OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 07:54 +0100, Lisi wrote: > There are tribes in Africa who wear almost no clothes. That is in > general illegal in public here. *chuckle* In Germany it's neither forbidden nor allowed and there are some few situations, when a judge is "forced" to decide, in what situation nu

Re: OT: man in the middle attack ?

I agree. The world has gone soft and to touchy feely, group hug for my liking... Say what you mean, and mean what you say... Sent from my HTC. - Reply message - From: "Ralf Mardorf" Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 2:08 am Subject: OT: man in the middle attack ? To: "debian-user" On Tue, 2012-

Fwd: OT: man in the middle attack ?

Anyone else getting this? Sent from my HTC. - Forwarded message - From: "debian-user" Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 2:18 am Subject: OT: man in the middle attack ? To: __ Type your response ABOVE THIS LINE to reply --

Re: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:08 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 07:54 +0100, Lisi wrote: > > There are tribes in Africa who wear almost no clothes. That is in > > general illegal in public here. > > *chuckle* > > In Germany it's neither forbidden nor allowed and there are some few

Re: how to copy files from linux to windows via terminal

Hi, Just use winSCP on your Windows... It's an opensource project which provide file transfert over ssh tunnel. --- JG 2012/8/20 Joe > On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:04:27 +0800 > lina wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > how to copy files from linux to windows via terminal. > > > > I know p

Re: Fwd: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 02:20 -0500, Chris wrote: > joe1assis...@gmail.com "joe1assis...@gmail.com" is our best friend! ;). I suspect that most of us filter out joe1assis...@gmail.com for a long time. Yes, I ("we") receive Joey's input too. - Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..

Re: Fwd: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tuesday 21,August,2012 03:20 PM, Chris wrote: > Anyone else getting this? I got one before. > > Sent from my HTC. > > - Forwarded message - > From: "debian-user" > Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 2:18 am > Subject: OT: man in the middle attack ? > To: > > __

Re: OT: man in the middle attack ?

Ahh. Thanks for the heads up. Sent from my HTC. - Reply message - From: "Ralf Mardorf" Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 2:28 am Subject: OT: man in the middle attack ? To: "Chris" Cc: "debian-user" On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 02:20 -0500, Chris wrote: > joe1assis...@gmail.com "joe1assis...@gmail.c

Re: Fwd: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tuesday 21 August 2012 08:20:15 Chris wrote: > Anyone else getting this? Yes. I understood that quoting Spam confuses the filters. Lisi > Sent from my HTC. > > - Forwarded message - > From: "debian-user" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: Fwd: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tuesday 21 August 2012 08:28:57 lina wrote: > On Tuesday 21,August,2012 03:20 PM, Chris wrote: > > Anyone else getting this? > > I got one before. > > > Sent from my HTC. > > > > - Forwarded message - > > From: "debian-user" > > Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 2:18 am Oh dear! Now someone els

Re: Fwd: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 08:33 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Tuesday 21 August 2012 08:20:15 Chris wrote: > > Anyone else getting this? > > Yes. I understood that quoting Spam confuses the filters. > > Lisi In this case it doesn't matter, we even could reply to Joe. Joe is immortal. The complete list wa

Problems with printing/scanning on Squeeze on a Lexmark aio

Hello, all! This is a cross-post. I posted to the Trinity list several days ago. It transpires that it is not a Trinity problem, so I am asking here. After a few days, if necessary, I shall go to the CUPS list. I have had the following cris de coeur from the user of a computer that I admini

Re: OT: man in the middle attack ?

... I have the perfect answer! Ban all of gmail *evil grin* That ought to do it! Sent from my HTC. - Reply message - From: "Ralf Mardorf" Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 2:43 am Subject: OT: man in the middle attack ? To: "Lisi" Cc: On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 08:33 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Tuesday

OT: Re: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: [cut] > Again I apologize for my bad behavior. [cut] > Regards > Ralf Hi Ralf, No hard feelings. Thanks for rectifying. I'm sorry if I bothered you in any way. Finally, I can see some good coming out of this mess. My best, Beco. -- Dr.

