testing-proposed-updates”). Since packages meant to > testing-proposed-updates should be acknowledged by the release team > prior to the upload, pl

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-10 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
kernel version (rtc_linux.c) to run for kernel versions 3.0 and higher. Nowadays all kernel versions have RTC support (solves #642209 for version 1.24). Closes: #642209 -- Joachim Wiedorn Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:19:19 +0100 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Bug#692260: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 [RC] -- Faxing over CAPI 2.0 device

2012-11-04 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
pi4hylafax (1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18) unstable; urgency=low * Only suggest package isdnactivecards. Closes: #682135, #691863. -- Joachim Wiedorn Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:03:33 +0100 Details see in the appended diff file. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn all-changes-18.diff.gz Descriptio

Re: logkeys in Debian

2012-08-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Vedran Furač wrote on 2012-08-09 01:57: > OK, I'll do as you say. But do you know how does one removes a package > from mentors? Dcut? Simple way: Login in mentors and select your package. Then click in the header: "delete this package". --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#683978: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 (fix two bugs)

2012-08-07 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Bart, Bart Martens wrote on 2012-08-06 18:20: > About your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-05 21:18. I read on > bug 682135 that you want the fix goes into wheezy, but this package at mentors > does not conform to the freeze policy. > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_po

Bug#683978: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 (fix two bugs)

2012-08-05 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
emove udev rules file. * Add postinst script to update logfile name and path in config.faxCAPI. -- Joachim Wiedorn Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:07:15 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: Backporting a multi-arched package

2012-07-31 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Jakub, thank you for clarifying. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120801001818.17b7e...@jupiter.home

Re: Backporting a multi-arched package

2012-07-25 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Helmut Grohne wrote on 2012-07-25 16:31: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Now you make me wonder. Please explain why this is needed. The original > question mentioned that the package in question is "Multi-Arch: > foreign". I do not se

Re: Backporting a multi-arched package

2012-07-24 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Martin, Remove multi-arch support: debian/control: * remove lines with "Multi-Arch:" * remove lines with "Pre-Depends: * Move back to dephelper (>= 8) debian/compat: * Move back to "8" debian/rules: * Remove lines which looks like support for multi-arch... debian/*.install: * chang

Re: how to upgrade from sqeeze to wheezy?

2012-07-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Игорь Пашев wrote on 2012-07-19 17:48: > You can replace your entries with these, and command > apt-get update > apt-get dist-upgrade Before you do a complete "dist-upgrade" I recommend to upgrade some essential packages: apt-get install debian-keyring debian-archive-keyring apt-get install

RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend, 2. try)

2012-06-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
axsend script. -- Joachim Wiedorn Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:36:13 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120621223938.5d830...@jupiter.home

Creating files in /etc/udev/rules.d/ while install a package

2012-06-18 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! Is it allowed to create a file into /etc/udev/rules.d/ while installing a package? The point comes out in package capi4hylafax which need an symlink /dev/faxCAPI but until now the admin must create it by hand. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-me

Bug#677433: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend)

2012-06-17 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
for faxsend script. -- Joachim Wiedorn Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:36:13 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lis

Bug#677433: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend)

2012-06-13 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
e to filename capi4hylafax.init and move LSB INIT INFO to header. * Fix small typo in manpage c2faxsend.1. * Update all automake/autoconf files (autoreconf). -- Joachim Wiedorn Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:55:25 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Re: How to build GCJ/GDC ?

2012-06-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Игорь Пашев wrote on 2012-06-09 03:01: > I just wonder how to build GCJ from the same VCS (as it mentioned via > source package page) In Debian are these source packages: Package gcc-4.7 with: XS-Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-4.7/ XS-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian

Re: Moving library to Multi-Arch

2012-05-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! Thank you Russ and Vincent for the detailed information. So I will convert only the runtime library package to multi-arch and let the -dev package as it is. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Moving library to Multi-Arch

2012-05-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, I want to adopt a package which isn't configured for multi-arch yet. In this package there is a -dev package with to binaries in /usr/bin. Is there a way to enable this package for multi-arch? I have read this could be a problem. For Wheezy all libraries must be multi-arch enabled, right?

