Reinhard Pötz pisze:
>> So do you agree with me changing both schema and implementation so @uri is
>> required?
>
> yes, go ahead
Done in r753635.
The same concern (about too many of optional attributes) applies to
call instruction.
>> What about this?
>
> @controller and @select cou
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
> Reinhard Pötz pisze:
>> Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time
>>> I wonder if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is optional. I fail
>>> to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this c
Reinhard Pötz pisze:
> Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time
>> I wonder if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is optional. I fail
>> to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in any
>> meaningful way.
>
> I
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time
> I wonder if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is optional. I fail
> to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in any
> meaningful way.
I haven't tried it now what happe
Hi,
It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time I wonder
if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is
optional. I fail to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in
any meaningful way.
The same concern (about too many of optional attributes) applies to cal