Re: OT: Re: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 04:53 -0300, Dr Beco wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Ralf Mardorf > wrote: > [cut] > > Again I apologize for my bad behavior. > [cut] > > Regards > > Ralf > > > > Hi Ralf, > > No hard feelings. Thanks for rectifying. I'm sorry if I bothered you > in any way. >

Re: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Ma, 21 aug 12, 02:47:29, Chris wrote: > > Joe doesn't annoy me, but it's not pleasant to read that Joe still > annoys some people. IMO this address should be banned. It wouldn't help, as "his"[1] e-mails go to the private address, not to the list. [1] I'm quite sure it's a misconfigured auto

Re: Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

On 8/20/2012 9:15 PM, John Hasler wrote: > Stephen Powell writes: >> Boot Strap Processor >> Installed Speed: 2.40 GHz >> Socket Name: BSP >> Manufacturer:GenuineIntel >> Version: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) >> CPUID: 0F27 >> L2 Cache:512 KB > >

Re: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 10:59 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > I'm quite sure it's a misconfigured autoresponder I'm quiet sure that you're right :(. So replying Joe should have a positive effect, but it doesn't. Joe doesn't take care about incoming mails ;p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user

Re: OT: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 10:59 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > I'm quite sure it's a misconfigured autoresponder > > I'm quiet sure that you're right :(. So replying Joe should have a > positive effect, but it doesn't. Joe doesn't take care ab

Re: System crash, or lockup

On 20 August 2012 15:39, Marc Shapiro wrote: > I have posted about this before, and one suggestion was that I have a > power > supply problem. This seems possible, even probably, for some of my > problems, but not, I think, for all of them. Also, I have noticed > additional types of problems sin

Re: Managing to get the 4 RAM GiB recognized easily

Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 11:36 +1200, Chris Bannister a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:42:28PM +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote: > > be ironed out but as far as I am concerned, skype works very well with > > all the dependencies under my debian 32/64bits hybrid. All you need to > > do is adding [arch=

Re: Nagios shows only one Host (Services)

On 18.08.2012 22:43, Camaleón wrote: I check that and there was only one process running. I stopped and started the Daemon anyway, but nothing changed. Ah, okay then. As you commented something about it was working fine in another instance, that "triggered" a light in my head :-) I have two

Re: man in the middle attack ?

Le lundi 20 août 2012 à 17:29 -0300, Dr Beco a écrit : > What should I do, or where should I look, to understand this problem? > > Can I log in with my account remotely to see the problem, or should I > better log in locally? Just do what it says. If you can log in locally, you can try ssh-keyg

Re: man in the middle attack ?

On 21 August 2012 07:54, Lisi wrote: [...] > > Self-agrandisement is almost a duty in some cultures. In others it is very > much frowned on. > [...] > Lisi > Wow! - I wonder how many (international) people are going to understand that. :-) -- Sent from FOSS (Free Open Source Software) Debian

Re: How to enlarge LUKS partition ?

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:25:38 +0200 "tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote: > On 20/08/2012 19:14, J. B wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:57:31 +0200 > > "tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote: > > > >> On 20/08/2012 16:53, J. B wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear list, > >>> > >>> Is there anyone who is successful incr

Re: man in the middle attack ?

Dr Beco writes: > After disconnecting the net cable, I realized the server was still up! :O > > I logged with a innocuous account to read that that was the old server > which miraculous revived. Some intern from TI turned on the old server > and it took precedence over the new one. That explained

Re: How to enlarge LUKS partition ?

On 21/08/2012 11:46, J. B wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:25:38 +0200 "tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote: On 20/08/2012 19:14, J. B wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:57:31 +0200 "tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote: On 20/08/2012 16:53, J. B wrote: Dear list, Is there anyone who is successful incr

Re: Detecting the format of a data stream.

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:08:11PM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > http://www.learner.org/faq/faq_broadband.html#broadband1 informs, > "The VoDs play in either Windows Media or Flash format. Users of Internet > Explorer on Windows will generally see the VoDs in Windows Media format. > Users of

Re: [OT] Is it possible to hide the ip in ssh connection

On Monday 20 August 2012 09:59:47 lina wrote: > Hi, > > I ssh to a server which has 400+ users, active ones around 100. > > Frankly speaking, I would feel comfortable to hide my IP if possible, > > any suggestions (I checked the spoof, but seems not positive), > > Thanks with best regards, Hi

New Mainboard.