Re: softlink creation in debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Ansgar Burchardt wrote on 2012-04-23 13:53: > On 04/23/2012 11:19 AM, karunakar medamoni wrote: > As Bruno already said you can do so with dh_link(1), but note that it is > wrong for a package in the official archive to ship files in /var/www. A good way is using postinst script for check the env

Re: adding a new file using (d)quilt

2012-04-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Gerber van der Graaf wrote on 2012-04-12 12:50: > What is the proper way to handle this? The simplest way is to add a static file debian/usersGuide.pdf and add this file to the debian/install file. Work with patch for pdf files is a worse way because pdf is a binary file format. --- Have a nice

Bug#668112: RFS: squidguard/1.4-5 -- filter and redirector plugin for Squid

2012-04-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
oses: #658206) * debian/postinst: update; check new log directory for use. * Add some hints into NEWS file. Kind regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d

Re: fastest hack-build-run iteration

2012-02-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
David Roguin wrote on 2012-02-20 21:40: > Hi, > > I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want > to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can > imagine that takes a lot of time. > > That's why I'm asking if there's a faster way to iterate over ch

Re: fastest hack-build-run iteration

2012-02-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Paul Wise wrote on 2012-02-21 09:28: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote: > > > I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want > > to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can > > imagine that takes a lot of time. > > > > That's wh

Re: compressing .debian.tar in xz format automatically

2012-02-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Jerome BENOIT wrote on 2012-02-19 05:00: > Hello List: > > I would like to compress my .debian.tar tarballs with xz : > is there a way to set up that for debuild and pbuilder ? > > Thanks in advance, > Jerome with the newer source format 3.0 there is a way with the file debian/source/option ho

Re: How to migrate to testing

2012-01-24 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Jakub Wilk wrote on 2012-01-24 18:14: > Does the test suite involve heavy floating-point computations? Two of > our mips buildds, corelli and lucatelli, doesn't have FPU, so it > wouldn't be surprising if they couldn't run such a testsuite in a I have seen in some packages that tests were dis

Re: GREAT news: My First Debian Package ! - "vpcs"

2012-01-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, > W: vpcs source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.2) This lintian message don't come out by Alexey Eromenko. I would say Alexey Eromenko uses Debian lenny for compiling. But it should be wheezy or sid. That should be background for the different of lintian differences.

Re: RFS: dvbackup

2011-11-26 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Dmitry Smirnov wrote on 2011-11-26 16:23: > I don't know how to regenerate man pages. If you have the original manpage, e.g. dvbackup.1 then open it with an editor and search for the string and change it. For the seen warnings "hyphen-used-as-minus-sign": "-" change to "\-" That is all.

Re: RFS: cherrytree (2nd try)

2011-10-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Vincent Cheng wrote on 2011-10-20 20:55: > cherrytree - hierarchical note taking application I have tested you package: I have created a package for Debian Squeeze (stable) from your source package without any problems. Then I installed and started cherrytree. And I am fascinated about this n

Re: RFS: slurm 0.4.0-1

2011-09-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Matthias Schmitz wrote on 2011-09-08 13:17: > home of the source is already git.debian.org [1]. Or did you think its > better to have a downloadable .tgz around? On http://git.debian.org/?p=users/matthias-guest/slurm.git;a=summary you have only the detailed changes of your debian package. But I

Re: RFS: slurm 0.4.0-1

2011-09-07 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Matthias Schmitz wrote on 2011-09-07 16:21: > * Package name: slurm >Version : 0.4.0-1 > * License : GPL-2 >Section : net Thanks for updating this package. It seems you have started as upstream by yourself, too - right? It would be very nice to see a home of

Re: RFS: libsmack (new package, ITP)

2011-08-16 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
> I would be glad about some feedback about this (first) package for SMACK > support. And I would be very glad if someone upload this package for me. Unfortunately I cannot answer the next three weeks. But I will wait for more feedback for better packaging of libsmack (and other smack packages i

RFS: libsmack (new package, ITP)

2011-08-16 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
ibsmack/libsmack_1.1.git20110809-1.dsc I would be glad about some feedback about this (first) package for SMACK support. And I would be very glad if someone upload this package for me. Kind regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of &q

Re: RFS: lebiniou, lebiniou-data (3rd try) (new upstream version)

2011-08-07 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
> http://pkg-fonts.debian.org/review/ correct link: http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org/review/ --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:

Re: RFS: libgeier (updated package)

