Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.15

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: ... > The proposed 8.0.15 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.14 Yee-haw. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.14

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed 8.0.14 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.14 Looks good to me. Mostly NIO tested on home-brewed app. Yoav -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.5

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: ... > The proposed 8.0.5 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.5 (alpha) > [ X ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.0.5 (beta) > [ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.5 (stable) Works OK on my ho

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.4

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.4 release is now available for voting. > > The main changes since 8.0.3 are: > - Update Eclipse JDT compiler to enable full Java 8 support for JSPs in > the default configuration > - Add new, experimental HTTP a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.52

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.52 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.52/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/rep

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.3

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed 8.0.3 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.3 (alpha) > [ X ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.0.3 (beta) > [ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.3 (stable) Looking solid. Yoav

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.1

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.1 release is now available for voting. > > The proposed 8.0.1 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.1 (alpha) > [ X ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.0.1 (beta) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Rossen Stoyanchev wrote: > I can confirm that the issue with the empty Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header > also affects Chrome 31.0.1650.63. I haven't tested 8.0.0 myself yet, but if it's broken on Chrome 31, that's a far bigger problem than Chrome 32: http://www.netm

Re: Git

Others have mostly captured the pros and cons, so mine is brief... On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I've been using Git more and more for Tomcat development and was > wondering what folks thought about moving Tomcat to git. This isn't a > formal proposal or a vote, I'm just t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC10

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available > for voting. > > Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is > equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are: > - Better handling of gen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC5

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed 8.0.0-RC5 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC5 alpha Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.45

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.45 release is now available for voting. > This release candidate contains JSR-356 Java WebSocket 1.0 implementation. > Note that use of this functionality requires Java 7. > > It can be obtained from: > http

Re: [ANN] New committer: Konstantin Preißer

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that > Konstantin Preißer has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer. Welcome ;) Yoav > > In addition to a number of high quality bug reports and patches, > Konstantin is also resp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.43

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.43 release is now available for voting. > This release candidate contains JSR-356 Java WebSocket 1.0 implementation. > Note that use of this functionality requires Java 7. > > It can be obtained from: > http

Download links broken on main web site?

Browsing http://tomcat.apache.org and clicking on the links in the left-hand menu's Download section, e.g. this one for Tomcat 7.0, leads to a broken page: http://tomcat.apache.org/download-70.cgi. Problem running mirror.cgi; if it persists, contact . In the meantime, try

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC1

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 1 is now available > for voting. > > The proposed 8.0.0-RC1 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC1 alpha Yoav -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.42

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.42 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.42/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.40

On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.40 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.40/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.39

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.39 release is now available for voting. > > The proposed 7.0.39 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.39 Stable The usual home-brewed app testing, no regressions.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.37

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.37 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.37/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.35

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.35 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.35/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: Rewrite functionality for 8

Nice! Thanks, Yoav On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I ported a valve providing mod_rewrite functionality (most of it) for > Tomcat "8", and committed it in the sandbox. This could be easily placed > in the main repository, where it would provide an additional it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.32

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.32 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.32/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori

Re: Resources - overview

On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I now have my proposed alternative resources implementation complete to > the point where it is worth comitting somewhere for others to comment > on. I therefore, propose the following way forward: +1 to the plan. I've read Konstantin's comment

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.26

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.26 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.26/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: SPDY support

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Costin Manolache wrote: > Ok, took a bit to get the Apr polling to work and add some minimal tests. > > Please take another look - in particular to > https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java > > The spdy implemen

Re: Publishing process for JARs for Maven Central

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central: > 1. scp+rsync via people.a.o > 2. Nexus I don't have a strong preference between them. Is there a difference between the two approaches in how fast the JARs are a

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.35

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:30 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.35/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.35 build corresponding to the > tag TOMCAT_6_0_35 is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.23 - Take 2

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The 7.0.23 tag was fine. The problem was local. I have re-rolled the > 7.0.23 release from a clean export of the 7.0.23 tag. > > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.23 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.23

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Correcting the subject. > > On 17/11/2011 18:33, Mark Thomas wrote: >> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.23 release is now available for voting. >> >> It can be obtained from: >> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.23/ >> The svn tag

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.20

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.20 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.20/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_20/ >

Re: Servlet 3.1, Tomcat 8 etc.