Greetings all. I have decided on buying one of these: http://shop.amd.com/us/All/Detail/Processor/HDZ555WFGMBOX?SearchFacets=category%3AProcessor and, as I am going to put it into one of these: http://www.mittoni.com.au/lian-li-black-pca04-mini-tower-htpc-chassis-usb3-p-3948.html I need recom

Re: [OT] Is it possible to hide the ip in ssh connection

On Tuesday 21,August,2012 07:48 PM, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > On Monday 20 August 2012 09:59:47 lina wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I ssh to a server which has 400+ users, active ones around 100. >> >> Frankly speaking, I would feel comfortable to hide my IP if possible, >> >> any suggestions (I checked the spoo

Re: [OT] Is it possible to hide the ip in ssh connection

On Tuesday 21 August 2012 08:09:22 lina wrote: > On Tuesday 21,August,2012 07:48 PM, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > > On Monday 20 August 2012 09:59:47 lina wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I ssh to a server which has 400+ users, active ones around 100. > >> > >> Frankly speaking, I would feel comfortable to hi

Re: man in the middle attack ?

Aidan wrote: > Now I'm really curious, but confused. Why did the presence of another > server change the key on the original server? Or did you mean that an > old server was, in error, put up in place of the one you set up earlier > (before the warning from SSH)? > > Kind regards, > Aidan Gauland

Re: Logging ISP Download Speed.

On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote: > Just to clarify on this situation: > > I have a cable connection that is rated at 100MB/s at full capacity. I > specifically asked what the lowest speed would be, that I could expect > to experience, when I took it on from an ADSL2+ connection t

[OT] Re: Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:46:30 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > Several years ago a friend, who owns his own business, gave me one of > his old servers because he knows that computers are my hobby. It's been > sitting around my basement since then, but it has finally worked its way > to the top of my

Re: man in the middle attack ?

Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 10:51 -0300, Dr Beco a écrit : > can show me if that is the case. But I would have to have the original > SSH key to compare to, to see if it changed or not. The command I gave you should be used if you have a local access to the ssh server to get the fingerprint. When you

Re: sometimes space does not work in knode

On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:50:09 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Camaleón wrote: > >>> However, if I use mouse to scroll all the way down to the end of the >>> message and press space key, nothing happens. It does not advance to >>> the next message. I am not sure if this is a feature or a bug.

[OT] Re: New Mainboard.

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:56:58 -0700, Weaver wrote: > I have decided on buying one of these: > > http://shop.amd.com/us/All/Detail/Processor/HDZ555WFGMBOX?SearchFacets=category%3AProcessor > > and, as I am going to put it into one of these: > > http://www.mittoni.com.au/lian-li-black-pca04-mini-t

Re: OT: Re: man in the middle attack ?

> From: Keith McKenzie km3952 > On 21 August 2012 07:54, Lisi lisi.reisz wrote: > > > > Self-agrandisement is almost a duty in some cultures. In others it is very > > much frowned on. > > > > Lisi > > > > Wow! - I wonder how many (international) people are going to > understand that. :-) I did

Re (2): Detecting the format of a data stream.

From: Darac Marjal Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:13:06 +0100 > Try "mplayer -identify http://example.com/stream";. Thanks. I'll look for something similar in VLC. http://wiki.videolan.org/VLC_command-line_help Regards, ... Peter E. -- 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456

Re: [OT] Re: New Mainboard.

Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 14:35 +, Camaleón a écrit : > I'd look for either MSI or Gigabyte boards as both brands do high quality > products. And I would also choose a solution with integrated VGA (ATI) > to keep the case as clean and organized as possible with the less cables > and cooling f

df and du don't seem to agree ?

Hi list, this might be a newbie question, but can anyone tell me why "du" and "df" don't seem to agree : server:~# df -h /var FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg00-var 5.0G 4.1G 624M 87% /var server:~# du -h -s /var 1.6G/var ("/var" is on a partition of

[OT] Re: Redhat marketing campaign going after free Linuxes

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:53:20 -0300, francis picabia wrote: > Redhat marketing people have a video and PDF docs to conclude based on > IDC studies that RHEL is cheaper than free Linux in the Enterprise. It makes sense. > There is a video on the right side with a summary of their claims. > > http

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

Hi On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:35PM +0100, David Cho-Lerat wrote: > Hi list, > > this might be a newbie question, but can anyone tell me > why "du" and "df" don't seem to agree : > > server:~# df -h /var > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/vg00-var 5.0G 4.1

Re: [OT] Re: New Mainboard.

