Re: New PyPI link format for Python packages

2016-05-28 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote: > This means that for the vast majority of Python packages (those using PyPI > to download sources) the Source0 link needs to be updated. Has there been any discussion about having a provenpackager change all the URLs in all the packages acros

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:03:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: >> On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> >It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between >> >a program that's zombie or unresponsive b

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-28 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2016-05-24 at 09:15 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > Changing the subject title. Previous subject archive is here: https > > ://goo.gl/erzW2s > > > > I don't know if you are aware but just in case , I think we also got > another bug

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-28 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:04 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > Huh? The bug has multiple comments referring to dnf mark install to set a > package to user installed (eg comment 4) and the actual bug text says to > call dnf mark install ... Yeah, it refers to it, but seems to go back and forth and does

Re: Packages to be Retired because of Broken Dependencies (2016-05-27)

2016-05-28 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2016-05-27 at 08:53 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > > copr-backend   msuchy, frostyx, praiskup  13 > weeks ago   I think copr-backend will be fixed soon   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337001 So, IMHO, shouldn't be removed.  Thanks, -- Sérgio M.

Re: Packages to be Retired because of Broken Dependencies (2016-05-27)

2016-05-28 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2016-05-27 at 08:53 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > copr-backend   msuchy, frostyx, praiskup  13 > weeks ago   I think copr-backend is be fixed soon   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337001 So, IMHO, shouldn't be removed  Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. --

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-28 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2016-05-24 at 09:15 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > Changing the subject title.  Previous subject archive is here:  https > ://goo.gl/erzW2s   I don't know if you are aware but just in case , I think we also got another bug report with same problem :  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-28 Thread James Hogarth
On 28 May 2016 16:54, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote: > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:20 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> I'm not entirely certain of the answer to that, though it should be quick to test when I get to a machine later. >> >> But in terms of efficiencies reinstall does a full reinstall of th

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-28 Thread James Hogarth
On 28 May 2016 14:42, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:03:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > >It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between > > >a program that's zombie or unresponsive but

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-28 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:20 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > I'm not entirely certain of the answer to that, though it should be quick > to test when I get to a machine later. > > But in terms of efficiencies reinstall does a full reinstall of the > package, including download and and scripts. Doing

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-28 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On May 28, 2016 6:42 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" wrote: > Once you have at least one process staying around, the login session > remains in "closing" state. As long as the session stays around, the > user's user@.service stays around, and this means many more processes > staying around. Tha

Fedora Rawhide-20160528.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 34/67 (x86_64), 8/16 (i386) ID: 19289 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/

Fedora 24-20160528.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 9/73 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386) ID: 19375 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/19375 ID: 19377 Test: x86_64 Workstati

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:03:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote: > > >It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between > >a program that's zombie or unresponsive but isn't doing anything or is > >unresponsive but is doing something; and

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160528.n.0 changes

2016-05-28 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160527.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160528.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:18 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 53 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 21.19 MiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size

[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Branched 20160528.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2016-05-28 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 24 Branched 20160528.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:40:15PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Fri, 27 May 2016, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:05:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>It's easy to know when this is the case, as the 'compose report' mails > >>are sent to this very list.

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 06:20:44PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:51:23AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> This breaks the storage of ssh-agent credentials for te one-time > >> enabling of S

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160528.n.0 changes

2016-05-28 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160527.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160528.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:15 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 44 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 8.72 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-28 Thread Howard Chu
Chris Murphy wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:09:33AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the server: better accou

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-28 Thread Howard Chu
Martin Kolman wrote: On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 18:15 +0200, Björn Persson wrote: Dominique Martinet wrote: Just noticed this change on rawhide... https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29 * systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes that are part of the user