2011-07-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Olaf Dietsche wrote on 2011-07-11 20:17: > > So overwrite it. > > I don't understand that. What do you mean with overwrite it? You create a file debian/libgeier-dev.lintian-overrides with the line: libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog and a file debian/libgeier0.lintian-overrides with the line:

Re: RFS: xnoise (2nd try)

2011-07-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Jörn, I have packaged xnoise without any lintian errors/warnings. Very good work. Unfortunately I am not a DD. So you must search further for an sponsor. One tip: Instead of using in debian/rules: override_dh_installman: dh_installman debian/xnoise.1 it is better creating a file d

Re: RFS: xnoise

2011-07-06 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
shuerhaaken wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54: > The package appears to be lintian clean. Unfortunately not! Here is my logging (packaging for testing): N: Setting up lab in /tmp/sVt1potpnA ... N: N: Processing changes file xnoise_0.1.25-1_amd64 (version 0.1.25-1) ... N: N: Processing source

Re: RFS: xnoise

2011-07-06 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
shuerhaaken wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54: > My motivation for maintaining this package is: I am the developer of > this program and I'd like to see it in Debian. In the past I packaged > this only for Ubuntu via ppa, but that is not the way it should go. Until now I haven't seen any ITP "bug report

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 20:22: > Yeah some breakage happens from time to time. I still don't think that's > a good reason to shorten the staging periode in unstable, or is this > inflicted by this new "don't break testing cause it's rolling" mantra? > As long as it's not security relevan

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Sven, thanks for your time. Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52: > * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes > and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should > be used. There is a reason: package libdb4.7 isn't anymore and if s

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 13:41: > * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available. > I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d.o and without > the wsvn in it. Or something else. My confusion grows from package to > package. :) Sorry, false copy a

RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
6) (Closes: #628279) - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes). - Update Vcs links to new server anonscm.debian.org. Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: Override paths for the very latest lintian.

2011-04-27 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Mats Erik Andersson wrote on 2011-04-27 23:59: > I notice to my surprise that lintian_2.5.0~rc2 has changed > the paths used in contructing warnings or errors when reporting > on init scripts. > > Previously I could write an override using > > /etc/init.d/downtimed > > but presently the in

Re: creating new package without archive file (e.g. tar.gz)

2011-04-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
The Fungi wrote on 2011-04-12 17:40: > While admittedly more recognizable for users of Western calendars, > an 8-digit ISO 8601esque datestamp is fairly low-density. With only > a couple more digits, you can have epoch seconds as your version > timestamp (as upstream, I actually just do 0.0. for

creating new package without archive file (e.g. tar.gz)

2011-04-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, I plan to create a Debian package of a new software which only have a git repository, but no archive file. How should I create such a Debian package? Is it enough to copy the git repo from the internet, remove .git/, rename the main directory of the sources (-) and run dh_make with --crea

Re: Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Julien Valroff wrote on 2011-03-20 21:48: > The best I have found is to use something like: > +gitMMDD. Please be aware, that "+" is not the optimal connector. Try dpkg --compare-versions and see: a) 1.2.0 is less than 1.2.0+git2011 b) 1.2.0 is greater than 1.2.0~git2011 The versi

RFS: lilo (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-03-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
s. * Fix typos and phrases in manpage of lilo.conf. (Closes: #258472) Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/

Re: nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Richard Ulrich wrote on 2011-03-02 22:13: > ifeq ( $(shell [ -e /etc/dpkg/origins/default ]; printf $$?), 0) > ifeq ( $(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu && echo yes), yes) > @echo "ubuntu maverick" > else > @echo "debian squeeze" > endif > else >

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Arvind S Raj wrote on 2011-02-19 15:18: > Good to know! I've made the changes requested-added python-qt4-dev to > build-depends and the manpages file and the section field in openteacher.1 > has been updated. Do take a look and let me know any more changes that can > be made-will be more than wil

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Arvind S Raj wrote on 2011-02-19 09:59: > Okay. Added python-qt4-dev to build-depends. A query at this point-would > ${python:Depends} work for build-depends as well? Is it recommended to use > it instead? IMHO it cannot work as build-depends, because the build dependencies will be tested at fir

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-18 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Arvind S Raj wrote on 2011-02-18 19:07: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > > Apologies-we had university exams so couldn't reply for over the past week. No problem. > > * You need some more dependencies in debian/control: > > as build depen