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:49:59 +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote: > Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 14:35 +, Camaleón a écrit : > >> I'd look for either MSI or Gigabyte boards as both brands do high >> quality products. And I would also choose a solution with integrated >> VGA (ATI) to keep the case as clean an

Re: Redhat marketing campaign going after free Linuxes

first, i love statistics - it allows people to say pretty much whatever they want and sound honest and scientific about it. i didn't read up on where those numbers came from, but lets assume they are correct and honest. what they didn't give is the numbers if an environment has all redhat boxes vs

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:07:54PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:35PM +0100, David Cho-Lerat wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > this might be a newbie question, but can anyone tell me > > why "du" and "df" don't seem to agree : > > > > server:~# df -h /var > > F

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

Hi Karl, thanks for the prompt answer. FYI: I always use the "-x" flag on du too, as this will not recurse down other mounted file systems - e.g. if you have /var/cache on a separate logical volume. that's good to know. This doesn't change anything in this case, though : server:~# du -h -s

SOLVED - was: Re: Problems with printing/scanning on Squeeze on a Lexmark aio

Solved by an aptitude update, aptitude full-upgrade. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201208211622.04466.lisi.re...@gmail.com

Re: [OT] Re: New Mainboard.

Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 15:10 +, Camaleón a écrit : > > Simply: because the BIOS provides a core functionality to the system and > has to work like a swiss clock and because UEFI is (still) a technology > too new to my liking. Right. I am still not of that opinion (EFI was there for years, U

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Tom H wrote: > Unless there's a fedora-devel thread where this was discussed, there's > probably no way to know why RHEL6 switched to kvm except to assume > that kvm's in-kernel and xen isn't. This has changed in the latest > kernels so xen support might very well

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:45:35 +0200, David Cho-Lerat wrote: > this might be a newbie question, but can anyone tell me why "du" and > "df" don't seem to agree : > > server:~# df -h /var > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/vg00-var 5.0G 4.1G 624M 87% /var > se

Re: man in the middle attack ?

On Tuesday 21 August 2012 10:41:35 Keith McKenzie wrote: > On 21 August 2012 07:54, Lisi wrote: > [...] > > > Self-agrandisement is almost a duty in some cultures.  In others it is > > very much frowned on. > > [...] > > > Lisi > > Wow! - I wonder how many (international) people are going to > und

Re: OT: Re: man in the middle attack ?

On Tuesday 21 August 2012 15:44:53 Dr Beco wrote: > "To share your interests is almost a duty in some cultures.  In others > it is considered self-agrandisement and is very > much frowned on." Except that was very much not what I meant! I wasn't talking about interests. I accept that it may be

Re: Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 21.08.2012 04:50, Yang Chengwei kirjoitti: > Find out if long-mode is supported by you CPU, for example. $ grep > -o lm /proc/cpuinfo I would recommend $ lscpu|head -n2 which outputs something like ``` Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):

Re: Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 21.08.2012 05:03, eqisow kirjoitti: > Well I can tell you that with <4 GB of RAM you should probably > just stick to 32 bit regardless. Why? > Although, you could also just try to install the 64 bit version and > see if it works. When booting 64-b

Re: Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

> From: green - greenfreedom > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:22:43 -0500 > > I suggest you get a grml96 image. The smallest is 300MB and supports booting > in both 32- and 64-bit modes, selected at boot (or grml-small for only one of > 32 or 64 is 150MB). Try the 64-bit mode. And having a grml CD or

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

Hi David, By the way, is there a command to see how big this reserved space actually is on a given partition/disk ? tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep "Reserved block count" Replace /dev/md0 with the device you want to check. Bye. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Re: df and du don't seem to agree ?

On 21.08.2012 18:14, Denis Witt wrote: By the way, is there a command to see how big this reserved space actually is on a given partition/disk ? tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep "Reserved block count" Sorry, I forgot to mention that the result will be in Blocks. You can get the block size (in By

Re: Nagios shows only one Host (Services)

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:04:31 +0200, Denis Witt wrote: > On 18.08.2012 22:43, Camaleón wrote: >>> I check that and there was only one process running. I stopped and >>> started the Daemon anyway, but nothing changed. > >> Ah, okay then. As you commented something about it was working fine in >> a

Re: Mic. and softphones [was Voice redirection: from mic. to speakers on wheezy laptop].

