+1 with these comments added.
Cheers!
Hernan
Joe Bohn wrote:
Looks good to me with one possible exception.
This:
"In addition, the Certification Authority portlet lets you setup a
Certification Authority, your own Public-Key Infrastructure, very easily
and use server/client Digital Certifica
+1
Jacek
On 8/20/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to Vamsi and Jacek. for their comments. I've incorporated
> all except the configuration by exception as my feeble mind couldn't
> wordsmith it well enough. Give me your +1 on this and we'll let 'er
> rip. Grat job everyon
Looks good to me with one possible exception.
This:
"In addition, the Certification Authority portlet lets you setup a
Certification Authority, your own Public-Key Infrastructure, very easily
and use server/client Digital Certificates for securing your applications."
doesn't read quite right
On Aug 20, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Thanks to Vamsi and Jacek. for their comments. I've incorporated
all except the configuration by exception as my feeble mind
couldn't wordsmith it well enough. Give me your +1 on this and
we'll let 'er rip. Grat job everyone.
Looks go
Thanks to Vamsi and Jacek. for their comments. I've incorporated
all except the configuration by exception as my feeble mind couldn't
wordsmith it well enough. Give me your +1 on this and we'll let 'er
rip. Grat job everyone.
On Aug 20, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Now that
On 8/20/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now that we've gotten through the issues that stalled 2.0 we have a
> successful vote and I've updated the Press Release as well with
> version information.
>
> This should be pretty good as it was the mostly approved version
> before the sec
On 8/20/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apache Geronimo Version 2.0.1
I don't like Version uppercased - Apache Geronimo 2.0.1 is fine.
> released by Apache Software Foundation
>
> date/time/location—The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) announced
> today the release of Apache Gero
Now that we've gotten through the issues that stalled 2.0 we have a
successful vote and I've updated the Press Release as well with
version information.
This should be pretty good as it was the mostly approved version
before the security problem.
Please review and perhaps the PRC can comm