Meta: +1 to starting this thread and its thinking this early. On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Therefore, after the next Tomcat 7 release, I would like to do the > following: > - Copy tomcat/trunk to tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk > - Start making Servlet API changes to tomcat/trunk +

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.18

> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.18 release is now available for voting. >> >> It can be obtained from: >> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.18/ >> The svn tag is: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.16

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.16 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.16/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_16/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.14

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed 7.0.14 release is: > > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ ] Alpha  - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Alpha > [ ] Beta   - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Beta > [ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Stable Yoav

Re: Veracode scan of 7.0.11

That's really cool, Mark. I'm glad you're doing this. I know we all have our doubts about scanning tools like this. But my main issue with them is always so many false positives that it feels hopeless. You seem to have fixed that. Thanks, Yoav On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Mark Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.10

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.10 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.10/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_10/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.7

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.7 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.7/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_7/ > > T

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.32

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:37 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.32 build corresponding to the > tag TOMCAT_6_0_32 is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.30

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Jason Brittain wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:18 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > >> According to the release process, the 6.0.30 build corresponding to the >> tag TOMCAT_6_0_30 is: >> [ ] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [X ] Stable +1 stable from me too.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Definition of active sessions

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The current Manager implementations have slightly different definitions > of 'active session' that I would like to make consistent in 7.0.x (and > maybe backport to 6.0.x) > I intend to make the following changes unless there are any objection

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release build 6.0.29

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 07/19/2010 06:33 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/ >> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to the >> ta

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change the name of the default host in server.xml

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students > raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The implied > relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion. That got me thinking: > > 1. Is there a bette

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 as beta

I thought I voted Beta as well before I left on vacation last week -- maybe that was for the RC4 instead? Anyways, happy to see it out. Congrats ;) Yoav On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Sorry for the delay. Work got in the way for a few days. > > I am pleased to announce

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 7.0.0 based on Tomcat 7.0.0-RC4

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > The next Tomcat 7.0.0 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC4 > can be obtained from: > http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.0-RC4/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_

Re: Draft of first blog post announcing TC7

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 17/05/2010 22:31, Yoav Shapira wrote: >> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first >>> blog post. It can be p

Re: Draft of first blog post announcing TC7

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first > blog post. It can be previewed here: > > http://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomcat/?previewEntry=apache_tomcat_7_released > > Suggestions for improvements welcome. Looks

Re: [VOTE] C-T-R for any translation fixes

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > Allow C-T-R for changes to svn properties: > [ ] +1 > [ X ] 0 > Allow C-T-R for any whitespace changes: > [ ] +1 > [ X ] 0 > Allow C-T-R for trivial fixes to English messages that are in resource files > and those that are inline in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 is: > > [ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions > [ ] Beta   - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is > [ ] Alpha  - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are I don't test with II

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat Connectors 1.2.29

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.29 is: > > [ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions > [ ] Beta   - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is > [ ] Alpha  - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are I'm a very light us

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.25

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ X ] Stable My usual testing with a coupl

Fwd: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?

Please see Justin's proposal below for the Incubator. (From a general, public list.) I think it'd be great for Tomcat to do the same. Your thoughts / votes? Yoav -- Forwarded message -- From: Justin Erenkrantz Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:57 AM Subject: Switching incubator.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.24

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:25 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ X ] Stable I did not run the TCK, but I

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.23

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 14/01/2010 14:23, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.23/ >> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.23 tag is: >> [ ] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [X] B

Re: Removing @VERSION@ filtering from top level text files

I kind of liked what you did, replacing the hard-coded numbers with tags / tokens. But I don't feel strongly enough about it either way, so +0 to what you did ;) Yoav On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Konstantin gave some arguments, why the use of @VERSION@ and similar an

Re: [ANN] New committer: Tim Whittington

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Tim > Whittington has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer. > > Please join me in welcoming him. Welcome aboard, Tim ;) Yoav

