Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org

2012-08-30 Thread Josh Boyer
On Aug 30, 2012 7:30 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: > We really need to set a sunset date and retire smolt. I was hoping the > new census project would be up and running before then, but we can't > keep smolt really limping along forever. Tomorrow. Ok that might be unreasonable. Make it Monday. jo

Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org

2012-08-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:19:15 +0300 Alek Paunov wrote: > Great, but the link under "Fedora Packages App" should be either > undefined or https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/, not the > current 404-pointing value of "UNKNOWN". Fixed. Thanks. > BTW, http://www.smolts.org/ returns 503 current

Orphaned packages

2012-08-30 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
Due to lack of time, I am dropping my maintainership for the following: - bouncycastle, bouncycastle-mail, bouncycastle-tsp: New version available, but not API compatible with the itext version (2.1.7) we have. I have an almost complete patch for itext-2.1.7 for the API changes for those who are i

Re: Network configuration future

2012-08-30 Thread Bill Nottingham
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) said: > I dont need convincing integrating network handling into > systemd/Core OS only makes sense to me diversity in this area > however does not and never has... > > Of what legacy admin overhead are you referring to that would/might > come by that?

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Gerry Reno
On 08/30/2012 11:16 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 8/30/12 9:26 AM, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> (*) DirectFB/FBDev: Found 'inteldrmfb' (ID 0) with frame buffer at >> 0xc0064000, 8100k (MMIO 0x, 0k) > > So this says you're using the intel drm driver... > > >> (*) DirectFB/Core/WM: Defaul

Re: Network configuration future

2012-08-30 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 08/30/2012 06:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: Olaf Kirch (o...@suse.de) said: On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote: Your feedback is very much welcome! The network management/sol

Re: root password of Fedora-18-Alpha-TC3

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2012-08-30 14:50, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:03:39PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: (Of course, as in Ubuntu, if you don't like the model and want to stick with the old-school system instead, you can just do 'sudo passwd' to set a password for the root user and take your

Re: root password of Fedora-18-Alpha-TC3

2012-08-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:03:39PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > (Of course, as in Ubuntu, if you don't like the model and want to > stick with the old-school system instead, you can just do 'sudo > passwd' to set a password for the root user and take your user out > of the 'wheel' group so it ca

Re: root password of Fedora-18-Alpha-TC3

2012-08-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:03:39PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > bit complicated. The original design was for there to be no root > password set: the idea is to use an Ubuntu-style model where the > first created user is an 'admin user' who can perform all admin > tasks - they can do admin tasks

Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org

2012-08-30 Thread Alek Paunov
Great, but the link under "Fedora Packages App" should be either undefined or https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/, not the current 404-pointing value of "UNKNOWN". BTW, http://www.smolts.org/ returns 503 currently, but I do not know if this is somehow related with "Everything seems to be

Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org

2012-08-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. I'm happy to announce the general availability of our status.fedoraproject.org site. This site provides an easy way for Fedora contributors and users to check on the status of services provided by Fedora Infrastructure. The site auto reloads every minute, and also provides a rss fee

Re: root password of Fedora-18-Alpha-TC3

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2012-08-30 11:22, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, After many work, I install Fedora-18-Alpha-TC3 in VirtualBox , but I don't have root password , don't remember ask me for that . this is correct ? There isn't exactly a 'yes' or 'no' answer to that question, it's a bit complicated. The original des

Re: root password of Fedora-18-Alpha-TC3

2012-08-30 Thread Deiu
Hi there, Seems to be a bug with the new features, details here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849250. You can reset the root password by following the steps outlined in the following guide: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_reset_a_root_password . Basically boot to single

Re: Network configuration future

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2012-08-29 22:43, Olaf Kirch wrote: Hi Adam, On Thursday 30 August 2012 04:16:23 Adam Williamson wrote: > *** Network Manager is just another daemon created for a task > which historically often did not need any daemons. It's almost as if > the new generation of Unix hackers wants to redo

root password of Fedora-18-Alpha-TC3

2012-08-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, After many work, I install Fedora-18-Alpha-TC3 in VirtualBox , but I don't have root password , don't remember ask me for that . this is correct ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 849328] perl-Module-Build-0.4003 is available