Good time of the day, Camaleón. Thank You for Your time and answer. You wrote: > > May other OS components cause this? Though I do not know what. :o) > > It could be but I can't guess what. > > The kernel version? Sure, but sound is working fine from the command > line utilities and also from

Re: Nagios shows only one Host (Services)

On 21.08.2012 18:21, Camaleón wrote: Is there some kind of proxy or filter between the system running Nagios and the client machine from where you are accessing (if any)? No. That behaviour has a slight resemblance to this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63072

Re: Mic. and softphones [was Voice redirection: from mic. to speakers on wheezy laptop].

> "jackd" I only can encourage everybody to use jackd for audio, when ever possible. Jackd by far and away isn't perfect, but it's the most comfortable [1] way to handle audio connections for Linux. There's a GUI written by Rui Nuno Capela to handle jackd connections, called QjackCtl. There are

Re: Mic. and softphones [was Voice redirection: from mic. to speakers on wheezy laptop].

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:30:00 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote: >> > May other OS components cause this? Though I do not know what. :o) >> >> It could be but I can't guess what. >> >> The kernel version? Sure, but sound is working fine from the command >> line utilities and also from another programs (e.g.

Re: Managing to get the 4 RAM GiB recognized easily

Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2012 schrieb Gary Dale: > On 15/08/12 02:13 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Mi, 15 aug 12, 05:12:46, Gary Dale wrote: > >> If your computer has a 64bit CPU, you could also install the 64bit > >> version of Debian over the existing. Just don't format your /home. > > > > Ano

Re: Managing to get the 4 RAM GiB recognized easily

Am Donnerstag, 16. August 2012 schrieb Chris Bannister: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:50:37PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote: > > It works, but why not just upgrade to full 64 bit if you can? It's > > not a lot more work unless you've installed a lot of extra packages. > > Not sure if things are better now

Re: Managing to get the 4 RAM GiB recognized easily

Am Montag, 20. August 2012 schrieb Gaël DONVAL: > Le jeudi 16 août 2012 à 09:29 +0300, Andrei POPESCU a écrit : > > On Mi, 15 aug 12, 14:50:37, Gary Dale wrote: > > > On 15/08/12 02:13 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > >Another option not mentioned yet is to install the -amd64 kernel > > > >(assuming

Re: How to enlarge LUKS partition ?

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:56:52 +0200 "tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote: > On 21/08/2012 11:46, J. B wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:25:38 +0200 > > "tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote: > > > >> On 20/08/2012 19:14, J. B wrote: > >>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:57:31 +0200 > >>> "tv.deb...@googlemail.com"

Re: Nagios shows only one Host (Services)

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:37:38 +0200, Denis Witt wrote: > On 21.08.2012 18:21, Camaleón wrote: >> That behaviour has a slight resemblance to this bug report: > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630727 > >> While not exactly the same, both problems seem to be related with the >>

Re: New Mainboard.

> > From: Weaver >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:56 AM >Subject: New Mainboard. > > >Greetings all. > >I have decided on buying one of these: > >http://shop.amd.com/us/All/Detail/Processor/HDZ555WFGMBOX?SearchFacets=categor

Re: sometimes space does not work in knode

Am Montag, 13. August 2012 schrieb Kamaraju S Kusumanchi: > I am using a mixture of stable + testing (Squeeze + Lenny), knode > version 4.4.11, KDE 4.8.4, I hope you aren´t serious or there is a typo in above. In a way that means that there is no Lenny involved ;). Anyway, in the state of devel

Icedove 10.0.6-1 or higher not in Wheezy

A recent Debian Security Advisory [1] warned that the package icedove had several security issues. These issues were resolved in version 10.0.6-1 (and a different version for Squeeze). I notice, however, that while 10.0.6-2 is available in Sid, Wheezy is still at 10.0.5-1. This page [2] (whic

