RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Michael Graveen
ichael Graveen Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:57 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Hi David, Can you elaborate on why SmarterMail's greylisting is dangerous? In SmarterMail all mail gets greylisted until it "passes". When it passes subs

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread SpamManager
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Todd Richards Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:11 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Thanks Craig. From all indications our server is tightened down pretty good right now. We moved

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread SpamManager
like. Brian From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 1:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter That is correct, as Interceptor is a Gateway and runs outside the server as opposed to inside t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Michael Graveen
o:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Todd Richards Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:11 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Thanks Craig. From all indications our server is tightened down pretty good right now. We moved from Imail to SM at the start of April

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Nick Hayer
e.com <mailto:dbar...@declude.com> *From:* supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Richards *Sent:* Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:11 PM *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com *Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Thanks Craig. From all indications ou

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread David Barker
: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter >From what I read, Interceptor (which we tried in its earlier incarnation, eons ago) doesn't include the Hijack functionality (the design wouldn't support it.) Rob From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@de

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
09 3:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter We've been running Declude Interceptor for a few months now and I agree completely with David's comments. It has been great and the transition was very easy. Dan From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Dan Shadix
1:04 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Hi Todd, Alligate has way better greylisting capabilities than SmarterMail. SmarterMails implementation is somewhat dangerous. You need to be able to accurately qualify which messages should be greylisted. Alligate i

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread David Barker
de.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Thanks Craig. From all indications our server is tightened down pretty good right now. We moved from Imail to SM at the start of April, and I implemented grey listing at the start of May. So we did have a fair amount of bac

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Todd Richards
2009 1:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Hi Todd, I think grey listing prevents backscatter coming INTO your mail server, it does not prevent you getting on blacklists. If you are on a blacklist then I think you need to figure out how your smtp serve

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Todd Richards
Thanks Darin! From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 2:21 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Hi Todd, No, I was intending to set up a notification process to automatically

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Darin Cox
p...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 7:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Todd, you might want to check SenderBase. We had a similar issue a month ago. SenderBase had recorded a number of backscatter messages fr

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Craig Edmonds
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter I think Greylisting reduces backscatter. Greylisting stops the majority of the SPAM from ever reaching our mail server, so it never has a chance to get bounced back because of a non existent user, etc. Mike _ Hi Everyone - We've been having a few

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Todd Richards
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 7:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter Todd, you might want to check SenderBase. We had a similar issue a month ago. Sende

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Todd Richards
kmail@declude.com Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter I think Greylisting reduces backscatter. Greylisting stops the majority of the SPAM from ever reaching our mail server, so it never has a chance to get bounced back because of a non existent user, etc. Mike _ Hi Everyone -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Darin Cox
ivery problems. Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Graveen To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 7:54 AM Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter I think Greylisting reduces backscatter. Greylisting stops the majority of the SPAM from ever reachin

re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Michael Graveen
I think Greylisting reduces backscatter. Greylisting stops the majority of the SPAM from ever reaching our mail server, so it never has a chance to get bounced back because of a non existent user, etc. Mike Hi Everyone - We've been having a few issue