2012-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849328 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #4 from Pau

[Bug 853147] New: Please drop redundant BR: perl(LWP::RobotUA)

2012-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853147 Bug ID: 853147 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-de...@lists.fe

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Jackson
On 8/30/12 9:26 AM, Gerry Reno wrote: (*) DirectFB/FBDev: Found 'inteldrmfb' (ID 0) with frame buffer at 0xc0064000, 8100k (MMIO 0x, 0k) So this says you're using the intel drm driver... (*) DirectFB/Core/WM: Default 0.3 (directfb.org) (!!!) *** ONCE [no mode found

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Gerry Reno
On 08/30/2012 09:47 AM, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 08/30/2012 09:40 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: >> On 08/30/2012 09:26 AM, Gerry Reno wrote: >>> If I run the command under root I see a more extensive output but having >>> same problems w/1024x768: >>> (*) DirectFB/Core/WM: Default 0.3 (directfb.org) >

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Gerry Reno
On 08/30/2012 09:40 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 08/30/2012 09:26 AM, Gerry Reno wrote: >> If I run the command under root I see a more extensive output but having >> same problems w/1024x768: >> (*) DirectFB/Core/WM: Default 0.3 (directfb.org) >> (!!!) *** ONCE [no mode found for 1024x7

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Gerry Reno
After manually setting tty0 and tty1 using the previous chmod command now when I reboot I get a strange mix of tty settings. Originally they would all have permissions like this: crw--w. 1 root tty 4, 10 Aug 30 2012 /dev/tty10 But now they are a mix of settings: # ls -l /de

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Tom Callaway
On 08/30/2012 09:26 AM, Gerry Reno wrote: > If I run the command under root I see a more extensive output but having same > problems w/1024x768: > (*) DirectFB/Core/WM: Default 0.3 (directfb.org) > (!!!) *** ONCE [no mode found for 1024x768] *** [fbdev.c:1354 in > dfb_fbdev_find_mode()

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Gerry Reno
If I run the command under root I see a more extensive output but having same problems w/1024x768: # dfbinfo ~~| DirectFB 1.6.1 |~~ (c) 2001-2012 The world wide DirectFB Open Source Community (c) 2000-2004 Conve

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Gerry Reno
On 08/30/2012 09:00 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 08/29/2012 06:52 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> (!) DirectFB/core/vt: Error opening `/dev/tty1'! >> --> Permission denied >> (!) DirectFB/Core: Could not initialize 'system_core' core! >> --> A general initialization error occured

Re: Self Introduction

2012-08-30 Thread José Matos
On 08/28/2012 01:01 PM, Sebastian Dyroff wrote: > Hey, > > My name is Sebastian Dyroff. I am from Germany, Berlin. I've just > finished my studies of computer science. Welcome Sebastian. > > I am a Linux user for a decade or so and tried a lot of different > Distros. For a long time I used gentoo

Re: F17: DirectFB

2012-08-30 Thread Tom Callaway
On 08/29/2012 06:52 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > (!) DirectFB/core/vt: Error opening `/dev/tty1'! > --> Permission denied > (!) DirectFB/Core: Could not initialize 'system_core' core! > --> A general initialization error occured > (#) DirectFBError [DirectFBCreate() failed]:

[Test-Announce] Reminder: Fedora 18 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2, Thursday, August 30 @ 17:00 EDT

2012-08-30 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Alpha. As previously announced last week, we moved Go/No-Go to Thursday. Thursday, August 30, 2012 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT/23:00 CEST) "Before each public

Re: Network configuration future

2012-08-30 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 08/30/2012 08:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: >> Olaf Kirch (o...@suse.de) said: >>> On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote: > Your feedback is very much welcome! T

Re: Arjan talk at the Linux Plumbers Conference

2012-08-30 Thread Bill Nottingham
mike cloaked (mike.cloa...@gmail.com) said: > Are any Fedora developers going to be going to the talk by Arjan on > system updates > (https://plus.google.com/114657443111661859546/posts/MGuHZdw2L9R) > at the Linux Plumbers Conference? Sure, there's a bunch of people who develop stuff for Fedora