Re: libqt4 Broken

On 2012-08-20 21:43 +0200, Weaver wrote: >> On 2012-08-20 16:24 +0200, Weaver wrote: >> >>> There seems to be issues with libqt4 in the latest update in unstable, >>> on >>> i386. >> >> I don't think so, it upgraded fine here. >> >>> Unpacking replacement libqtgui4:i386 ... >>> dpkg: unrecoverable

Re: Icedove 10.0.6-1 or higher not in Wheezy

On 2012-08-21 22:12 +0200, Alex Robbins wrote: > A recent Debian Security Advisory [1] warned that the package icedove had > several security issues. These issues were resolved in version > 10.0.6-1 > (and a > different version for Squeeze). I notice, however, that while 10.0.6-2 is > available

Re: [OT] Re: New Mainboard.

On 08/21/2012 10:35 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:56:58 -0700, Weaver wrote: I have decided on buying one of these: http://shop.amd.com/us/All/Detail/Processor/HDZ555WFGMBOX?SearchFacets=category%3AProcessor and, as I am going to put it into one of these: http://www.mittoni.com.

Re: Daemons in schroot or how to start chroot automatically

Roger Leigh wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > There are two issues. ... > > So one key question here: do you have /proc mounted inside the > chroot? No. I only do that if the task and applications I am running in the chroot require it. But for my typical chroot these are rarely required. Sure they

Re: [OT] Re: New Mainboard.

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Gaël DONVAL wrote: > Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 14:35 +, Camaleón a écrit : > >> I'd look for either MSI or Gigabyte boards as both brands do high quality >> products. And I would also choose a solution with integrated VGA (ATI) >> to keep the case as clean and or

Re: Logging ISP Download Speed.

On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote: I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers, And so do we all... The problem here is not the network bandwidth, it's that some parts of the update process have to download a lot of small

Re: best filesystem for logical volume ?

shawn wilson wrote: > J. B wrote: > > Though I'm little confused now. As per the tutorial /boot should be > > un-encrypted. But I got some doc at net where /boot is also encrypted. > > Can you please help me to solve the puzzle ? > > I'm following http://kirriwa.net/john/doc/lvm+raid1.html#step3 >

Re: on the way of encrypting a system, need some help please

J. B wrote: > I have bought a new HDD. Created 2 partitions. > An un-encrypted 1 GB /boot as a separate partition on the Disk. One gig for /boot? I know you are probably planning on using it for a dropbox but that still seems excessive to me. If I wanted a dropbox I would use an additional diffe

Re: Changing to digest form

Camaleón wrote: > Gary Roach wrote: > > I'm presently using the standard form of this mailing list and wish to > > change to the digest form. > > If you want to post replies, I wouldn't do it :-/ Agreed strongly! Please do not post replies from a digest. > > Can I just re-subscribe to the dige

Re: Long delay when shorewall/shorewall6 starts/stops

Nate Bargmann wrote: > This has bugged me on and off most of this year since for some reason > that I can't find, the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause > of about a minute before the system start/shutdown can continue. Right > now this affects both my desktop and laptop running Sid

Re: Fwd: OT: man in the middle attack ?

Lisi wrote: > lina wrote: > > Chris wrote: > > > Anyone else getting this? > > I got one before. > > > From: "debian-user" > > Oh dear! Now someone else has quoted it. This isn't spam to the mailing list. This is spam from a subscriber to the original posters. So it doesn't matter if you quot

Re: How to enlarge LUKS partition ?

>On 21/08/2012 19:22, J. B wrote: [trim] The free space is 10 GB, where the luks partition is 200 GB. I'm eagerly waiting to know the output of your experiment. Ok, I was under the impression from your first post that the free space was 800GB. I didn't have time to do extensive tests but wi

Re: Long delay when shorewall/shorewall6 starts/stops

From: Nate Bargmann Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:35:57 -0500 > Right now this affects both my desktop and laptop running Sid. Is the desktop the fw zone? Another machine? > ... the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause > of about a minute before the system start/shutdown can contin

Re: Redhat marketing campaign going after free Linuxes

* On 2012 21 Aug 10:20 -0500, shawn wilson wrote: > first, i love statistics - it allows people to say pretty much > whatever they want and sound honest and scientific about it. Yes, lies, damned lies, and statistics. > some things could be > better (making sources.list more like yum.d for instan