Re: Tomcat-Lite update

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2010/1/6 Mark Thomas : >> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote: >>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily - >>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds, >>> so people c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is: > > [ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions > [ ] Beta   - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is > [ ] Alpha  - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are Yoav ---

Re: Mavenized tomcat build

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, David Jencks wrote: > I am well aware that the tomcat developers regard ant as the one true build Having now used Maven 2.x for a couple of years, it Works. +1 for trying it for Tomcat. Yoav - T

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use CTR for anything in the tomcat/archive in svn

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does > contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the > whole archive CTR. On the rare occassions where someone wishes to make a > change to code in the archi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove case insensitivity option for Tomcat 7

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I think we have kept the backwards compatibility option for long enough. > Given the security implications I'd like to deprecate it for Tomcat 6 > and remove it for Tomcat 7. +1. Yoav --

Re: Restructuring svn

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Once 4.1.x is archived, there will be no release branches sharing code. > Therefore, we have the option to restructure 5.5.x to remove the use of +1. Yoav - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:33 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ >> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: >> [ ] Broken >> [ ] Alpha

Re: Terms of use for our Wiki

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Tim Funk wrote: > On a quick glance - it seems to be off of all the wikis. Including the wiki > home http://wiki.apache.org/general/ I believe that's right, and we don't need one. In general, all ASF projects have the same Terms of Use, as governed by our license

Re: [ANN] New committer: Konstantin Kolinko

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Konstantin > Kolinko has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer. Welcome aboard dude ;) Yoav - To unsubscrib

Re: 5.5.x release

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > I was thinking sometimes next week, how does that sound? +1. Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: de

Re: Vote needed for patch to enable 4.1.x release

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt > needs one more vote before I can included it in 4.1.x and roll the 4.1.39 > release after the 4.1.38 release was aborted. +1. Yoav

Re: pool for beta testing

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gents, > I was planning on doing a beta release of the connection pool, but first > announce it for testing. > > any thoughts on doing that or the process involved? Sounds like a good idea. I don't see a need fo

Re: Maven page on wiki updated with some best practices

Sorry folks, obviously meant to send to another list ;) On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just FYI, if you're looking for more Maven information or are just > bored, which I doubt ;) > > https://wiki.hubteam.com/display/Eng/Maven &

Maven page on wiki updated with some best practices

Just FYI, if you're looking for more Maven information or are just bored, which I doubt ;) https://wiki.hubteam.com/display/Eng/Maven Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] bayeux module

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > now that we do have a module directory, I'd like to propose to take the > bayeux impl out of tomcat core, and put it into an individual module > > reasons > 1. It's built on top of Tomcat, but its not core tomcat >

Re: Tagging Tomcat Native 1.1.16

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I plan to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_16 later today. > The current trunk has few fixes over released 1.1.15 > Improved IPV6 checking, building against APR 1.3 > (not mandatory, but allows to build), and one API typo. +1. Yoa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove the invoker servlet

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to remove the invoker servlet entirely from trunk (and hence TC7.x > onwards) and deprecate it in 6.0.x. +0. We should document it boldly and let people know before the release. Yoav -

Re: [VOTE/SENSUS] connection pool

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's get a feel for what we think we should do. > > Based on > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46038 > > I believe (pick only one): > > a. [ ] It doesn't belong here, take it elsewhere > b. [ ]

Re: Tomcat connection pool contribution

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hear both of your concerns, and I will withdraw the proposal, thanks for > speaking up These are all good comments. Is it possible to package up in a way that core Tomcat does not depend on it, like Costin s

Re: Tomcat connection pool contribution

Filip, On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if there are no objections, I'll start integrating this into trunk tonight or > tomorrow, I've read the bug in Bugzilla and looked at the code. I understand why you want a new connection pool implement

Re: Branching connectors/jni for Tomcat Native

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to create a branch of connectors > for native component so it depends on the > new APR 1.3.x API +1. Like Mark, I'm also OK with removal. Yoav --

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.27

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wont stop this release, there are way too many important fixes. > the only way this release wont happen, is if we don't get 3+ stable votes, > then we do another release You don't need 3 stable votes. You need