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, I have tried compiling/packaging under Debian Squeeze with the following results: * file debian/manpages only have a LIST of filenames of manpages. * the manpage should have the name debian/openteacher.1 and inside this file the SECTION field should overwritten with "1". * You need som

Re: RFS: lilo (updated package)

2011-01-22 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Niels Thykier wrote on 2011-01-22 02:56: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:23.1-1 of my package > > "lilo". > > Some notes: > > - This package goes into unstable, ready for squeeze+1. > > Right, but until Squeeze is out I will upload to unstable without prior > agreement wit

RFS: lilo (updated package)

2011-01-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
an Ubuntu systems, too (without changes). Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn --- Here is the changelog of these package: lilo (1:23.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (Closes: #339778) * Upstream bugfixes: - Option 'append' works with acpi=off. (Closes: #4283

Re: common source package for use in Debian and Ubuntu

2011-01-18 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Raphael Hertzog wrote on 2011-01-18 09:03: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > > > Now my questions: > > > > 1. is this a good way for switching contol file? > >It must switch the maintainer lines because Ubuntu has another policy. > >

common source package for use in Debian and Ubuntu

2011-01-17 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! as suggested in this bug report for "lilo": http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602824 and introduced with: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/05/managing-distribution-specific-patches-with-a-common-source-package/ I want to realize the idea of a debian directory usable for Debi

Re: RFS: readaloud

2010-12-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
jos...@photosessionsltd.com wrote on 2010-12-29 10:07: > * Package name: readaloud > Version : 1.2.0-1 This seems to be the new version. But the link to mentors.d.n you have used is old. Please use an up-to-date template which can be easily created by you 'readaloud' site on mentors.

Re: RFS: Gummi - GTK+ based LaTeX editor with live preview pane

2010-12-27 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote on 2010-12-19 23:55: > Please upload to mentors with the same version number and I will sponsor > it. I found the updated package of gummi in mentors.d.n. I think this package is now ready for sponsoring, isn't it? Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: RFS: Gummi - GTK+ based LaTeX editor with live preview pane

2010-12-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Daniel, I have made a updated the german translation for gummi (v0.6.0) (see homepage of gummi / ticket for translation) which also run very well with 0.5.5. See attachment. Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) 01_german-update.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data de_559.po.g

Re: RFS: Gummi - GTK+ based LaTeX editor with live preview pane

2010-12-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote on 2010-12-20 00:40: > s/he wants. The problem for which I won't upload it is that the source > tree is not clean. See debian/patches/debian-changes-0.5.5-1 . Add this into debian/rules: override_dh_clean: dh_clean rm

Re: RFS: lilo (updated package) (new Maintainer)

2010-12-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Niels, Niels Thykier wrote on 2010-12-12 17:18: > Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian. :) Thank you very much! Now I hope to the release team. > For the next non-Squeeze upload you may want to consider using the 3.0 > (quilt) format, since it supports binary files in the debi

Re: RFS: lilo (updated package) (new Maintainer)

2010-12-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Niels, Niels Thykier wrote on 2010-12-12 16:05: > I had a quick look at your package, though there are things I may have > missed. Thanks for your review. > Too much copy paste from the RFS template :) The binary package has 11 > warnings (it also triggers a number of less severe tags e.g

RFS: lilo (updated package) (new Maintainer)

2010-12-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Priority and Section. - Add package conflicts to grub-pc and grub-legacy. - Remove conflicts to manpages. - Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.1 (without changes). Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Benoît Knecht wrote on 2010-11-11 20:44: > > [...] > > > > The only problems (at least as far as I can tell) left right now are > > that autogen.sh asks for user input when running (this is because of > > gettext) > > This is indeed an issue, the build process should not require user > input. I

Re: Four days

2010-10-04 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, Michal Čihař wrote on 2010-10-04 18:14: > Lack of interested mentors is indeed an issue. Nobody has unlimited > time and chooses what attracts him. For me it usually means things I > know and test or which I find interesting after reading RFS email. I will mention another point: We have

RFS: xfe (updated package with some fixes) (2nd try)

2010-09-30 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
ADME.source. * Fix open error with program xfpack. (Closes: #593215) Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: xfe (updated package)

2010-09-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
ADME.source. * Fix open error with program xfpack. (Closes: #593215) Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: squidguard (updated package, fix for IA64)

2010-06-25 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
squidguard/squidguard_1.4-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

  1   2   >