Re: Long delay when shorewall/shorewall6 starts/stops

* On 2012 21 Aug 14:56 -0500, Bob Proulx wrote: > Nate Bargmann wrote: > > This has bugged me on and off most of this year since for some reason > > that I can't find, the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause > > of about a minute before the system start/shutdown can continue. Right >

Re: Long delay when shorewall/shorewall6 starts/stops

* On 2012 21 Aug 15:32 -0500, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > From: Nate Bargmann > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:35:57 -0500 > > Right now this affects both my desktop and laptop running Sid. > > Is the desktop the fw zone? Another machine? Each machine is defined for its own fw zone. I do not have a

Re: Re: Long delay when shorewall/shorewall6 starts/stops

Camaleón, I accidentally deleted your reply. Perhaps the only difference I can see with the FAQ you quoted is that it's for the much older version 3.0. That has not been in Unstable/Testing for some time. Currently, the Shorewall packages are at 4.5.5-1. I'll double check for any LDAP stuff, th

Re: Changing to digest form

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:51:27PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > > People using digests usually don't know how to reply using them and > cause a lot of problems. Please don't be the source of problems. > Using a digested mailing list is hard! You need special tools in > order to burst the digest

Re: libqt4 Broken

> On 2012-08-20 21:43 +0200, Weaver wrote: > >>> On 2012-08-20 16:24 +0200, Weaver wrote: >>> There seems to be issues with libqt4 in the latest update in unstable, on i386. >>> >>> I don't think so, it upgraded fine here. >>> Unpacking replacement libqtgui4:i386 ... dpkg:

Re: man in the middle attack ?

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Dr Beco wrote: > Aidan wrote: >> Now I'm really curious, but confused. Why did the presence of another >> server change the key on the original server? Or did you mean that an >> old server was, in error, put up in place of the one you set up earlier >> (before

Re: [OT] Re: New Mainboard.

> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:56:58 -0700, Weaver wrote: > >> I have decided on buying one of these: >> >> http://shop.amd.com/us/All/Detail/Processor/HDZ555WFGMBOX?SearchFacets=category%3AProcessor >> >> and, as I am going to put it into one of these: >> >> http://www.mittoni.com.au/lian-li-black-pca0

Re: [OT] Re: New Mainboard.

> Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 14:35 +, Camaleón a écrit : > >> I'd look for either MSI or Gigabyte boards as both brands do high >> quality >> products. And I would also choose a solution with integrated VGA (ATI) >> to keep the case as clean and organized as possible with the less cables >> and c

Re: Changing to digest form

Mike McClain wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > People using digests usually don't know how to reply using them and > > cause a lot of problems. Please don't be the source of problems. > > Using a digested mailing list is hard! You need special tools in > > order to burst the digest to read and reply

Re: New Mainboard.

> > > > > >> >> From: Weaver >>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >>Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:56 AM >>Subject: New Mainboard. >> >> >>Greetings all. >> >>I have decided on buying one of these: >> >>http://shop.amd.com/us/All/Detail/Processor/HDZ555WFGMBOX?Sear

problem on 64 bit Debian Squeeze

I am running Debian Squeeze on several computers. One is a 64 bit machine. After changing from Debian Lenny to Squeeze I have a problem with installing drivers and software for a Lexmark printer. This printer worked fine with Lenny. Now when I try to install the drivers this is what appears in the

Re: Long delay when shorewall/shorewall6 starts/stops

Nate Bargmann wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > I assume you have something like this in your /etc/network/interfaces: > > > > allow-hotplug eth0 > > iface eth0 inet dhcp > > My laptop has exactly this stanza along with the lo stanza below in the > desktop's interfaces file. As WiCD is used, I

Re: Re: Long delay when shorewall/shorewall6 starts/stops

From: Nate Bargmann Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:22:15 -0500 > Each machine is defined for its own fw zone. I do not have a DMZ. The > machines do sit behind a OpenWRT router with its firewall enabled. Once everything is working, does "shorewall restart" give the delay? The router issues an

trying to umount a chroot /dev

I setup a chroot on a snapshot. Part of the setup was mount --rbind /dev /mnt/chrtest/dev I have exited the chroot and, I believe, ended the processes I started. umount /mnt/chrtest/dev gives umount: /mnt/chrtest/dev: device is busy How can I get this to work? After reviewing the output of moun

  1   2   >