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.27

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.27/ > > According to the release process, the 5.5.27 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ X ] Beta > [ ] Stable

Re: Tomcat-Lite - part 1

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and easier to embed variant. I think it's time to see what can be > contributed back to tomcat main branch, what can be > released, and what needs to be retired or moved out. Overall, a huge +1. I think this is the be

Re: 5.5.27

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about cutting a release candidate on Monday, Aug 18th and if all is > well, have a release towards end of next week? +1. Yoav - To unsubs

Question about patch in Bugzilla 44282

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java?r1=603340&r2=616953&pathrev=616953 Should the actual privileges work be inside the log.isTraceEnabled check? Don't we want to do the work independent of the log level? -- Thanks, Yoav

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.18

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.18/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.18 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ X ] Stable Yoav

Re: [VOTE] bayeux inclusion

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413 > > I think this toolkit should > > [X ] +1 include it as an independent component, I'

Re: 6.0.18 tag

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The plan is to tag it later today. > > Comments ? +1. Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: path to becoming a committer

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Albrecht Weinert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, some times ago I under-went the same sought for answers, > on: > How to commit? > What is Tomcat's definition of patch? > (wrt changed or new source code) etc. > It brought me to just using substanti

Re: path to becoming a committer

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM, ilango_g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I found the location of the bug database at ASF Bugzilla. This is a place to > start? Yes, that's a good place to start. You will also want to read several pages on http://www.apache.org/dev/, including "How the ASF Works,"

Re: Feedback on new startup class

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please check http://people.apache.org/~costin/startup/ for a new class I > would like to add to tomcat(head), and an associated example/unit test. It > allows a jetty-like mode of programmatic loading/config of tomcat,

Re: Feedback for Bayeux contribution

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like some feedback on the contribution, before I call for a vote for > inclusion > > thanks > Filip > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413 I'm happy to wel

Re: JConsole and tomcat.

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you don't add the option - you'll see that tomcat uses a separate mbean > server. I want to have it consistent - > with or without -Dcom.sun... to use the platform mbean server. +1 from me. Maybe add a flag to di

Re: Mavenizing Tomcat : Was: Osgifing Tomcat

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current build scripts are fully tested and work well. Adding > additional methods of building or replacing these scripts altogether > would only provide ways to create and/or release broken binaries. Again, no one

Re: Mavenizing Tomcat : Was: Osgifing Tomcat

Filip, this is a fairly rare case where I disagree with you ;) On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > simply because it requires changes, I like to think we work according to It can be done without requiring any changes. > "if it aint broke, don't

Re: Mavenizing Tomcat : Was: Osgifing Tomcat

Hi, On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Costin told us he didn't want to change the current source layout. I agree with Coston on this. But thankfully Maven is flexible in this area. You can define any set of source folders. > - add subdirs (for modules)

Re: Draft support status announcement

Looks good to me. Yoav On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > Please find below a draft of an announcement I intend sending to the users > list later this week. Comments? > > Mark > > > Subject: [ANN] Tomcat support status > > All, > > We would li

Re: Mail failure spamming (WAS: Re: No valid command found)

I just sent in a deny command, hopefully that will work quickly. Yoav On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you stop this madness? > > Antonio > > 2008/3/6, MDaemon at qualitas.it <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] does n

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.37

On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the release process, the 4.1.37 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ X ] Stable I did limited testing on the distro (examples, etc.) as well as deploying a home-brewed up and running scripted tes

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, the way Apache is structured, it is impossible to say that 3.x is no > longer supported. If three PMC members were to show an interest in > expanding it in the future (say myself, Costin, Henri), then the rest woul

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adding a note that 3.x is no longer supported / removing much of the 3.x > info from: > /index.html > /security-3.html > /whichversion.html > /bugreport.html > > Thoughts? +1. Yoav --

Re: [Proposal] Remove status page from the docs

+1. On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > Whilst working through a general update of the docs webapp (CATALINA_BASE > vs. CATALINA_HOME, Tomcat 5 -> Tomcat 6, common/lib -> lib etc) I cam > across this page. > > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-d

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >